These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Fuel block confusion

Author
Garasu nosekai
Creodron.com
#1 - 2011-12-01 20:10:48 UTC
Ok, so I feel like I'm missing something here. These new fuel blocks seem like nothing more than a giant pain in the butt.
From what i have gathered its going to be roughly 50% more expensive, 44% more volume to haul and just one more step in getting the fuel. If I am indeed missing something can someone please get me up to date.
Skorpynekomimi
#2 - 2011-12-01 20:14:46 UTC
Lower fuel consumption, less maths, less clicks to fuel a PoS from a ship, and less bother.

Economic PVP

Garasu nosekai
Creodron.com
#3 - 2011-12-01 20:19:01 UTC
Skorpynekomimi wrote:
Lower fuel consumption, less maths, less clicks to fuel a PoS from a ship, and less bother.


None of that makes sense to me... no offence. If its more expensive who the hell cares if its using less that becomes meaningless. and the fact that before this we could fuel our poss for 90 days with a single freighter full and now is far from that just makes it even more of a pain. Just nothing about this seems better, in any way shape or form. Anything that it has made easier by making the fuel one item is nullified by the fact that you have to make and move the more expensive and bigger fuel.
Arana Mirelin
Te'Rava Industries
#4 - 2011-12-01 20:22:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Arana Mirelin
The only place where the "more expensive" would come from is the full use of LO and HW now, rather than them being dependent on PG and CPU usage. However, those do not add up to 50% of the fuel cost, under current conditions or reasonable projections.

I'd need to recalculate, but the figures I saw from the first devblog indicated a minor (few %) compression, rather than expansion, of volume.

It would have an impact on people who fuel multiple towers of the same type, only needing to add 1 fuel type rather than balancing multiples. I've got 2, and it's kinda meh. No real advantage or disadvantage to me.
Zions Child
Higashikata Industries
#5 - 2011-12-01 20:24:56 UTC
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Ok, so I feel like I'm missing something here. These new fuel blocks seem like nothing more than a giant pain in the butt.
From what i have gathered its going to be roughly 50% more expensive, 44% more volume to haul and just one more step in getting the fuel. If I am indeed missing something can someone please get me up to date.


Your math is wrong. Look at the numbers in both blog posts. Currently, they are pricy because they are new on the market, not to mention some increase in cost is to be expected from PI changes.
Arana Mirelin
Te'Rava Industries
#6 - 2011-12-01 20:26:41 UTC
Zions Child wrote:
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Ok, so I feel like I'm missing something here. These new fuel blocks seem like nothing more than a giant pain in the butt.
From what i have gathered its going to be roughly 50% more expensive, 44% more volume to haul and just one more step in getting the fuel. If I am indeed missing something can someone please get me up to date.


Your math is wrong. Look at the numbers in both blog posts. Currently, they are pricy because they are new on the market, not to mention some increase in cost is to be expected from PI changes.


That is true. Also, the blueprints for them need to be researched. So the current market fuel blocks are inefficient and use more fuel. Once they are researched though, the price should come down.
mnybag1
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2011-12-01 20:30:06 UTC
Zions Child wrote:
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Ok, so I feel like I'm missing something here. These new fuel blocks seem like nothing more than a giant pain in the butt.
From what i have gathered its going to be roughly 50% more expensive, 44% more volume to haul and just one more step in getting the fuel. If I am indeed missing something can someone please get me up to date.


Your math is wrong. Look at the numbers in both blog posts. Currently, they are pricy because they are new on the market, not to mention some increase in cost is to be expected from PI changes.



^^^ this. If you just ran the numbers and compared it to how much it used to cost, than your math error comes from the spike in PI prices because of the POCO add and the change in price indicies/rise in taxes.
Garasu nosekai
Creodron.com
#8 - 2011-12-01 20:41:31 UTC
mnybag1 wrote:
Zions Child wrote:
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Ok, so I feel like I'm missing something here. These new fuel blocks seem like nothing more than a giant pain in the butt.
From what i have gathered its going to be roughly 50% more expensive, 44% more volume to haul and just one more step in getting the fuel. If I am indeed missing something can someone please get me up to date.


