These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Message Regarding "Hyperdunking"

First post First post First post
Author
Anthar Thebess
#1641 - 2015-07-17 09:16:59 UTC
Have you ever considered that the problem is also in freighters?
They big , slow, haul much.
Maybe eve should shift to DST based transport and not to a freighter based.
Tanked, fast , cloaky and have 60k dedicated cargo hold.
Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1642 - 2015-07-17 12:07:46 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Dark Reignz wrote:
Lol I must have been gone a long time if 1trillion a month losses is considered "no major cost" to an alliance/corp.
Eve is a game all about losses. Ships are suppose to explode: it fuels the war economy this game is based on. Yes, that includes in highsec, and yes that includes ships that "can't shoot back". That is how the game has been designed. A trillion is just a fraction of the losses in the overall Eve economy each month.

And besides, no corp lost 1 T ISK in a month. Red Frog "failed" only 245 contracts (of ~248,000) in all of 2014, and they don't even say how many of those failures were due to ganks. But even 20 a month is nowhere near 1T ISK.


Dark Reignz wrote:
Anyways either CCP need fix this loophole or more high sec cool-bro's need to join Rajhid and his band of anti gankers. Their video's show how easy 1 or 2 people can spoil that ganking ****.
More the second. There is no loophole - criminals are suppose to operate in highsec for exactly your second option, that is to drive conflict and make content in this game. Fight back against those dirty gankers, you really can make a difference and make highsec a more interesting place.

Dark Reignz wrote:
On the other hand... billions and trillions isk worth of ganks is just too profitable for high sec shananigans and needs a massive nerf to be fair.
I agree. Highsec income should be nerfed into the ground so that there are not billions of ISK being generated and transported around there in near perfect safety. A massive nerf there would make things more fair and help push people into more content-producing space.

At some point this game attracted bottom-feeders who live from boosting their egos. Making it work to achieve anything would bring back the former glory of the past, compared to all the idiots we have now who only care about themselves.

We need less sheep and more creative, actually thinking people. Nerfing the easymode gameplay will lower subs, but increase quality again.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1643 - 2015-07-17 12:12:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
We need less sheep and more creative, actually thinking people. Nerfing the easymode gameplay will lower subs, but increase quality again.
Good luck selling "lower subs" to stakeholders. You understand that CCP is a business right?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1644 - 2015-07-17 12:20:18 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
We need less sheep and more creative, actually thinking people. Nerfing the easymode gameplay will lower subs, but increase quality again.
Good luck selling "lower subs" to stakeholders. You understand that CCP is a business right?

Like MCT?
Removal of bots?
Nerfing caps, leading to unsubbed accounts?

All things they knew would lower subcount, which they also know isn't the center of the universe.


Your superficial, self centered way of thinking is nothing anyone shouldpay attention to. Your posting history exposes you as liar, hypocrite and borderline psychopath. I will not dignify any of your future posts with responses.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1645 - 2015-07-17 12:27:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:
We need less sheep and more creative, actually thinking people. Nerfing the easymode gameplay will lower subs, but increase quality again.
Good luck selling "lower subs" to stakeholders. You understand that CCP is a business right?

Like MCT?
Removal of bots?
Nerfing caps, leading to unsubbed accounts?

All things they knew would lower subcount, which they also know isn't the center of the universe.
- MCT was not a removal it's was a conversion of subs from separate accounts to a single account
- Removing bots prevents economic collapse which would lead to a sub exodus
- Nerfing caps is part of a bigger plan and removes a very small number of subs temporarily (most of us have our capital pilots either as mains or on the same accounts).

CCP are unlikely to take steps to make their game less appealing and purposely lose customers. If anything they are likely to do the exact opposite since they've already had to make several cuts and add more revenue sources like skins as their existing playerbase isn't bringing in enough cash. What your post originally boiled down to is that you don't like that people aren't playing the way you want to play and think they should be forced to or kicked out. Well tough, people will play how they want.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#1646 - 2015-07-17 13:20:54 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Have you ever considered that the problem is also in freighters?
They big , slow, haul much.
Maybe eve should shift to DST based transport and not to a freighter based.
Tanked, fast , cloaky and have 60k dedicated cargo hold.


DSTs are neither cloaky nor particularly fast and have a cargohold of 5k.
They do however have built-in warp stabs and a 50k fleet hanger (+5%/level)

They are not going to replace freighters cuz you just can't carry enough bulk.
But damn gotta love that tankCool
Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#1647 - 2015-07-17 14:16:00 UTC
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#1648 - 2015-07-17 14:24:54 UTC
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Have you ever considered that the problem is also in freighters?
They big , slow, haul much.
Maybe eve should shift to DST based transport and not to a freighter based.
Tanked, fast , cloaky and have 60k dedicated cargo hold.


