These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Is CSM information abused by the big blocks

First post First post
Author
Snagletooth Johnson
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2015-02-04 09:53:05 UTC
CSM is the Illuminate!



Thebriwan
LUX Uls Xystus
#22 - 2015-02-04 09:53:43 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Can we just wait for some CCP employee to respond.
Because almost every one here is posting that CSM election is only to get informations first and use it in their own benefit.


THAT I can not left standing.
I did not write anything like that.

It is in the nature of the thing that the members of the CSM know things that other players did not know.
But it is a very important line between knowing something and acting on it!

That out of the way:

The will be a dev blog when the time is right.
I get the impression that there are plans and ideas how to change sov, but there is actually nothing decided, implemented, or tested.
Nevase Prometeus
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2015-02-04 10:43:10 UTC
I think this kind of situation should be monitor closely by CCP. If EVE policy is base on everyplayers is equal. When some players got important informations before another players it gave them more advantage . question is

- How do we know that players who got this information don't use this information to make them more advantage ?

- what is the protocal that should prevents this situations to happens ?

- When this situation happens , when another players or corps had got effect from this. What actions that CCP would do to make justice for everyplayers.

As a real life this situaton is look like "insiders trades" in stock market .When high rank peoples got important information before ordinary stock holders . They know what will happens in the next weeks or tomorrow so they took actions before another people. It is very hard to find evedence for take actions or punish anyone whi violate the rules.

But finally as a real life too. Nothing will happen people who got advantage still exists nothing gonna change. CCP will do nothing and this topic will be lock.

"truth is never die but people who said that could die" Sad but true.
Jegrey Dozer
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2015-02-04 11:06:21 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
What i want for all eve players is equal chance.
CCP all players deserve this equal chance.


The CSM are elected by a Democratic process. It does not get any more equal than that.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#25 - 2015-02-04 11:08:09 UTC
Nevase Prometeus wrote:
- wow do we know that players who got this information don't use this information to make them more advantage ?

I think it's sad that this would be the position and we don't give people credit for being adults and respect that they all do the right thing by default.

Unless clear evidence is put forward showing some abuse, then good luck to the CSM members.

If you are so concerned about the integrity of the members, what did you do during their candidacy to be sure that you would be happy with them as CSM members if elected?

Just another case of not doing anything yourself to know who you might be voting for and then questioning the system after the event.

Take some responsibility for your own inaction if you want to go slinging mud.
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#26 - 2015-02-04 11:09:16 UTC
If you have clear evidence of a NDA violation, contact CCP Internal Affairs with the details.
Anthar Thebess
#27 - 2015-02-04 11:16:27 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
If you have clear evidence of a NDA violation, contact CCP Internal Affairs with the details.

If you think that this is violation, then do it yourself.
Like stated before , this is not about CSM, but about making a DEV blog about incoming SOV and Nullsec changes so every player could prepare to it , in the same way like groups having CSM representatives do.
Dave Stark
#28 - 2015-02-04 11:55:45 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
If you have clear evidence of a NDA violation, contact CCP Internal Affairs with the details.

If you think that this is violation, then do it yourself.
Like stated before , this is not about CSM, but about making a DEV blog about incoming SOV and Nullsec changes so every player could prepare to it , in the same way like groups having CSM representatives do.


either report the violation of the NDA, or stop whining.
Anthar Thebess
#29 - 2015-02-04 12:00:29 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:

either report the violation of the NDA, or stop whining.

Roll
Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#30 - 2015-02-04 12:20:39 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Abrazzar wrote:
If you have clear evidence of a NDA violation, contact CCP Internal Affairs with the details.

If you think that this is violation, then do it yourself.

You're the one who thinks that it is, so you do it.
Breaking an NDA is a serious ethical and contractual violation. It will go on your public record and future employers will see it as an indication that you are untrustworthy. I don't think people are generally willing to take that risk just to help out their internet spaceship alliance.
Serene Repose
#31 - 2015-02-04 13:08:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Serene Repose
CSM wasn't created to give the playerbase input. It was created to back the playerbase down. CSM is a crumb tossed to us to bail the powers that be out of WiSgate, and at this point I think we fell for it, too. (Sorry to say.) No corporation is going to give the unwashed minions the keys to the kingdom. At this day and age does that really have to be said? Apparently, yes.

It's a requirement to be able to make a trip to Iceland to be CSM, no? Once in Iceland, they are "wined and dined" so to speak. They're given the VIP treatment. They get to sit down with the bigshots and "tell them what's what." You can't believe anything pertinent to you is being discussed. Or, can you?

The anonymous nature of a "place" as huge as New Eden (we like to say) makes it possible for a handful of people from the largest organizations to pretty much place themselves on the CSM with no opposition. They represent their organization, not you. They even say so. "If we are good enough to get elected, and you aren't, why should we represent you?" This is just window dressing to keep up a pretense that "we" are being represented - that the mighty corporation (CCP) still listens to the little guy.

