These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Megacyte and Zydrine prices

First post
Author
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#41 - 2015-04-04 14:46:09 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Adunh Slavy wrote:
GankYou wrote:

Zydrine and Megacyte are indeed a very small ratio of the rest, and it was somewhat fine, although very volatile, when Zyd and Megacyte were at 3600 ISK p/u and 5400 ISK p/u, respectively.


This time the market reaction has been a bit different, and more volatile.


Price simply doubled on the manufacturing input news. Smile

Quote:
The past two days have seen swings of ~1000 ISK in the secondary hubs, that pace was not observed last time.


There were no such swings in Domain/Jita. Secondary hubs are illiquid, hence it was all over the place for a day or two.

http://eve-markets.net/detail?typeid=40#history

http://eve-markets.net/detail?typeid=39#history

Chart history goes back only 7 years.

See you this Summer. Blink
Morukk Nuamzzar
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#42 - 2015-04-04 15:36:57 UTC
GankYou wrote:

Chart history goes back only 7 years.

Soem interesting stuff indeed...

Zydrine - Price History (2008-2015)

Buy order 2008-10-28: 2.5031,34

Zydrine

Megacyte - Price History (2008-2015)

Buy order 2009-08-25: 4.024,22

Megacyte
Adunh Slavy
#43 - 2015-04-04 15:47:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Adunh Slavy
GankYou wrote:

There were no such swings in Domain/Jita.


My transaction log, over the past few days, would beg to differ, with regards to Domain.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#44 - 2015-04-04 16:28:58 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Adunh Slavy wrote:
GankYou wrote:

There were no such swings in Domain/Jita.


My transaction log, over the past few days, would beg to differ, with regards to Domain.


People over-reacted a little in Domain by buying out the whole stock of Zyd there. It only lasted a few short hours, though. Smile

Quiet month ahead, see you around Summer time. Blink
Ren Oren
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2015-04-04 20:51:12 UTC
Megacyte just jumped to 2162

Zydrine followed jumping to 1997

Wowza
Ren Oren
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2015-04-04 21:36:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Ren Oren
Update, Mega still holding @ 2159.44 - 1950.06

Zydrine was a flash in the pan, it jumped for a moment then quickly fell back to 1540.00-1080.54 currently holding that level

Update 2: Seems the Mega jump was the real deal, still holding @ 2161.89-1950.06
Zydrine showing support @ 1539.00- 1152.00

Update 3: Zydrine is waking up after taking a quick nap, currently @ 1,845-1236
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#47 - 2015-04-04 21:54:40 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Still satisfying demand in Domain.

░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄
░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄
░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█
░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░█
░▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░█
█▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒█
█▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█

Pyerite @ 1.45 bn Units under 13 dumped in Amarr - first time I'm seeing this kind of volume for this mineral in Domain region.
Max Powerhausen
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#48 - 2015-04-04 22:27:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Max Powerhausen
Only 503,647 of mega left in glorious Providence, someone(s) brought almost all of it

http://i.gyazo.com/ae9fc3f782fade1f24a4ada13b7b8397.png
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#49 - 2015-04-05 02:16:53 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Judging by the buy orders, the price must've been decent. Smile I've been to Catch and Stain on the 28th, as I've mentioned earlier, Zyd and Mega were around 450/750 in sov space, thin volume however.

I think demand has been duly satisfied throughout the week and today especially - Any higher, without lowends rebalancing lower, and Tech 1 production stops. Renters should be scrambling to farm as much ABC as they can before the end of April, and dump it on the market. Smile

The aroma of ISK in the morning. Ahh. Big smile
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#50 - 2015-04-05 19:24:15 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Since the move has finished, time to recap:

Megacyte: Since having bottomed around 694 ISK p/u in late 2014, it moved 1406 ISK during the month of March and first week of April, setting a avg. bid high of 2,100 ISK p/u. This highend mineral retraced all of it's decline since the Spring-Summer of 2014.

