These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
Trakow
Beta Switch
#3341 - 2015-02-05 19:10:54 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Trakow wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
With 4 monitors in a square, you can activate modules on each of them fairly fast if you simply stick to the corners in the center of the setup. So, banhammer.

Well there you go, so just do that. You just proved that you can play just as easily without using VideoFX, so why use it?


No, I just proved that player solutions can get you banned for playing EVE without the use of ISBoxer.


No, because CCP can see if you're running ISBoxer or not. I am a programmer and it's really easy to include a bit of code that sees what other processes are running, which can then be checked against a list of known software that is banned. It's also easy to find out which windows have focus, and if the focus changes without an ALT-TAB key combination or a mouse-click, that's also an easy way to find round-robin users. Or, alternatively, if the key press action is sent directly to another window, without the focus changing, which is also possible, then that's another red flag that round-robin is being used. It's too easy.

One example of being caught red-handed is the link someone posted a while back about an incursion player who got banned. He denied using ISBoxer/input broadcasting at first when he complained on the forum, but then later admitted that he was using VideoFX and round-robin. So it wasn't the input-broadcasting that got him caught, because he wasn't doing that. They obviously knew that he was using the software. I have yet to hear about someone getting banned for using ISBoxer when they actually weren't. And those that have been banned will of course deny using it even if they are, but I have yet to hear about someone getting their account unbanned after finding it was a false accusation.
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
#3342 - 2015-02-05 19:26:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Delt0r Garsk
Trakow wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Trakow wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
With 4 monitors in a square, you can activate modules on each of them fairly fast if you simply stick to the corners in the center of the setup. So, banhammer.

Well there you go, so just do that. You just proved that you can play just as easily without using VideoFX, so why use it?


No, I just proved that player solutions can get you banned for playing EVE without the use of ISBoxer.


No, because CCP can see if you're running ISBoxer or not. I am a programmer and it's really easy to include a bit of code that sees what other processes are running, which can then be checked against a list of known software that is banned. It's also easy to find out which windows have focus, and if the focus changes without an ALT-TAB key combination or a mouse-click, that's also an easy way to find round-robin users. Or, alternatively, if the key press action is sent directly to another window, without the focus changing, which is also possible, then that's another red flag that round-robin is being used. It's too easy.

One example of being caught red-handed is the link someone posted a while back about an incursion player who got banned. He denied using ISBoxer/input broadcasting at first when he complained on the forum, but then later admitted that he was using VideoFX and round-robin. So it wasn't the input-broadcasting that got him caught, because he wasn't doing that. They obviously knew that he was using the software. I have yet to hear about someone getting banned for using ISBoxer when they actually weren't. And those that have been banned will of course deny using it even if they are, but I have yet to hear about someone getting their account unbanned after finding it was a false accusation.

You are wrong. It is easy to hide these things. For example i am on linux. To eve it looks like it is the only thing running on windows, even when i multibox. Even worse, is the privacy implications in the EU that no EULA can overrule.

AKA the scientist.

Death and Glory!

Well fun is also good.

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#3343 - 2015-02-05 19:42:59 UTC
You forget one major thing about the guy who got banned.

He was following CCP's new interpretation of the EULA and got banned. He never denied he was using broadcasting, he denied he was using straight broadcasting. If CCP is going to ignore their own EULA regarding that, after promising us they can detect the difference between the two....
ashley Eoner
#3344 - 2015-02-05 19:44:21 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
Trakow wrote:
Completely different because of the space in between windows. VideoFX can place everything you need all next to each other in a small space which makes it much easier to click on everything within seconds. If you have 5 monitors you need to move your mouse from screen to screen and isn't as easy. So, VideoFX is changing the way the game is displayed and how you play it.
Except it isn't as you can easily stack eve in window mode so all your overviews and such are right next to each other. I can run VGs about the same without isboxer as I can with isboxer's videofx. The only difference is someone with a smaller monitor at a lower resolution can only keep up with me if they are using videofx.

If anything videofx levels the field by allowing those without the financial resources to buy a 55 inch 4k monitor to do something similar with a smaller display.

Trakow wrote:
One example of being caught red-handed is the link someone posted a while back about an incursion player who got banned. He denied using ISBoxer/input broadcasting at first when he complained on the forum, but then later admitted that he was using VideoFX and round-robin. So it wasn't the input-broadcasting that got him caught, because he wasn't doing that. They obviously knew that he was using the software. I have yet to hear about someone getting banned for using ISBoxer when they actually weren't. And those that have been banned will of course deny using it even if they are, but I have yet to hear about someone getting their account unbanned after finding it was a false accusation.


I like your imagination and shamelessness. You have no issue with making up whole stories in an attempt to support your statements. Also I love your "no one is ever banned for multiboxing and if they were obviously they were using isboxer and are lying. Guilty no matter what. God I hope you don't serve on jury duty.

Think about this for a moment. If CCP can tell what you're running then how do they fail so massively at stopping bots? I mean they ban some and I applaud them for that but any trip to certain areas will result in you seeing a lot of obvious bots running.

Lets head back to WoW and their Warden. It was blatantly obvious to anyone playing WoW that Blizzard had added a scanner to the game. That scanner called warden fails MASSIVELY to catch such obvious bots as the newbie level 1s floating in space forming website names....
Trakow
Beta Switch
#3345 - 2015-02-05 20:01:56 UTC
ashley Eoner wrote:
Blahblah...


Learn how capitalization of proper nouns works, then talk.
Trakow
Beta Switch
#3346 - 2015-02-05 20:13:11 UTC
Delt0r Garsk wrote:
You are wrong. It is easy to hide these things. For example i am on linux. To eve it looks like it is the only thing running on windows, even when i multibox. Even worse, is the privacy implications in the EU that no EULA can overrule.


There are plenty of tools to see that, lsof, netstat, nc, and while they don't show all processes from all users, they can show processes from the current user that executed the program. Works for me in Ubuntu...
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
#3347 - 2015-02-05 20:22:58 UTC
Not from within wine it doesn't. Then there are instances, and injection and well clearly your not as much of a programmer as you think you are.

Oh and using isboxer is *not* cheating.

AKA the scientist.

Death and Glory!

Well fun is also good.

Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3348 - 2015-02-05 20:42:30 UTC
god damn, offline for two days and new wall of text in the Forums.

to the Video FX haters.
i can just Position 10 Webcams to the Monitors i have and accumulate the recorded Videos on one Screen. not third Party Software used. but same effect.

so why not using the power of the graphicscard to do the same? out of eve btw cause videofx is NOT changing eve. ist just recording eve and displaying it on another Position.
you dont want to ban fraps for recording eve. why do you want to ban Video fx for that?

ccp falcon stated that in the lates Podcast that videofx is NOT taken as a bannable offense. and since no other Statement is beeing put here readable for ALL OF THE COMMUNITY we dont have reason to believe otherwise.

and to the guys who are not getting tired to post again that evemon, teamspeak etc is not causing an unfair Advantage over Players not using those.

THEY ARE. teamspeak is giving you a huge Advantage over another fleet not using teamspeak during fight.
evemon is giving you a huge Advantage in planning skills etc. compared to a guy who is not using it.

I am issueing ten commands to ten different boxes using ten different keys.
so no difference to a normal Player cause i dont use multiplex or broadcasting.

if you want to get me banned cause i use my ten fingers then go on.
since eve is not getting into the News anymore with good things it might has to be the first MMORPG banning Players for using all fingers a normal grown human has.

i'm looking forward to that.

Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#3349 - 2015-02-05 20:46:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Lady Rift
Lol at evemon being an advantage. Should also have included spreadsheets and websites(as these whole forums)
ashley Eoner
#3350 - 2015-02-05 20:51:01 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
Delt0r Garsk wrote:
Not from within wine it doesn't. Then there are instances, and injection and well clearly your not as much of a programmer as you think you are.

Oh and using isboxer is *not* cheating.

Be careful as under the rules being discussed using wine would be a bannable offense.


