These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Rokh

First post
Author
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#141 - 2015-01-31 20:32:27 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Gregor Parud wrote:
ergherhdfgh wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:
According to that logic a Drake is also fine and we should tell newbies to go use that.

before the tiericide I ran level 4s in a drake for a long long time before I could fly a BS. We had the learning skills back in those days so 6 months into this game I still could barely do anything but learn skills.

I think that you need to learn to quit while you're behind. You just keep digging yourself a deeper hole.


You would have been better off chaining lvl 3 than gnawing on lvl 4s in a Drake, also back then HML and the Drake itself were a lot better. So yeah, facts and all that.

I'm not "behind" at all, as if discussions are to be won, we simply disagree on reasons to fly or recommend stuff. If you haven't noticed it really is clown Rex who does the sperging, I just react to it.




Gregor, not everybody is a carebear as you.

I for once, give NO **** about if my income is maxed out.

Actually, I think those people min/max anything are forgetting that it's a freaking game.

Play as you have fun, some people though might unlike you have fun by doing stuff that isn't the most efficient.
You keep assuming that OP and everybody else in here is like you, a bear that wants to accumulate ISK for the sake of nothing, doing it as fast as possible.

I can tell you, it's way more fun for me to run a mission hard mode by "an insufficient" ship and succeed then being the high-sec lemming a lot of people are doing the same thing as his fellow lemming mission-bears.



And, yes, as you do the exact same thing as Tippia, keep saying "But my way is best, cuase it's way more efficient." you are AS bad.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#142 - 2015-01-31 20:40:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Solonius Rex
Gregor Parud wrote:
People were just as new and inexperienced as they are today and I'd say these days it's actually better due to better NPE, lots more guides, youtubes, wikis and whatnot.


And yet your tactic with your 100mn AB railgun battleship is something that new players will have a very hard time dealing with.
Quote:

MWD messes up fittings and cap like bastard even if you don't use it. On tight fits like most ships it generally doesn't make sense to use them because of that.


Like you said before, its easy to make a fit cap-stable.

Quote:

NPC behaviour has indeed changed but with a little bit of experience it's very easy to predict their aggression behaviour, it's also why you keep your lights at short range (they're for close range frigs and you don't want them to die when aggroed) with sentries as alternative when you don't have to move anymore; high dps, good ranges and instant reeling in in case of aggro.


Again, new players will have a hard time dealing with drone aggro, because new players have poor drone skills making their drones neither very durable nor very powerful. Even with my very good drone skills and keeping lights close to me, i still lose the odd drone or two because the frigs web and kill light drones, easily. With your tactic, you are almost completely relying on your light drones to kill enemy frigates, which means, by the time they get near and you release your light drones, there is going to be half a dozen frigates circling you, and half a dozen frigates concentrating on your light drones once theyre out.

That, plus the fact that drone controlling always occurs on a short delay, and that only sheilds get recharged, and at a very slow rate, so drawing drones in and then out only delays it slightly, your tactic a very very very quick way of losing your drones, even if you "predict" their behavior.

Quote:

It's also why counting drone dps on your MJD rokh isn't realistic, even if the targets finally get in drone control range the drones are still going to get in trouble when aggroed, due to them being so far from your ship.


Neither is counting on Warden DPS on your Hyperion, as youre going to have to use hobgoblins for a very long time trying to micromanage them to kill the frigates while you use your railguns to attack the battleship, and yet i still included them in the hyperion total DPS. But by saying that, you seem to be absolutely clueless as to how the tactics of a MJD rokh is supposed to work.

The whole point of MJD and targetting the frigs first is so that you dont have to deal with the trouble of drone aggro, because by the time they get close enough for you to use your drones, theres only gonna be 1-2 left, if any. And as we all know, Battleships dont aggro light drones, atleast in any meaningful sense, which means you are free to unleash your drones 30, 40km away at the battleships without worrying about any aggro on your drones because the frigates are already dead.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#143 - 2015-01-31 21:27:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
J'Poll wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:
ergherhdfgh wrote:
You'll not see anyone suggesting that the Rokh is better than a Marauder for running level 4's.

Oh and towards the end you'll see yourself linking a fit with a cap booster on it and claiming that it is cap stable.



Who said anything about how the Rokh should compete with a marauder. Who said anything on that fit being stable?

"(hence the CCC for instance, making it stable on everything but the repper/AB)."

