These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

WoW refugees and the future of EVE

Author
Jenshae Chiroptera
#61 - 2015-04-30 14:12:38 UTC
Ria Nieyli wrote:
This thread is a shameful display of hubris.
Please use a thesaurus.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Solecist Project
#62 - 2015-04-30 14:13:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Solecist Project
Staten Island wrote:
Freya Sertan wrote:
The more players in EvE the better for the future of the game, period. More players = more money = more content = more people to shoot in the face.

Come WoW refugees, come to the darkness. Come, see what online gaming REALLY is.


Except things seem to be going the other way. Back when I started playing I would log on and there would be mid to high 30k folk on during est and there was a constant drum beat from ccp about how they were going to set a record for concurrent log ins and you would see spikes into the 40s (high 40s?). Anyway these days it seems always to be in the 20s and often the low 20s. Sure CCP claimed that after "this is eve" there was a spike in new users, but IMO it doesnt seem to have made a difference long term and every one of these updates seems to be driving long term users away, with none of the hordes of mythical wow users coming into replace them.

Yeah and since then CCP has been banning bots in masses ...
... ruined the RMT market ...
... introduced MCT which made lots of people reduce their account numbers ...
... banned multiplexing.

Considering all of that ...
... they are doing quite well.

I still see 30k+ daily. That means for the times when I check ...
... nothing much has changed. Other TZ might differ.

It wouldn't matter if PCU dropped to 20k ...
... if that's the daily average.

PCU is highly misleading.
What matters is the amount of users per hours spread across the day.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
SL33PERS
#63 - 2015-04-30 14:19:25 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:
This thread is a shameful display of hubris.
Please use a thesaurus.


I deployed the exact meaning that I desired to.
Isis Dea
Society of Adrift Hope
#64 - 2015-04-30 14:23:43 UTC
GenericForumAlt 1267389 wrote:
I've been seeing a lot more complaining than usual about the WoW refugees recently. Seems it spiked when CCP announced permanent ship skins. The people who are so quick to complain about how entitled the wow community is are in a way entitled themselves. CCP is a company and making the game more appealing or easier gets subs. I'm in a new player friendly corp in nullsec and our numbers have been swelling with people completely new to EVE, its almost 2 a day at this point.

We don't get vets unsubbing and most are happy with the changes that are happening. EVE isn't "your" sandbox its "a" sandbox, yeah yeah my 15 dollars a month blah blah same argument the people in WoW use. I think its time to come to terms with the fact that EVE Online is not the same game it was 10 years ago and it will never be. Ship skins, clothing, refined UI some of the most heated topics recently are all massive revenue drivers for other companies. Of course CCP is going to add them and to think they won't try to make revenue because of the vocal minority bitching about it on the forums is just idiotic.

CCP isn't going to hold their game and company profits back because you feel dissatisfied with a change that has no impact on gameplay, get over it.


Vet since 2004, finally unsubbing. Although it's more because I'm a role-player who's watched the slow decline of EVE's catering to its lore and vast sci-fi dystopia and more catering to trollish alliances that were the initial reason I ran away from other titles and came to EVE in the first place.

Still keeping my stuff, of course. Maybe one day EVE will become that way again...

(I fall into that tiny demographic that actually wanted to see more clothes/character stuff, than spaceship skins...)

More Character Customization :: Especially compared to what we had in 2003...

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#65 - 2015-04-30 14:28:22 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
I have always been under the impression CCP would rather have addicts who will be here till they die paying their subs than flash in the pan one or two monthers who will leave when their ability to comprehend the nature of the game fails them and they either leave or demand changes to keep them happy.

In short; better 5000 constant numbers than 50,000 whining babies who need constantly appeased.


The problem for that is greed. Every MMO could potentially have lived on it's "core" audience for years but owners usually want better returns on investment. If your target audience was large to begin with, you face less problem than if you were creating a niche game. The cut-off line always depend on your running cost. If the 50,000 babies are needed to keep your stuff running, the 5000 constant numbers option is just not valid.
Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#66 - 2015-04-30 14:35:11 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
If the 50,000 babies are needed to keep your stuff running, the 5000 constant numbers option is just not valid.


Yeah, but they aren't needed. That's why we dont have em.

Isis Dea wrote:
I'm a role-player who's watched the slow decline of EVE's catering to its lore and vast sci-fi dystopia and more catering to trollish alliances that were the initial reason I ran away from other titles and came to EVE in the first place.


So you are a roleplayer, but one who doesn't want to roleplay in a universe you can actually interact with but prefer the painted-on chairs and unassailable whims of NPCs who never ever ever change? In a lore that isnt particualrly interesting or original?

