These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AFK Cloaking™: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals

First post First post
Author
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6841 - 2016-09-30 09:12:02 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


So says a loser old player who relies on this to get easy kills.


Spending two days hunting a vindicator then taking it on in a bomber while outnumbered in the system 16 to 1 is easy?



Depends on a number of factors, can be easy, can be impossible. But tell me, did you spend most of those two days AFK cloaked in that little bomber of yours while playing other games or doing something else?

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#6842 - 2016-09-30 09:38:42 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


Depends on a number of factors, can be easy, can be impossible. But tell me, did you spend most of those two days AFK cloaked in that little bomber of yours while playing other games or doing something else?


Yes, because that is what is needed to get around the intel given by local.

Again, AFK cloaking is the only counter to local chat.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6843 - 2016-09-30 10:00:23 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


Depends on a number of factors, can be easy, can be impossible. But tell me, did you spend most of those two days AFK cloaked in that little bomber of yours while playing other games or doing something else?


Yes, because that is what is needed to get around the intel given by local.

Again, AFK cloaking is the only counter to local chat.


Some people can kill stuff without having to use boredom to grind people down...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#6844 - 2016-09-30 10:56:57 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


Some people can kill stuff without having to use boredom to grind people down...


Nobody can get around local chat, hence why AFK cloaking is needed as that is the only counter.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6845 - 2016-09-30 11:42:40 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


Some people can kill stuff without having to use boredom to grind people down...


Nobody can get around local chat, hence why AFK cloaking is needed as that is the only counter.


Well instead of testing myself against players I worked out that I was testing myself against **** poor mechanics and lazy useless players, so where is the fun in that for someone who wants to test himself against people with something about them. AFK cloaky camping is just the fallback position of losers.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#6846 - 2016-09-30 11:53:20 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


Well instead of testing myself against players I worked out that I was testing myself against **** poor mechanics and lazy useless players, so where is the fun in that for someone who wants to test himself against people with something about them. AFK cloaky camping is just the fallback position of losers.



You are the one demanding a 100% unavoidable free intel system.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6847 - 2016-09-30 12:03:32 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


Well instead of testing myself against players I worked out that I was testing myself against **** poor mechanics and lazy useless players, so where is the fun in that for someone who wants to test himself against people with something about them. AFK cloaky camping is just the fallback position of losers.



You are the one demanding a 100% unavoidable free intel system.


AFK cloaky camping is a strategy used by lazy losers.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#6848 - 2016-09-30 12:24:43 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


AFK cloaky camping is a strategy used by lazy losers.


I see you have run out of arguments Mr Trump.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6849 - 2016-09-30 12:51:11 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


AFK cloaky camping is a strategy used by lazy losers.


I see you have run out of arguments Mr Trump.


Your argument is solely that local is too difficult for you poor little lambs which forces you to AFK cloaky camp while you play World of Tanks while waiting for someone to take a bet that you are off line, elite Eve play my ass, really it is as stark as that, there is no challenge for a player to play against other players here, it is just a rubbish experience. And trying to divert attention away from your own personal failures is typical.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6850 - 2016-09-30 13:45:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Sonya Corvinus
Dracvlad wrote:
Some people can kill stuff without having to use boredom to grind people down...


Some people can earn ISK without risk-free AFK ratting in null with 100% perfect/safe intel. Oh wait, you don't pay attention and don't fleet up when ratting. I forgot.

Given you are quitting EVE, did you just decide to go full blown troll on your way out? The salt coming from your posts could season my food for the next five years. You're going through the forum version of a ragequit.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#6851 - 2016-09-30 14:08:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Some people can kill stuff without having to use boredom to grind people down...


Some people can earn ISK without risk-free AFK ratting in null with 100% perfect/safe intel. Oh wait, you don't pay attention and don't fleet up when ratting. I forgot.

Given you are quitting EVE, did you just decide to go full blown troll on your way out? The salt coming from your posts could season my food for the next five years. You're going through the forum version of a ragequit.
Seriously. Dracvlad, you've loudly announced you have given up on this game and are quitting, so why are you wasting your energies on battling people on the internet about a video game you will soon, or already are not playing? Don't get me wrong, it's your subscription and if you want to spend the remainder of it wrangling over changes to a game you will not be around to see, be my guest, but perhaps there is something more constructive and directly useful to you personally that you could spend your time.