"(p.s. it's not difficult to run non stable fits)"



*cough* YOU DID.


Question was: Can a rokh be used for missions.

People said yes, you said: But, it's **** compared to a Kronos.



So...stop making a fool of yourself.



p.s.

Cap booster fitted....cap stable.


hahaha


Well, in general cap stable.

Only bears care about that. You seriously suck at fitting if you must fit for stability. I have missions ships with cap lifes of 5 minute full running, if you fail to clear a mission that fast (or know how to work your cap)...you seriously need to learn how to fly.

Your capacitor should only last as long as you need it to.



You do a whole lot of mouth breathing, you do realise that?


Sow me where I state that it should be better than a Marauder. What I SAID was that as Caldari doesn't have a turret marauder there's no point in training up Caldari BS as it's a dead end, and but one might as well stick to Gallente BS in the form of a mega/hype.


I stated (and it's obvious from the fit, not difficult to notice for ppl who can read fits) that it's stable on the guns, resists and TC (not AB/MJD and armour rep) as to not make it too difficult for a newer player who's diving in to the whole non-stable thing. Remember the "we're aiming this at newbies" thing?


Also, calling me a carebear is quite hilarious. When did your balls drop, when you joined that new corp of yours?
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#144 - 2015-01-31 21:37:10 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Gregor Parud wrote:


You do a whole lot of mouth breathing, you do realise that?


Sow me where I state that it should be better than a Marauder. What I SAID was that as Caldari doesn't have a turret marauder there's no point in training up Caldari BS as it's a dead end, and but one might as well stick to Gallente BS in the form of a mega/hype.


I stated (and it's obvious from the fit, not difficult to notice for ppl who can read fits) that it's stable on the guns, resists and TC (not AB/MJD and armour rep) as to not make it too difficult for a newer player who's diving in to the whole non-stable thing. Remember the "we're aiming this at newbies" thing?


Also, calling me a carebear is quite hilarious. When did your balls drop, when you joined that new corp of yours?




Quote:
- there is no faction version to be used as a next step up and the Marauder is missile based, the Rokh is it. It's a dead end



Where did OP asked or said it there should be a progression after that?



Go do some English 101:


OP asked, is the Rokh viable to do missions?

Asnwer: Yes.


You are the ONLY person in the whole thread who lacks the ablity to read that and answer the question.



And, there you go, as with Rex: ad hominem replying....




Let me make it clear again:

From the actual OP wrote:
Now if you ignore that the Rokh is basically a deadend if you consider progression (from Hyperion I can upgrade to Kronos ultimately), is it really such a bad ship for PvE?



* OP already knows it's a dead end ship.
* OP asks if it can be used in PvE.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#145 - 2015-01-31 21:40:23 UTC
If you make sperg dumb remarks expect replies. So again, when did you start thinking you're suddenly amazing?
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#146 - 2015-01-31 21:42:06 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Gregor Parud wrote:
If you make sperg dumb remarks expect replies. So again, when did you start thinking you're suddenly amazing?


Well, at least I have basic reading capabilities of English.

And don't need to resort to ad hominem replies.




* Ad hominem replies - check
* Grant delusing only his opinion is right - check
* Keeps replying - check


Tippia alt confirmed.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#147 - 2015-01-31 21:42:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
Solonius Rex wrote:
The whole point of MJD and targetting the frigs first is so that you dont have to deal with the trouble of drone aggro, because by the time they get close enough for you to use your drones, theres only gonna be 1-2 left, if any. And as we all know, Battleships dont aggro light drones, atleast in any meaningful sense, which means you are free to unleash your drones 30, 40km away at the battleships without worrying about any aggro on your drones because the frigates are already dead.


So what you're meaning to say is that we shouldn't add your drone dps to the total, duly noted.

In case of the hype it'll use its drones vs frigates while the rails take care of the bigger targets, so IS added, and in cases when you don't have/want to move and there's long range targets you have the option of launching the wardens.


So, your Rokh fit is not what I would have done but we'll use yours for the comparison.

yours does 481 dps while not making use of drones most of the time, mine does 541 on turrets alone, which it will apply just fine due to two tracking comps. On top of that it WILL use its drones more often, but even without that the dps increase is about 12% (which is massive given how people will commit murder for 5% implants). Even more so because the lower your dps becomes the closer you get to a BS NPC's tank, making it take WAY longer. So 12% increase right away, and on top of that possibly WAY more due to lights/sentries. And that all assumes you're using antimatter the whole time, which you're not.

On top of that there's the possibly that you waste time due to MJD cycle or not being able to angle your MJDs to get to the next mission target. The Hype in this case can choose, he can AB to the gate if it's close enough (Hype will travel 25-60km in the time it takes MJD to cycle) OR it can use its own MJD if the situation favours it.

And when the mission favours it you switch to blasters and deal a ton more dps, what's the Rokh going to do in that case?
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#148 - 2015-01-31 21:45:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
J'Poll wrote:
And don't need to resort to ad hominem replies.


I call em as I see em, make spergy mouth breathing replies and guess what, I'll expect you to be/have become a spergy mouth breather. Like you do so often in threads. How many warnings are you on at this moment?


p.s. you still haven't shown me where I stated the Rokh ought to beat a marauder.
Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#149 - 2015-01-31 22:23:53 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:

So what you're meaning to say is that we shouldn't add your drone dps to the total, duly noted.


Since i added drone DPS to both the hyperion and rokh, no.

Quote:

In case of the hype it'll use its drones vs frigates while the rails take care of the bigger targets, so IS added, and in cases when you don't have/want to move and there's long range targets you have the option of launching the wardens.


So, your Rokh fit is not what I would have done but we'll use yours for the comparison.

yours does 481 dps while not making use of drones most of the time, mine does 541 on turrets alone, which it will apply just fine due to two tracking comps. On top of that it WILL use its drones more often, but even without that the dps increase is about 12% (which is massive given how people will commit murder for 5% implants). Even more so because the lower your dps becomes the closer you get to a BS NPC's tank, making it take WAY longer. So 12% increase right away, and on top of that possibly WAY more due to lights/sentries.


Im not even sure why you would use all level 5 skills to compare this. Were talking about this in terms of low-skilled characters. No low skilled new player is going to max out battleship to 5. 3, maybe 4 max. At level 4, the damage difference on rails alone is only 22 dps.

This seems to be more evidence of how you are discussing this from an experienced, high skill level player, as opposed to what weve been discussing, which is a low skilled, inexperienced player.

Quote:
And that all assumes you're using antimatter the whole time, which you're not.


52km optimal at level 3 Caldari BS, 58 at level 4. Yeah, youre gonna be using antimatter the whole time on ships that actually count.

Again, i shall repeat this the 4th time to you. The only time you would use high range low damage ammo is when you are killing the frigates from 80km away.

Quote:

On top of that there's the possibly that you waste time due to MJD cycle or not being able to angle your MJDs to get to the next mission target. The Hype in this case can choose, he can AB to the gate if it's close enough (Hype will travel 25-60km in the time it takes MJD to cycle) OR it can use its own MJD if the situation favours it.


And then theres the possibility that you run out of light drones, having to MJD out, and then align and dock to station, wasting far more time and far more isk than having to MJD back to your original position, or close tot he gate, and slowboating. Whats your point? We can both create scenarios where we waste a massive amount of time.

The only difference between yours and mine, is that mine puts the least risk, doesnt cost 150 million isk more, and has a lower chance of wasting time, because the chances that your MJD wont get you in decent range to the gate, is far lower than the chances that your drones are getting hammered because you waited till the half a dozen frigs circled your ship before releasing drones with poor drone skills.

Quote:

And when the mission favours it you switch to blasters and deal a ton more dps, what's the Rokh going to do in that case?


Oh right, i forgot, rokhs cant use blasters. Rokhs cant use active sheild tanks or ancillary sheild boosters. Wait, no, they can. Well thats a relief, i thought i was in trouble there for a sec.

BTW, i cant think of any mission that would be done with blasters that i couldnt run in good time with a railgun. Only situation i could think of is if they spawned a bunch of battleships right next to you, and im not aware of any mission that does that.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#150 - 2015-01-31 22:50:10 UTC
You keep saying how you lose drones all the time, which is just not the case.
Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#151 - 2015-01-31 23:11:20 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
You keep saying how you lose drones all the time, which is just not the case.


Half a dozen frigates, webbing and killing drones.

Drone recall lag/delay around 2 seconds.

Hob 2's 60 sheild 100 armor 300 hull with poor skills. Thats it.

Each frig deals atleast 20 dps(Lower end of the DPS meter).

