These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tier 3 BC fits!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Headerman
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2011-12-02 11:12:23 UTC
Hi all,

Thought i would throw this out there...

What fit have you been thinking of for a new Tier 3 BC?

I thought of this Naga fit, i think it would make a great addition to a low sec gate camping gang:

[Naga, Gate Camper]
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Damage Control II

Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range
Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive
Large Shield Extender II
Invulnerability Field II
Invulnerability Field II
Warp Scrambler II

Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L

Medium Hybrid Burst Aerator II
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I

12 CPU and about 30 PG to spare, over 1400 DPS when heated too. Decent range on the blasters makes it easy to hit targets jumping through if u sit at 0 on the gate.

Anyone else got a fit?

Australian Fanfest Event https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90062
Alara IonStorm
#2 - 2011-12-02 11:39:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
[Naga, DPS Support]
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Damage Control II

Large Shield Extender II
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Invulnerability Field II
Invulnerability Field II
Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive

Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Ion Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L

Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I

62k EHP but relies on other ships to tackle. 930 DPS, 1070 DPS Overheat with CNA. 1040 DPS, 1200 DPS Overheat with Void. 750 DPS, 805 DPS Overheat with Null
DarkAegix
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2011-12-02 12:22:51 UTC
[Talos, Shield Gank]

Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L

Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon Microwarpdrive
J5b Phased Prototype Warp Scrambler I
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction

Pseudoelectron Containment Field I
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Tracking Enhancer II

Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I


Warrior II x5



Shield gank Talos. 28.5k ehp.
1203dps with CN Antimatter, 1371dps overheated.

I think Void would definitely be viable with this ship, since blasters have received the 20% tracking bonus, the ship has a tracking bonus AND there's a tracking enhancer fitted.
1333dps with Void, 1521dps overheated
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2011-12-02 23:24:51 UTC
The Talos got a huge drone bay? wait what?

F that now frigates won't be able to tackle one, but every single other Tier 3 battlecruiser can't defend against small targets.

Why are they giving it the drone bay dps equal to that of rifter? So it can easily break the tanks of frigates. Thanks CCP, great change.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg
Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#5 - 2011-12-02 23:51:23 UTC
I can say with some certainty that Oracles have no trouble hitting Harpies or Proteuses.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.
RESHAIM Reshaimi
Industrial Asylum
#6 - 2011-12-03 03:42:04 UTC
Liang Nuren wrote:
I can say with some certainty that Oracles have no trouble hitting Harpies or Proteuses.

-Liang



For missioning (level 2/3 mission) i would prefer Harbinger over Oracles anyway, within little and fast target Oracles start to be a pain in the ass to play out, and you will loose a lot of precious time trying to shot down little annoying npc drones and frigate.


A little drone bay would help to take care of little target, and wouldn't compromise pvp at all.


Oracles seems to be a good replacement for null sec ratting, vs some BS spawn and cruiser, if you wouldn't use a BS out there.
But for all the other things, there are better ships to choose.

At least Oracles look fine, the only positive things i founded about that ship is the graphic.. great job for the graphic designer who's done that ship, but my personal dislike for the Oracles stats that look so weird.. but this only my personal point of view, and anyone could disagree on this. :)