Might I suggest spending that time on finding a new game or other pass time to start exploring when you subscription ends? Or if you know what you are going to do with your free time next, you can make your presence felt on their discussion boards. AFK cloaking in Eve is a minor issue, one CCP will eventually get around to addressing but not for a while yet. It is not worth 343 pages of moaning, or the constant salty bickering you have been engaging in over it for days on end.

No one is a "loser" for playing the game by the rules. Maybe those rules could be improved, but there is a reason why things are the way they are and why CCP hasn't moved on this issue in years. They have said they will though, possibly with these upcoming Observatory Arrays, and that should be enough to let it lie for now.

Go and find yourself a new passion you are excited about. There is a whole wide world out there of things to spend your leisure time on other than a video game you are done with.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#6852 - 2016-09-30 14:32:38 UTC
hahahaha wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee , i love this thread.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6853 - 2016-09-30 15:26:02 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Sonya Corvinus wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Some people can kill stuff without having to use boredom to grind people down...


Some people can earn ISK without risk-free AFK ratting in null with 100% perfect/safe intel. Oh wait, you don't pay attention and don't fleet up when ratting. I forgot.

Given you are quitting EVE, did you just decide to go full blown troll on your way out? The salt coming from your posts could season my food for the next five years. You're going through the forum version of a ragequit.
Seriously. Dracvlad, you've loudly announced you have given up on this game and are quitting, so why are you wasting your energies on battling people on the internet about a video game you will soon, or already are not playing? Don't get me wrong, it's your subscription and if you want to spend the remainder of it wrangling over changes to a game you will not be around to see, be my guest, but perhaps there is something more constructive and directly useful to you personally that you could spend your time.

Might I suggest spending that time on finding a new game or other pass time to start exploring when you subscription ends? Or if you know what you are going to do with your free time next, you can make your presence felt on their discussion boards. AFK cloaking in Eve is a minor issue, one CCP will eventually get around to addressing but not for a while yet. It is not worth 343 pages of moaning, or the constant salty bickering you have been engaging in over it for days on end.

No one is a "loser" for playing the game by the rules. Maybe those rules could be improved, but there is a reason why things are the way they are and why CCP hasn't moved on this issue in years. They have said they will though, possibly with these upcoming Observatory Arrays, and that should be enough to let it lie for now.

Go and find yourself a new passion you are excited about. There is a whole wide world out there of things to spend your leisure time on other than a video game you are done with.


I am writing a book, well three actually, one is at 480 pages, another at 170 pages and another at 130 pages, when I get writers block I check out this thread. I have another game which is Star Citizen, though I cannot be bothered with the beta stuff.

As my parting shot I am taking aim at something which is very destructive in terms of player retention, as I have said in other threads that currently ganking of mining ships is in a good place, because people have options to use a lower yield tanky ship and that was important in terms of giving players something that works for them.

War decs, the mechanics are pretty good, need some adjustments which I have gone over, but the issue is how things have developed with the player base in hisec and the loss of prey players, hisec is not in a good position.

Eve needs active players, AFK cloaky camping is not helpful in terms of activity, less cloaky camping would see more people doing stuff, creating more targets for roams and more people willing to fight. One thing I saw quite often was people log on, see camping say damn this then log off, or log on a mission or incursion alt because no one else was active. And I kept seeing it. I have got people to go out in groups and all that, but it is very dependent in terms of who is on and able to be active.

The problem is that I studied a group of players that were camping me, I got into their group and funny enough still have contact with them, none of them are currently active ion Eve, I saw what they did:

1. Account share
2. Play other games with a screen logged on with all their camping alts which they checked every so often
3. They were all very wealthy ingame with massive ISK and asset reserves
4. They only dropped when there was no risk, I was set up to kill them and one spotted one of my guys who logged on by accident and that was itm no drop.
5. Their objective was to get perfect execution style BLOP's drops

I did enjoy doing these drops a few times, but it is not a white knuckle fight that really gets you, like me and my mates going out with 3 BC's and 2 cruisers killing a Tempest Fleet Issue and Gila and I was the only one left alive with a sliver of structure in a drake, its nothing like that. It is just so flat.

This game has so much going for it, but it is players like that which have ruined it. I am keeping an eye on the game, I hope it will turn around enough to be worth coming back to, but I currently doubt it.