60 DPS on a drone(lets say only half go on a single drone, cause youre lucky). 1 second and sheild is gone. another 3 seconds armor gone. By the time you react and recall drones, its already down to armor, if youre lucky and react quickly enough.

Rince and repeat for the other 4 drones left on grid.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#152 - 2015-01-31 23:19:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
That or just wait till they red box you and keep an eye on them so the second they yellow box, meaning they're switching, you'll have enough time to pull them in. It's not difficult.

However I will concede an important point, one that you kinda missed :P, that the Rokh's dps isn't affected by BS skill lvl
Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#153 - 2015-01-31 23:49:34 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
That or just wait till they red box you and keep an eye on them so the second they yellow box, meaning they're switching, you'll have enough time to pull them in. It's not difficult.


Sure, so you just keep recalling all drones every time the frigate changes to yellowboxing, then releasing them when they switch. And how much damage are you gonna do to the frigs that way? Id say nearly 0.

Quote:

However I will concede an important point, one that you kinda missed :P, that the Rokh's dps isn't affected by BS skill lvl

I didnt miss it. You did, when you used an All level 5 skill set as a reference for how much damage a hyperion does vs a rokh.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#154 - 2015-01-31 23:53:26 UTC
Don't exaggerate. And no, if you had you'd have said so :)
Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#155 - 2015-02-01 00:07:52 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
Don't exaggerate. And no, if you had you'd have said so :)

Exaggerate... what? Are you out of arguments that you have to rely on vague random words that make no sense, hoping that atleast one of them might confound me enough to say "Sorry, youre right, i lost"?

And yes, i did say so. You really need to learn to read, man. This is worrying me. One day youre going to ram into a car and injure yourself because you thought it said "Speed limit 120 km/h" instead of "Speed limit 20 km/h".
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#156 - 2015-02-01 00:24:01 UTC
Quote:
Id say nearly 0.


That.
Solonius Rex
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#157 - 2015-02-01 00:34:09 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:
Quote:
Id say nearly 0.


That.


Youre recalling ALL your drones every time you get yellowboxed by a frig. Every time. And youre still talking about min/max. Lol.

But i love how you keep winding down and only respond to 1 or 2 points, as if you know that youve lost on all the other points but dont want to admit you lost.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#158 - 2015-02-01 01:01:53 UTC
No, because you're simply exaggerating and regurgitating the same points over and over. I can just do the "read back this post" thing but it doesn't lead anywhere.

And there you do the exaggerating thing again: if it's just 1 or 2 yellow boxing you kill them, if it's a whole bunch THEN you pull them back. it sounds as if you never used this pretty basic tactic, otherwise you wouldn't make dumb remarks about it.
ergherhdfgh
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#159 - 2015-02-01 04:56:11 UTC
Gregor Parud wrote:

p.s. you still haven't shown me where I stated the Rokh ought to beat a marauder.


You had made the point that since you could find a ship that did more dps than the Rokh that no one should ever fly the Rokh under any circumstances. I was simply pointing out that by that logic no one should ever fly anything but a Marauder for level 4's to show how asinine your point was.


Want to talk? Join Cara's channel in game: House Forelli

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#160 - 2015-02-01 08:05:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Gregor Parud
ergherhdfgh wrote:
Gregor Parud wrote:

p.s. you still haven't shown me where I stated the Rokh ought to beat a marauder.


You had made the point that since you could find a ship that did more dps than the Rokh that no one should ever fly the Rokh under any circumstances. I was simply pointing out that by that logic no one should ever fly anything but a Marauder for level 4's to show how asinine your point was.




No. I made the point that since the OP was skilling Gallente anyway there's no reason to sidegrade to Caldari as it has, in the long run, nothing to offer for hybrid users compared to Gallente. And that he might as well NOT waste time getting caldari BS to 4 and stick to his initial choice being Gallente.

Would the OP have said "I fly Caldari turret ships for :reasons:" then the answer would have been "well, if you enjoy that go for it" but that wasn't the case: OP has been skilling Gallente and thus there is "no point" in going for the Rokh. That doesn't mean the Rokh is "useless", it means that a Rokh doesn't add anything for someone who's focus already is, and again will be, Gallente.

Big difference.


Hence in my first post summing up all the pros and cons (even the ones the OP himself mentioned, on purpose) and then coming to the "all things considered you might as well stick to Gallente" conclusion.