DSTs are neither cloaky nor particularly fast and have a cargohold of 5k.
They do however have built-in warp stabs and a 50k fleet hanger (+5%/level)

They are not going to replace freighters cuz you just can't carry enough bulk.
But damn gotta love that tankCool


DSTs can consistently pull of the cloak MWD trick which makes them effectively cloaky. They can also fit MJDs and have 80k EHP tanks. A nearly total 70,000 m3 cargo hold at max level is substantial for quite honestly an un-gankable ship.

People are either lazy or oblivious to do what they can do to avoid ganks, such as not putting 10 billion in loot into a fully anti-tanked freighter, and then proceeding to afk in the most populated system in the game.
Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#1649 - 2015-07-17 15:29:43 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Well tough, people will play how they want.

Agreed.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1650 - 2015-07-17 15:42:33 UTC
Globby wrote:
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
How can people be that dumb and still breathing?

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#1651 - 2015-07-17 15:44:07 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Globby wrote:
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
How can people be that dumb and still breathing?

Entitlement and laziness, I think.
Anthar Thebess
#1652 - 2015-07-17 15:48:24 UTC
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Have you ever considered that the problem is also in freighters?
They big , slow, haul much.
Maybe eve should shift to DST based transport and not to a freighter based.
Tanked, fast , cloaky and have 60k dedicated cargo hold.


DSTs are neither cloaky nor particularly fast and have a cargohold of 5k.
They do however have built-in warp stabs and a 50k fleet hanger (+5%/level)

They are not going to replace freighters cuz you just can't carry enough bulk.
But damn gotta love that tankCool


You can fit a cloak on DST , you can use DST, stabs .
Shield DST can have full tank, full set od stabs and use MJD - it warps fast enough for a potential tacklers to have big issue.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#1653 - 2015-07-17 15:49:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Globby wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Globby wrote:
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
How can people be that dumb and still breathing?

Entitlement and laziness, I think.


Pressure, fear, inexperience and panic, plus the meta gaming of said person who is bombarding them with ransom demands, and on another toon offers to help with webbing and reps. I have spoken to a few people who fell for this even after I had warned them about the tactic and they all admitted that they were panicking too much to think clearly, they could not even think to check the duelists killboard.

Your comment smacks of entitlement and laziness...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#1654 - 2015-07-17 15:54:35 UTC
Well, it's a good lesson to learn, especially early on and not when they're carrying 8 billion.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#1655 - 2015-07-17 15:56:30 UTC
Globby wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Globby wrote:
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
How can people be that dumb and still breathing?

Entitlement and laziness, I think.

Some perhaps. But to be fair CCP's direction to bubble-wrap highsec over the last few years has produced a huge cohort of players that have never been forced to have any interactions with other players, let alone ones that may lie to them or otherwise wish them harm. They play Eve as a single player game and thus are completely out of their element when the get a convo from a "good Samaritan" offering to help warp their freighter to safety.

Highsec is so safe, that even after many years of playing too many of them don't even realize you can be attacked in highsec, like our friend Tase:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=434974&find=unread
http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/06/dont-tase-me-bro.html
https://soundcloud.com/loyalanon/tase-loses-a-providence

Players need to experience loss, or at least learn about experiencing loss early on in their Eve careers or they will just end up another amusing statistic on the killboards a year or two in. They need to understand that this is a competitive game and some other players are actually out to take their stuff, even in highsec. Insulating new players from losses, and thus what Eve is about, is doing no one a favour.




Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1656 - 2015-07-17 16:00:51 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Globby wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Globby wrote:
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
How can people be that dumb and still breathing?

Entitlement and laziness, I think.

Some perhaps. But to be fair CCP's direction to bubble-wrap highsec over the last few years has produced a huge cohort of players that have never been forced to have any interactions with other players, let alone ones that may lie to them or otherwise wish them harm. They play Eve as a single player game and thus are completely out of their element when the get a convo from a "good Samaritan" offering to help warp their freighter to safety.

Highsec is so safe, that even after many years of playing too many of them don't even realize you can be attacked in highsec, like our friend Tase:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=434974&find=unread
http://www.minerbumping.com/2015/06/dont-tase-me-bro.html
https://soundcloud.com/loyalanon/tase-loses-a-providence

Players need to experience loss, or at least learn about experiencing loss early on in their Eve careers or they will just end up another amusing statistic on the killboards a year or two in. They need to understand that this is a competitive game and some other players are actually out to take their stuff, even in highsec. Insulating new players from losses, and thus what Eve is about, is doing no one a favour.





I'd phrase that differently. Overly protective environments breed people who need protection, because they never learned to protect themselves. They never had to. What we see lately is an influx of new players who could never protect themselves and want easy fun. It's getting worse, really.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#1657 - 2015-07-17 16:01:13 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Globby wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Globby wrote:
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
How can people be that dumb and still breathing?

Entitlement and laziness, I think.


Pressure, fear, inexperience and panic, plus the meta gaming of said person who is bombarding them with ransom demands, and on another toon offers to help with webbing and reps. I have spoken to a few people who fell for this even after I had warned them about the tactic and they all admitted that they were panicking too much to think clearly, they could not even think to check the duelists killboard.

Your comment smacks of entitlement and laziness...
Speaking of laziness, if a freighter pilot is too damn lazy to enable the auto-reject duel function that's their problem. It's not like the setting is hard to access (1 keypress and 2 mouse-clicks)

Hit the 'ESC' key
Select 'Audio & Chat' tab
Check the box in the bottom right 'Dueling' section for 'Auto Reject Invitations'

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#1658 - 2015-07-17 16:15:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Globby wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Globby wrote:
Lol, more people accepted duel requests from alts than died from hyperdunking yesterday, numerically and in ISK value.

On the eve of Burn Amarr, my friend SIEGFRIED COHENBERG dueled THREE freighters, and killed them all.
How can people be that dumb and still breathing?

Entitlement and laziness, I think.


Pressure, fear, inexperience and panic, plus the meta gaming of said person who is bombarding them with ransom demands, and on another toon offers to help with webbing and reps. I have spoken to a few people who fell for this even after I had warned them about the tactic and they all admitted that they were panicking too much to think clearly, they could not even think to check the duelists killboard.

Your comment smacks of entitlement and laziness...
Speaking of laziness, if a freighter pilot is too damn lazy to enable the auto-reject duel function that's their problem. It's not like the setting is hard to access (1 keypress and 2 mouse-clicks)

Hit the 'ESC' key
Select 'Audio & Chat' tab
Check the box in the bottom right 'Dueling' section for 'Auto Reject Invitations'


You are just being silly, again..., the duel is also a way that the anti-gankers have helped people get away, by webbing them, which has been used very well by certain gankers. It is rather more of an issue in not verifying the person that is offering to help, which is panic related.

In reply to Black Pedro:

Flying a freighter is a very boring thing to do as such, however now its a bit of a challenge in terms of whether they make it or not, doing web duty is actually fun and I am often surprised at the lack of people doing it. I do understand that they have a life and that AP'ing an empty freighter is not exactly stupid, but even those get ganked so yes it is in the current environment.

I keep hoping that people will get together and sort out how they do logistics and the laziness is in not working as a team to protect their logistics people and their ships. With the current success level of CODE I would think that they will learn the lesson, but its very slow in sinking in... I rather believe that people who actually do freighter stuff in the main are just too chilled out and passive...

EDIT: I should point out that I have seen freighters get bumped even when being webbed, I did some timing on the speed of certain bumpers and compared it to my own webbing with a twin faction web Loki and found it a bit tight, and that was getting in and getting close to the gate before the freighter jumped. In effect I have to be perfect when it matters.

EDIT 2: Another factor is that industry is done mainly by solo players who have been in the game a long time, they are often in one man corps which is to avoid war decs, so they cannot easily do webbing, that means they use duels which is sub-optimal in my opinion or tie up another toon in that corp and cost them production and make them more evident. In effect they just try to get through and hope they don't get culled.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#1659 - 2015-07-17 16:25:06 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Have you ever considered that the problem is also in freighters?
They big , slow, haul much.
Maybe eve should shift to DST based transport and not to a freighter based.
Tanked, fast , cloaky and have 60k dedicated cargo hold.


DST... fast...?

Erm.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Globby
Never Ignorant Gettin' Goals Accomplished
Gimme Da Loot
#1660 - 2015-07-17 16:41:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Globby
Freya Sertan wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Have you ever considered that the problem is also in freighters?
They big , slow, haul much.
Maybe eve should shift to DST based transport and not to a freighter based.
Tanked, fast , cloaky and have 60k dedicated cargo hold.


DST... fast...?

Erm.

Much faster than a freighter.

Dracvlad wrote:

EDIT: I should point out that I have seen freighters get bumped even when being webbed, I did some timing on the speed of certain bumpers and compared it to my own webbing with a twin faction web Loki and found it a bit tight, and that was getting in and getting close to the gate before the freighter jumped. In effect I have to be perfect when it matters.

I should also say that if you're getting webbed it should take three or four ticks for you to catch warp consistently. When I tested it, I could get 3 ticks 50% of the time and 4 ticks the other 50%. That's way too quick for any bumping mach to bump you unless it happens to guess your position and is <4km off of you when you decloak.

Dracvlad wrote:

EDIT 2: Another factor is that industry is done mainly by solo players who have been in the game a long time, they are often in one man corps which is to avoid war decs, so they cannot easily do webbing, that means they use duels which is sub-optimal in my opinion or tie up another toon in that corp and cost them production and make them more evident. In effect they just try to get through and hope they don't get culled.

You know instead of plexing your account, you can get a buddy trial and then apply the plex to him, giving you a free 60 day alt and still plexing your account? It also only takes an hour to get an effective webbing alt.