These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Scylla] Ishtars

First post First post
Author
Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#261 - 2015-03-18 14:10:28 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Soldarius wrote:
http://evenews24.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/zbg9Bbn-1024x702.png

Sentry drones are so well balanced. Roll

Holy crap. I knew Artillery and ACs were bad, but goddamn dude, when you put it like that...


dps graph was shamelessly stolen from someone else. So I can't take credit for it. But it is a very good graph.

Also, this is a friendly reminder that arty has crappy dps but great alpha. ACs need a buff. They are literally terrible.

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#262 - 2015-03-18 15:14:39 UTC
Soldarius wrote:
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Soldarius wrote:
http://evenews24.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/zbg9Bbn-1024x702.png

Sentry drones are so well balanced. Roll

Holy crap. I knew Artillery and ACs were bad, but goddamn dude, when you put it like that...


dps graph was shamelessly stolen from someone else. So I can't take credit for it. But it is a very good graph.

Also, this is a friendly reminder that arty has crappy dps but great alpha. ACs need a buff. They are literally terrible.



AC became useless when CCP both nerfed track enhancer and buffed blasters damage AND falloff.
The result is that there is no engagement envelope where AC are better than Blasters that is not already far enough that would be better to use rails.


So AC have not a SINGLE METER of engagement envelope where they are a good option.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#263 - 2015-03-18 16:19:59 UTC
Soldarius wrote:
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Soldarius wrote:
http://evenews24.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/zbg9Bbn-1024x702.png

Sentry drones are so well balanced. Roll

Holy crap. I knew Artillery and ACs were bad, but goddamn dude, when you put it like that...


dps graph was shamelessly stolen from someone else. So I can't take credit for it. But it is a very good graph.


And very accurate.

REMOVE SENTRIES FROM THE ISHTAR

Cruiser-sized hull with T2 resists using BATTLESHIP-sized weapons systems.

Good job, CCP.

Good job.

Ishtars Online
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#264 - 2015-03-18 18:06:31 UTC
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.
Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#265 - 2015-03-19 01:57:11 UTC
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.

I think that they already knew the answers that they were going to get. They've given the Ishtar some lovetaps over the last year, but are still hesitant to give it the pimphand treatment that it really needs, for some reason.
Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#266 - 2015-03-19 02:17:41 UTC
Corben Arctus wrote:
Aiyshimin wrote:
This will achieve the goal of making Ishtars less useful, but unfortunately does nothing to make other ships useful. Range and speed are overpowered in EVE, and only doctrines with damage projection and mobility work.

In other words, people will just use the next platform that outranges others while remaining mobile, leaving whole shipclasses gathering dust in hangars.



This.


Yep, there will always be one that is more powerful than others.

Enough crying and they get nerfed.


They have been crying about sentries and drones for the past couple of years.

Remove them all from the game. FIXT
Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#267 - 2015-03-19 02:42:13 UTC
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.


Yea, and it's all to dry the tears.

If the ishtar is so OP, then why don't these people simply fly the ishtar?

It isn't that the ishtar is op. IT IS the players that cry are BAD. They will always be bad.

Nerfing another ship / module / drone for them won't make them good.

Let's see what bat country cries about next.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#268 - 2015-03-19 05:32:53 UTC
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.


If the ishtar is so OP, then why don't these people simply fly the ishtar?

It isn't that the ishtar is op. IT IS the players that cry are BAD. They will always be bad.


You're not very mature now, are you? Blink

There are other ships people have trained for, because, you know, they like the ships/types, and like having fun in game.

But your point is also invalid, in that other countless people simply trained for the ishtard because it became the current meta doctrine.

Train for an ishtard or get kicked from your alliance/corp. Blink
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#269 - 2015-03-19 06:02:49 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.


If the ishtar is so OP, then why don't these people simply fly the ishtar?

It isn't that the ishtar is op. IT IS the players that cry are BAD. They will always be bad.


You're not very mature now, are you? Blink

There are other ships people have trained for, because, you know, they like the ships/types, and like having fun in game.

But your point is also invalid, in that other countless people simply trained for the ishtard because it became the current meta doctrine.

Train for an ishtard or get kicked from your alliance/corp. Blink



And this nerf will change nothing other than people will bring more ishtars

Xequecal
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#270 - 2015-03-19 08:05:02 UTC
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Corben Arctus wrote:
Aiyshimin wrote:
This will achieve the goal of making Ishtars less useful, but unfortunately does nothing to make other ships useful. Range and speed are overpowered in EVE, and only doctrines with damage projection and mobility work.

In other words, people will just use the next platform that outranges others while remaining mobile, leaving whole shipclasses gathering dust in hangars.



This.


Yep, there will always be one that is more powerful than others.

Enough crying and they get nerfed.


They have been crying about sentries and drones for the past couple of years.

Remove them all from the game. FIXT


The Ishtar is so overpowered that aside from roles given to ships with specialized, specific bonuses, (tackling, ewar, logistics) it is the best subcap for literally everything in the game. It is the best brawler, best kiter, and best sniper. It can do all three of these on the same fit. Its damage application is unparalleled. Heavy drones from an Ishtar do more DPS than a pulse laser battleship and still have the tracking to hit interceptors. It is also the best PvE ship. It runs 10/10s solo and to beat it in ISK/hr in anoms you need a >1b isk pirate BS.

