EVE General Discussion

What's wrong with more?

Thanks for that, based on what your saying there isn't anything wrong with more space other then there is enough, good for you m8 but I need more room then you i guess cuss its kind of cramp for my liking

This would be pretty out of flavour. EVE gate collapsed and collapsed so hard we barely/don't remember old "earth." This was by design, so the Dev's could make a universe to their choosing. We are in New Eden, not the Milky Way precisely because it lets us build whatever playground we want. We have stuff like Jove and Talocan for the connection to the old forgotten life. To bring Earth back would either
A: Be deserted high tech archaelogy (Sleeper space already is this)
B: Awesome wtf pwnmobiles/more powerful than stuff we already have.

The first is redundant. We have sleepers, data sites, relic sites for high tech archaelogy. Not to mention all the storyling stuff. Sleeper tech is only a few years old in New Eden. It is still largely not understood. We barely know who the sleepers are.


The second would invalidate all older stuff. Why train Gallente Cruiser V when I can train Terran Hybrid Laser and Alpha-Centarii Frigates? Sure we can make them have a skill tree similar to what the pirate cruisers do, but IMO EVE has enough ships. I'm personally a tad upset about T3 destroyers being so incredibly OP they invalidate an entire class of ship. Short of adding new mechanics, there is not much room left for more ships. We could maybe use some solid armor-RML choices. I think we have the rest pretty well covered in some way?

Exactly.

If it had been based in the Milky Way then there would be bound to be arguments over minutiae, especially if it had been supposed to be anywhere near Earth.

Being a pessimist, I like to think that there is no civilisation on the other side of the wormhole. And that the remains are degraded and of no use.

I wouldn't even mind seeing T4 ships with new mins that you have to min in the new expansion, that would be really cool to :)

what would make it more reasonable?(my guess is nothing I'm just not that hard core) you have all the answers have anything helpful to add or is wow all you got as far as helping no one, and trying to bash me goes?

fyi my eve account's are older than my wow account, and as of late they have both really not been getting my money. 9.99 deal to come back to what i already left behind in the dust, just a good reminder why i left it there. Thanks for that.

Back to the issue at hand, more system that are bare with stars and no stargates would be cool to add on maybe empty virgin ground that corps and alliance can build station's and stargates. never mind what the haters say most off them just sit on here and rant and rag on most post anyways, a kick everyone in the teeth policy so to say, or at less try to.

well from the looks for now here is where it this post stay, that said. How many current system are there in eve and would we want that many in the new area? Was also thinking it would be kind of cool on the new planets have them full of drones or something giving the dust 514 guys some PVE to clear out drones so we can take over the planets.

I think power creep is bad for games. T3 dessies should be deleted.

Just because high-sec and a smattering of low and null-sec systems/areas are highly populated, it does not mean that the whole map is.

There are large swathes of space in the game that see little to no traffic. The tricks are to get there and survive.


Because that would take away from the "untamed and unknown" feeling that wormholes give.



Don't worry OP... you'll be able to build stargates yourself SOON (tm). But it will require you being part of a larger organization first.