Your math is wrong. Look at the numbers in both blog posts. Currently, they are pricy because they are new on the market, not to mention some increase in cost is to be expected from PI changes.



^^^ this. If you just ran the numbers and compared it to how much it used to cost, than your math error comes from the spike in PI prices because of the POCO add and the change in price indicies/rise in taxes.



Ok, ill have to find those to see, its not 'My" its the math of the guy who does our fuel. If that is all true then even if they are the SAME price its still a pain in the ass to haul compared to before. This i know for a fact. We could fuel our 3 large towers with one trip bringing less then 960km3 now that will not be possible as it will take around 1296000 m3 to fuel our towers with these.
mnybag1
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2011-12-01 21:13:50 UTC
The only way that is at all possible is if you were only using 50% of both PG and CPU, in which case, the increase is more a cause of them switching how that works than the fuel blocks. They would have done that anyway (from what i have read), the fuel block thing was just an extra pirk. If however you were using anywhere above 50% cpu and power, then you have a math error and should try again.
Garasu nosekai
Creodron.com
#10 - 2011-12-01 21:23:18 UTC
mnybag1 wrote:
The only way that is at all possible is if you were only using 50% of both PG and CPU, in which case, the increase is more a cause of them switching how that works than the fuel blocks. They would have done that anyway (from what i have read), the fuel block thing was just an extra pirk. If however you were using anywhere above 50% cpu and power, then you have a math error and should try again.



I have been in this corp for almost a year... we always haul in the same amount of fuel for the same amount of towers. We could fuel 2 large Caldari towers and one True Sansha for 90 days with one freighter worth of fuel. As for the the PG CPU usage last time i checked they were at almost full power usage and around half cpu.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#11 - 2011-12-01 21:25:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Tau Cabalander
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Ok, ill have to find those to see, its not 'My" its the math of the guy who does our fuel. If that is all true then even if they are the SAME price its still a pain in the ass to haul compared to before. This i know for a fact. We could fuel our 3 large towers with one trip bringing less then 960km3 now that will not be possible as it will take around 1296000 m3 to fuel our towers with these.

Fuel bays were made larger, so they hold a bit more fuel than before.

* Fuel bays are now 140k / 70k / 35k (was 110k / 55k / 27.5k)

For three large towers:

3 * 140,000 m3 = 420,000 m3 which easily fits in any freighter (was 330,000 m3 which fits in some JF)

That's an increase of only 90,000 m3. Lasts me about 6 days longer than before.
Dusty Meg
Echelon Research
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2011-12-01 21:35:57 UTC
Garasu nosekai wrote:
mnybag1 wrote:
The only way that is at all possible is if you were only using 50% of both PG and CPU, in which case, the increase is more a cause of them switching how that works than the fuel blocks. They would have done that anyway (from what i have read), the fuel block thing was just an extra pirk. If however you were using anywhere above 50% cpu and power, then you have a math error and should try again.



I have been in this corp for almost a year... we always haul in the same amount of fuel for the same amount of towers. We could fuel 2 large Caldari towers and one True Sansha for 90 days with one freighter worth of fuel. As for the the PG CPU usage last time i checked they were at almost full power usage and around half cpu.

Just haul the raw materials and make the fuel blocks yourself. with a ammo array. There size issue solved

Creater of the EVE animated influence map http://www.youtube.com/user/DustMityEVE

Garasu nosekai
Creodron.com
#13 - 2011-12-01 21:48:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Garasu nosekai
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Ok, ill have to find those to see, its not 'My" its the math of the guy who does our fuel. If that is all true then even if they are the SAME price its still a pain in the ass to haul compared to before. This i know for a fact. We could fuel our 3 large towers with one trip bringing less then 960km3 now that will not be possible as it will take around 1296000 m3 to fuel our towers with these.

Fuel bays were made larger, so they hold a bit more fuel than before.

* Fuel bays are now 140k / 70k / 35k (was 110k / 55k / 27.5k)

For three large towers:

3 * 140,000 m3 = 420,000 m3 which easily fits in any freighter (was 330,000 m3 which fits in some JF)

That's an increase of only 90,000 m3. Lasts me about 6 days longer than before.



... that is to fill the towers not to fuel them for the same period of time we have been in the past. like i said around 40% more space needed to move them.

Quote:
Just haul the raw materials and make the fuel blocks yourself. with a ammo array. There size issue solved


This would work if it didn't require way way way more m3 of space to move the amount of the old fuel mats it takes to make the new fuel blocks. The 1 robotics part it takes is already bigger then the whole fuel block.
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#14 - 2011-12-01 21:58:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Garasu nosekai wrote:
We could fuel our 3 large towers with one trip bringing less then 960km3 now that will not be possible as it will take around 1296000 m3 to fuel our towers with these.

The fuel bay of a large tower is only 140k m^3, so three of them only take in 420k m^3 total max.

A large tower eats a maximum of 40 blocks of 5 m^3 per hour, that's 200 m^3 of fuel blocks max used up per hour.
A 140k m^3 full load should last for at least 700 hours, or 29 days and 4 hours minimum.

BEFORE THE PATCH, A BIG TOWER USED TO EAT UP TO 228.5 m^3 OF FUEL PER HOUR AT FULL GRID/CPU LOAD.
That's a nearly 10% reduction in volume of fuel used per hour compared to a maxed-out tower !

60 m^3 was fuel for the grid, 60 m^3 was fuel for the CPU, 108.5 m^3 was "always needed" fuel.
Hundo Kay
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#15 - 2011-12-01 21:59:23 UTC
Dusty Meg wrote:
Garasu nosekai wrote:
mnybag1 wrote:
The only way that is at all possible is if you were only using 50% of both PG and CPU, in which case, the increase is more a cause of them switching how that works than the fuel blocks. They would have done that anyway (from what i have read), the fuel block thing was just an extra pirk. If however you were using anywhere above 50% cpu and power, then you have a math error and should try again.



I have been in this corp for almost a year... we always haul in the same amount of fuel for the same amount of towers. We could fuel 2 large Caldari towers and one True Sansha for 90 days with one freighter worth of fuel. As for the the PG CPU usage last time i checked they were at almost full power usage and around half cpu.


Just haul the raw materials and make the fuel blocks yourself. with a ammo array. There size issue solved


Just makes the probelm worse since now you are hauling 225m3 for every 200m3 of finished product.

The cost issue and the size issue are only a factor if you are significantly below 100% for CPU and Power.

I prefer the new system. Sure its an extra step to make the blocks, but it is a heck of a lot easier to load and run the tower, and see my fuel reserve when all I have to do is divide on ething by 40, and not 8 things by different numbers.
Dusty Meg
Echelon Research
Goonswarm Federation
#16 - 2011-12-01 22:01:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Dusty Meg
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Tau Cabalander wrote:
Garasu nosekai wrote:
Ok, ill have to find those to see, its not 'My" its the math of the guy who does our fuel. If that is all true then even if they are the SAME price its still a pain in the ass to haul compared to before. This i know for a fact. We could fuel our 3 large towers with one trip bringing less then 960km3 now that will not be possible as it will take around 1296000 m3 to fuel our towers with these.

Fuel bays were made larger, so they hold a bit more fuel than before.

* Fuel bays are now 140k / 70k / 35k (was 110k / 55k / 27.5k)

For three large towers:

3 * 140,000 m3 = 420,000 m3 which easily fits in any freighter (was 330,000 m3 which fits in some JF)

That's an increase of only 90,000 m3. Lasts me about 6 days longer than before.



... that is to fill the towers not to fuel them for the same period of time we have been in the past. like i said around 40% more space needed to move them.

Quote:
Just haul the raw materials and make the fuel blocks yourself. with a ammo array. There size issue solved


This would work if it didn't require way way way more m3 of space to move the amount of the old fuel mats it takes to make the new fuel blocks. The 1 robotics part it takes is already bigger then the whole fuel block.


You do know that that one robotic makes 40 blocks which is what a large pos requires for a hour? So one hour of pos fuel for a large pos is 200m3
So if i ran the numbers on my current pos its an increase of 35 m3 every hour if I hauled the blocks compared to the raw materials. But im not running my pos at max, but am growing.

Creater of the EVE animated influence map http://www.youtube.com/user/DustMityEVE

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#17 - 2011-12-01 22:15:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Let me repeat that : numbers for a LARGE regular tower with no fuel consumption bonuses...

BEFORE fuel blocks:
108.5 m^3/hour for mandatory fuel
UP TO 60 m^3/hour for powergrid
UP TO 60 m^3/hour for CPU
= total of UP TO a maximum of 228.5 m^3/hour at full MW/tf load
Assuming 90% CPU load and 65% grid load, that's (108.5+54+39)m^3/hour = 201.5 m^3/hour

AFTER fuel blocks - always 200 m^3/hour, regardless of CPU/grid load.

P.S. Before the patch, assuming a 50% load on both CPU and grid (at which time you could have just as well just bloody switched to a medium tower) that's a 168.5 m^3/hour use, vs 200 m^3/hour use, or only 31.5 m^3/hour difference (+18.7% total fuel volume).

P.P.S. Assuming the absolute worst case scenario which is highly unlikely to EVER happen in reality, that of 51% to either CPU or grid usage and negligible (let's say 4%) use in the other, that's still 141.5 m^3/hour of fuel used in the old system, with a WORST CASE SCENARIO difference of 58.5 m^3/hour, or +41.3% fuel volume use. In a situation so unbelievable it almost only happens on paper.
Dusty Meg
Echelon Research
Goonswarm Federation
#18 - 2011-12-01 22:21:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Dusty Meg
Akita T wrote:
Let me repeat that : numbers for a LARGE regular tower with no fuel consumption bonuses...

BEFORE fuel blocks:
108.5 m^3/hour for mandatory fuel
UP TO 60 m^3/hour for powergrid
UP TO 60 m^3/hour for CPU
= total of UP TO a maximum of 228.5 m^3/hour at full MW/tf load
Assuming 90% CPU load and 65% grid load, that's (108.5+54+39)m^3/hour = 201.5 m^3/hour

AFTER fuel blocks - always 200 m^3/hour, regardless of CPU/grid load.

P.S. Before the patch, assuming a 50% load on both CPU and grid (at which time you could have just as well just bloody switched to a medium tower) that's a 168.5 m^3/hour use, vs 200 m^3/hour use, or only 31.5 m^3/hour difference (+18.7% total fuel volume).

Forum eat my post.
That clears that up and nullifies your argument of them being 44% more volume. Just put some more modules on the pos and it justifies it. And the prices is A due to the PI price increases and B due to the fact that all the blocks currently on the market are wasting fuel. As soon as the server was back up I was on my way to my local Thukker Mix station to pick up the BPO's. Then got them straight in a pos to ME them to perfect (40), these dont come out for another 2 days, which means the prices will drop

Creater of the EVE animated influence map http://www.youtube.com/user/DustMityEVE

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#19 - 2011-12-01 22:31:28 UTC
Garasu nosekai wrote:
... that is to fill the towers not to fuel them for the same period of time we have been in the past. like i said around 40% more space needed to move them.

If you mean you have to haul more PI stuff to make blocks, then yes that may be true depending on your old-style consumption.

Of course you don't have to haul the PI stuff to a POS to make blocks. You can make blocks at any station, then haul the blocks.

Even hauling PI to one POS to make blocks for all other POSes is possible, and more convenient and efficient than manufacturing blocks at every POS.

I bought 5 BPO so I could make a lot of fuel blocks very quickly, so I didn't have to spend much time doing that. Otherwise it takes 1 day to manufacture 12 days of fuel (less when manufacturing time reduction bonuses are applied). So I can make 2 months worth in less than a single day.
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
#20 - 2011-12-01 22:31:42 UTC
I might point out that they decided not to increase POS fuel bay sizes. They're the same size as they were before.


POS fuel has increased in price by approx 10 million isk if you make the POS fuel yourself, on a small tower, due to the changes in PI. Previously it was in the 30-40m range, now it ranges into the 50-60m range per month.
123Next page