These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Technology Lab

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Devsite blog: December 2014 third-party developer update

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2014-12-09 15:20:07 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Phantom
CCP FoxFour has a new blog ready packed with information:

  • Changes to char/CharacterSheet and clone grades
  • An update of developers.testeveonline.com and the way how you connect your applications (CREST access or authentication only)
  • Additional information regarding public CREST
  • News about the Static Data Export
  • SSO and more

Check out this latest devsite blog and enjoy all the wonderful information in CCP FoxFour's December 2014 third-party developer update!

CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer
CCP FoxFour
C C P
C C P Alliance
#2 - 2014-12-09 15:21:11 UTC
YAY! Fun times here we come!

@CCP_FoxFour // Technical Designer // Team Tech Co

Third-party developer? Check out the official developers site for dev blogs, resources, and more.
Querns
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#3 - 2014-12-09 16:06:42 UTC
Confirming that my instance of evemon complained mightily of all my characters having insufficient clones. However, I went into the options and told it never to bother me about clone grades again.

ADVANTAGE: QUERNS

This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
Desmont McCallock
#4 - 2014-12-09 18:39:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Desmont McCallock
At least we have a "disable" option in EVEMon for the insufficient clone notification. (Eat your heart out FoxFour P)
Sable Blitzmann
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2014-12-09 19:20:38 UTC
I don't really understand the point of the new modifierInfo column in dgmEffects. I mean, I understand that you guys are developing a new effect system, but I don't understand why it's being stored as a string that must be parsed to get the data when it should be stored as another table. Example:

- domain: shipID func: ItemModifier modifiedAttributeID: 70 modifyingAttributeID: 2002 operator: 5

It's very straightforward and I hope more work continues in this direction considering how much of a mess the expression table is, but care to share some insight into why the decision was made to make this a simple string instead of another table? Is it just a stopgag until all other effects are ported to a new system? Just seems really inefficient to do it that way
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#6 - 2014-12-09 21:36:08 UTC
Wheee! 'Live' market data!

And they said it'd never happen.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Kaladr
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2014-12-10 23:54:17 UTC
Its quite fun - in the middle of redoing all of the order finding logic through EVE-Central to make sure its as fresh as possible.

Creator of EVE-Central.com, the longest running EVE Market Aggregator
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#8 - 2014-12-11 03:19:35 UTC
Kaladr wrote:
Its quite fun - in the middle of redoing all of the order finding logic through EVE-Central to make sure its as fresh as possible.



If you do come up with a 'keep this especially fresh' list, I'd be interested in seeing it Smile I can make guesses, but that's all they are.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter