These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Awoxing is no more

First post
Author
Aredontis
Doomheim
#561 - 2015-01-17 16:26:57 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
There's no hypocricy in that, at least not within the current context.

CCP removes a way to kill people from within a corp,
leaving only suicide ganking or wardeccing as options.

As wardeccing is the only legal way to kill people now ...
... it makes sense to remove the ability of people to simply dodge it without any consequences.

Yeah no, the million ISK fee and clicking two buttons isn't really a consequence.


To be fair, I do not know if he does as you say,
but if he does it in light of a nerf like this one, then it's fair.


Your third sentence makes your 4th false, as you've already pointed out that there are 2 ways to kill people. Ganking still "legal" (I love when people use that term, since the law really has nothing to do with internet spaceships, I just find it funny).

On your final statement, he's been calling to have awoxing stay the way it is, while changing dec mechanics. Wants cake, wants to eat cake. Big smile
Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#562 - 2015-01-17 16:28:26 UTC
So, we've gotten to "make all ships worthless" as a solution to awoxing....neat.
Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#563 - 2015-01-17 17:48:17 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Aredontis wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Hey, while we're at it, can we patch out the loop hole that allows you to avoid wardecs when otherwise you'd have to pay for a surrender?


This seems to be a recurring theme with you. You complain that a change that affects your play style (negatively) shouldn't be made, while in the same breath, complaining that a change that affects your play style (positively) should be made.
Hypocrite much?

There's no hypocricy in that, at least not within the current context.

CCP removes a way to kill people from within a corp,
leaving only suicide ganking or wardeccing as options.

As wardeccing is the only legal way to kill people now ...
... it makes sense to remove the ability of people to simply dodge it without any consequences.

Yeah no, the million ISK fee and clicking two buttons isn't really a consequence.


To be fair, I do not know if he does as you say,
but if he does it in light of a nerf like this one, then it's fair.


There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec.
Losing all offices rented.
Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know).
Lose all rights and have to redo them.
Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them.
24 hours stasis before quitting corp.
New corp creation fee.
Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know).
Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.

No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#564 - 2015-01-17 17:55:06 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Basil Pupkin wrote:
Solecist Project wrote:
Aredontis wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Hey, while we're at it, can we patch out the loop hole that allows you to avoid wardecs when otherwise you'd have to pay for a surrender?


This seems to be a recurring theme with you. You complain that a change that affects your play style (negatively) shouldn't be made, while in the same breath, complaining that a change that affects your play style (positively) should be made.
Hypocrite much?

There's no hypocricy in that, at least not within the current context.

CCP removes a way to kill people from within a corp,
leaving only suicide ganking or wardeccing as options.

As wardeccing is the only legal way to kill people now ...
... it makes sense to remove the ability of people to simply dodge it without any consequences.

Yeah no, the million ISK fee and clicking two buttons isn't really a consequence.


To be fair, I do not know if he does as you say,
but if he does it in light of a nerf like this one, then it's fair.


There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec.
Losing all offices rented.
Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know).
Lose all rights and have to redo them.
Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them.
24 hours stasis before quitting corp.
New corp creation fee.
Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know).
Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.

No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution.


You are missing consequences up with annoyance.

Sure, it's annoying...but you happily evaded a wardec with 0 real consequences.

P.s. if you have a POS, you should be able to defend it.

IMO, the moment you are wardecced, any "space" assets should be locked in place. Defend it or let it be killed...your choice.
CCP did that exact thing with PoCo's. During a war they can't be transfered ownership, so when they finally do that POS overhaul...I hope they do it to the POS too.



Also.


HAHAHAH

On grief decs...and who will be in command of deciding if something is a real war dec or a grief dec...let me guess..as it is a stupid idea by a carebear, it will likely be the defending side so they can just eliminate all wars.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#565 - 2015-01-17 17:56:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Destiny Corrupted
Basil Pupkin wrote:
There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec.
(1) Losing all offices rented.
(2) Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know).
(3) Lose all rights and have to redo them.
(4) Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them.
(5) 24 hours stasis before quitting corp.
(6) New corp creation fee.
(7) Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know).
(8) Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.

No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution.

