These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3361 - 2015-02-06 17:14:46 UTC
well. at least i dont pick my skills after what stats they use to skill.
i pick my skills what i wanna fly. and if thats a big ship with guns and shields and armor which takes more than a year i let evemon calculate the fastest way for that.
if you show me ingame how i can do that i would appreciate that.
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
#3362 - 2015-02-06 17:15:08 UTC
Thread derailing...

Who cares about evemon. I don't.

What i care about is that something that was fine for 10 years no longer is. A CSM person posted to claim that 99% think mulitboxing is cheating, finally we are having people band with no explanations other "anything that is not eve shall invoke a banhammer if we feel like it".

What is going to be changed next, because of a vocal minority that want everything to be perfectly "fair". Fixed screen resolution? no multiboxing at all?

In the mean time the power of two advertising continues.

AKA the scientist.

Death and Glory!

Well fun is also good.

Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3363 - 2015-02-06 17:27:39 UTC
we already had those voices here, claiming only one active client at a time per player.
Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#3364 - 2015-02-06 18:31:44 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
well. at least i dont pick my skills after what stats they use to skill.
i pick my skills what i wanna fly. and if thats a big ship with guns and shields and armor which takes more than a year i let evemon calculate the fastest way for that.
if you show me ingame how i can do that i would appreciate that.



you know there are only a couple of combinations to train skills in right?

int/mem=armor,rigging,astrometics,shields, target management, electronics, engineering(expect WU&AWU), neural enhancement.
per/will= t1 spaceships, gunnery (WU&AWU )
will/per= t2 ship types
mem/per=drones

Things that normally don't require a full remap for are navigation( int/per) social (char/int) navigation can be done at the same time when int is your primary to get the most benefit .
Are the basic ones for pvp and shooting red crosses.

the profile can only be changed once a year unless there are bonus remaps available. And the greatest training time will always be when you have maxed a primary and secondary vs spreading them around. As if you spread them around you gain in the short term to hurt yourself in the long term.
ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers
#3365 - 2015-02-06 18:41:43 UTC
Marsha Mallow
#3366 - 2015-02-06 19:16:38 UTC
ShadowandLight wrote:
Are you making fun of my blue helmet

It's envy. I'm not playing space barbie until I get a proper hat.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3367 - 2015-02-06 21:49:53 UTC
first.
posting a gm petition answer is violating the eula.
secondary.
why dont this gm show up here and clarifies this for all and good to read?
Marsha Mallow
#3368 - 2015-02-06 22:15:17 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
posting a gm petition answer is violating the eula.

That looked like a Dev response rather than a GM. Reposting it might be naughty and they might tell him off, but it's upto them how they enforce the EULA. Strictly speaking, if they were going to enforce the EULA literally we'd all be ballgagged for obscenity. They'd also have to ballgag half of the staff.

Charadrass wrote:
why dont this gm show up here and clarifies this for all and good to read?

Maybe they are scared of engaging in a public debate with angry multiboxers where they might accidentally slip up and show their true feelings by referring to you as those-peasants-everyone-hates-but-we-need-to-keep-the-lights-on.
Maybe they really love you and would prefer to keep it a dirty secret.
Maybe they just find this thread hilarious, and keep doing the face.
Maybe they are in the pub.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Hilti Enaka
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#3369 - 2015-02-06 22:15:32 UTC
Quote:
Lastly, multiboxing is allowed, and programs designed for multiboxing in mind which allow a player to manually issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed. In the same vein as what has been stated above, the player must be manually sending the commands; if a program is automating those commands for you, then it would be considered a breach of our EULA.


So after reading this threadnaught im still unclear on what is allowed and what is not when it comes to controlling multiple clients at once?
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#3370 - 2015-02-06 22:16:53 UTC
Lady Rift wrote:
And i didn't say anything on eft in that last post cause I have friends who will do that thing for me.
evemon for training queue can be done in game now that you aren't limited to a 24 hour queue. It really is only useful for a faster way to see what skill a mod requires to use and then compare it against of mods of that type. You can queue up to 10 years in the skill queue if I remember CCP right.
So trying to say that evemon is a distinct and definite advantage to acquiring things in game faster is a lie. I get my 2610sp/hr all the time without it and evemon wouldn't let me train faster than that. (I use +4's)
Evemon might be more convenient but doesn't accelerate acquiring things


You might not use EFT, but your friends might. And others sure as heck do use it, so stop trying to dismiss it outright.
EVEMon allows a player who hasn't memorized what each skill's attributes are, plug in a ship or a fit that he wants to fly, hit "optimize remap", and it'll tell him how to get the most SP / hour possible, giving him a distinct advantage over someone who does not use such a program and just "eyeballs" it.

