These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is there only one way to play this game now?

Author
Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#141 - 2015-04-16 18:37:30 UTC
Brutus Utama wrote:

why doesnt code go and take some Sov if they are all high and mighty? or is it because the current owners would actually rek them because you know they actually use combat ships.


Lots of CODE. people are either alts or people from Sov Alliances; paradoxically as it may seem, all the big killmails are in HiSec because sov warfare is a blueballing snoozefest. You are literally guaranteed a 200m+ killmail from unlocking a catalyst in high as opposed to training years of months and buying a capital only to never have the chance to use it.

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#142 - 2015-04-17 00:37:50 UTC
Rastafarian God wrote:
On a side note... I had a friend loose two MONTHS worth of ice mining work to a freighter suigank squad. He was also hauling a lot of stuff my friends mined. I hoever never gave him anything and still have what I mined. Because I know these things can happen. Im a smart player. I am being cautions and my friend is the exact person you speak of. I told him but it still happened. He's pissed now but I get it.

I also move things via freighter some times but never like that.. I never AP and I never haul more then the ship is worth assuming siad ship is a common target. IF someone ganks me, its just by chance and they are being dicks. So I do get the whole thing. But if you are going to say you are making the game better as a whole... then do it...dont use it as an accuse to do random crap.

So why do you dont ap your freighter? Because of suicide gankers of course, they are the only threat left to your stuff. They are the only reason why you have to think about how you move your stuff. They are the only reason why you don't just put everything you own into a freighter with 3 cargohold expanders, press the ap button and go for dinner.

There is a whole business around moving stuff in highsec for you, because people **** their pants and want someone else to move their stuff. This would not exist if there was no suicide ganking. I mean you could even move your stuff in complete safety in a t1 hauler on ap with max cargo setup. There would be no reason for any other setup. There would be no reason to pay anyone to move your stuff.
Gerhard Stringfellow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#143 - 2015-04-17 00:58:31 UTC
Rastafarian God wrote:
On a side note... I had a friend loose two MONTHS worth of ice mining work to a freighter suigank squad. He was also hauling a lot of stuff my friends mined. I hoever never gave him anything and still have what I mined. Because I know these things can happen. Im a smart player. I am being cautions and my friend is the exact person you speak of. I told him but it still happened. He's pissed now but I get it.

I also move things via freighter some times but never like that.. I never AP and I never haul more then the ship is worth assuming siad ship is a common target. IF someone ganks me, its just by chance and they are being dicks. So I do get the whole thing. But if you are going to say you are making the game better as a whole... then do it...dont use it as an accuse to do random crap.


If he was that dumb to put it all in a freighter, that's on him. Welcome to EvE. Mean people will get to profit from your misfortune, or your "friend". There's profit in ganking too, that's the reality of the EvE universe. It's good that he's pissed, now he realizes that you can't be careless in New Eden and hope to hold onto your cargo for very long. Don't come here expecting sympathy, and ask yourself what drew you to EvE?

Personally, I was drawn to the fact that the big battles had such a real value loss to them, and for a lot of other peoples its the fact that you have villains who aren't just stupid end-game content in a themepark MMO. The villains here will be a lot tougher because they're real people, and you're having to match with him.

So the gankers will continue to gank and you know what, it'll be fun for them and they'll be doing the game a favor in the process. Instead of coming here and hoping some giant authority figure will take pity and change game mechanics to better suit you, find a way to resolve being metaphorically beaten up and having your lunch money taken. That might be going somewhere else, that might be finding a way to fight them, or convincing other people to band together, or any number of possible solutions. EvE gives you that freedom. So HTFU and learn to EvE.

Another pubbie elite PvE pay to win mining carebear

Zealous Miner
Doomheim
#144 - 2015-04-17 01:06:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Zealous Miner
Rastafarian God wrote:
Im a smart player. I am being cautions

...

IF someone ganks me, its just by chance and they are being dicks.

...

But if you are going to say you are making the game better as a whole... then do it...dont use it as an accuse to do random crap.

Here's some friendly advice: If you got ganked you weren't cautious enough and they were smarter and better prepared than you were. Getting ganked in this game is entirely your fault.

It doesn't make sense to blame someone else for taking advantage of you leaving your guard down. You are engaged in PVP from the moment you log in until the moment you log out.

This is what we preach in high sec. This is the banner we fly under. Judging from your comments you still haven't figured out what the New Order is really about.

Fedo. Fedo? Fedo!

Razor Wong
Oceanic Trade and Transport
#145 - 2015-04-17 01:30:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Razor Wong
Cool

CODE isn't that difficult to deal with. They were annoying at first. But the folks in mining systems I'm familiar with just banded together and learned to build hardened mining vessels that can be highly resistant to attack. High drone skills help. We mine in large groups and mutually support ourselves. CODE hasn't been a problem in months, and their whole premise is cheap extortion
against the weak. Train up and don't become a victim.
Zealous Miner
Doomheim
#146 - 2015-04-17 01:34:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Zealous Miner
Razor Wong wrote:
But the folks in mining system I'm familiar with just banded together and learned to build hardened mining vessels that can be highly resistant to attack. High drone skills help. We mine in large groups and mutually support ourselves.
So, they adapted accordingly to the situation rather than continued to mine AFK in anti-tanked barges?

Another victory for the New Order.

Fedo. Fedo? Fedo!

Captain Davison
Malachi Keep Detachments
#147 - 2015-04-17 01:43:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Davison
Edward Gibbon wrote:
I've been playing Eve for years now, longer than I ever planned to. Other games grab my attention from time to time, but I always come back. One of the things that always had me coming back was the community, but that seems to be getting badly fractured. It's been a while now and these CODE people seem to be gaining numbers. They've got their supporters and their detractors.

My problem with them is two fold: They're fanatics (they exactly the same language and tactics of the Gamergate crowd, but that's another post that's just going to cause a lot of problems), and that provokes a fanatical response from those who oppose them. This doesn't ultimately help any one. But my largest problem is their utter insistence that the game be played exactly their way, and the increasing efforts they're going to make sure that Eve is only played their way.

I love the emergent gameplay that I've seen over the years. As someone whose life revolves around economics and sociology, this game never fails to be interesting. That interest is waning though. I've got a family these days. I can mine, and play with the kids at the same time. I can blow stuff up when they're asleep and I can focus more attention on things. These CODE people don't seem to want me mining, and if I'm only going to be able to shoot stuff exclusively, then I'll play other games.

It's like they're trying to turn this into League Of Legends: A game can only be played in one very specific way with a toxic community that enforces those views.


More than one way to mine. Get a skiff, laugh when they try, get concordokken'd without breaching your shields (it's not impossible to take a Skiff down, but it's a complete and total pain). Had them bug me a few times, mostly laughed them off because they can't fit for **** in the end, let alone actually gank someone who isn't a bot-miner.

Zealous Miner wrote:

This is what we preach in high sec. This is the banner we fly under. Judging from your comments you still haven't figured out what the New Order is really about.


No, we completely get what the so-called 'New Order' is about.

Namely, being hateful idiots who get their jollies off on pirating, but do a half-assed job of it and can't handle anything other than the softest of targets.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#148 - 2015-04-17 01:56:20 UTC
Brutus Utama wrote:
why doesnt code go and take some Sov if they are all high and mighty?

Possibly because they have a very specific states goal and purpose which entirely involves high security space.
Rastafarian God
#149 - 2015-04-17 06:40:58 UTC
Well full disclosure, Ive only been "ganked" in highsec once and they failed. I was in an empty Bestower coming back from moving something small. It was retaliation for me blowing up one of there corpies haulers in lowsec. Kind of a silly reason but they still tried. It just ended in my scooping the loot from there force recon that concorde blew up. The randomness actully threw me a little.

If I have a crap ton worth of stuff to move and know I may be in a gank pipline, I split it up between cloaky haulers. Although I pay 45 bucks a month (been playing for over half a decade so that adds up) so I can do that. So yes I am cautious.

I fully understand the joy of planning out a gank and actually making a profit at it. it does take a lot of planning and team work. But if you do that. Dont tell the world that you only did it to make the game better.

As for the whole AP-ing thing. I dont have the data in front of me. Does CODE ever gank freighters that are not auto piloting? I honestly do not know. They probably do from time to time but Im not sure. As for the blanket argument. Even if you dont AP and are manually flying an empty frighter to move it, there is a chance people will randomly gank you. That is not the freighter pilots fault in any way. Ive seen tripple plated freighters go down for no reason. I know this is a PVP game but this is a problem. Freighters are becoming a ship that a lot of times are not worth flying because of this. I know people that are using PVP, yes PVP fitted Orcas to move things instead. While you may argue that the people that do this are just being smart and playing the game right, it also means that a ship class in the game is failing making the game broken.

Everything in EVE should have the potential to die anywhere. I believe that beyond all else as do all of you. And yes you can sometimes counter the gankers by having a proper fleet. But my god its completely possible to do the math and know you'll bring a freighter down. So bragging is silly. And the point I am trying to make is that while you may be teaching players to be smarter using the current game mechanics, you are not doing anyone any favors.

I used to bump every miner in my belt before CODE even existed just to make sure no one was botting. I was one of the first people do do this. At least as far as I know. thats why I am conflicted. I think everyone should bump miners just to see. But once you start getting into permits you are milking. Once you get into suiganking, you are farming. Wich are all legit ways of playing the game. Just dont do these things and blurt out old ideals for doing it that dont apply anymore.

Black Pedro
Mine.
#150 - 2015-04-17 09:35:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Rastafarian God wrote:
I fully understand the joy of planning out a gank and actually making a profit at it. it does take a lot of planning and team work. But if you do that. Dont tell the world that you only did it to make the game better.

I do gank primarily to make the game better. I am a true believer that risk of loss everywhere, even in highsec, is what makes this game special. It doesn't hurt that I like blowing other players up and sometimes taking their stuff, but my actions, and the greater actions of the New Order, make Eve a better game for everyone.

I encourage other players to put aside their quest for maximum ISK/hour from time-to-time and give back to the community by enforcing the risk vs. reward idea this game is built on.

Rastafarian God wrote:
As for the whole AP-ing thing. I dont have the data in front of me. Does CODE ever gank freighters that are not auto piloting? I honestly do not know. They probably do from time to time but Im not sure. As for the blanket argument. Even if you dont AP and are manually flying an empty frighter to move it, there is a chance people will randomly gank you. That is not the freighter pilots fault in any way. Ive seen tripple plated freighters go down for no reason. I know this is a PVP game but this is a problem. Freighters are becoming a ship that a lot of times are not worth flying because of this. I know people that are using PVP, yes PVP fitted Orcas to move things instead. While you may argue that the people that do this are just being smart and playing the game right, it also means that a ship class in the game is failing making the game broken.

CODE, and Goonswarm both gank whatever they can get their hands on. Autopiloting freighters are trivial to catch, but an unescorted freighter will also get caught relatively easy by a bumper on the gate. A freighter with a webbing escort will be into warp and escape most times though before a bumper can catch them.

And yes, it is the freighter pilot's fault. A webbing escort makes you near invulnerable, but requires effort. Freighters need to have a downside or otherwise everyone will just use them exclusively, and without gankers they would always use them cargo-fit and AFK. If you cannot, or do not want to spend the effort to protect your freighter, then you should use something else like a tanked Orca or a DST which can be immune to bumpers. Freighters are not broken because they are not the ideal ship for all hauling situations. If anything, they need to have bigger downsides to make flying the other ships more attractive as we are already perilously close to seeing nothing else but AFK freighters silently crossing highsec while their owners are off doing other things than actually playing Eve.

Freighters were intended to be used for carrying bulky, but inexpensive goods, and not a super-tanked ship with a massive cargo-hold that because of CONCORD, is safe from attack in highsec and therefore replaces all other haulers. The problems CCP has had balancing this is exactly why there are no other capital ships allowed in highsec - CONCORD protection makes them game breaking. Bumping and ganking are the weakness of freighters so fly them when appropriate, and choose a safer ship when not.
Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#151 - 2015-04-17 09:42:03 UTC

Rastafarian God wrote:
I dont have the data in front of me.


Is this where we pretend that data would actually change your opinion about anything?

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Eve Solecist
Shitt Outta Luck - GANKING4GOOD
#152 - 2015-04-17 10:07:52 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:

Rastafarian God wrote:
I dont have the data in front of me.


Is this where we pretend that data would actually change your opinion about anything?


My data proves me that 100% of all people do not wear anything under their clothes!

CHECKMATE, PETA!
  • All incoming connection attempts are being blocked. If you want to speak to me you will find me either in Hek local, you can create a contract or make a thread about it in General Discussions. I will call you back. -
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#153 - 2015-04-17 10:09:24 UTC
Eve Solecist wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:

Rastafarian God wrote:
I dont have the data in front of me.


Is this where we pretend that data would actually change your opinion about anything?