I have continually SCREAMED, "Don't fall for it." I've continually said, "Disband the CSM." I know they're not going to do that. I know the "big organizations", like the kitten wears the mittens, will always send someone up there, so if they just get ONE vote, but we boycott the vote, they'll get in anyway, and CCP will continue to say in its media, "Look! You're represented!"

As long as WE take them seriously, and act like they mean something, they get their press - their little public affairs act works. If WE (the playerbase) IGNORE them and stop giving them the bandwidth, they may exist, but they take the form of an elaborate ad, which is what they amount to, and just another public relations expense for CCP (which, by the way, may even be tax deductable.)

Bottom line? CSM works for CCP, not us. Don't expect anything from them and you won't be disappointed by them.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Dradis Aulmais
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2015-02-04 13:11:25 UTC
Another CCP better answer me thread

Tuff *******

Dradis Aulmais, Federal Attorney Number 54896

Free The Scope Three

Anthar Thebess
#33 - 2015-02-04 13:16:47 UTC
This thread is going in the wrong direction.
Make a topic why CSM is bad.
Here is only to point to CCP, that information about incoming sov changes is already used to make preparations.

Unless CCP think otherwise , all players deserve the same start in the new eve world - without it, they will be even more behind big players.

Based on recent big blocks moves i think lower tier moon minerals or PI will have more use, or they will be harder to obtain, but this might be only coincidence.

Vyl Vit
#34 - 2015-02-04 13:19:38 UTC
Dradis Aulmais wrote:
What planet are you from? The way you get a corporation to cooperate is to shop somewhere else.

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.

Hicksimus
Torgue
#35 - 2015-02-04 13:22:37 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:

Unless CCP think otherwise , all players deserve the same start in the new eve world - without it, they will be even more behind big players.


You mean like that time they got caught in bed with their null friends and decided to move from blatantly cheating to cheating via the CSM under the flag of democracy? Because that actually happened so we know CCP thinks otherwise. This is EvE though, CCP have been pretty big dicks to the community since 2003 and it's not going to stop now. Let them give null the advantage.....after all, that's where their income IRL is coming from.

Recruitment Officer: What type of a pilot are you? Me: I've been described as a Ray Charles with Parkinsons and a drinking problem.

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#36 - 2015-02-04 13:30:09 UTC
tl;dr so far:

-Nulli leader tells line members "change is coming, haha i can't tell you what they are"

-OP tinfoils this into massive unfair preparation by nullsec powerblocks, wants to parlay this into free knowledge for all.

-OP pretends he is not trying to cause a shitstorm.

-Shitstorm brews anyway....


Pass the popcorn UAE!

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#37 - 2015-02-04 13:31:36 UTC
Yes, that is possible.

Like they will tell us even if true. Roll

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#38 - 2015-02-04 13:38:32 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
If you have clear evidence of a NDA violation, contact CCP Internal Affairs with the details.

^^This

CSM members sign an NDA for a reason, and is also why 99% of them WILL NOT risk acting on insider info

acting on the info (even if not means they KNOW theyll be screwed aswell as their alliance when the change DOES come) has REAL LIFE consequences

try getting a job at any respectable company when you have a compnay taking legal action against you for NDA breach on your record

(wow, i was sitting here on this post for like 5 minutes trying to end it, only to be unable to remember the word "record")
Anthar Thebess
#39 - 2015-02-04 13:40:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Anthar Thebess
War Kitten wrote:
tl;dr so far:

-Nulli leader tells line members "change is coming, haha i can't tell you what they are"

-OP tinfoils this into massive unfair preparation by nullsec powerblocks, wants to parlay this into free knowledge for all.

-OP pretends he is not trying to cause a shitstorm.

-Shitstorm brews anyway....


Pass the popcorn UAE!


Nulli CSM member states that :
"i know changes , i cannot tell you , we have to continue adjusting and continue changing i think we can do it , i think we laid good ground work , i have good idea what do we need to become and i think we are in good position to do so "

Sorry but this sentence simply points that work in the direction of upcoming changes has already started without telling every one what those changes will be.

If i would know that in next month , people will have ability to make cheap fuel from garbage, i would buy all landfills that i can afford , without telling any one.

Nariya Kentaya wrote:

Did you cared to listen this recording from around 3:24s ?
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#40 - 2015-02-04 13:50:58 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:

Nulli CSM member states that :
"i know changes , i cannot tell you , we have to continue adjusting and continue changing i think we can do it , i think we laid good ground work , i have good idea what do we need to become and i think we are in good position to do so "

Sorry but this sentence simply points that work in the direction of upcoming changes has already started without telling every one what those changes will be.



"We've laid good groundwork... I have good idea of what we would need to become...We are in a good position to do so...I'm optimistic about the future...I'm happy with where we are now..."

I hate to tell you, but this is leader-speak meant to pump up the rabble and build confidence in leadership without saying anything. It sounds good, but it means and proves nothing.

It does, however, make you a great candidate for pleb school, and an ideal line member if you're willing to believe everything your leader says as gospel.

Go Team!

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Previous page123Next page