You probably should have stayed in the Golden Lion Inn tbqfh
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#67 - 2015-04-30 15:05:17 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
If the 50,000 babies are needed to keep your stuff running, the 5000 constant numbers option is just not valid.


Yeah, but they aren't needed. That's why we dont have em.

Isis Dea wrote:
I'm a role-player who's watched the slow decline of EVE's catering to its lore and vast sci-fi dystopia and more catering to trollish alliances that were the initial reason I ran away from other titles and came to EVE in the first place.


So you are a roleplayer, but one who doesn't want to roleplay in a universe you can actually interact with but prefer the painted-on chairs and unassailable whims of NPCs who never ever ever change? In a lore that isnt particualrly interesting or original?

You probably should have stayed in the Golden Lion Inn tbqfh


I was only illustrating without it applying to EVE's current state.

As for that inn, it's kinda creepy tbh...
Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#68 - 2015-04-30 15:18:00 UTC
Staten Island wrote:
Freya Sertan wrote:
The more players in EvE the better for the future of the game, period. More players = more money = more content = more people to shoot in the face.

Come WoW refugees, come to the darkness. Come, see what online gaming REALLY is.


Except things seem to be going the other way. Back when I started playing I would log on and there would be mid to high 30k folk on during est and there was a constant drum beat from ccp about how they were going to set a record for concurrent log ins and you would see spikes into the 40s (high 40s?). Anyway these days it seems always to be in the 20s and often the low 20s. Sure CCP claimed that after "this is eve" there was a spike in new users, but IMO it doesnt seem to have made a difference long term and every one of these updates seems to be driving long term users away, with none of the hordes of mythical wow users coming into replace them.


Got any kind of proof of that? Any kind at all? Not just inconsequential reports of you seeing the pilot count on the launcher. It is really easy to say "OMG x game is dying!!!" but it's way harder to actually prove it.

CCP has the data and they have shared it. Guess what? It is the exact opposite of what you're saying.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#69 - 2015-04-30 15:27:29 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:


I was only illustrating without it applying to EVE's current state.

As for that inn, it's kinda creepy tbh...


Oh no, I totally get that. Just confirming your confirmation while I take Ramona for her first Confirmation (its an Amarr thing)

And yes, the Golden Lion is no place for minors thats for true. Or Miners for that matter.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#70 - 2015-04-30 16:17:02 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
i don;t mind some of the changes. the learning curve in eve is steep, but giving someone more then a dogy paddle before tossing them intot he deep end is good.

And more wow players, more people to shoo tin the face.

Eve has room to devlope in ways to attract people without losing itself. The hot red head who will rip your balls off if you **** her off, can change her dress if she wishes.. or put on makeup.. but she will still rip your balls off.

as long as eve stays single shard, uninstanced, open world, and dark. she will be fine. you can dull some of the edges for noobs, and still keep her core




Noooo not the sack

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Velarra
#71 - 2015-04-30 17:19:44 UTC
At least no one's pleading for eve to go F2P.
Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#72 - 2015-04-30 17:23:19 UTC
Velarra wrote:
At least no one's pleading for eve to go F2P.


The lynchin party I think is too obvious
Velarra
#73 - 2015-04-30 17:30:26 UTC
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Velarra wrote:
At least no one's pleading for eve to go F2P.


The lynchin party I think is too obvious


Big smile

And then there's the horrible reality of knowing CCP would be completely incapable of executing such a drastic shift in economics without failure and irrevocably destroying the entire game in the process.
Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#74 - 2015-04-30 17:38:01 UTC
Velarra wrote:
Ma'Baker McCandless wrote:
Velarra wrote:
At least no one's pleading for eve to go F2P.


The lynchin party I think is too obvious


Big smile

And then there's the horrible reality of knowing CCP would be completely incapable of executing such a drastic shift in economics without failure and irrevocably destroying the entire game in the process.


It would be a self-destruct that would make Age of Conan: Hyperboring Adventures look like a wise business move.
Prince Kobol
#75 - 2015-04-30 18:26:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Freya Sertan wrote:
Staten Island wrote:
Freya Sertan wrote:
The more players in EvE the better for the future of the game, period. More players = more money = more content = more people to shoot in the face.

Come WoW refugees, come to the darkness. Come, see what online gaming REALLY is.


Except things seem to be going the other way. Back when I started playing I would log on and there would be mid to high 30k folk on during est and there was a constant drum beat from ccp about how they were going to set a record for concurrent log ins and you would see spikes into the 40s (high 40s?). Anyway these days it seems always to be in the 20s and often the low 20s. Sure CCP claimed that after "this is eve" there was a spike in new users, but IMO it doesnt seem to have made a difference long term and every one of these updates seems to be driving long term users away, with none of the hordes of mythical wow users coming into replace them.


