These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Offline towers claiming moons

Author
Sapheni
Black Moon Mining
#1 - 2011-11-29 00:35:45 UTC
I am looking for a place to set up a POS in high-sec. I have hunted around a number of suitable systems, but every single moon is taken. Sad Many POSs are operational and in use, but at least 60% are offline towers (usually small) with no other structures nearby. The only purpose they serve is to prevent others from using the moon. Obviously one can pay a fee, war dec the corp and blow up their unprotected small tower pretty quickly, but that's not really the point: it costs them nothing to leave a tower anchored in space, effectively claiming an area which another player could use. This seems to be:

a) achieving something for nothing, which is contrary to EVE's ethos;
b) not the intended use of a POS.
And I would guess that
c) it probably puts off newer players who find space is "full"

Since POS mechanics are being reviewed perhaps something could be done to make players pay for the space they claim or lose their structures? I would propose some sort of timer (say a week or so) after which offline towers automatically unanchor themselves. This would give people who've taken a holiday (etc) time to recover if they forgot to fuel their POS properly. Some sort of failsafe would be needed to prevent exploitation, namely to prevent the tower being onlined for a few minutes once a week to reset the timer and then offlined again.

Thoughts?
Velicitia
XS Tech
#2 - 2011-11-29 01:04:41 UTC
minimum should be 30 days of inactivity (as with anchorable cans).

most of the time you'll find that the offlined towers are owned by corps that have either disbanded, have gone inactive, or may have simply forgotten about a tower because they moved and just never bothered taking the tower down...

send the owner an evemail, maybe they'll just pull it down for you.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#3 - 2011-11-29 01:08:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Tau Cabalander
You are not looking hard enough. I know there are empty moons within 4 jumps of Jita.

There are corps that make a living by ransoming POSes, and failing that destroying them. They leave a wake of empty moons behind them.

It is fairly simple to check eve-kill for hisec POS killmails, and check if the moon is still free.
Alisarina
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2011-11-29 01:23:02 UTC
Tau this is intriguing, how does one use that site to look up only high sec control tower losses? I've never used it before is all, or knew it existed. I feel ashamed.
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#5 - 2011-11-29 01:45:09 UTC
Two things. First, just wardec and take the moon. It's only 2M and a bit of ammo.

Second. No, offline towers should never be simply removed. Some corps (like my own) have a POS but don't constantly use it due to fuel requirements. We do online it when needed, but it's not always needed every month. And we don't want to take it down due to the standings required to re-anchor it (requiring people to drop and rejoin the corp is just painful if you don't have to).

There really isn't a problem here. If you want a certain moon, take it. Otherwise don't complain about it, the system is fine as-is.
Kaanchana
Tax-haven
#6 - 2011-11-29 02:34:12 UTC
On a different topic, would it be possible for an abbadon to take down an offline small pos provided there will be no defenders? If so, approximately how long will it take?
Breaker77
Reclamation Industries
#7 - 2011-11-29 02:38:21 UTC
Kaanchana wrote:
On a different topic, would it be possible for an abbadon to take down an offline small pos provided there will be no defenders? If so, approximately how long will it take?


Small tower AFK in a few hours.

I've managed to take down a medium DG tower in about 26 hours, minus downtime, solo before. Of course being a DG tower it had extra hitpoints. That was also with an alt that had large energy turrets 3, amarr BS 3 or 4, and sentry drones 3.

Skill up a little more it would take a little less time. Soloing a large tower, thats gonna take a while due to the shield regen rate even though the tower is offline, but it is still doable.

Kaanchana
Tax-haven
#8 - 2011-11-29 02:42:36 UTC
Breaker77 wrote:
Kaanchana wrote:
On a different topic, would it be possible for an abbadon to take down an offline small pos provided there will be no defenders? If so, approximately how long will it take?


Small tower AFK in a few hours.

I've managed to take down a medium DG tower in about 26 hours, minus downtime, solo before. Of course being a DG tower it had extra hitpoints. That was also with an alt that had large energy turrets 3, amarr BS 3 or 4, and sentry drones 3.

Skill up a little more it would take a little less time. Soloing a large tower, thats gonna take a while due to the shield regen rate even though the tower is offline, but it is still doable.



Thanks mate, so mega pulse apoc with 3 sentries, max skills must be good enough to take it down in few hours? I can add a torp raven if needed, but prefer to be afk.
Gizan
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#9 - 2011-11-29 03:27:59 UTC
find out your dps, then take the rep of the towers shields and subtract that from your dps, then take the ammount of shields/armor/structure and divide that by your dps(dps - shield passive recharge)
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#10 - 2011-11-29 04:38:39 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
If it's an offline tower, wardec and take a couple insured Pulse Laser Domis with t2 Heavies to go shoot it afk. (Best and cheapest [meta 3 guns] afk DPS availiable, is there anything the Domi can't do) Use an alt corp and your towers can stay safe while you do this. If you come back and find yourself in a clone vat, I guess they weren't a dead corp.


