These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Skynet Down
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Dread Operative
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#21 - 2015-03-07 16:14:50 UTC
Dread Operative wrote:
This is such an EASY fix, don't allow carriers to assign fighters within (X)k of POS shield. They already have the mechanic available; siphons, depots, cynos, etc etc. Carriers would continue to be useful while adding tons of vulnerability.


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5547363#post5547363

Kalihira
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#22 - 2015-03-09 00:02:25 UTC
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote:
They just need to work on the remote capacitor transfer modules.

If I transfer you X power, it should cost X, plus the energy to use the module and account for the lost power sent through our pea soup space.

Remove all cap energy transfer hull bonus's and make the received amount 90% of the amount sent.


A: this has nothing to do with the OPs statement and B: why would you want to make cap transfers useless in the first place?
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#23 - 2015-03-09 16:05:34 UTC
It's a perpetuum mobile you can build without extensive use of villard wheels. So OP.

Also, bridging already uses uo a ton of cap (If you use your own jumpdrive), and getting bridged requires jump fuel. The cool 20th century way of transportation Cool
Master Sergeant MacRobert
Red Sky Morning
The Amarr Militia.
#24 - 2015-03-09 17:19:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Master Sergeant MacRobert
Kalihira wrote:
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote:
They just need to work on the remote capacitor transfer modules.

If I transfer you X power, it should cost X, plus the energy to use the module and account for the lost power sent through our pea soup space.

Remove all cap energy transfer hull bonus's and make the received amount 90% of the amount sent.


A: this has nothing to do with the OPs statement and B: why would you want to make cap transfers useless in the first place?


A: Has a relevance by association to the discussion of Carriers in particular.

B:
Kalihira wrote:
cap transfers
They're called Cap Transfers not Cap multipliers. You pass cap not magic it out of your a**e

"Remedy this situation or you shall live out the rest of your life in a pain amplifier"
Kalihira
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#25 - 2015-03-09 17:24:42 UTC
Lloyd Roses wrote:
It's a perpetuum mobile you can build without extensive use of villard wheels. So OP.

Also, bridging already uses uo a ton of cap (If you use your own jumpdrive), and getting bridged requires jump fuel. The cool 20th century way of transportation Cool


You know its a module right? might be mini power generators, capable of transferring power in a limited extent through spacetime...... anyway, yes, bridging does have a downside for the bridged ships. However, its kinda stupid that the one module capable of stopping a cyno has a spool time, while a cyno itself is instant. Might be an idea to change that....
Kalihira
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#26 - 2015-03-09 20:37:59 UTC
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote:
Kalihira wrote:
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote:
They just need to work on the remote capacitor transfer modules.

If I transfer you X power, it should cost X, plus the energy to use the module and account for the lost power sent through our pea soup space.

Remove all cap energy transfer hull bonus's and make the received amount 90% of the amount sent.


A: this has nothing to do with the OPs statement and B: why would you want to make cap transfers useless in the first place?


A: Has a relevance by association to the discussion of Carriers in particular.

B:
Kalihira wrote:
cap transfers
They're called Cap Transfers not Cap multipliers. You pass cap not magic it out of your a**e


A: no it doesnt, its about skynet, not cap transfers. If you want to discuss carriers in general make a new topic
B: see my previous post
Previous page12