These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

CCP: Avatar redesign
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2015-05-12 17:02:29 UTC
In the case of the Avatar, I don't think anyone is demanding change simply for the sake of change. All you have to do is look at the stupid ******* thing, and realize that it could look a lot cooler.

The Mona Lise comparison is just downright dumb. Don't do that.

The Avatar is like the definition of stagnation. It could use a make over.

Now, no one is saying it's the only ship that should be fixed up. There are a few others, for sure. But the Avatar is up there I think. It's goofy looking. It's ******* ugly. But not only is it ugly, it's overall design is just poor. They could easily keep the original concept, the weird umbrella type of design, but give it an interesting modern twist and just make it look better overall. It could easily be done.
Harrison Tato
Yamato Holdings
#22 - 2015-05-12 23:00:55 UTC
13kr1d1 wrote:
Dsparil wrote:
actually more of a plea LOL. Any chance of you guys redesigning the front end of the Avatar so it doesn't look like a mushroom with a face ready to give a blowjob?

Love the khanid paint scheme, love the armor bonuses to the amarr line but I absolutely cannot get past that front end.


Yeah! Lets redesign it so it looks like the new caracals then it'll be so cool with all its triangle shapes all over like this is Tranformers: the movie! Cause we need to ruin the game's individuality to pander to simpletons, yay \o/ !!!



I'm not sure.....is this sarcasm :)
Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2015-05-12 23:06:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiddle Jr
Ares Desideratus wrote:
In the case of the Avatar, I don't think anyone is demanding change simply for the sake of change. All you have to do is look at the stupid ******* thing, and realize that it could look a lot cooler.

The Mona Lise comparison is just downright dumb. Don't do that.

The Avatar is like the definition of stagnation. It could use a make over.

Now, no one is saying it's the only ship that should be fixed up. There are a few others, for sure. But the Avatar is up there I think. It's goofy looking. It's ******* ugly. But not only is it ugly, it's overall design is just poor. They could easily keep the original concept, the weird umbrella type of design, but give it an interesting modern twist and just make it look better overall. It could easily be done.


Sounds easy thing to do, take a pencil eraiser and list of paper and bring something other than words.

Then we could talk about it.

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2015-05-13 02:32:10 UTC
Tiddle Jr wrote:
Ares Desideratus wrote:
In the case of the Avatar, I don't think anyone is demanding change simply for the sake of change. All you have to do is look at the stupid ******* thing, and realize that it could look a lot cooler.

The Mona Lise comparison is just downright dumb. Don't do that.

The Avatar is like the definition of stagnation. It could use a make over.

Now, no one is saying it's the only ship that should be fixed up. There are a few others, for sure. But the Avatar is up there I think. It's goofy looking. It's ******* ugly. But not only is it ugly, it's overall design is just poor. They could easily keep the original concept, the weird umbrella type of design, but give it an interesting modern twist and just make it look better overall. It could easily be done.


Sounds easy thing to do, take a pencil eraiser and list of paper and bring something other than words.

Then we could talk about it.

You're right. Nobody should ever critique a video game ever again unless they are willing to fund, design, and create their own video game. It's only logical.
Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2015-05-13 03:05:05 UTC
Don't overband this tiny stick. You said it's peanuts to rework. I don't agree.

The game is fine, well at least playable.

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2015-05-13 04:17:29 UTC
13kr1d1 wrote:
Haters are going to hate. Everyone likes different music and thinks other music sucks. You think the old apoc sucks, cuz "haters".

So does that mean you think the new designs suck because "haters"? Why is your "haters" better than our "haters"? I mean, if "haters" is bad doesn't that invalidate your message with all it hate?
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2015-05-13 07:29:43 UTC
Tiddle Jr wrote:
Don't overband this tiny stick. You said it's peanuts to rework. I don't agree.

The game is fine, well at least playable.

Yes it's fine, but it could be finer. Maybe this idea shouldn't be high on the list of priorities but it's still a good idea and the Avatar is still a weird looking piece of crap.
Previous page12