These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Wich csm representative is for miners ?

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Jenshae Chiroptera
#101 - 2015-02-27 12:57:16 UTC
admiral root wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
This list is also supported by EN24.
I thought you wanted people to take the list seriously? Twisted
+1
I read EN24 to clear my head of anything serious before I go to sleep. Twisted

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#102 - 2015-02-27 16:21:18 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Bethan Le Troix wrote:
Taking the devils advocate for a minute.

Sabriz Adoudel has a t least two good ideas:

Increase the wardec charges if a stronger corp/alliance wardecs a weaker/smaller corp/alliance.
Arguable. The problem is that most of the most competent highsec PvP group that wardec are tiny, so the amounts they pay would likely not change much. Also, with his idea there's the issue that you can wardec anyone for cheap using a 1 man corp then invite your real corp as allies.

The way it currently works is you pay more to have more war targets. The whole system needs an overhaul to be honest though.

Bethan Le Troix wrote:
Introduce small benefits to being a long term member of a player-run corporation such as small percentage increases in mining yield.
So bring WoW guild perks to EVE. What woulds stop people simply running their own corps for one or two characters just to get the bonuses and still being about as free from conflict as they currently are? And then you'd also have the issue that a group wardecs them who they stand absolutely zero chance of defending against, now they have the options:
- Drop corp and lose all of your bonuses
- Don't play until the wardec is over.
- Pay a substantial amount of isk for either a surrender or hire mercs which may or may not be effective.

At the end of the day, that idea is to make it easier for wardec groups to force corps into positions they can't function in so that they are forced to lose out whatever they do.


Alright. You've blown Sabriz increase to wardec fees out of the water. I'll give you that one.

Regarding small benefits for player run corporations I still think there is mileage in this idea. It is an encouragement to pilots to join player run corps which are arguably more enjoyable to be in and the taxes are usually lower than standard NPC tax. The benefits might be staged - say 1% then 2% then 3% depending on length of membership. The benefits wouldn't necessarily have to be mining orientated. They could be for weapons damage, market taxes, or something else. Maybe there could be an option for CEO's to choose which type of benefit their corp would have. I don't think this idea is WoW (I have never played WoW though.Smile ) and that there is some merit in it.

On the other hand I guess to be safe Steve Ronuken is the best bet for miners. Big smile
Desimus Maximus
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#103 - 2015-02-27 17:05:32 UTC
The only players who are ever elected to the CSM are from the large monolithical coalition entities. This is because they CTA their pilots, usually in the thousands, to vote for their own self interests ranging from consorting on resource limitations and availabilities to sov mechanics and very narrow ship/fleet mechanics that will dull any ability of would-be conquerors from being able to take over their space in the same manner in which they did themselves. Such as assisting 1,000 sentries to a single pilot and 1-shotting everything and then petitioning for the nerfing of drone assists literally hours after taking space...

There is not, nor ever will be a 'pro-miner' member of the CSM without imposing term limits that extends to that players corporation or alliance, whichever is the larger to which they belong.

1 term. Any member being from CSM members corp/alliance within the last 12 months is disqualified from running in the next election.
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#104 - 2015-02-27 17:12:17 UTC
Desimus Maximus wrote:
The only players who are ever elected to the CSM are from the large monolithical coalition entities. This is because they CTA their pilots, usually in the thousands, to vote for their own self interests ranging from consorting on resource limitations and availabilities to sov mechanics and very narrow ship/fleet mechanics that will dull any ability of would-be conquerors from being able to take over their space in the same manner in which they did themselves. Such as assisting 1,000 sentries to a single pilot and 1-shotting everything and then petitioning for the nerfing of drone assists literally hours after taking space...

There is not, nor ever will be a 'pro-miner' member of the CSM without imposing term limits that extends to that players corporation or alliance, whichever is the larger to which they belong.

1 term. Any member being from CSM members corp/alliance within the last 12 months is disqualified from running in the next election.



Hi!

Which monolithical coalition entity am I on?

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#105 - 2015-02-27 20:05:39 UTC
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Desimus Maximus wrote:
The only players who are ever elected to the CSM are from the large monolithical coalition entities. This is because they CTA their pilots, usually in the thousands, to vote for their own self interests ranging from consorting on resource limitations and availabilities to sov mechanics and very narrow ship/fleet mechanics that will dull any ability of would-be conquerors from being able to take over their space in the same manner in which they did themselves. Such as assisting 1,000 sentries to a single pilot and 1-shotting everything and then petitioning for the nerfing of drone assists literally hours after taking space...

There is not, nor ever will be a 'pro-miner' member of the CSM without imposing term limits that extends to that players corporation or alliance, whichever is the larger to which they belong.

1 term. Any member being from CSM members corp/alliance within the last 12 months is disqualified from running in the next election.



Hi!

Which monolithical coalition entity am I on?


or I?

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)/¯
Varathius
Enlightened Industries
Goonswarm Federation
#106 - 2015-02-27 20:14:22 UTC
the only thing worth spending time on mining related in this game is this website called miner bumping.
Bel Tika
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#107 - 2015-02-27 20:57:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Bel Tika
Every aspect of Eve Online is worth doing, im sorry your so narrow minded to comprehend that

An GL Steve :P
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#108 - 2015-02-27 22:25:09 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Desimus Maximus wrote:
The only players who are ever elected to the CSM are from the large monolithical coalition entities. This is because they CTA their pilots, usually in the thousands, to vote for their own self interests ranging from consorting on resource limitations and availabilities to sov mechanics and very narrow ship/fleet mechanics that will dull any ability of would-be conquerors from being able to take over their space in the same manner in which they did themselves. Such as assisting 1,000 sentries to a single pilot and 1-shotting everything and then petitioning for the nerfing of drone assists literally hours after taking space...