My data proves me that 100% of all people do not wear anything under their clothes!

CHECKMATE, PETA!


i wear a watch :( sadface why u read bad data

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Eve Solecist
Shitt Outta Luck - GANKING4GOOD
#154 - 2015-04-17 10:46:17 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Eve Solecist wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:

Rastafarian God wrote:
I dont have the data in front of me.


Is this where we pretend that data would actually change your opinion about anything?


My data proves me that 100% of all people do not wear anything under their clothes!

CHECKMATE, PETA!


i wear a watch :( sadface why u read bad data

WATCHWEARERS! MY ONLY NEMESIS!!!!
  • All incoming connection attempts are being blocked. If you want to speak to me you will find me either in Hek local, you can create a contract or make a thread about it in General Discussions. I will call you back. -
Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#155 - 2015-04-20 23:30:01 UTC
Bing Bangboom wrote:
The miners CHOOSE to go out in the ships that the pvpers like to shoot. CCP doesn't even have to make them do it. They just toss out the ore or ice and the targets flock to it. CCP even allows them to be AFK. Doesn't that tell you what the intention is?


Some pvpers shoot ships that can fight back, in parts of the map where anyone can shoot anyone they like.
Clearly the intention is for there to be more to do in spaceships than shoot things.
No, really.
The three main types of play: Destructive, Creative, Gathering, in the order that infants discover them. Exploring, espionage, warfare and griefing either combine or suport one of these primary types of play.
A healthy individual has a wide range of options for interacting with others, a sick individual a very narrow range. The sick individual's few tricks will be very sharp from continual use and therefore the sickest individuals are usually the most dominant.
TLDR: sickness rules, thanks Tim.



Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Solecist Project
#156 - 2015-04-20 23:40:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Solecist Project
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Bing Bangboom wrote:
The miners CHOOSE to go out in the ships that the pvpers like to shoot. CCP doesn't even have to make them do it. They just toss out the ore or ice and the targets flock to it. CCP even allows them to be AFK. Doesn't that tell you what the intention is?


Some pvpers shoot ships that can fight back, in parts of the map where anyone can shoot anyone they like.
Clearly the intention is for there to be more to do in spaceships than shoot things.
No, really.
The three main types of play: Destructive, Creative, Gathering, in the order that infants discover them. Exploring, espionage, warfare and griefing either combine or suport one of these primary types of play.
A healthy individual has a wide range of options for interacting with others, a sick individual a very narrow range. The sick individual's few tricks will be very sharp from continual use and therefore the sickest individuals are usually the most dominant.
TLDR: sickness rules, thanks Tim.




This thread died three days ago.
Before that it only sufffered from unimaginary pain.

You resurrected it, only to spread your hate.

You are either a code alt trying to make it a topic again ...
... or a hater who simply can not resist his own weakness and *has* to post.


At least change "sick" into something that doesn't make people flip.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Telegram Sam
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#157 - 2015-04-21 00:32:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Telegram Sam
Edward Gibbon wrote:

Very true, and I make a good profit from them too. But there's also great asteroids in 0.7 space where I can leave some drones to protect me from rats while I spend half an hour in the back yard with the kids trying to catch butterflys :)

Right there at post #10 is where I detected a scent of Eau de Troll wafting through the room. ^
Maybe instead of AFK mining, you could AFK try catching some butterflies with the kids, while leaving some drones to protect you while AFK catching butterflies with the kids? Big smile Good one, though.

You CODE. guys need some attention? Came back posting to try to whup things up and to try to revive the cause?
Telegram Sam
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#158 - 2015-04-21 01:01:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Telegram Sam
Edward Gibbon wrote:

Very true, and I make a good profit from them too. But there's also great asteroids in 0.7 space where I can leave some drones to protect me from rats while I spend half an hour in the back yard with the kids trying to catch butterflys :)

Right there at post #10 is where I detected a fragrance of Eau de Troll wafting through the room. ^ With a distinctive scent of Eau de une Personne Certaine du Longtemps.

Maybe instead of AFK mining, you could do some AFK catching butterflies with the kids, while leaving some drones to protect you? Big smile Good one, though.

You CODE. guys need some attention? Came back posting to try to whup things up and to try to revive the cause? Was fun for a while, but....
Otso Bakarti
Doomheim
#159 - 2015-04-21 05:43:58 UTC
Ever hear of the "lowest common denominator"?

There just isn't anything that can be said!