[Dominix, Afk Structure Deeps]

Mega Modulated Energy Beam I, Multifrequency L
Mega Modulated Energy Beam I, Multifrequency L
Mega Modulated Energy Beam I, Multifrequency L
Mega Modulated Energy Beam I, Multifrequency L
Mega Modulated Energy Beam I, Multifrequency L
Mega Modulated Energy Beam I, Multifrequency L

Cap Recharger II
Cap Recharger II
Cap Recharger II
Cap Recharger II
Cap Recharger II

Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Reactor Control Unit II
Reactor Control Unit II
Reactor Control Unit II
Reactor Control Unit II

Large Sentry Damage Augmentor I
Large Sentry Damage Augmentor I
[Empty Rig slot]


Garde II x5


Just shy of 80mil per BS, 900dps with max skills. Drop the rigs to save 16mil and lose 70 dps.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Salcon Cliff
Zephyr Corp
#11 - 2011-11-29 20:03:18 UTC
Yeah, was just going to add - make sure they are a dead corp before you go afk :).

Also, those damn Minmatar towers have 50% em and 25% therm resists, so it takes forever with lasers :(. It is almost worth it to load up a Tempest or Maelestrom with autocannons and pick a good ammo (i.e. fusion)
Sapheni
Black Moon Mining
#12 - 2011-11-29 20:18:53 UTC
I am sure there are indeed empty moons within a few jumps of Jita, but it's like hunting a needle in a haystack. Most moons are occupied by offline towers. And yes, I can destroy an offline tower, but that is not the point. The towers are occupying moons - i.e. conferring a strategic advantage - without cost to the owner.


  • If the corp is dead then its infrastructure should decay;
  • If the corp is occupying a spot but not using it then it should pay for it (or the infrastucture should decay);
  • If the corp is occupying the spot in order to 'ransom' it... then it should have to pay to do so (or the infrastructure should decay).


No doubt I will have to waste a few hours shooting one of these dead towers in the end, but I don't think the current system fits with the ethos of the game and it ought to be changed.

Serial Chi
White Knights of Equestria
#13 - 2011-11-29 20:52:37 UTC
most of those offline towers arent there to block people from taking them. they are there because the owners dont want to grinding/buy the faction standings to set them back up when they return to the game/area. ccp should allow these towers to get unanchored and claimed by someone else after a certain amount of time of being inactive.
Eric Raeder
No Fee Too High
#14 - 2011-11-29 21:01:41 UTC
I have an offline tower in wormhole space that has been there for nearly a year, and would self destruct if I could, the periodic notifications I recieve about it are annoying. I would definitely like CCP to put in some mechanic that causes offline towers to unanchor after some period of time.
Ten Bulls
Sons of Olsagard
#15 - 2011-11-29 21:07:40 UTC
To narrow down your search, i suggest first looking for a system that has cheap rent, and more than two available corp slots.

If lots of corps already setup in a system its less likely to have available moons.

Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2011-11-29 21:40:51 UTC
I'm seeing the potential for a new sort of merc corp here. Pay someone the war dec fee, plus a merc fee, and they take down the offline towers around hi sec.
Sapheni
Black Moon Mining
#17 - 2011-11-29 22:04:56 UTC
A low-risk way to test the new battlecruisers... now that's an idea. Big smile
Abdiel Kavash
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#18 - 2011-11-29 22:11:13 UTC
Sapheni wrote:
Obviously one can pay a fee, war dec the corp and blow up their unprotected small tower pretty quickly, but that's not really the point: it costs them nothing to leave a tower anchored in space, effectively claiming an area which another player could use.

FYI, even a small tower costs more than a wardec fee.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#19 - 2011-11-30 12:54:43 UTC
Serial Chi wrote:
most of those offline towers arent there to block people from taking them. they are there because the owners dont want to grinding/buy the faction standings to set them back up when they return to the game/area. ccp should allow these towers to get unanchored and claimed by someone else after a certain amount of time of being inactive.


Sounds pretty good... how about something like this so we can have a numbers discussion:

30 days of inactive, then they become hackable (l4 or l5 required).
You hack the tower, and it becomes yours. You have one hour to fuel it or it goes boom (or something, I dunno).

flying up to a tower, you won't know if it's hackable or not, so you just have to try with all offlined towers. If it's not hackable, you fail with some specific message that you're not able to gain access to the tower's computers (i.e. something really specific so you KNOW you'll never succeed). Otherwise, you just get normal failure notes (stuff along the lines of "almost had it ... maybe if I tried ...") or a success message.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Jenn Makanen
Doomheim
#20 - 2011-11-30 13:09:14 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Serial Chi wrote:
most of those offline towers arent there to block people from taking them. they are there because the owners dont want to grinding/buy the faction standings to set them back up when they return to the game/area. ccp should allow these towers to get unanchored and claimed by someone else after a certain amount of time of being inactive.


Sounds pretty good... how about something like this so we can have a numbers discussion:

30 days of inactive, then they become hackable (l4 or l5 required).
You hack the tower, and it becomes yours. You have one hour to fuel it or it goes boom (or something, I dunno).

flying up to a tower, you won't know if it's hackable or not, so you just have to try with all offlined towers. If it's not hackable, you fail with some specific message that you're not able to gain access to the tower's computers (i.e. something really specific so you KNOW you'll never succeed). Otherwise, you just get normal failure notes (stuff along the lines of "almost had it ... maybe if I tried ...") or a success message.



Sounds good to me.
123Next page