As noted above Falcon already made the argument against banning videofx in a podcast not that long ago.
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3351 - 2015-02-05 20:55:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Charadrass
Lady Rift wrote:
Lol at evemon being an advantage. Should also have included spreadsheets and websites(as these hold forums)


you are using evemon dont you?
so it is not bothering you.
People who dont use evemon do have a clear disadvantage cause they cant plan and remap properly.
in fact, they are losing time over those players who are using evemon.
Players with evemon have to pay less to reach their skillgoals.
so evemon is pay to win?
so why the **** is that allowed?
Dirk MacGirk
Specter Syndicate
#3352 - 2015-02-05 23:02:14 UTC
The reason why using examples like Teamspeak, Evemon, Dotlan, EFT, Excel, Windows Calculator or any other third or fourth-party program you can think of is so fail is because CCP does not consider these part of in-game play. They may indeed create an advantage, but these apps do not interact with the client on the input side of the equation. Using VFX for streaming reasons doesn't either. But if you are using VFX to create inputs into the game, then that is an entirely different story. You are ostensibly creating an alternate user interface. These other programs that are continuously referenced don't change anything but the decision-making process in the mind of the player sitting at the keyboard. How is this not clear to you?

All third-party apps are not created equal. Even if you could legitimately make a non-laughable case that any of these apps, up to and including Windows itself, somehow bestows an advantage, it doesn't even matter. CCP has the right to rule in favor of one or more at the expense of any of the others. Why not just focus your efforts on defending ISBoxer based on its own merits? It's just a smarter argument than trying to create some equivalency between all third-party apps. CCP could decide Dotlan or EFT create the most lopsided advantage in the history of gaming and still choose to allow them. It has absolutely nothing to do with their decision related to ISboxer.

At this point, the arguments in favor of ISBoxer and the examples of various workarounds have probably hurt the pro-ISBoxer case more than helped it. Your best case, and one that I have been trying to hammer on for months, is in trying to pressure CCP to say more publicly so that the rules are as understandable as possible. However, I think this is just going to come down to all sides hearing what they want to hear by twisting the words to fit a desired outcome. Sadly, that isn't going to save anyone when/if the bans come. "I thought what Falcon said meant this..." isn't going to be a defense. If Falcon said anything it is: petition CCP for an answer. You may want to try that.

In the end, I'm really starting to wonder if some of you are just dead-enders. That if it really does go the way it seems like it is going that you'll just quit anyway, so why not go down fighting until you get banned. Fair enough. We've all got to go out some way. Good Luck. I hope they bring more clarity and perhaps they will at FanFest. I'm sure some of you will be there and will be able to meet face to face with Falcon and Peligro and others. I look forward to what may come of some face to face sidebars or even their presentation from Team Security.
Trakow
Beta Switch
#3353 - 2015-02-05 23:58:22 UTC
Delt0r Garsk wrote:
Not from within wine it doesn't. Then there are instances, and injection and well clearly your not as much of a programmer as you think you are.

Oh and using isboxer is *not* cheating.


An instance is just an executable running, and by running multiple copies of the executable, you're creating multiple instances. And injection has nothing to do with anything because DLL injection and SQL injection has nothing to do with anything I'm talking about, and nothing to do with wine or eve... So don't talk about random things that you googled and know nothing about.
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3354 - 2015-02-06 12:01:36 UTC
Every Third Party Program is creating an In Game Advantage.

EvEMon - reducing significantly your needed time for long term skill plannings. thereforce it might reduces your Ingame or Realworld Money costs.
Teamspeak - creating a significant better Fleetmovement and allows faster control and reaction in certain circumstances.
EveCentral - allows daytraders and "marketbots"! to react quicker to the market than normal pilots. that is a huge advantage over normal players.
Siggy - Wormhole overviews. without that a normal pilot has to do a lot more to spread his scanned information.
isboxer with broadcasting - allowing one player to fly with multiple accounts and do the same actions to ALL accounts at the same time. hence. you misclick and warp into a trap. you die. with all your boxes. there is no difference between 10 players flying and 1 player flying with 10 boxes. except the pure envy the 1 player gets. for what? i dont know. he has multiple costs in ships, ammo, plex / realmoney. and multiple chances to lose all ships at once.
isboxer without broadcasting - still allowing one player to fly with multiple accounts, but this time the player has to interact with each box. this can be achieved via keybuttons linked to a specific box. so every command send out needs to be pressed seperatly.

yes. you have an advantage with third party software.
yes teamspeak and evemon are falling under this description as well as isboxer.

and no. your freighter got not ganked from an isboxer because he could. your freighter got ganked cause it was worth it.
if youre getting ganked by a regular pirate crew or an isboxer doesnt matter in the end, does it?
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
#3355 - 2015-02-06 12:28:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Delt0r Garsk
Trakow wrote:
Delt0r Garsk wrote:
Not from within wine it doesn't. Then there are instances, and injection and well clearly your not as much of a programmer as you think you are.

