These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Kiting is not cancer...

First post
Author
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#1 - 2015-04-10 18:35:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Christine Peeveepeeski
The margin for error that mordus ships and 10mn ab T3 dessies is the cancer. Couple that with links (which usually I have no issue with) and what you get is a quickly stagnating meta where ewar and logi balls become king even in small gangs.

I mention this because kiting without these ships actually requires skill when fighting someone that is also skilled at the game. More so when you engage a larger gang/fleet. The problem is that those that are skilled and want to be the hunter rather than the hunted gravitate to kiting simply because you can pick your fights. That simple really.

Sort out the crazy high end point ranges and 10mn ab t3 dessies and we'll go back to a world where kiting isn't something my cat can do if I shine a laser pointer at my keyboard.

Sure, people will still moan at kiters as risk averse bastards but that doesn't mean it's not balanced. It's just that kiters fly smart.

That is all.
Daerrol
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2015-04-10 18:52:06 UTC
*Opens mouth to protest and object then is suddenly silent*

As much as I LOVE armor Brawling, this is pretty much it right here.
Arla Sarain
#3 - 2015-04-10 19:00:19 UTC
Combat is still one dimensional within scram range.

And the margins between AB and MWD are the difference between black and white. There is very few moment to moment tactics you can employ when in a fight; fit determines what you can fight, which is rather narrow. A fight ends up in the opposing parties knowing the outcome and one party just waiting 60s to lose a ship.
Zen Guerrilla
CTRL-Q
#4 - 2015-04-10 20:04:54 UTC
Arla Sarain wrote:
Combat is still one dimensional within scram range.

And the margins between AB and MWD are the difference between black and white. There is very few moment to moment tactics you can employ when in a fight; fit determines what you can fight, which is rather narrow. A fight ends up in the opposing parties knowing the outcome and one party just waiting 60s to lose a ship.

If you believe that, you must not have had many frigate fights.

Anyway, you're slightly missing the point. It's about certain ships having it too easy kiting and not about the difference between AB and MWD fits.

pew pew

Plato Forko
123 Fake Street
#5 - 2015-04-10 20:23:08 UTC
The only reason people even buy obviously OP ships is because there's no shortage of idiots willing to chase after them in obviously slower ships.

It's a bit of a straw man to blame ez-mode kiting on Garmurs because there's really nothing stopping anyone from getting kills the same way in a cheap attack frig with speed mods and long-range guns.
Doji Okakura
#6 - 2015-04-10 20:58:42 UTC
I love ppl flying t3 dessies in pvp. The tears when i kill them are awesome, and they were even greater when the t3's cost 200-300mill Lol
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#7 - 2015-04-10 21:01:45 UTC
Doji Okakura wrote:
I love ppl flying t3 dessies in pvp. The tears when i kill them are awesome, and they were even greater when the t3's cost 200-300mill Lol


That's odd, I see no t3 kills on your killboard.

Nor in fact more than 20 lifetime kills.

Perhaps you accidentally posted with an alt?
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#8 - 2015-04-10 21:03:08 UTC
Plato Forko wrote:
The only reason people even buy obviously OP ships is because there's no shortage of idiots willing to chase after them in obviously slower ships.

It's a bit of a straw man to blame ez-mode kiting on Garmurs because there's really nothing stopping anyone from getting kills the same way in a cheap attack frig with speed mods and long-range guns.


True plato but any skilled pilot will kill an idiot most of the time. The issue is that the mordus ships and t3 dessies makes that skill gap completely irrelevant. 2 skilled pilots, ones in one of these OP ships, ones not. The OP ship is getting away or getting a kill 99% of the time.
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#9 - 2015-04-10 21:26:42 UTC
There are no shortage to garmur counters.

Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels.
Cruor, reduces margin for error.
Hyena, reduces margin for error.
Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram.
Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers.
Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.

The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.

There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing.
Estella Osoka
Cranky Bitches Who PMS
#10 - 2015-04-10 21:47:27 UTC
And that is why you have d-scan and don't engage those ships. Once people stop leroying into obviously kite fit ships sitting in a plex, the less you will see people flying them.

