These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Project Reassembly from Eve University
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Wroxton Vee
EVE University
Ivy League
#1 - 2015-02-08 14:23:27 UTC
On 2014.12.10, Eve University announced Project Resassembly to record the statics of the new wormhole systems.

We've made great strides; but there are still some wormholes for which we do not have complete information. I'd like to repost Titus Tallang, Teaching Director at Eve University's opening post here:

Quote:

After the release of the recent Rhea content update and the opening of the mysterious Thera system to capsuleers, explorers all over New Eden have suddenly reported mysterious locations being accessible through seemingly-usual wormhole focii.
These solar systems, quickly termed "shattered wormholes", are quite unusual in appearance, as all their planets do not appear to have any moons - or, at the least, no moons that would be detectable by conventional scanner systems. Also reported in these systems are immensely valuable ice clusters, something formerly unheard of in Anoikis space.

Thus, in an effort to further communication and sharing of information between the brave souls venturing into these uncharted systems, EVE University - acting as a reputable, neutral entity with a history of supporting public exchange of information - would like to announce:

Project: Reassembly

What is the aim of Project: Reassembly?
To publicly catalogue all 100 shattered wormhole systems with their J-signature, system effect, class and static connections.

How do I access already-compiled data?
All currently-compiled data can be found on this wiki page

I've encountered a shattered wormhole! How do I contribute?
Please fill out this form with information about the system. If possible, include proof (screenshots) of your claims. You can blur out any sensitive data where necessary.

I'm in this system, and the information you have is incorrect! What do I do?
Let us know! Fill out the form linked above and we'll look into it!



Project Reassembly Wormhole Reporting Form: http://goo.gl/forms/RYplbEk0iY

Project Reassembly current information web page: http://eveuni.org/reassembly

Senior Personnel Officer, WHC SRP Officer, Mentor - EVE UNIVERSITY
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2 - 2015-02-08 20:36:57 UTC
Werent these all posted like, a week after the new holes came out?
Pretty sure they were...

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Wroxton Vee
EVE University
Ivy League
#3 - 2015-02-08 21:21:02 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
Werent these all posted like, a week after the new holes came out?
Pretty sure they were...


Just the system names and types. The statics weren't.

Senior Personnel Officer, WHC SRP Officer, Mentor - EVE UNIVERSITY
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2015-02-08 22:09:36 UTC
Fair enough *shrug*.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Astinga
Fishbone Industries
#5 - 2015-02-08 22:46:02 UTC
Wroxton Vee
EVE University
Ivy League
#6 - 2015-02-08 23:26:19 UTC
Astinga wrote:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=389942&find=unread


Yea, not compiling systems - mostly what's in the systems (statics, mainly)

Senior Personnel Officer, WHC SRP Officer, Mentor - EVE UNIVERSITY
Jack Hayson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2015-02-09 00:25:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Hayson
Wroxton Vee wrote:
Yea, not compiling systems - mostly what's in the systems (statics, mainly)

Uhm... no offence dude, but did you even look at the google doc? Roll


For most systems you can already tell from the "reported wormholes" column which of the holes are the statics*, however I'm waiting for a second report of a system before I write them into the "statics" column.
*Every "normal" shattered class got an additional k-space static (->e.g shattered C4 has 2 w-space, 1 k-space static)
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#8 - 2015-02-09 01:55:15 UTC
Wroxton Vee wrote:
Astinga wrote:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=389942&find=unread

Yea, not compiling systems - mostly what's in the systems (statics, mainly)

Statics are constellation based, you should be able to deduce them from that sheet pretty easily (even though the wh data there IS a horrible mess).

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Jack Hayson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2015-02-09 09:25:32 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
Statics are constellation based,

That's not true for the shattered systems. Every shattered class has only one constellation, but the systems seem to have different statics.
Well, except for class 13 (the frig systems) which has 3 constellations.
Jayze Severasse
Divided by Zer0
#10 - 2015-02-09 10:18:37 UTC
Jack Hayson wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:
Statics are constellation based,

That's not true for the shattered systems. Every shattered class has only one constellation, but the systems seem to have different statics.
Well, except for class 13 (the frig systems) which has 3 constellations.


I saw something similar, constant lowsec static U210 and a changing nullsec static hole code K346 and was different the first day, alas I didn't write it down.

I got a large hisec k162 punch in, a frequent Q003 micro to null. A M001 micro to c4/5 (dangerous unknown) and a C008 to another c4/5, and a N968 to c3. I had frequent c3 access.

This was a C3 no effect large hole shattered.
Wroxton Vee
EVE University
Ivy League
#11 - 2015-02-09 16:46:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Wroxton Vee
Jack Hayson wrote:

Uhm... no offence dude, but did you even look at the google doc? Roll


For most systems you can already tell from the "reported wormholes" column which of the holes are the statics*, however I'm waiting for a second report of a system before I write them into the "statics" column.
*Every "normal" shattered class got an additional k-space static (->e.g shattered C4 has 2 w-space, 1 k-space static)


I did. We will compare that data with the data already collected, and confirm the statics. Thanks!

Some additional information we are collecting is the occupancy of the system - some of them seem to be occupied by Sansha - at least one that I have come across personally. The hole had no sleeper sites, but a bunch of null sansha sites (http://i.imgur.com/C0dANw0.png).

Maybe we can pool our information together?

Jack Milton wrote:
Statics are constellation based, you should be able to deduce them from that sheet pretty easily (even though the wh data there IS a horrible mess).


What Jack Hayson and Jayze Severasse said. The statics are quite non-standard and constellation independent, as far as I have seen.

Senior Personnel Officer, WHC SRP Officer, Mentor - EVE UNIVERSITY
Jack Hayson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2015-02-09 17:32:47 UTC
Wroxton Vee wrote:
Maybe we can pool our information together?

Sure.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#13 - 2015-02-09 22:29:31 UTC
Out of random interest, why do you care?
Just scan the system and you'll find out what connections it has, it's not like scanning takes long.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Jack Hayson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2015-02-09 23:06:43 UTC
Efficiency.
Depending on what you are looking for you don't need to scan down the entire system when you know what class the static is.
E.g. when we have a full rolling fleet going and are looking for cap kills we won't bother scanning down that C5->C3 static and just roll the connection.
Also in certain systems you can already ignore several signatures based on their sig size, when you know which sig size the statics have.
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#15 - 2015-02-09 23:41:00 UTC
This is EVE uni. Nothing they do is ever good, sensible or manly. I had three T3's of theirs run away from my Nereus. Literally warped off grid on me.

~~ Localectomy Blog ~~
Alundil
Rolled Out
#16 - 2015-02-10 20:40:44 UTC
Trinkets friend wrote:
This is EVE uni. Nothing they do is ever good, sensible or manly. I had three T3's of theirs run away from my Nereus. Literally warped off grid on me.

That's because you have shifty eyes.

I'm right behind you
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#17 - 2015-02-11 02:56:39 UTC
Granted, the Planet Dollaz (model I through, oh, 20) has been impliacated in the death of some ships at various stages. But still.

*_*

~~ Localectomy Blog ~~
Wroxton Vee
EVE University
Ivy League
#18 - 2015-02-11 15:46:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Wroxton Vee
Jack Hayson, I'll use your information in our wiki as well. Thanks.

Senior Personnel Officer, WHC SRP Officer, Mentor - EVE UNIVERSITY