These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Bowhead wreck

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2015-01-11 05:58:58 UTC
The Bowhead wreck should have intact ships in it at first, but after it despawns or is salvaged, any assembled ships should be ejected into space and left sitting there for someone to take them.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
Alia Ravenswing
DARK HAT
#22 - 2015-01-11 11:14:58 UTC
No Bowhead wreck? I'm gonna rage quit.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2015-01-11 13:07:50 UTC
oh darn, I guess you should stop killing them in protest til after it's fixed.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]
Dangeresque Too
Pistols for Pandas
#24 - 2015-01-12 22:54:05 UTC
And people wonder why I think CCP just doesn't care about releasing completed items and features.

One would think, and no this is not just being critical for the sake of being rude, its just common sense from a development standpoint, that if you are releasing a new capital/freighter class ship, one of the items on the checklist would be to give it a custom wreck like the rest of the ships in the class. But I guess expecting CCP to release something that is like the rest of what they already released would be hugely silly. Or is that too much to ask? Embedded QA anyone? Or maybe someone forgot to update the 'new ship checklist'... which isn't promising either.

CCP QA lost another point, good job guys.

Or maybe I didn't understand the idea of the quick release cycle in that I thought CCP had said they can use it to not feel rushed and release unfinished content, which this might fall into. But it appears as though the actual use of the quicker release cycles is to use the current cycle to develop what is planned to be released at the end of the cycle, and then even if it isn't finished for testing until the day before it still gets pushed out anyways.

Ok, rant over. Sorry, just couldn't resist with such an easy miss on their part. I hadn't seen any blown up in space yet so I didn't get a chance to call them out on it sooner :(
Kaerakh
Obscure Joke Implied
#25 - 2015-01-13 03:25:24 UTC
Dangeresque Too wrote:
And people wonder why I think CCP just doesn't care about releasing completed items and features.

I didn't, I hadn't heard of you until today.

Schrodinger's Hot Dropper

The Fate of Forum Alts

Guaranteed Success
Previous page12