Unless you're tackling, remote repping, or jamming, there is never a reason to fly any other subcap that costs less than 1b. The Ishtar's existence completely derails all other balance comparisons. No one cares that, say, ACs really suck right now compared to blasters and lasers, because you can just forget about the comparison and fly an Ishtar which does 3x the DPS and application while selecting damage type and using no cap or fitting. The overpoweredness is so ludicrous that you can fly what would appear to be the hardest, direct counter dictated by game mechanics and you will still lose. For example, try to fly Zealots against shield Ishtars using only bouncers. You're shooting directly into their resist hole while they shoot your strongest resist, but you will still lose horribly because the Ishtar is just that much bullshit. They will either outrange you at 130km or just brute force over the resist difference by up close brawling with a weapon system that does triple the damage yours does.
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#271 - 2015-03-19 09:29:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Spugg Galdon
For a giggle, prevent all Ishtars from undocking/being boarded for an entire month and lets see what happens.

A new meta would develop. Then, after a month, randomly allow Ishtars to undick again and see how quickly we return to Ishtars: Online.
Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#272 - 2015-03-19 17:08:19 UTC
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.


If the ishtar is so OP, then why don't these people simply fly the ishtar?

It isn't that the ishtar is op. IT IS the players that cry are BAD. They will always be bad.


You're not very mature now, are you? Blink

There are other ships people have trained for, because, you know, they like the ships/types, and like having fun in game.

But your point is also invalid, in that other countless people simply trained for the ishtard because it became the current meta doctrine.

Train for an ishtard or get kicked from your alliance/corp. Blink


If by mature you mean lack of logic, intelligence, or general knowledge of how the game works, then I guess I will never be.

Every fleet, corp, alliance has doctrines. You might need to get out of your mining barge occasionally. RVB runs a fleet on saturdays.

Ishtar has been one of the first ships you train into for the past 5+ years. Maybe you think the raven is prettier so you go for that.

This whole thing is nothing more than bad players crying because they are bad. They will always be bad. Hide and watch for what they cry about next.
Schluffi Schluffelsen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#273 - 2015-03-19 20:13:41 UTC
By the way, I just wanted to say thanks to CCP Rise for taking our concerns into consideration and not even answering any of these raised issues. Scylla patch notes are online and everything's going to stay as it is.

Thank you very much, much appreciated!
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#274 - 2015-03-20 06:08:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.


If the ishtar is so OP, then why don't these people simply fly the ishtar?

It isn't that the ishtar is op. IT IS the players that cry are BAD. They will always be bad.


You're not very mature now, are you? Blink

There are other ships people have trained for, because, you know, they like the ships/types, and like having fun in game.

But your point is also invalid, in that other countless people simply trained for the ishtard because it became the current meta doctrine.

Train for an ishtard or get kicked from your alliance/corp. Blink


If by mature you mean lack of logic, intelligence, or general knowledge of how the game works, then I guess I will never be.

Every fleet, corp, alliance has doctrines. You might need to get out of your mining barge occasionally. RVB runs a fleet on saturdays.

Ishtar has been one of the first ships you train into for the past 5+ years. Maybe you think the raven is prettier so you go for that.

This whole thing is nothing more than bad players crying because they are bad. They will always be bad. Hide and watch for what they cry about next.


You're continuing in the same vein.

Too reliant on a broken ship, are we? Blink Don't worry too much, it has happened in the past and it will happen again and again - when balance is neglected, the nerf bat, in the end, strikes so hard that the ship becomes history.

Remember Draeks?

Nanophoons?

Nosdomis?

Me neither. Or at least I try not to. Smile
Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC
#275 - 2015-03-20 07:02:15 UTC
Schluffi Schluffelsen wrote:
By the way, I just wanted to say thanks to CCP Rise for taking our concerns into consideration and not even answering any of these raised issues. Scylla patch notes are online and everything's going to stay as it is.

Thank you very much, much appreciated!

You just have no idea.
They were discussing it internally (tm) and concluded that our concerns are not valid.
After Scylla goes live, Ishtars will be balanced, period. Metrics (tm) will show it.
CSM (tm) also approved it. They always do.
Problem solved, salaries paid.
afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#276 - 2015-03-20 08:17:32 UTC
Arsine Mayhem wrote:
Spugg Galdon wrote:
Well this thread was a complete and pointless waste of time.

It was announced. It was asked... "What do you think?"

No replies or discussion from a Dev in this thread since it opened.

Scylla patch notes released and the original proposal is what's there.



Seriously? Why did you even bother to open this thread as a discussion. Should of just posted a notification thread and ******* well locked it.


Yea, and it's all to dry the tears.

If the ishtar is so OP, then why don't these people simply fly the ishtar?


We do.

Everyone does.

And you know what? We're bored ******* shitless with them. They could literally deleted them tomorrow and no tears would be shed. People are THAT sick of them.
Aplysia Vejun
Children of Agasul
#277 - 2015-03-20 09:07:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Aplysia Vejun
I'm always in lowsec and npc null.
Last time i saw an ishtar is about 3 weeks ago. It was someone doing a 5/10 site.

So no, they arent used everywhere and anytime.
50% of the ships around are tengus. Then 10% the other t3 abd the rest is composed of the other ships, mostly interceptors
Aplysia Vejun
Children of Agasul
#278 - 2015-03-20 09:13:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Aplysia Vejun
Bah. Stupid smartphone... double post
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#279 - 2015-03-20 09:37:46 UTC
Aplysia Vejun wrote:
I'm always in lowsec and npc null.
Last time i saw an ishtar is about 3 weeks ago


That explains things. You wouldn't happen to live in Stain? http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/coalitionsov/Coalitioninfluence.png

Blink
Aplysia Vejun
Children of Agasul
#280 - 2015-03-20 09:48:42 UTC
Actually no. Im speaking of syndicate and lowregions of solitude, aridin, genesis