Oh and using isboxer is *not* cheating.


An instance is just an executable running, and by running multiple copies of the executable, you're creating multiple instances. And injection has nothing to do with anything because DLL injection and SQL injection has nothing to do with anything I'm talking about, and nothing to do with wine or eve... So don't talk about random things that you googled and know nothing about.

Your funny. Injection, as in replace OS libs so that all os call are intercepted by your own code is not hard to do. All root kits do it. They exist for just about every OS out there.

MS, sony , Disney and other massive players in this game learn this lesson every single time they try and own others hardware in a bid to curb copyright stuff. You can't make other peoples computers do what you want them to do. What makes you think that CCP can do better.

Oh computer security was my day job in a previous life. It is not hard to hide running programs. Especially when eve does not run with elevated permissions.

And by instance i mean Xen and other virtualization stuff.

AKA the scientist.

Death and Glory!

Well fun is also good.

Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#3356 - 2015-02-06 13:47:32 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
Lady Rift wrote:
Lol at evemon being an advantage. Should also have included spreadsheets and websites(as these hold forums)


you are using evemon dont you?
so it is not bothering you.
People who dont use evemon do have a clear disadvantage cause they cant plan and remap properly.
in fact, they are losing time over those players who are using evemon.
Players with evemon have to pay less to reach their skillgoals.
so evemon is pay to win?
so why the **** is that allowed?



don't bother with the new skill queue evemon just waste time. I know from in game what skills are what attributes and once I make a year ish queue I remap to those attributes. I can do this quickly as its not hard at all. Evemon doesn't do anything that you can't figure out ingame.

Evemon doesn't do anything for speed, proof set up a plan and see how fast it trains oh that's right it doesn't you need to go into eve and queue the skill and you train at the same speed with evemon installed or not.


EFT fitting tools I don't bother with. If someone wants me to pvp they either give me a ship(doesn't happen much anymore :( ) or they just post a fitting for me.
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#3357 - 2015-02-06 14:31:37 UTC
sorry. forgot EFT.

evemon is calculating the best remap.
i dont see you filling the skill queue for a year and calculating manually what should be the best remap. really i dont see it.

and even though.
evemon is violating the new eula directly.
ccps statement that this violation is ok ....erm... will not be a bannable offense is rendering the whole eula useless and greyzoned.
cause ccp can flip their statements each and every second. plus youre getting different statements based on the ccp employee you are asking.

and the best thing is.
one gm is accusing another for lying.
i am not kidding.

so ccp, balls to the walls. state clearly what is allowed and what is not.
regarding to the forums and eula statements: videofx + manuall multiboxing one key per box per command is allowed.
so stick to that and stop banning players for beeing fast.

or post here in the forums. from a dev, a gm, or from hilmar himself. that isboxer + videofx + manual multiboxing is forbidden.

easy for everyone. the whole problematique is there because ccp dont get it done to publish a clear statement.

we were happy as ccp stated: broadcasting and multiplexing is forbidden. we adapted and still got banned a few.

we want to stay in eve as customers. so if you want us to stay. erase the grey areas. its not that hard.
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#3358 - 2015-02-06 14:36:53 UTC
Lady Rift wrote:
don't bother with the new skill queue evemon just waste time. I know from in game what skills are what attributes and once I make a year ish queue I remap to those attributes. I can do this quickly as its not hard at all. Evemon doesn't do anything that you can't figure out ingame.

Evemon doesn't do anything for speed, proof set up a plan and see how fast it trains oh that's right it doesn't you need to go into eve and queue the skill and you train at the same speed with evemon installed or not.

EFT fitting tools I don't bother with. If someone wants me to pvp they either give me a ship(doesn't happen much anymore :( ) or they just post a fitting for me.