There is not, nor ever will be a 'pro-miner' member of the CSM without imposing term limits that extends to that players corporation or alliance, whichever is the larger to which they belong.

1 term. Any member being from CSM members corp/alliance within the last 12 months is disqualified from running in the next election.



Hi!

Which monolithical coalition entity am I on?


or I?

m



Everyone knows the Gallente federation is made up of trillions of people!

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#109 - 2015-02-27 23:01:49 UTC

Gallente Federation degenerates elected to positions of power?

I worry about EVE's future..

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#110 - 2015-02-28 05:42:28 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:

Gallente Federation degenerates elected to positions of power?

I worry about EVE's future..



and well you should

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)/¯
Bellak Hark
New Eden Media Organization
#111 - 2015-02-28 07:09:00 UTC
Desimus Maximus wrote:
The only players who are ever elected to the CSM are from the large monolithical coalition entities. This is because they CTA their pilots, usually in the thousands, to vote for their own self interests ranging from consorting on resource limitations and availabilities to sov mechanics and very narrow ship/fleet mechanics that will dull any ability of would-be conquerors from being able to take over their space in the same manner in which they did themselves. Such as assisting 1,000 sentries to a single pilot and 1-shotting everything and then petitioning for the nerfing of drone assists literally hours after taking space...

There is not, nor ever will be a 'pro-miner' member of the CSM without imposing term limits that extends to that players corporation or alliance, whichever is the larger to which they belong.

1 term. Any member being from CSM members corp/alliance within the last 12 months is disqualified from running in the next election.



Xenuria is your candidate.
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn
Department 10
#112 - 2015-03-04 17:08:36 UTC
We voted for Steve Ronuken in the end. I think he is the best choice for miners. Not that we have mined for several months now. Doing other stuff........ in-game.

" They're gonna feel pretty stupid when they find out. " Rick. " Find out what ? " Abraham. " They're screwing with the wrong people. " Rick. Season four.   ' The Walking Dead. ' .
Zealous Miner
Doomheim
#113 - 2015-03-04 21:22:53 UTC
I can say with great confidence that Sabriz Adoudel has a miner's best interests in mind.

I have entrusted Sabriz with my vote and I encourage others to do the same.

Fedo. Fedo? Fedo!
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#114 - 2015-03-04 22:07:39 UTC
Desimus Maximus wrote:
The only players who are ever elected to the CSM are from the large monolithical coalition entities.

Did you fact check this before you wrote it?
Jenshae Chiroptera
#115 - 2015-03-04 23:02:14 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Desimus Maximus wrote:
The only players who are ever elected to the CSM are from the large monolithical coalition entities.

Did you fact check this before you wrote it?
Let's break it down though shall we?

Mangala Solaris - RvB - large alliance (HS)
DJ FunkyBacon - EVE Radio - spot light position
Sion Kumitomo - Goons - large alliance (Null)
Progodlegend - Nulli - large alliance (Null)
Corebloodbrothers - Volt - large alliance (Null)
Ali Aras - Noir - large alliance (?)
Xander Phoena - Gents - large alliance (Null)
mynnna - Goons - large alliance (Null)
Asayanami Dei - no idea who this is or what their alliance is but not very big only 250 active members
Corbexx - No Holes - large alliance (Worm Holes)
Gorski Car - RvB - large alliance (HS)
Steve Ronuken - 3rd Party stuff - spot light position

Sugar Kyle - Low Sec campaigner.
Mike Azariah - High Sec newbie cuddle bear.

- - - -

2 - major exceptions
2 - high publicity characters
1 - wth?
5/14 definitely from Null Sec
9/14 definitely from large alliances.

Two from Goons
Two from Red vs Blue

If alliances are managing to elect two CSM candidates then clearly not enough people care about CSM.

Highest votes ever for CSM elections? Call it 50K / 500K so 10% of EVE voted.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#116 - 2015-03-04 23:46:24 UTC
Also should be noted:

'Don't vote for anyone in the csm, they're all from large alliances' is a self fulfilling prophecy.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Jenshae Chiroptera
#117 - 2015-03-05 04:15:36 UTC
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Also should be noted:
'Don't vote for anyone in the csm, they're all from large alliances' is a self fulfilling prophecy.
I did vote for some of the current CSM because I think they are a good personality influence, such as Core or have put in a lot of work, like Corbexx.

I disagree with how they are getting elected and how ignorant most players are of what CSM even is.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
ISD Decoy
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#118 - 2015-03-05 14:23:51 UTC
A wildly off topic post, and one quoting it have been removed.

Quote:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.

27. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued to the off-topic poster.

ISD Decoy

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department
malcovas Henderson
THoF
#119 - 2015-03-05 14:49:04 UTC
As a miner, I do not care who, represents me. I care about who represents the good of the game.
Anslo
Scope Works
#120 - 2015-03-05 14:57:15 UTC
Trolls saying to vote for Sabriz aside (protip, don't vote Sabriz), there isn't a mining specific CSM candidate. Mike Azariah is your best bet, he's the high sec focused candidate. Actually focused on improving highsec for everyone, not making it a gankers paradise.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]