Got any kind of proof of that? Any kind at all? Not just inconsequential reports of you seeing the pilot count on the launcher. It is really easy to say "OMG x game is dying!!!" but it's way harder to actually prove it.

CCP has the data and they have shared it. Guess what? It is the exact opposite of what you're saying.


CCP have not shared the most most important piece of data which they used to for years now, and that is the actual number of Subscribers.

People can make there own minds why that is but for me it is the simple fact that they have gone down instead of up.

Its a great marketing tool to share with the world that your game is gaining subscribers but it is not so good to share if you are losing subscribers.

Most publishers like to tell the world when they have x number of subscribers but go all quiet when that number starts to go down.. CCP are no exception to the rule.
Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#76 - 2015-04-30 18:31:45 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Freya Sertan wrote:
Staten Island wrote:
Freya Sertan wrote:
The more players in EvE the better for the future of the game, period. More players = more money = more content = more people to shoot in the face.

Come WoW refugees, come to the darkness. Come, see what online gaming REALLY is.


Except things seem to be going the other way. Back when I started playing I would log on and there would be mid to high 30k folk on during est and there was a constant drum beat from ccp about how they were going to set a record for concurrent log ins and you would see spikes into the 40s (high 40s?). Anyway these days it seems always to be in the 20s and often the low 20s. Sure CCP claimed that after "this is eve" there was a spike in new users, but IMO it doesnt seem to have made a difference long term and every one of these updates seems to be driving long term users away, with none of the hordes of mythical wow users coming into replace them.


Got any kind of proof of that? Any kind at all? Not just inconsequential reports of you seeing the pilot count on the launcher. It is really easy to say "OMG x game is dying!!!" but it's way harder to actually prove it.

CCP has the data and they have shared it. Guess what? It is the exact opposite of what you're saying.


CCP have not shared the most most important piece of data which they used to for years now, and that is the actual number of Subscribers.

People can make there own minds why that is but for me it is the simple fact that they have gone down instead of up.

Its a great marketing tool to share with the world that your game is gaining subscribers but it is not so good to share if you are losing subscribers.

Most publishers like to tell the world when they have x number of subscribers but go all quiet when that number starts to go down.. CCP are no exception to the rule.


Hold up. If you admit you don't even know the amount of subscribers how can you possibly say it's gone down?

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

SpaceyJoe Mentat
Kollectorz
#77 - 2015-04-30 18:58:46 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Catering to the same player base as most other MMO is not a safe bet. Look at all the wow killers...


Eve has pretty securely established its niche in the PVP gaming community:

Eve = World PVP king
WoW = Arena and BG
ESO = AvA
PS2 = mmofps
LoL = "E Sport" king

Cash shops are popping up all over the industry; until ccp makes an instanced arena/bg system they aren't catering to the WoW pvp crowd.
Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#78 - 2015-04-30 19:10:48 UTC
SpaceyJoe Mentat wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Catering to the same player base as most other MMO is not a safe bet. Look at all the wow killers...


Eve has pretty securely established its niche in the PVP gaming community:

Eve = World PVP king
WoW = Arena and BG
ESO = AvA
PS2 = mmofps
LoL = "E Sport" king

Cash shops are popping up all over the industry; until ccp makes an instanced arena/bg system they aren't catering to the WoW pvp crowd.


Why would they want to?

And just no. Just totally no. Your list... no.
Hicksimus
Torgue
#79 - 2015-04-30 19:29:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Hicksimus
Freya Sertan wrote:

Hold up. If you admit you don't even know the amount of subscribers how can you possibly say it's gone down?


While nobody can say numbers are going down with certainly I'm sure everybody can grasp the logic of self fulfilling prophecy and as a result they can grasp the concept of CCP never wanting to show that "EvE is dying". Given that knowledge and CCP's employment reductions lately plus their push towards paid content we can also be certain that they have revenue issues. So I can't tell you with absolute certainty that subscriber numbers are going down but I can tell you that the logic exists to suggest that it is the cause of them not showing the subscriber numbers.

Recruitment Officer: What type of a pilot are you? Me: I've been described as a Ray Charles with Parkinsons and a drinking problem.

Ma'Baker McCandless
The McCandless Clan
#80 - 2015-04-30 19:34:59 UTC
Hicksimus wrote:

While nobody can say numbers are going down with certainly I'm sure everybody can grasp the logic of self fulfilling prophecy and as a result they can grasp the concept of CCP never wanting to show that "EvE is dying".


So CCP not saying Eve Is DyingTM = EvE MUST be dying.

It couldnt possibly be more likely that they aren't concerned or reporting it because it... isnt dying?