Don't feed them, and they will eventually either die or change their habits.
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#11 - 2015-04-10 21:56:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Christine Peeveepeeski
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
There are no shortage to garmur counters.

Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels.
Cruor, reduces margin for error.
Hyena, reduces margin for error.
Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram.
Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers.
Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.

The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.

There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing.


Thanks for the input Crosi, while I'd say you have listed some fantastic counters to all kiters certainly in plexes I'd also say that perhaps I have not made my point clearly.

Why would I fly any of them when I could fly a garmur? In a garmur I can now engage a massive range of ships, or just leave. The ships you just listed are much more limited. I also don't want this to degenerate into solely an anti garmur post. I am very specifically gathering it, the orthrus and the t3 dessies into one pile. It's just too easy to get kills and run from people you don't like.
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#12 - 2015-04-10 22:21:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Christine Peeveepeeski wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
There are no shortage to garmur counters.

Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels.
Cruor, reduces margin for error.
Hyena, reduces margin for error.
Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram.
Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers.
Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.

The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.

There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing.


Thanks for the input Crosi, while I'd say you have listed some fantastic counters to all kiters certainly in plexes I'd also say that perhaps I have not made my point clearly.

Why would I fly any of them when I could fly a garmur? In a garmur I can now engage a massive range of ships, or just leave. The ships you just listed are much more limited. I also don't want this to degenerate into solely an anti garmur post. I am very specifically gathering it, the orthrus and the t3 dessies into one pile. It's just too easy to get kills and run from people you don't like.


I guess your choice of ships would depend on if there is a garmur doing something that offends you and if you want to kill it. If not fly a garmur. if there is a ship you cant break with a garmur, go get a counter to whatever that as per established rock paper scissors rules

Though yes, the engagement/disengagement envelope of garmur can be wide depending on fit and setup, While there are counters that are much cheaper i would hesitate to say its broken. That said, i do just let some people go in structure, i feel that bad for them. But then im flying with many billions of isk invested and they are flying with 10-50m isk There absolutely should be depreciating returns, but 7bil is a lot more than 50m :p

Also, an orthrus is such a huge puddle of isk on grid i have no problem with them being powerful ships. Sure, they take some thought to kill. But we kill them because its hard, not because its easy :p

As for t3 dessy, i still havent injected the skill. Seem slightly OP given the mode selection, but then i dont think perfect balance is a desirable goal in eve. Definitely not balance towards solo/micro gang.
Dato Koppla
Neuronix
#13 - 2015-04-11 07:11:17 UTC
IIRC Crosi, you fly your Garmurs linked and HG snaked, those things have no counters assuming an equal level of pilot skill. The stuff you listed has a chance of killing Garmurs IF they mess up, and that's not really an argument since X can always kill Y if Y messes bad enough up regardless of the ship.

8km/s cold Garmurs are basically immune to almost everything that can hit it. I remember trying to kill a Garmur in an LML Talwar only to find my missiles would peter out before they hit the Garmur and even then, if I did manage to hit him he could just pull range and warp out since he'd be fighting at 60km where nothing bar another Garmur/Orthrus could point him. Drones don't hit, rail corms you can just pull range and leave, faster MWD ships don't have a hope of catching you with 20km defensive scram, sentinel only neuts to 30km and is far slower, Hyena only webs to 40 and even if you get webbed, you can just warp out before he gets the point on etc etc

Garmurs are broken mostly because of how powerful offgrid links are but even then, the ship design allows you to scale ridiculously well with links that it's just stupid.
Arla Sarain
#14 - 2015-04-11 08:36:52 UTC
Arty claws Vs Garmur?

Slightly slower, but more DPS, unless Garmur starts using precision missiles.

Missile damage on the claw goes down a lot.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#15 - 2015-04-11 10:49:27 UTC
Christine Peeveepeeski wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
There are no shortage to garmur counters.

Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels.
Cruor, reduces margin for error.
Hyena, reduces margin for error.
Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram.
Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers.
Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.

The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.

There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing.


Thanks for the input Crosi, while I'd say you have listed some fantastic counters to all kiters certainly in plexes I'd also say that perhaps I have not made my point clearly.

Why would I fly any of them when I could fly a garmur? In a garmur I can now engage a massive range of ships, or just leave. The ships you just listed are much more limited. I also don't want this to degenerate into solely an anti garmur post. I am very specifically gathering it, the orthrus and the t3 dessies into one pile. It's just too easy to get kills and run from people you don't like.


If they're so strong, why don't you fly them?
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#16 - 2015-04-11 11:21:07 UTC
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Christine Peeveepeeski wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
There are no shortage to garmur counters.

Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels.
Cruor, reduces margin for error.
Hyena, reduces margin for error.
Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram.
Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers.
Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.

The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.

There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing.


Thanks for the input Crosi, while I'd say you have listed some fantastic counters to all kiters certainly in plexes I'd also say that perhaps I have not made my point clearly.

Why would I fly any of them when I could fly a garmur? In a garmur I can now engage a massive range of ships, or just leave. The ships you just listed are much more limited. I also don't want this to degenerate into solely an anti garmur post. I am very specifically gathering it, the orthrus and the t3 dessies into one pile. It's just too easy to get kills and run from people you don't like.


If they're so strong, why don't you fly them?


OOooh thats because I'm a scrub. I could, and I am sure I'd get lot's of lovely kills. I don't play EVE or shoot people in EVE for the killmail totals though. Beauty of a sandbox I suppose, we all get our thrills oneway or another.

Garmur - I do fly them but it's boring me shitless flying it. I like the rush of pvp and I rarely if ever get that from this ship.
Orthrus - My experience with the garmur tells me I would also not enjoy this.
T3 dessies - I'd be a hypocrite if I flew these, I am staunchly opposed to their inate flexibility in one ship. At least t3 cruisers have to refit.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#17 - 2015-04-11 11:28:34 UTC
Christine Peeveepeeski wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Christine Peeveepeeski wrote:
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
There are no shortage to garmur counters.

Sentinel, reduces margin for error to minimal levels.
Cruor, reduces margin for error.
Hyena, reduces margin for error.
Dramiel, faster, tankier and more dps. Though weak vs defensive scram.
Multiple sniper corms or area denial coercers.
Element of surprise with an OH, dual overdrive derptron gets a lot of people garmur kills.

The one property that a boosted rep fleet point garmur has in common with all of these is its 2-200x more expensive.

There is no denying that kiting was a lot more challenging for me when i flew the maulus more, its incorrect to say there is no paper for the garmurs stone. Shiny killmails in space waiting to happen is a good thing.


Thanks for the input Crosi, while I'd say you have listed some fantastic counters to all kiters certainly in plexes I'd also say that perhaps I have not made my point clearly.

Why would I fly any of them when I could fly a garmur? In a garmur I can now engage a massive range of ships, or just leave. The ships you just listed are much more limited. I also don't want this to degenerate into solely an anti garmur post. I am very specifically gathering it, the orthrus and the t3 dessies into one pile. It's just too easy to get kills and run from people you don't like.


If they're so strong, why don't you fly them?


OOooh thats because I'm a scrub. I could, and I am sure I'd get lot's of lovely kills. I don't play EVE or shoot people in EVE for the killmail totals though. Beauty of a sandbox I suppose, we all get our thrills oneway or another.

Garmur - I do fly them but it's boring me shitless flying it. I like the rush of pvp and I rarely if ever get that from this ship.
Orthrus - My experience with the garmur tells me I would also not enjoy this.
T3 dessies - I'd be a hypocrite if I flew these, I am staunchly opposed to their inate flexibility in one ship. At least t3 cruisers have to refit.


https://zkillboard.com/kill/45506849/

0/10, try harder next time.
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#18 - 2015-04-11 11:32:01 UTC
Eh?

Ok so your input is useless :(
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#19 - 2015-04-11 11:45:25 UTC
So is yours.

You admit to not even have flown T3 Destroyers, yet you seem to have an opinion on them Lol
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#20 - 2015-04-11 12:41:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Christine Peeveepeeski
I also have an opinion on local politics yet have never stood for office. Does this mean I am not capable of making an informed decision based on engagements against these ships or talking to those more informed than I am?

You are yet to discredit what I've said, only trying to discredit the person saying it. I shall give you a 5/10 though since I responded to you.
123Next pageLast page