Zydrine's advance from the lows around 395 ISK p/u set a multi-year high around 1488 ISK p/u in the same time period - a 1093 ISK move! This marks prices never seen since the Summer of 2013.

Price retracement lower throughout the month is likely, as current manufacturing consumption does not yet reflect the ask price, along with new supply becoming readily available and in large quantities, as nullsec entities scramble to farm these two minerals.

Sources used: Fuzzywork.co.uk market data, High bid values; Eve-markets for macro analysis.
Traedar
InterStellar Trading Syndicate
#51 - 2015-04-06 00:21:18 UTC
This should be interesting. In the old days, before the drone regions, Zydrine was regularly around 3300-3700 and Megacyte was like 4400. But logistics of getting high ends to Jita were very different back then.

The big thing is, if the devs are really going to give null sec folks all the low ends they need to build then there won't be any reason to drag high ends to empire except for profit. No more bringing it in and hauling out compressed low ends to build titans. It will only be brought in because it is "OMG Profit" to do so.

Also, now the logistics are easier of moving stuff from null to empire via jumping but now there is an ISK cost whereas before all it required was a grunt willing to haul. And there is jump fatigue now.

Any thoughts on these things?

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#52 - 2015-04-06 00:59:15 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Traedar wrote:

The big thing is, if the devs are really going to give null sec folks all the low ends they need to build then there won't be any reason to drag high ends to empire except for profit.


Exactly that.

Jump Freighters currently carry useful cargo both ways. Of course, on big Mega/Zyd shipments, there will always be a JF available. For the right cut. Blink

Quote:
No more bringing it in and hauling out compressed low ends to build titans. It will only be brought in because it is "OMG Profit" to do so.


Just like the Good Old Days. Poking Arkonor in a Miner II-fit Thorax, then hauling it back to Empire in a frig-ceptor. Cool

Freelancers will be supplying the high ends. Blink
Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#53 - 2015-04-06 16:15:13 UTC
Morukk Nuamzzar wrote:
Do you guys remember when high end mineral prices were 4000 Megacyte and 1600 for Zydrine? Not that someone wasn't complaining back then, as always:

http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=1039499


I remember this vividly. It was when the Drone Poo nerf was announced. I was buying up Zydrine and Nocxium in a small/medium market/mission hub. But the speculators crashed it before it hit my price point. Was one of the few times I've ever actually lost a significant chunk of isk on speculation and/or market manipulation.

Fun times.

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

Fzhal
#54 - 2015-04-07 17:04:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Fzhal
GankYou wrote:

No, the way I understand it: it isn't a Superock that you will be mining in null, I think the composition ratios of the number of Veld/Scord/ETC/ABC asteroids per field/anomaly and their sizes/volumes are getting adjusted, so that if you want to, you can build a production base on site with low(mid-)end minerals no longer being a disastrous bottleneck that they currently are. Smile

I disagree with you. It would fail if they simply added large quantities of low ends to the null belts because the highest volume low ends would be dirt cheap in High-Sec. It would still be more efficient for null to mine the high end ores and import the lows. In order to accomplish their goal, they'd have to change the mineral composition of the high end ores themselves. And that is what I think they are going to do. You don't have to take out much Zyd/Mega to compensate for adding a large volume of low ends to the ore composition.

Another Fozzie related quote I remember is him saying something to the affect of, "We have to balance for the good of the whole game and not just one area." I think a secondary goal for them will be to revitalize low-sec mining. If null is going to use most of their Zyd/Mega, where is high sec going to get it, low-sec? (If they do it smartly, CCP will account for mission loot reprocessing as well.) But I hope that they realize that low-sec's lack of mining has always been due to a number of human factors. A decade ago, when high end minerals weren't so abundant and low sec mining was nearly worth it, people still didn't mine in low because the returns were a bit too low when coupled with the typical lazy roid-ripping mentality. However, with faction war and highly organized low-sec corps, today's low-sec is now a nightmare compared to what it used to be. With the inefficiencies of ninja mining (dock-up time), low sec ores would have to be worth 3-6 times more than what you can get in high sec.