Quote:
Evemon might be more convenient but doesn't accelerate acquiring things

Neither did ISBoxer, according to CCP's interpretation of 6A3 being on a per-character basis, and not a per-human being basis. No doubt whichever CCP or CSM that wanted "one account online per person" will re-interpret that to ban multiple EVE instances per IP/MAC address or per computer, and when that day happens, I will be sitting front row center with a bucket of popcorn and a cellphone, calling up everyone who ever said "hurrdurr it's not a slippery slope" and saying "I told you so". AFAICT, they haven't changed their interpretation of 6A3, but I may be wrong. In which case, "I told you so."
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3371 - 2015-02-06 22:32:54 UTC
all that we want is a clear statement what is allowed and what not. they KNOW by now what isboxer can do and how the functions are called.
it is NOT a problem to tell your customers what is ok and what not.
any other company ignoring customers this way is losing customers. so is ccp.
dont know if Hilmar is aware of the situation.
Marsha Mallow
#3372 - 2015-02-06 22:38:22 UTC
Hilti Enaka wrote:
So after reading this threadnaught im still unclear on what is allowed and what is not when it comes to controlling multiple clients at once?

You could just refer to the OP. This threadnaught is people attempting to contradict it and find workarounds, then having hysterics when random botters get banned. The muttering on their internal botscrub forums (which anyone can view) is even more amusing.

There is a free player made app here which can be used to support multiple clients. Apparently FoxFour is a perverted multiboxer too. You should all harangue this person at SausageFest.

Charadrass wrote:
all that we want is a clear statement what is allowed and what not. they KNOW by now what isboxer can do and how the functions are called.
it is NOT a problem to tell your customers what is ok and what not.
any other company ignoring customers this way is losing customers. so is ccp.
dont know if Hilmar is aware of the situation.

Shouldn't you be taking that up with the ISaBotter owners? You're paying them for the product, after all.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3373 - 2015-02-06 22:46:00 UTC
who iam paying for what ever is not your concern.
actually i am paying 19 accounts with real money to ccp. and therefore ccp has the ******* obligation to set things clear.
Marsha Mallow
#3374 - 2015-02-06 23:11:42 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
who iam paying for what ever is not your concern.
actually i am paying 19 accounts with real money to ccp. and therefore ccp has the ******* obligation to set things clear.

I'm currently paying for 32 via plex, which actually earns CCP more money. Normally I average 40-60. Guess I just 'elevated' myself above you by wiggling my digits, no addons required.

Can I ask a genuine question though?

My gameplay has been nerfed repeatedly over the time I've played, and with regard to farming it is a concern because I'd rather earn it than pay to play (scruffy student). With as little effort as possible, because PVE is disgusting. My chosen farming method is about to get hit - probably nuked, if I'm honest. The rationale looks solid to me, I really can't protest it from such an obviously selfish position when the wider benefits are blatantly obvious. The change will benefit more players than me (I tend to see this fairly simplistically). So.. I look at it for a while, mutter, grumble, whine (mainly at myself for not ditching the project sooner).... then start considering new options. Simple as that. It's done, it was good for a while, I abused it while I could - but there are plenty of other avenues to grub about in.

What are your new options?

What you guys in here have been saying for a lot of this thread is that you utterly refuse to give up automated farming. You could take the easy route, and go to another game. You could take the harder route and adjust your gameplay to stay in 'The Game' as Peligro put it. Bless, I really liked that film. Or you could whinge bitterly about how you were treated, campaign badly and make yourselves look like a group of complete imbeciles who should be banned for humanitarian reasons. All you've done here is ensure that multiboxers who feel entitled to special treatment should be backhanded, everywhere.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3375 - 2015-02-06 23:24:42 UTC
i adjusted my gameplay according to the broadcasting and Multiplexing bans.
i dont have any other method beeing banable seen in the Forums yet.

so to what should i adjust? some guy posted so called gm answer? really?
Marsha Mallow
#3376 - 2015-02-06 23:39:41 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
i adjusted my gameplay according to the broadcasting and Multiplexing bans.
i dont have any other method beeing banable seen in the Forums yet.

so to what should i adjust? some guy posted so called gm answer? really?

You raise a good point that the nuances may be missed by non-English speakers in all fairness. But if you are German that's an established community with a lot of people who can translate. The native English speakers here are playing with semantics, pretty badly.

If you haven't been banned and you are following the new rules, don't worry about it. IF you get hit with a ban, then squawk.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3377 - 2015-02-06 23:47:52 UTC
in the past the german gms posted their opinions instead of the correct meaning of an english posted decision.

for example. in the german Forums there are multiple postings by gms stating that isboxer is forbidden years ago.
contrary to the english part of the Forums.

you might see now why i am asking for an official answer in english speaking part of the Forums.
Marsha Mallow
#3378 - 2015-02-07 00:01:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Marsha Mallow
Charadrass wrote:
in the past the german gms posted their opinions instead of the correct meaning of an english posted decision.

for example. in the german Forums there are multiple postings by gms stating that isboxer is forbidden years ago.
contrary to the english part of the Forums.

you might see now why i am asking for an official answer in english speaking part of the Forums.

Again, a good point. But you need to cite these claims (even if they are in German).
The language barrier doesn't mean you are stupid, if anything, the opposite.
In which case you should be able to judge the spirit of rulings - and they shouldn't utterly destroy your game. Unless it hinges upon a specific mechanic or tool you cannot play without.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3379 - 2015-02-07 00:04:59 UTC
i dont Need a reason for asking for a Statement in the english part of the Forums do i?

Marsha Mallow
#3380 - 2015-02-07 00:18:15 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
i dont Need a reason for asking for a Statement in the english part of the Forums do i?

Well no, ofc, but it's still amusing

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day