(1) You don't lose anything. Leaving a CEO character in the corporation ensures you don't have to shut it down, and can come back to it later.
(2) Doesn't need to be done for the same reason as (1). In the 24 hours before the war goes live, it's entirely viable to take down some expensive structures, and add a bunch of hardeners and ECM batteries to the POS. No one is going to touch it then. A high-sec ****-star POS siege is like the least fun thing possible.
(3) Done in about 10 minutes if you're copying them from the previous corporation. It's just a table with checkboxes.
(4) Done in about 30 seconds. Literally 7 text entry fields.
(5) Wrong. There isn't one.
(6) 2 million ISK is a lot. Much more than the 50+ the aggressors paid to start the war, so you're right, I concede this one.
(7) This is the only task that requires some time.
(8) Another 10-minute ordeal.

And finally, not every high-sec corporation owns (or needs to own) POSes. You use this argument as a static variable, when in fact, it clearly isn't.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#566 - 2015-01-17 18:01:43 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Basil Pupkin wrote:
There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec.
(1) Losing all offices rented.
(2) Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know).
(3) Lose all rights and have to redo them.
(4) Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them.
(5) 24 hours stasis before quitting corp.
(6) New corp creation fee.
(7) Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know).
(8) Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.

No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution.

(1) You don't lose anything. Leaving a CEO character in the corporation ensures you don't have to shut it down, and can come back to it later.
(2) Doesn't need to be done for the same reason as (1). In the 24 hours before the war goes live, it's entirely viable to take down some expensive structures, and add a bunch of hardeners and ECM batteries to the POS. No one is going to touch it then. A high-sec ****-star POS siege is like the least fun thing possible.
(3) Done in about 10 minutes if you're copying them from the previous corporation. It's just a table with checkboxes.
(4) Done in about 30 seconds. Literally 7 text entry fields.
(5) Wrong. There isn't one.
(6) 2 million ISK is a lot. Much more than the 50+ the aggressors paid to start the war, so you're right, I concede this one.
(7) This is the only task that requires some time.
(8) Another 10-minute ordeal.

And finally, not every high-sec corporation owns (or needs to own) POSes. You use this argument as a static variable, when in fact, it clearly isn't.


All of this.

If that what you have listed is a consequence in your eyes. You are truely the most stupid person around as it doesn't take that much effort.



A smart person would already have thought about it and luckily plenty have done it:

1. Have 2 corps, with 2 CEO-alts with the exact same corp set up (roles etc).

2. During war, have people move from one corp to the other (p.s. CCP removed the 24h stasis a long long time ago).

3. POS, just set up a dickstar and nobody will touch it.


Hell, for the duration of a war...you all drop back to NPC corp and just share a common chat channel that is moderated to be on invite only. This way you can still do stuff together while the war ticks away.


Fun part: I expect a whole lot more of wardecs and/or ganking with this change. All the awoxers will still go after the same easy targets, just in a different way. Let's see how long people that come out of their NPC corp will stay in those player corps that they have to keep leaving and rejoining with every warRoll

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#567 - 2015-01-17 18:08:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Destiny Corrupted
Honestly you don't even need to make a second corporation. Just keep people in NPC corps for a week, and the aggressors will let the war lapse and look elsewhere. Those who come back to you after you put the players back into the corporation (often happens with mercenary contracts with disbandment as a goal), would have went after a recreated corporation anyway.

And I really can't emphasize the "no one's going to shoot a ****-star" thing enough. Good, large groups charge like 3-4 billion for that. No one else will bother.

J'Poll wrote:
Fun part: I expect a whole lot more of wardecs and/or ganking with this change. All the awoxers will still go after the same easy targets, just in a different way. Let's see how long people that come out of their NPC corp will stay in those player corps that they have to keep leaving and rejoining with every warRoll

This is exactly what will happen, and why they'll have to go after wars next. There will be nothing else to go after, aside from non-combat stuff such as theft.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Jenshae Chiroptera
#568 - 2015-01-17 18:13:57 UTC
Shailagh wrote:
Ccp cant you see this logic is flawed?? Some csm dudes even tried to say so. Wtf is the poijt of them is you dont listen?? This vhange and gonna increase RETENTION 1% IF ANYTJING GONNA MAKE OLDVETS QUIT MORE.
Old veterans are a naturally declining group of players.

MMOs aim for three years out of a player and to keep cycling new ones into their game. When a game gets top heavy with veterans that starts affecting newbie retention and drives the game into the ground.

Especially, in a game where veterans can go and beat up on newbies.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#569 - 2015-01-17 18:27:18 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Basil Pupkin wrote:
There are tremendous consequences for "dodging" grief dec.
(1) Losing all offices rented.
(2) Roll down all POSes (and they are far from instant, you know).
(3) Lose all rights and have to redo them.
(4) Lose all corp hangars and have to redo them.
(5) 24 hours stasis before quitting corp.
(6) New corp creation fee.
(7) Anchoring all POSes again (and they are far from instant, you know).
(8) Moving all bears to the new corp, resetting all standings the old corp had, just to do it again when some imbecile loots yet another easymode suicide wanked indy for a billion of super easy ISK and decides he spends it to grief dec you 20 more times.

No consequences you say? I'd say it's riddled with them. Removing grief decs and leaving only war decs as decs would be the proper solution.

(1) You don't lose anything. Leaving a CEO character in the corporation ensures you don't have to shut it down, and can come back to it later.
(2) Doesn't need to be done for the same reason as (1). In the 24 hours before the war goes live, it's entirely viable to take down some expensive structures, and add a bunch of hardeners and ECM batteries to the POS. No one is going to touch it then. A high-sec ****-star POS siege is like the least fun thing possible.
(3) Done in about 10 minutes if you're copying them from the previous corporation. It's just a table with checkboxes.
(4) Done in about 30 seconds. Literally 7 text entry fields.
(5) Wrong. There isn't one.
(6) 2 million ISK is a lot. Much more than the 50+ the aggressors paid to start the war, so you're right, I concede this one.
(7) This is the only task that requires some time.
(8) Another 10-minute ordeal.

And finally, not every high-sec corporation owns (or needs to own) POSes. You use this argument as a static variable, when in fact, it clearly isn't.


(1) Corp standings will go down in a week of only-ceo-alt in there. You still pay for office renting but now you have to pay 2x if you make second corp.
(2) Large POS yes, medium and small ones are undefendable. Also, with 2 corps they can't use each other's POS.
(3) It's a table with thousands of checkboxes, and a major PITA.
(4) Moving stuff out of old hangars and placing them into new ones is a PITA.
(5) Confirming stasis is there, I just tried to quit corp and it prompted me with a 24 hour stasis period.
(6) Odds are grief deccer never worked for them, just got them for free suicide wanking someone who did, so I don't really see grief deccer expenses as a valid excuse. Even if he did work for them, for 50 million he's getting too much, while for 2 million all you get is PITA.
(7) Same as 2.
(8) That isn't only the corp standings you set, there are also NPC standings toward your corp. They matter less now, but you can't get tax reduction and jump clones in hisec otherwise, and they take a week to set in, so every grief dec you lose them.

Every industrial corporation is currently forced to have a POS, there is no other way to compress ORE otherwise and POS facilities are still better than NPC stations, means not using them is a setback, so you either do or suck.

It's only suicide wanking corps who don't have to own anything at all, 9000 catalysts aside.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Solops Crendraven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#570 - 2015-01-17 19:16:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Solops Crendraven
Dont worry this is still a Avoxing is no more Thread.

Moving To Las Vegas Watch Me Play Poker! enter link description here

MajorBean
HandelsGilde-De
Outsmarted
#571 - 2015-01-17 21:30:30 UTC
Shailagh
6Six6Six6Six
#572 - 2015-01-17 21:50:00 UTC
So we have like 4 weeks til this kicks in? Roger that, ima grief the total utter complete hell out of all newbie friendly corps til then with rerolling 10hr hero trial alts if need be. Over and over and im going to EXXXCLUSIVELY TARGET THE VENTURES AND L1 FRIG NEWBROS. This is what they say we do right? Let it be true. Ima gank/grief their little ventures face off then proced to talk trash to said newb til he uninstalls. 4 weeks. Time to bring the hurt
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#573 - 2015-01-17 22:20:16 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Aiyshimin wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Ah, the day subscription fees mattering more than quality content is finally upon us.

fair play to ccp, took them longer to succumb to allure than most other companies.
still, a sad day.


What part of a hisec awoxing was quality content?

Of course sub numbers mean more than a niché group having a free pass to ganking, what did you seriously expect? CCP is trying to fix the game before its too late, and this is just one of them.

The part in which you befriend some rich clown, and then pop his shiny CNR, or freighter full of his belongings after convincing him to move a few systems over. Or the good old mining op bust. You know, the stuff that actually makes up the majority of awoxing activities, as opposed to the ridiculous bullcrap about little day-old babbys losing their basic-fitted Ventures to sociopath griefers blah blah (I've seriously yet to see a kill like that).


I'm not sure that what EVE really needs is more people convincing fools to blow hundreds of dollars on PLEX just so someone can pad their billboards.

It's also worth noting that what is proposed is an option. With any luck CCP will make the option something that costs ISK to turn on, for example a 5% corp tax from CONCORD, or a monthly fee similar to a wardec. Then you'll find out that many corps just don't turn the option on because they think they know what they're doing.

How do you feel about the "automatic boot from corp at downtime" feature? I supposed you feel that it's severely curtailing your safari exploits and is an evil feature that should never have been implemented?
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#574 - 2015-01-17 22:24:57 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Mara Rinn wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Aiyshimin wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Ah, the day subscription fees mattering more than quality content is finally upon us.

fair play to ccp, took them longer to succumb to allure than most other companies.
still, a sad day.


What part of a hisec awoxing was quality content?

Of course sub numbers mean more than a niché group having a free pass to ganking, what did you seriously expect? CCP is trying to fix the game before its too late, and this is just one of them.

The part in which you befriend some rich clown, and then pop his shiny CNR, or freighter full of his belongings after convincing him to move a few systems over. Or the good old mining op bust. You know, the stuff that actually makes up the majority of awoxing activities, as opposed to the ridiculous bullcrap about little day-old babbys losing their basic-fitted Ventures to sociopath griefers blah blah (I've seriously yet to see a kill like that).


I'm not sure that what EVE really needs is more people convincing fools to blow hundreds of dollars on PLEX just so someone can pad their billboards.

It's also worth noting that what is proposed is an option. With any luck CCP will make the option something that costs ISK to turn on, for example a 5% corp tax from CONCORD, or a monthly fee similar to a wardec. Then you'll find out that many corps just don't turn the option on because they think they know what they're doing.

How do you feel about the "automatic boot from corp at downtime" feature? I supposed you feel that it's severely curtailing your safari exploits and is an evil feature that should never have been implemented?


I said it before. But if the whole "No in corp fighting" also has a downside to it, in some form like as you say and ISK sink. I'm perfectly fine with it...risk vs reward stuff still applies then, you have less risk, you should have less reward.

The auto boot from downtime is IMO still a good thing. As by the time a safari person gets booted from corp, he already had his safari. Not that we need that function anymore after this, as nobody will be able to go on a safari as you can't shoot people in corp anymore.Roll

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Solecist Project
#575 - 2015-01-17 22:34:00 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Aiyshimin wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Ah, the day subscription fees mattering more than quality content is finally upon us.

fair play to ccp, took them longer to succumb to allure than most other companies.
still, a sad day.


What part of a hisec awoxing was quality content?

Of course sub numbers mean more than a niché group having a free pass to ganking, what did you seriously expect? CCP is trying to fix the game before its too late, and this is just one of them.

The part in which you befriend some rich clown, and then pop his shiny CNR, or freighter full of his belongings after convincing him to move a few systems over. Or the good old mining op bust. You know, the stuff that actually makes up the majority of awoxing activities, as opposed to the ridiculous bullcrap about little day-old babbys losing their basic-fitted Ventures to sociopath griefers blah blah (I've seriously yet to see a kill like that).


I'm not sure that what EVE really needs is more people convincing fools to blow hundreds of dollars on PLEX just so someone can pad their billboards.