This issue defines for me whether Eve will die or not, because if CCP are serious about activity this will be one area they would take care of, that they do not speaks volumes to their lack of awareness in my opinion of course. I know that they will use an OS for local going forward, which is a good thing, and I have heard them say that they will do something, but saying and doing is another matter.

You are one of the people on the other side so to speak who I have a lot of respect for, I wish you well.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6854 - 2016-09-30 15:41:26 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Eve needs active players, AFK cloaky camping is not helpful in terms of activity, less cloaky camping would see more people doing stuff, creating more targets for roams and more people willing to fight. One thing I saw quite often was people log on, see camping say damn this then log off, or log on a mission or incursion alt because no one else was active. And I kept seeing it. I have got people to go out in groups and all that, but it is very dependent in terms of who is on and able to be active.


If you would have posted like this instead of your incessant trolling and insults, we could have had a conversation.

The issue you're describing is extremely small groups trying to live in hostile null with no consequences. If you're in a group that isn't big enough to have standing fleets of a dozen or so people at all times, you need to reconsider living in null, or consider joining a bigger alliance. That's the nature of the game. You can do HS solo. You can do LS solo or in small groups. Null is intended to be group based. It's not intended for solo play. You need a group to drop someone, and you SHOULD need a group to defend against it.

So the issue isn't cloaking, the real issue is people wanting to solo NS without the downside that comes with solo playing in hostile space in a multiplayer game.

My biggest issue with what you and people who think along your lines say is when the argument is made "we can't always be in a fleet, and we don't always have enough people online to form one". That's not an excuse, especially for null or wormholes. Those are two areas of the game specifically designed for group play. You've also mentioned ratting in carriers. You shouldn't undock/log in to a capital ship if you aren't part of a decently sized fleet. Those aren't ships made for solo play.

Hoping you will actually respond to what I say for once in this thread (but not counting on it given your history of trolling) does that make sense? Why should a solo player ratting in space that's hostile to everyone by design be given extra measures of safety? They have no business being there in the first place. Get friends, get in a bigger group.
Vic Jefferson
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#6855 - 2016-09-30 21:48:55 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
This game has so much going for it, but it is players like that which have ruined it. I am keeping an eye on the game, I hope it will turn around enough to be worth coming back to, but I currently doubt it.



Players haven't ruined anything here. Local is give and take. Right now it's symmetrically broken - attackers and defenders both have perfect intel. If one of those conditions were not true, then it would be asymmetrically broken, but as of right now, its gives as much as it takes. Players rather have found an emergent solution to perfect intel.

Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X.....XI.....XII?

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6856 - 2016-10-01 13:43:56 UTC
Sonya Corvinus, I looked at your killboard, you operate in the most active TZ, of course you will not see it the same way. And in terms of your TZ you are correct with your statement, late EU TZ too. The amusing thing is that most of the people who cloaky camp are ATK in your TZ, give or take a few Russians and they can be crazy in terms of staying up very late. Anyway almost it for me, have fun...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#6857 - 2016-10-01 17:16:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
Dracvlad wrote:
Sonya Corvinus, I looked at your killboard, you operate in the most active TZ, of course you will not see it the same way. And in terms of your TZ you are correct with your statement, late EU TZ too. The amusing thing is that most of the people who cloaky camp are ATK in your TZ, give or take a few Russians and they can be crazy in terms of staying up very late. Anyway almost it for me, have fun...


Okay, here is the thing, if most people who are cloaky camping are EU TZ, then it is quite possible that other TZ's can safely ignore such activities (relatively speaking). If you are US TZ there is a good chance you can log in and do stuff like ratting when the EU TZ guys who are cloaky camping are in bed and/or at work. I am Pacific TZ so when we had a cloaky camper in Cloud Ring that is exactly what I did. His corp was heavily German (I did a bit of intel gathering to figure this out). I looked at the time I'd log in and want to do some ratting and he was there in system...and I'd conclude that at 6 AM on Wednesday it was higly unlikely he was at his PC. Yes he could take the day off, yes he might work nights, or some such, but hey....its a risk and I was willing to take it. Never saw any action other than rats dying and then getting the occasional escalation.

But if you see somebody in local day-after-day, and do nothing about it....like find out what TZ they tend to be active in. Trying to bait them to see when they are ATK (and by baiting I mean literally feeding them a free kill, and don't be dumb, act like you are trying to avoid being killed...well mostly), fleeting up when ratting, dropping down to a cheaper fit, running anoms in PvP fit ships in a group, etc....well...you must not want that space.

