These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

How come CCP hasn't simply isolated minerals?

Author
Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#41 - 2015-04-15 22:43:21 UTC
Anhenka, you keep bringing up that nullsec will keep feeding highsec the null ores (at least those that we highsec players dont go out and brave farming ourselves) and I 100% agree.

The problem is that CCP isnt just changing the composition of ore 40 jumps from highsec, they are changing ALL of nullsec so whereas we will continue to need their ore they will not need ours.

this means:

1. If we want to get brave and go get nullsec ores we will have to get by alliance guns to both farm it and bring it back, whereas, with nullsec having highsec ore sitting next to their butts they will not have to do the same to farm our ore types.

2. Since all of nullsec will be getting our ores, they will have a reduced or possible zero need for our ore thus leading to a drop in our ISK / hr as need drops.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2015-04-16 01:30:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
Anhenka, you keep bringing up that nullsec will keep feeding highsec the null ores (at least those that we highsec players dont go out and brave farming ourselves) and I 100% agree.

The problem is that CCP isnt just changing the composition of ore 40 jumps from highsec, they are changing ALL of nullsec so whereas we will continue to need their ore they will not need ours.

this means:

1. If we want to get brave and go get nullsec ores we will have to get by alliance guns to both farm it and bring it back, whereas, with nullsec having highsec ore sitting next to their butts they will not have to do the same to farm our ore types.

2. Since all of nullsec will be getting our ores, they will have a reduced or possible zero need for our ore thus leading to a drop in our ISK / hr as need drops.


1: We never had to forcibly take over highsec to get highsec ores and both currently and after the incoming patches you will need to either ninja mine or buy it from us off market, so I can't honestly say I see anything changing from #1 from either point of view excepting demand levels for the others products.

Ours for yours will drop because deep null wont be able to move your ore anymore. Yours for ours will be less because you will not be building products for sale to the majority of nullsec anymore. Regions near highsec will still import trit and focus on the highends in null, because you will still work for less than any nullsec player.

2: Without the changes, the outer regions will become uninhabitable.

I get that you are upset that there will no longer be a massive demand for highsec Veldpar and Scordite, and that your income is going to drop significantly. To a certain degree I sympathize. But you do realize that the current market situation is basically nullsec having massive subsidies on Veldpar and Scordite? There's certainly not enough highsec and lowsec demand to drive the current levels of mining.

The current situation is an artifact of the fact that mining anomalies produce many times more highends than lowends, so that at the end of a mining op you might end up with one half a BS worth of Trit, one BS worth of Pyerite, one of Mexallon, one of Isogen, and ten BS's worth of all the highends.

At this point you have three options.
1: Import trit from highsec.
2: Ask your miners to run off to the non anomaly belts and mine veld/scord for 9 hours for each hour spent mining highends for the same price per unit as highseccers will work for, then listen to them refuse.
3: Pay your miners a decent wage that is a significant fraction of any other activity in nullsec that requires the same constant attention of nullsec mining, for what someone in highsec is currently willing to do for a third of that wage.

Well with the JF nerf, 1 is not an option, nor can you export the highends for sale if you live in deep null. 2 is never an option and still wont be afterword.

You know what 3 leads to in a closed economy? 500 mil isk t1 BS's. 3 Bil isk Carriers. T1 ships which only pay out a fraction of their cost in insurance.

This in turn results in every person asked to pay these prices to say "**** that with a rake, I'm leaving to a region where we can import trit." After all, ratting/exploration/market income didn't magically triple with the change.

Suddenly with one change something like 18 regions of nullsec become worthless overnight.


So in the end it really boils down to one question.

What does CCP care about more, the outer regions of nullsec not being even emptier than the current GW, or letting highsec veldspar miners keep their nullsec subsidies.

What do you think the answer is?



TLDR: I feel bad for you, but the writing has been on the wall for this change literally for years, and there's really no chance of CCP stopping or reverting this change. It is a central part of their long term plans.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#43 - 2015-04-16 01:50:15 UTC
Looks like Lowsecks got a decent buff after all - Zydrine content in Hedbergite / Hemorphite / Jaspet has been increased by 126% on average. Smile

Quote:
Hedbergite:
Pyerite: 1000
Isogen: 200
Nocxium: 100
Zydrine: 19

Hemorphite:
Tritanium: 2200
Isogen: 100
Nocxium: 120
Zydrine: 15

Jaspet:
Mexallon: 350
Nocxium: 75
Zydrine: 8


Mex in Jaspet, Isogen content in Hemo and Pyerite in Hed have been increased by 143% / 169% / 1143% respectively.
13kr1d1
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2015-04-16 04:50:58 UTC  |  Edited by: 13kr1d1
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
13kr1d1 wrote:
Hahaha, excellent.

Exactly, he's not thinking about it. With no equal demand on both sides, null will have all the bargaining power. Then what happens? Do null groups get to hold hisec hostage for all the money possible, when hisec already doesn't make that much?

highsec doesnt make that much?

what are incursions, level 4s, PERFECTLY SAFE MINING, market trading, hauling contracts, PI (if your living in an area with not-stupid landlords)

all of this income near risk free if your at your monitor for it, all of which not only makes about the same or LESS an hour in nullsec, but comes with added risk


PI is crap in hisec, you need to go to at least 0.2 sec to get decent planets.

market trading is what it is, I doubt it is any more dangerous in null since it is carried out purely in stations. All of the other activities have the level of risk allowed to them by people ganking. If nullsec folks don't like mission runners hopping in and out of level IV's why not go and gank them? I'm sure they will have some juicy big holes in their mission fit that you can exploit. Incursions? Same thing except hit the logi and watch the rest fall. Mining? Join code. Hauling? Join code.

If someone is at their monitor and fit correctly to mitigate risk how is this wrong? If they are interacting socially in a mining fleet and fit for protection how is this wrong? If they are co-operating in an incursion in a social group how is this wrong?


Its funny how nullbears whine about risk aversion when they won't come into hisec and gank blinged out mission runners who are afk running.


Quote:
1: We never had to forcibly take over highsec to get highsec ores and both currently and after the incoming patches you will need to either ninja mine or buy it from us off market, so I can't honestly say I see anything changing from #1 from either point of view excepting demand levels for the others products.


Quite honestly because you couldn't if you tried. It'd break your bank if you went after corps, many people stay NPC corp, and concord gets after you if you were to play in hisec like you do in null. So you're risk averse, which is how hisec, with the ores you needed, maintained some bargaining power with null.

Don't kid yourselves. Even the dirtiest pirates from the birth of EVE have been carebears. They use alts to bring them goods at cheap prices and safely, rather than live with consequences of their in game actions on their main, from concord to prices

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2015-04-16 05:06:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
I would support reducing the availability of nocxium in nullsec and all but eliminating it from highsec, and making it more available in lowsec than anywhere else. But once the gross yields are significantly better in lowsec than in highsec (they aren't currently), the work is done. Nobody should be forcing people to mine out there. It should be a viable choice is all.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

13kr1d1
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2015-04-16 11:32:48 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
I would support reducing the availability of nocxium in nullsec and all but eliminating it from highsec, and making it more available in lowsec than anywhere else. But once the gross yields are significantly better in lowsec than in highsec (they aren't currently), the work is done. Nobody should be forcing people to mine out there. It should be a viable choice is all.


Honestly, that's how I read the situation after a bit of thinking. Apart from anoms with rare ores, which people might actually start wardeccing over rights to in hisec (one can dream!), It suddenly makes lowsec ores a lot more lucrative if the only place to get high end minerals for high sec is there, because null becomes its own little gated community.

Don't kid yourselves. Even the dirtiest pirates from the birth of EVE have been carebears. They use alts to bring them goods at cheap prices and safely, rather than live with consequences of their in game actions on their main, from concord to prices

Previous page123