It's also worth noting that what is proposed is an option. With any luck CCP will make the option something that costs ISK to turn on, for example a 5% corp tax from CONCORD, or a monthly fee similar to a wardec. Then you'll find out that many corps just don't turn the option on because they think they know what they're doing.

How do you feel about the "automatic boot from corp at downtime" feature? I supposed you feel that it's severely curtailing your safari exploits and is an evil feature that should never have been implemented?


I said it before. But if the whole "No in corp fighting" also has a downside to it, in some form like as you say and ISK sink. I'm perfectly fine with it...risk vs reward stuff still applies then, you have less risk, you should have less reward.

The auto boot from downtime is IMO still a good thing. As by the time a safari person gets booted from corp, he already had his safari. Not that we need that function anymore after this, as nobody will be able to go on a safari as you can't shoot people in corp anymore.Roll

This actualky makes me wonder if CCP considers reverse safaris and if
members can look up the state of friendly fire...

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#576 - 2015-01-17 22:37:34 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
… as nobody will be able to go on a safari as you can't shoot people in corp anymore.Roll


LOL. Chicken little thought the sky was falling too!

How many industrial corps will be happy to pay 50M ISK a month just to prevent safaris, when they know they can limit their exposure to safaris through various means such as:


  • Recruitment corp separate to the mission-running corp, separate to the POS-running corp
  • Use the boot-on-downtime feature
  • Don't recruit people with a history of corp-kills


A CONCORD enforcement fee of 50M a month will mean people have to weigh up the risk of losing a 200M ISK mining ship every other month versus the known loss of 100M ISK in that same period.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#577 - 2015-01-17 22:42:28 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
This actualky makes me wonder if CCP considers reverse safaris and if
members can look up the state of friendly fire...


I'd expect the "friendly fire flag" to be visible on Corp Info to everyone, not just corp members. The whole point is to allow rookies a sense of safety in leaving NPC corps after all. If rookies can't tell that the "friendly fire flag" is turned off before joining the corp, what's the point of having it?

On a similar vein, what's the point of having the "friendly fire flag" if rookies can't tell that it's been turned off? Similar to wardecs having start and invalidation notices, I'd expect a CONCORD notice declaring explicitly when the friendly fire flag changes.
Solecist Project
#578 - 2015-01-17 23:10:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Solecist Project
Now I wonder what happens if I now here publicly announce ...
... that I will go on a killing spree through as many new player friendly corps as possible ...

... with restrictions.

.) No shooting of new players.
.) Only engage the bad ones created for epeen.
.) Only engage the CEOs/older members of those corps who don't teach their members how to defend themselves.
.) Only engage in those corps where members aren't actually taught anything and just are left alone.


I'd like to know thoughts beyond the predictable ones.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Concord Guy's Cousin
Doomheim
#579 - 2015-01-17 23:13:06 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Now I wonder what happens if I now here publicly announce ...
... that I will go on a killing spree through as many new player friendly corps as possible ...

... with restrictions.

.) No shooting of new players.
.) Only engage the bad ones created for epeen.
.) Only engage the CEOs/older members of those corps who don't teach their members how to defend themselves.
.) Only engage in those corps where members aren't actually taught anything and just are left alone.


I'd like to know thoughts beyond the predictable ones.
I'd buy that for a dollar

ISD LackOfFaith ~ "Your Catalyst was a hamster, and your Retriever smelt of elderberries"

NPC Forum Alt, because reasons.

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#580 - 2015-01-17 23:19:15 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
3. Ranting is prohibited.

A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counter productive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.


4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


8. Use of profanity is prohibited.

The use of profanity is prohibited on the EVE Online forums. This includes the partial masking of letters using numbers or alternate symbols, and any attempts at bypassing the profanity filter.


11. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including support ticket responses and emails) received from any member of CCP staff.


20. All posts must be related to EVE Online.

Posts regarding other companies and products or services are prohibited and any content of this nature will be removed. Posts regarding other games are however permitted on the Out of Pod Experience forum for the purposes of discussion only.


27. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued to the off-topic poster.



Thread reopened.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)