These are all ways to change and uncertainty into risk. And risk can be managed.

Now this does not mean that it can't be improved...

But I don't think going from one binary system to a different binary system is the way to go. Something that is going to muddy the waters, so to speak.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
#6858 - 2016-10-01 18:09:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Sonya Corvinus
Dracvlad wrote:
Sonya Corvinus, I looked at your killboard, you operate in the most active TZ, of course you will not see it the same way. And in terms of your TZ you are correct with your statement, late EU TZ too. The amusing thing is that most of the people who cloaky camp are ATK in your TZ, give or take a few Russians and they can be crazy in terms of staying up very late. Anyway almost it for me, have fun...


I play with a group that has 24/7 coverage. When we put up citadels, or take out POS's or citadels in WHs, we have 24/7 hole control. We easily have numbers for a bubbler and an instalocker on every WH in system, 24/7. For each of the dozen or so citadels I've seen go up in WH space so far we have had two people on each incoming WH 24/7 for the entire time it is onlining. If we didn't have those numbers, we don't deserve the space. The same goes for null. If you don't have the numbers to defend your PvE-ers, don't live in null. I know that comes across kind of like I'm an a**hole, but I am being serious. There's nothing wrong with staying in HS/LS. Lately I don't have nearly as much time to play due to real life issues, so guess what I did. I didn't call for changes or nerfs to WH space, I moved out to LS temporarily, given I can be effective in LS playing solo.

Similarly, if you don't have numbers, time or energy to do nullsec right, you leave null until you build enough numbers. You don't call for nerfs to the game because you aren't flying with the right group.

As far as timezones go, I am east coast US. I have woken up at 4am to help corp mates because my phone went off asking for numbers, I have gotten out of game pings at 2pm on a saturday when I am not at home and rushed home to help, etc.

If you're camped and suspect a hot drop, let your alliance know out of game and get them to log on. That's the kind of organization that's needed in null/WHs.

Teckos Pech wrote:
But if you see somebody in local day-after-day, and do nothing about it....like find out what TZ they tend to be active in. Trying to bait them to see when they are ATK (and by baiting I mean literally feeding them a free kill, and don't be dumb, act like you are trying to avoid being killed...well mostly), fleeting up when ratting, dropping down to a cheaper fit, running anoms in PvP fit ships in a group, etc....well...you must not want that space.


Exactly...drop from carriers down to VNIs for ratting, for example and be in fleet and on comms. Who cares if you lose a VNI, they cost next to nothing, and if your alliance gets a blops kill from it, you by far came out ahead.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#6859 - 2016-10-01 18:27:20 UTC
Sonya Corvinus wrote:


Teckos Pech wrote:
But if you see somebody in local day-after-day, and do nothing about it....like find out what TZ they tend to be active in. Trying to bait them to see when they are ATK (and by baiting I mean literally feeding them a free kill, and don't be dumb, act like you are trying to avoid being killed...well mostly), fleeting up when ratting, dropping down to a cheaper fit, running anoms in PvP fit ships in a group, etc....well...you must not want that space.


Exactly...drop from carriers down to VNIs for ratting, for example and be in fleet and on comms. Who cares if you lose a VNI, they cost next to nothing, and if your alliance gets a blops kill from it, you by far came out ahead.


Right, change the calculus. Those being camped do have options. Maybe you don't feel they are the best options, but you do have options and if you truculently insist on not exercising them and logging off....well, that is a choice that person made, not the cloaky camper.

And I seriously do not believe that an AFK flag will result in more targets, more ships in space. I have a feeling that people will be back arguing that the AFK flag is not sufficient. That the next evolution to cloaky camping as a result of this change will not have the intended results.

For example, you warp to an anomaly at range and burn off all while cloaked. Then you go AFK till you get the AFK flag and then you come back every now and then and see if somebody is in the anomaly. When it finally happens you warp into the anomaly and lock, scram, light cyno and one dead ratter.

After this happens enough, a butthurt ratter comes to the forums and whines. More come and we are back to where we started and even when there is an AFK flag, people still dock up and the Bads™ still loggoff.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#6860 - 2016-10-01 21:24:27 UTC
So east coast USA, as I said you are in peak time for the game as you have EU TZ there too. What?



When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp