These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tactical Destroyers

Author
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#61 - 2015-05-15 02:59:52 UTC
Cpt Bunny wrote:
This is power creep for sure, but i believe there is purpose and direction behind it.

Picture this:

Future release of T3 BC, BS etc
Shortly after CCP makes eve free to play, for all Tech 1 ships and modules.



So they suddenly decide they don't like, need or even want money from the vast majority of their playerbase?
Staleward Ad'mraa
F-I-N-K PROPERTY
#62 - 2015-05-15 04:31:15 UTC
That ship looks very fragile... aka Jackdraw. I tend to sway towards ships that look sturdy and strong. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Whittorical Quandary
The Asteroid is Depleted
#63 - 2015-05-15 05:55:58 UTC
Personally, I was hoping the caldari one to take a bird shape like some of the other caldari ships (IE Raven, Condor, Moa...)

Then mode changes would extend/reduce the wingspan like a bird, wider for cruising/defensive and narrower for snipe or speed like a bird does to drop down on prey. (I think the f15 fighter jet also did something similar for carrying heavy loads etc.)

"The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that you never know if they are genuine."

— Abraham Lincoln

Carrie-Anne Moss
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#64 - 2015-05-22 04:17:08 UTC
All t3 are OP. Power creep. Power Leap
Specia1 K
State War Academy
Caldari State
#65 - 2015-05-22 04:51:19 UTC
Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:
All t3 are OP. Power creep. Power Leap


Meep Meep

Champion of the Knights of the General Discussion

Thunderdome