These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Now that CCP has readjusted the wheel and are facing north again...

First post First post
Author
supersexysucker
Uber Awesome Fantastico Awesomeness Group
#21 - 2011-12-03 04:43:34 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
i agree... too many people complaining about the CSM without any better alternative.


How about nothing, CSM does nothing, we already know that, what got eve changed? O right, the players quitting... not the csm the PLAYERS.

Waste of time and money.
Julius Rigel
#22 - 2011-12-03 04:45:02 UTC
The CSM is a complete joke.

But if there's anyone I'd trust to make something useful out of this BS, it's definitely the Goons. They're a dedicated ol' bunch of boys, that's for sure.

One of you beautiful BAMFs give my regards to Geop, will ya?
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2011-12-03 05:01:26 UTC
I don't know why the **** you're complaining - didn't Mittens say he's going to Quit EVE Forever after he gets done being CSM chairman anyway?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Liam Mirren
#24 - 2011-12-03 05:09:46 UTC
Did I step in a time machine? Cause it feels like I'm back in 2006.

Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.

DarkAegix
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2011-12-03 05:25:20 UTC
Mittens is a terrible poster.
His CSM ability is good, however.
Karadion
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2011-12-03 06:07:59 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:
Karadion wrote:
Let's get rid of you.

Not empty quoting.

Also CSM is due north by north east by a smitdge.

Why would I get rid of my post? You got me confused now.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#27 - 2011-12-03 06:15:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
I've yet to see any argument against the CSM that didn't amount to "I am butthurt about goons waa".

Seriously, suck it up and accept that the CSM has done alot to benefit you as an EVE player, particularly since it stopped being an ineffectual shitheap.
Taiwanistan
#28 - 2011-12-03 09:24:05 UTC
the **** you love to hate

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Tore Vest
#29 - 2011-12-03 09:46:23 UTC
CSM still here ?
Oh my..........

No troll.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#30 - 2011-12-03 10:02:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
Tore Vest wrote:
CSM still here ?
Oh my..........

Black Nova Corp [BNC] from 2009.11.09 21:48 to 2011.02.05 01:58.

lmao

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#31 - 2011-12-03 10:05:45 UTC
Democracy with the votes of 10% of the population is not real democracy, but a flavor of oligarchy. And the answer is not getting rid of voting, but to gather more voting.

CSM would make a lot more of sense if players were forced to vote after login so every last 350,000th account was asked and had to bloody cast a vote, if even a random one (random order of appearence of the options would fix any bias caused by random voting, and all in all random voting would be a white noise canceling itself).

Also could give the players an Australian voting system so they could both vote for or vote against candidates, and there you go...

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Tore Vest
#32 - 2011-12-03 10:12:47 UTC
Andski wrote:
Tore Vest wrote:
CSM still here ?
Oh my..........

Black Nova Corp [BNC] from 2009.11.09 21:48 to 2011.02.05 01:58.

lmao


So.... what ???

No troll.

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#33 - 2011-12-03 10:30:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Thorn Galen
I stopped counting the number of "burn the CSM" threads ages ago. The Op's post is yet another weak attempt to raise some kind of fictitious awareness of a useless CSM, as he sees it.

You sir are dishonest as are others claiming that the CSM is all about Goons. The Jita statue shootup, the Failcarna unsubs, nothing would have come from that if not for this CSM and yes, this CSM Chariman. All those actions would have amounted to nothing more than faded pixels and a rapid decline and ultimate ending of Eve. You're not thinking clearly and your thoughts are clouded by your personal grudges against the goons and against The Mittens in particular.

Get rid of the CSM? That's like saying shut down the internet because you're not happy with several websites. The CSM is vital to this game, to have CCP's ear. This CSM has their finger on the pulse of Eve.

Oh wait, I'm brown-nosing, those are most likely your thoughts. Too bad, I've said it before and I will again - I give credit where credit is due and love them or hate them, the CSM are largely responsible for shaking the CCP out of their past complacency.

Perhaps the next time, instead of spewing venom and hatred because of personal butthurt issues, cast a vote. Stand to be elected, go on a political campaign across Eve to have yourself elected to the next CSM. Instead, you sit there and rant and rave about how useless the CSM is and how it's all about the Goons.

You know what ? So what ? Good things are happening and although it's because CCP have done good since Failcarna, they woke-up from all sorts of pressures forcing them to do so, one of those pressures came directly, incessently and strongly from the CSM.

Now get off your dillusional ivory tower and do something about it, other than spew garbage in forums because, let's face it, you have personal issues with The Mittens and his crowd.

'Nuff said.
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#34 - 2011-12-03 10:36:16 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Democracy with the votes of 10% of the population is not real democracy, but a flavor of oligarchy. And the answer is not getting rid of voting, but to gather more voting.

CSM would make a lot more of sense if players were forced to vote after login so every last 350,000th account was asked and had to bloody cast a vote, if even a random one (random order of appearence of the options would fix any bias caused by random voting, and all in all random voting would be a white noise canceling itself).

Also could give the players an Australian voting system so they could both vote for or vote against candidates, and there you go...


We can't even dislike forum posts and you think CCP is going to allow grief voting in the CSM election? Would be fun to sink the hopes and dreams of some people, but it's unlikely to ever happen.

Forcing people to vote sound good and is what true democracy is all about. Because it totally won't still be 10% of people voting for their candidate, while the rest vote for the first candidate that happens to appear in their list, so they can get it over with and go back to playing the game. The best part ofcourse being that, since 100% of players voted, the CSM now truely has the undivided backing of the playerbase and not some false and artificilly inflated voter number, that actually has little to no correspondence with what the players really support and is just used as a fake show of legitimacy.

Definitely not a pointless annoyance, that only tries to mask the low levels of interest people have in the process and CSM in general. A giant improvement over the current system as we can all agree.
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2011-12-03 10:36:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Jowen Datloran
Hm, not dismissive of the OP's notion.

The CSM has been one big pile of disappoint this term. A strong rework of its purpose would be supported.

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Zagdul
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2011-12-03 10:38:16 UTC
All hail our chairman overlord... except his push for blowing up stations in null.



(FYI: It'll make null more dependent on empire as people will lose faith in the system and not store assets. Instead, remove stations from the Sov mechanic and allow us to drop more)

Dual Pane idea: Click!

CCP Please Implement

Zagdul
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2011-12-03 10:38:43 UTC
Jowen Datloran wrote:
Hm, not dismissive of the OP's notion.

The CSM has been one big pile of disappoint this term.


How so?

Dual Pane idea: Click!

CCP Please Implement

Merovee
Gorthaur Legion
Imperium Mordor
#38 - 2011-12-03 10:59:59 UTC
Goons are fun, makes the game interesting. If we want to dislodge them then we must work for it, it shouldn't be easy or it wouldn't be fun. Oh wait Delve...never mind. I'm sure the neck beards will try something new to spice up the game, its too bad there is no counter force to keep them inline and honest. Blink

Empire, the next new world order.

Jonni Favorite
Red Slice Enterprise
#39 - 2011-12-03 11:23:37 UTC
Gealbhan wrote:
... lets get rid of the CSM. They're about as useful as a waterproof teabag with the goons leading it anyway.

According to your statement, that's like removing the engine of your car because you put Diesel fuel instead of unleaded..
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#40 - 2011-12-03 11:26:41 UTC
Gealbhan wrote:
I agree with Hecatonis, such outbursts for such a simple statement.

@The Mittani : y so srs?

The Goons can never be dislodged from the CSM with their mains, alts and fanboi's voting for them. The CSM is not for the players anymore it's just a popularity contest.
The only real course of action is to disband it despite what White Tree thinks, The CSM did not bring those changes about - CCP did.
Do you honestly think anyone takes the CSM seriously? You're just a figure head.

I just find it ironic that the person supposedly representing the players has his lapdogs out there disrupting the players experience.



Yes that's the problem with democracies - people you don't like can get elected just because lots of voters want to chose them instead of people you like. So unfair!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016