I think that high-sec ores will take a dive and CCP will again be using medium and high end minerals to bait more people to null security. Remember, they have always said that they want more people in null, always. I think this is because they believe that null's necessary camaraderie keeps players around for longer, which is understandable.

I've noticed that the markets are seem to be in limbo, with the number of buy orders down along with their prices. And that isn't because they are increasing Zyd/Mega usage in BPOs by whatever amount, as anyone can predict what that will do. No, everyone knows that the fate of this 2015's market is hinging on how they implement the null sec ore changes. The people in the best position to profit off of this situation now are those with good knowledge of the mineral volumes (including manufactured exports) that are exported to null.
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#55 - 2015-04-07 17:21:29 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Fzhal wrote:
GankYou wrote:

No, the way I understand it: it isn't a Superock that you will be mining in null, I think the composition ratios of the number of Veld/Scord/ETC/ABC asteroids per field/anomaly and their sizes/volumes are getting adjusted, so that if you want to, you can build a production base on site with low(mid-)end minerals no longer being a disastrous bottleneck that they currently are. Smile

I disagree with you. It would fail if they simply added large quantities of low ends to the null belts because the highest volume low ends would be dirt cheap in High-Sec.


How will it become dirt cheap without people having mined it in the first place? Blink

Good luck exporting Mega/Zyd to Hisec that is needed for your own production. Smile

Fzhal wrote:

I think that high-sec ores will take a dive and CCP will again be using medium and high end minerals to bait more people to null security. Remember, they have always said that they want more people in null, always.


And this is exactly what is going to happen.

Hisec had it, and still does, for too good for far too long. For the vast majority, life in Null, compared to Hisec, is bordering on inhumane levels in most aspects of the gameplay.

This is a game, you know. Smile

Good poast - http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?10878-Isk-is-not-enough-why-nullsec-is-unplayable-for-single-account-players

We will create our own truly Sovereign Empires and Freeports. Blink
Fzhal
#56 - 2015-04-07 17:33:48 UTC
GankYou wrote:
Fzhal wrote:
GankYou wrote:

No, the way I understand it: it isn't a Superock that you will be mining in null, I think the composition ratios of the number of Veld/Scord/ETC/ABC asteroids per field/anomaly and their sizes/volumes are getting adjusted, so that if you want to, you can build a production base on site with low(mid-)end minerals no longer being a disastrous bottleneck that they currently are. Smile

I disagree with you. It would fail if they simply added large quantities of low ends to the null belts because the highest volume low ends would be dirt cheap in High-Sec.


How will it become dirt cheap without people having mined it in the first place? Blink

Good luck exporting Mega/Zyd to Hisec that is needed for your own production. Smile

Because that is all that the high-sec miners can safely mine. They will mine it because 6 mil an hour is better than ninja mining at 30 mil an hour and losing a 250 mil ship every week or two. The vast majority of high-sec miners are risk averse. If high end ore content remains the same (but low-end roids are added), while Mega/Zyd BPO usage goes up, null miners would be more efficient to continue to mine Mega/Zyd in large quantities, use the higher profits to beef up their low-end importation, which would land them back in the same situation they are trying to "fix".
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#57 - 2015-04-07 17:38:22 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
You said lowends will become dirt cheap without Nullsec having mined them in the first place due to, in your opinion, fail-of-an-implementation in Nullsec ore changes.

Is a contradiction. Blink
Fzhal
#58 - 2015-04-07 17:52:15 UTC
GankYou wrote:
You said lowends will become dirt cheap without Nullsec having mined them in the first place due to, in your opinion, fail-of-an-implementation in Nullsec ore changes.

Is a contradiction. Blink

I do not see the contradiction. I've been very specific in my use of ore and minerals, but perhaps you didn't pick up on it. My argument is that they will change the mineral content of high-end ores.
Fzhal wrote:

I disagree with you. It would fail if they simply added large quantities of low ends to the null belts because the highest volume low ends would be dirt cheap in High-Sec. It would still be more efficient for null to mine the high end ores and import the lows. In order to accomplish their (CCP's) goal, they'd have to change the mineral composition of the high end ores themselves. And that is what I think they are going to do. You don't have to take out much Zyd/Mega to compensate for adding a large volume of low ends to the ore composition.

If Null miners get low-end minerals when mining the ABC ores, they won't need to import as much low end compressed ore. But high-sec miners will be left mining what they currently have. Since Null currently imports most of their low end minerals from High, the change will mean a surplus because null doesn't need to import it anymore.
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#59 - 2015-04-07 18:25:59 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Fzhal wrote:

If Null miners get low-end minerals when mining the ABC ores, they won't need to import as much low end compressed ore.


CCP Fozzie wrote:
So it's more profitable... so that you don't need to ship in lowends, and you won't have such access of high ends, that drop the price.We want to give a similar ratio of minerals in nullsec to what you would use to do all the building.

...

We're updating composition ratio of existing ABC ores and every existing ore in nullsecks.


More Tritaniumz in ABC? I don't think so. Smile

Rather, less ABCs, more of the rest, so that people won't have the choice but to mine lowends, after they cherry pick all of the ABCs out. Blink

Of course, some brilliant people initially will be selling their Mega/Zyd with ISK in their eyes, and then rebuying it from Empire at a premium in either hulls, modules, or both. Smile

Quote:
But high-sec miners will be left mining what they currently have.


Tough luck. Hisec mining is/should be like level 1 thru level 3 missions. Blink

Is a shame that Level 4 missions in the same Hisec are skewing risk-reward/time for all other activities - but what can you do. vOv
Fzhal
#60 - 2015-04-07 19:07:00 UTC
GankYou wrote:
Fzhal wrote:

If Null miners get low-end minerals when mining the ABC ores, they won't need to import as much low end compressed ore.

More Tritaniumz in ABC? I don't think so. Smile

Okay, you got me there, I should have said null ores. Regardless, CCP wants null to have less excess, and that means that high sec won't see as much Mega/Zyd imported or low end minerals exported. That is a double whammy... Make that a triple whammy, since they are drastically increasing Mega/Zyd requirements in almost all BPOs.


GankYou wrote:
No, the way I understand it: it isn't a Superock that you will be mining in null, I think the composition ratios of the number of Veld/Scord/ETC/ABC asteroids per field/anomaly and their sizes/volumes are getting adjusted, so that if you want to, you can build a production base on site with low(mid-)end minerals no longer being a disastrous bottleneck that they currently are.

When you said that, I thought you meant that you expected them to add veldspar roids to null belts...

GankYou wrote:

Fzhal wrote:
But high-sec miners will be left mining what they currently have.

Tough luck. Hisec mining is/should be like level 1 thru level 3 missions. Blink

No argument there...

Overall, I agree that this has high potential to revitalize Eve. The problem will be that they are changing so many things in Null at once, that they will have trouble 1) figuring out root causes 2) tweaking one system without negatively impacting the others.

Yep, within the next 3-5 releases they are going to be re-sculpting everything that is 0.0. This is going to be one of the biggest events in Eve's history.

Upcoming Changes:
Null belts/ore content (has put the markets in limbo)
Null mineral increase in BPOs
Structures, which primarily affect Null (specifically, ship safety will be re-defined no matter how hard they try to keep it the same)
Sovereignty mechanics

This is too much at once. There will be too much noise/interplay between these new systems to the point that CCP is will be unable to pinpoint the right things to tweak among all the changes that were made in null's interconnected ecosystem.