It's not that it makes it faster. It's that it can be argued that it grants an advantage over someone who DOESN'T use EVEMon, or EFT. With EVEMon, you can optimize your queue for a year or more and optimize your attribute remap timing and train faster than someone who hasn't mapped it out and perfectly remaps every year.

For EFT, just because you don't use it doesn't mean it can't provide an advantage. My current PVP toy came about because of EFT/PYFA, as I have to use a meta module in order to cram everything on without implants. I challenge you to find me someone who has memorized each and every module in EVE and their CPU/PG attributes. I'd be very surprised if someone has. Some of the meta modules (damage controls, for example) are kinda expensive, and new players without much ISK or market skills would buy the meta 4 one (currently 8m or so Jita) and find out it didn't fit, or that he could fit the T2 version, and now he's wasted ISK.
Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#3359 - 2015-02-06 16:53:04 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Lady Rift wrote:
don't bother with the new skill queue evemon just waste time. I know from in game what skills are what attributes and once I make a year ish queue I remap to those attributes. I can do this quickly as its not hard at all. Evemon doesn't do anything that you can't figure out ingame.

Evemon doesn't do anything for speed, proof set up a plan and see how fast it trains oh that's right it doesn't you need to go into eve and queue the skill and you train at the same speed with evemon installed or not.

EFT fitting tools I don't bother with. If someone wants me to pvp they either give me a ship(doesn't happen much anymore :( ) or they just post a fitting for me.


It's not that it makes it faster. It's that it can be argued that it grants an advantage over someone who DOESN'T use EVEMon, or EFT. With EVEMon, you can optimize your queue for a year or more and optimize your attribute remap timing and train faster than someone who hasn't mapped it out and perfectly remaps every year.

For EFT, just because you don't use it doesn't mean it can't provide an advantage. My current PVP toy came about because of EFT/PYFA, as I have to use a meta module in order to cram everything on without implants. I challenge you to find me someone who has memorized each and every module in EVE and their CPU/PG attributes. I'd be very surprised if someone has. Some of the meta modules (damage controls, for example) are kinda expensive, and new players without much ISK or market skills would buy the meta 4 one (currently 8m or so Jita) and find out it didn't fit, or that he could fit the T2 version, and now he's wasted ISK.



And i didn't say anything on eft in that last post cause I have friends who will do that thing for me.

evemon for training queue can be done in game now that you aren't limited to a 24 hour queue. It really is only useful for a faster way to see what skill a mod requires to use and then compare it against of mods of that type. You can queue up to 10 years in the skill queue if I remember CCP right.

So trying to say that evemon is a distinct and definite advantage to acquiring things in game faster is a lie. I get my 2610sp/hr all the time without it and evemon wouldn't let me train faster than that. (I use +4's)

Evemon might be more convenient but doesn't accelerate acquiring things
Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#3360 - 2015-02-06 17:06:31 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
sorry. forgot EFT.

evemon is calculating the best remap.
i dont see you filling the skill queue for a year and calculating manually what should be the best remap. really i dont see it.

and even though.
evemon is violating the new eula directly.
ccps statement that this violation is ok ....erm... will not be a bannable offense is rendering the whole eula useless and greyzoned.
cause ccp can flip their statements each and every second. plus youre getting different statements based on the ccp employee you are asking.

and the best thing is.
one gm is accusing another for lying.
i am not kidding.

so ccp, balls to the walls. state clearly what is allowed and what is not.
regarding to the forums and eula statements: videofx + manuall multiboxing one key per box per command is allowed.
so stick to that and stop banning players for beeing fast.

or post here in the forums. from a dev, a gm, or from hilmar himself. that isboxer + videofx + manual multiboxing is forbidden.

easy for everyone. the whole problematique is there because ccp dont get it done to publish a clear statement.

we were happy as ccp stated: broadcasting and multiplexing is forbidden. we adapted and still got banned a few.

we want to stay in eve as customers. so if you want us to stay. erase the grey areas. its not that hard.




Its really not hard to pick int+mem skills for a year, then pick per+will for a year and so on. When you could only have a 24 hour queue it was a pain to remember what skills you wanted to train next sometimes but with over a year long queue now it really isnt hard.