These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

[Proposal] Get CCP to "roll back" the Fuel Block change
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Lykouleon
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#21 - 2011-12-07 05:19:13 UTC
Henry Haphorn wrote:
The wants of the many outweigh the needs of the few I suppose.Roll

I fixed your post.

Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword
Velicitia
XS Tech
#22 - 2011-12-07 12:51:56 UTC
Grozdan Boyadijev wrote:

... their towers are profitable enough that even if they weren't fully utilizing the PG and GPU of the tower, they can afford full usage.


Not always ... I've got one that's not "profitable" with the changes (it might break even) ... but even with the cost being less than profitable, researching BPOs with no wait (and thus, being able to bring things to market faster) will continue to prove profitable.

and the corpies like it too. Works for me.Cool

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia
Jenn Makanen
Doomheim
#23 - 2011-12-07 13:01:42 UTC
From the numbers I've seen Scrapyard Bob throwing around.in general, the blocks make towers cheaper to run, even if you weren't using all the CPU and PG. Large towers are potentially a different story.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=405610#post405610

Numbers will change as the market has to provide more of each, but still.
Previous page12