These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
KC Kamikaze
Blue-Fire
#2981 - 2014-12-31 16:44:25 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:

At least no more clone upgrade costs anymore.


Definitely a good thing. I think about 85% of the changes CCP make I agree with for the most part. The wormhole mechanics changes were a real bastard to lower class holes while high class holes it made a lot better. I moved out of my c2-c3 because of them. I see no benefit to the broadcasting ban though for anyone.
STORMTROOPER301
Clan Shadow Wolf
Tactical Narcotics Team
#2982 - 2014-12-31 16:57:21 UTC
Up until now this has been my favorite game. Now CCP is dumbing things down and nerfing things that are sucessful. If you keep listining to crybabys and changing the game to make them happy, pretty soon those will be the only people playing this game. Eve has always been a game with the safety turned off. It sucks to see you guys ruin this game for so many people that have planned out what they want to do, and have taken lots of time and money out of thier lives to do so. This move makes CCP the biggest scammer in eve.
Sol Project
Shitt Outta Luck - GANKING4GOOD
#2983 - 2014-12-31 17:20:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Sol Project
All these selfish people who always only see their own interests
and never care about anything else but themselves.

Disgusting freaks.

The amount of bullshit some people's minds come up with
just to feel justified in whining, raging or crying about this change is flabbergasting.


Most of you people who complain about this lack any decency,
or dignity, or understanding of this game beyond your small scope you call "viewpoint".


It's no loss at all when you are gone.

Ladies of New Eden YC 117 by Indahmawar Fazmarai

Warning: NSFW! Barely legal girls in underwear!

Diana Kim > AND THIS IS WHY THE FEDERATION MUST BE DESTROYED!!

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#2984 - 2014-12-31 18:48:14 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
*snipped out post I don't care about*


I'm quoting you for your signature. I watched the fan fest stream and was physically at vegas, so proof that they said nothing was changing for multiboxers?

And even if they did say that, they did not lie. I multibox, I use 3 accounts off a single instance of eve, I alt tab and manually control every account. The removal of input broadcast changes absolutely nothing for me. So by definition of what muliboxing is, there is no lie. So... proof? Cause frankly... you are wrong or don't understand the word "MultiBox"

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

KC Kamikaze
Blue-Fire
#2985 - 2014-12-31 19:01:06 UTC
Sol Project wrote:
All these selfish people who always only see their own interests
and never care about anything else but themselves.

Disgusting freaks.

The amount of bullshit some people's minds come up with
just to feel justified in whining, raging or crying about this change is flabbergasting.


Most of you people who complain about this lack any decency,
or dignity, or understanding of this game beyond your small scope you call "viewpoint".


It's no loss at all when you are gone.



There are plenty of reasons reasons to oppose this change that have merit.
1. The DEVs said there would be no change to multiboxing then changed their minds. - People have spent a lot of time and money in developing a multiboxing system that allows them to play eve the way they want to. (Sandbox Remember?) To be approved to do this and then go back on that is very bad form.

2. I think we can all agree that you can't pilot multiple accounts with the efficiency that you can pilot one and the difficulty increases exponentially the more accounts you use. Sure an ISBoxer can do more than a single player ... he's paid and worked for the ability to do that the same as anyone else can. Just because you have no desire to do this is irrelevant. Sandbox right?

3. The people who are bitching about it have no valid grounds to *****. Oh that multiboxer with teh bombers got me waaa waaa. Lets be crybabies and petition ccp for all our lossmails. If you got bombed I guess you weren't vigilant enough to avoid it, but no it's not your fault it's that isboxer who did more work and preparation while you were blindly ratting away then you can even comprehend.... Or.... oh this multiboxer is clearing all the ore sites or combat sites. He should have to fleet with other people and not do it solo.. you don't like it form your own damn fleet with other people and wardec them or if you sniveling bears ever come out of highsec just take matters into your own hands. Sandbox rules right?

It's ok ... you whine and cry enough ccp will make the rest of us conform to what you want and we will still always be better than you so you will continue to petition and whine and cry at every opportunity. This game is like the burning crusade expansion of WoW .. hard as **** and unforgiving... by the time you are done whining and crying we will have pandas and faceroll content in every corner. You will get what you want and we will move on to another game. Fortunately we are not there yet and I sincerely hope that CCP moves away from this sandbox for toddlers mentatity and puts the game back in the real players control.
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2986 - 2014-12-31 20:08:10 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
I'm quoting you for your signature. I watched the fan fest stream and was physically at vegas, so proof that they said nothing was changing for multiboxers?
And even if they did say that, they did not lie. I multibox, I use 3 accounts off a single instance of eve, I alt tab and manually control every account. The removal of input broadcast changes absolutely nothing for me. So by definition of what muliboxing is, there is no lie. So... proof? Cause frankly... you are wrong or don't understand the word "MultiBox"


Sorry, I forgot to tell people to record everything they saw and heard. Next time, I'll be sure to have people bring hidden microphones and button cams.
From someone attempting to make the same argument earlier:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
"Multiboxing" encompasses ISBoxers. ISBoxers, by definition, use multiple accounts. All ISBoxers are multiboxers, but not all multiboxers are ISBoxers.

Seriously, stop treating ISBoxers as second class people.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#2987 - 2014-12-31 20:09:25 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
*snipped out post I don't care about*


I'm quoting you for your signature. I watched the fan fest stream and was physically at vegas, so proof that they said nothing was changing for multiboxers?

And even if they did say that, they did not lie. I multibox, I use 3 accounts off a single instance of eve, I alt tab and manually control every account. The removal of input broadcast changes absolutely nothing for me. So by definition of what muliboxing is, there is no lie. So... proof? Cause frankly... you are wrong or don't understand the word "MultiBox"
To be fair, you being an unaffected multiboxer means nothing is changing for *some* multiboxers.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers
#2988 - 2014-12-31 20:21:59 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
*snipped out post I don't care about*


I'm quoting you for your signature. I watched the fan fest stream and was physically at vegas, so proof that they said nothing was changing for multiboxers?

And even if they did say that, they did not lie. I multibox, I use 3 accounts off a single instance of eve, I alt tab and manually control every account. The removal of input broadcast changes absolutely nothing for me. So by definition of what muliboxing is, there is no lie. So... proof? Cause frankly... you are wrong or don't understand the word "MultiBox"
To be fair, you being an unaffected multiboxer means nothing is changing for *some* multiboxers.


Idk about other EVE multiboxers, but im spending days setting up new "processes"... partially because im anal
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#2989 - 2014-12-31 20:24:55 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
I'm quoting you for your signature. I watched the fan fest stream and was physically at vegas, so proof that they said nothing was changing for multiboxers?
And even if they did say that, they did not lie. I multibox, I use 3 accounts off a single instance of eve, I alt tab and manually control every account. The removal of input broadcast changes absolutely nothing for me. So by definition of what muliboxing is, there is no lie. So... proof? Cause frankly... you are wrong or don't understand the word "MultiBox"


Sorry, I forgot to tell people to record everything they saw and heard. Next time, I'll be sure to have people bring hidden microphones and button cams.
From someone attempting to make the same argument earlier:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
"Multiboxing" encompasses ISBoxers. ISBoxers, by definition, use multiple accounts. All ISBoxers are multiboxers, but not all multiboxers are ISBoxers.

Seriously, stop treating ISBoxers as second class people.



pssh, lots of people were filming.

and second, ISBoxers are not a citizen of anything. And you can still use ISBoxer with no problem. You just can't unse input boardcast. Thus, Multiboxing is not changing, just the way you were is. That's the difference. By definition, I am correct.

This is the equivlant of saying that because Dr, Who is cancled that all geeks are being punished.. no, only Dr. Who fans are punished, the rest will shrugs it off.

Welcome to eve, Adapt or die, HTFU and if you cancle accounts you can contract me your stuff, i'll keep it safe for you.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#2990 - 2014-12-31 20:26:08 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
*snipped out post I don't care about*


I'm quoting you for your signature. I watched the fan fest stream and was physically at vegas, so proof that they said nothing was changing for multiboxers?

And even if they did say that, they did not lie. I multibox, I use 3 accounts off a single instance of eve, I alt tab and manually control every account. The removal of input broadcast changes absolutely nothing for me. So by definition of what muliboxing is, there is no lie. So... proof? Cause frankly... you are wrong or don't understand the word "MultiBox"
To be fair, you being an unaffected multiboxer means nothing is changing for *some* multiboxers.



No, again, nothing changes for multiboxers, not a damn thing. Something is changing for inuput broadcasters who multiboxed. But that is not the same thing. By definition of what a multiboxer is I am correct.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#2991 - 2014-12-31 20:34:55 UTC  |  Edited by: DaReaper
KC Kamikaze wrote:
Sol Project wrote:
All these selfish people who always only see their own interests
and never care about anything else but themselves.

Disgusting freaks.

The amount of bullshit some people's minds come up with
just to feel justified in whining, raging or crying about this change is flabbergasting.


Most of you people who complain about this lack any decency,
or dignity, or understanding of this game beyond your small scope you call "viewpoint".


It's no loss at all when you are gone.



There are plenty of reasons reasons to oppose this change that have merit.
1. The DEVs said there would be no change to multiboxing then changed their minds. - People have spent a lot of time and money in developing a multiboxing system that allows them to play eve the way they want to. (Sandbox Remember?) To be approved to do this and then go back on that is very bad form.

2. I think we can all agree that you can't pilot multiple accounts with the efficiency that you can pilot one and the difficulty increases exponentially the more accounts you use. Sure an ISBoxer can do more than a single player ... he's paid and worked for the ability to do that the same as anyone else can. Just because you have no desire to do this is irrelevant. Sandbox right?

3. The people who are bitching about it have no valid grounds to *****. Oh that multiboxer with teh bombers got me waaa waaa. Lets be crybabies and petition ccp for all our lossmails. If you got bombed I guess you weren't vigilant enough to avoid it, but no it's not your fault it's that isboxer who did more work and preparation while you were blindly ratting away then you can even comprehend.... Or.... oh this multiboxer is clearing all the ore sites or combat sites. He should have to fleet with other people and not do it solo.. you don't like it form your own damn fleet with other people and wardec them or if you sniveling bears ever come out of highsec just take matters into your own hands. Sandbox rules right?

It's ok ... you whine and cry enough ccp will make the rest of us conform to what you want and we will still always be better than you so you will continue to petition and whine and cry at every opportunity. This game is like the burning crusade expansion of WoW .. hard as **** and unforgiving... by the time you are done whining and crying we will have pandas and faceroll content in every corner. You will get what you want and we will move on to another game. Fortunately we are not there yet and I sincerely hope that CCP moves away from this sandbox for toddlers mentatity and puts the game back in the real players control.


1) so? Who owns the game? Who makes the rules? It doesn't matter if someone spent a billion dollars making a program to work with eve and then ccp said 'no worry we don't want you to that' This argument is stupid. This is like you owning a house with a lot of land, some guy decides 'well you are not using this section of your land, so i'll build a house here' For whatever reason you did not notice till the done and you tell him 'no get off my land' the argument 'but I spent xxx amount making the house.." means jack. You do not own eve, CCP does, they are lords and gods. They can do whatever the hell they want, we just play here. And proof that they said they were not changing multiboxing? Cause I have not seen or heard any. And again Multiboxing is not changing. So there is no lie.

2) again, how much the input broadcaster paid is irrelviant. A Bot pays a lot for that program or for someone to make said program, should they be allowed to bot? A RMT pays a lot of money to setup websites so he can sell his crap, should he be allowed to? A car theif pays for the equipment and the skill to steal your car, should you just let him? That's the point. It does not matter how much time or money someone put into something. This is CCP's game. Last I checked you don't own CCP. Thus your opinion means nothing. And I've ran 5 accounts in wormhole sites at the same time with no issues, by alt tabing, so your point is what?

3) once again... Do you own ccp? They make the rules, and they decided that input broadcast was bad for the game. That all there is to it. End of discussion.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#2992 - 2014-12-31 20:42:36 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
*snipped out post I don't care about*
I'm quoting you for your signature. I watched the fan fest stream and was physically at vegas, so proof that they said nothing was changing for multiboxers?

And even if they did say that, they did not lie. I multibox, I use 3 accounts off a single instance of eve, I alt tab and manually control every account. The removal of input broadcast changes absolutely nothing for me. So by definition of what muliboxing is, there is no lie. So... proof? Cause frankly... you are wrong or don't understand the word "MultiBox"
To be fair, you being an unaffected multiboxer means nothing is changing for *some* multiboxers.
No, again, nothing changes for multiboxers, not a damn thing. Something is changing for inuput broadcasters who multiboxed. But that is not the same thing. By definition of what a multiboxer is I am correct.
There is far too much stupid in your posts.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2993 - 2014-12-31 20:43:58 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to tell people to record everything they saw and heard. Next time, I'll be sure to have people bring hidden microphones and button cams.

pssh, lots of people were filming.
and second, ISBoxers are not a citizen of anything. And you can still use ISBoxer with no problem. You just can't use input broadcast. Thus, Multiboxing is not changing, just the way you were is. That's the difference. By definition, I am correct.
This is the equivlant of saying that because Dr, Who is cancled that all geeks are being punished.. no, only Dr. Who fans are punished, the rest will shrugs it off.
Welcome to eve, Adapt or die, HTFU and if you cancel accounts you can contract me your stuff, i'll keep it safe for you.


I highlighted a word you might find interesting.
The irony coming from your post is so strong I could use it to make a longsword. This was never about ISBoxer itself being banned, despite what the trolls and the ill-informed would like you to think. This was about input broadcasting. And as I said before (which you ever-so-quickly ignored) ISBoxers ARE BY DEFINITION MULTIBOXERS. Therefore, anything which affects ISBoxers and people who use input broadcasting software affects multiboxers via set-of-value rules.

Quote:
This is the equivalent of saying that because Dr Who is canceled, geeks are being punished.

Fixed your earlier statement and removed strawman argument. An even better statement would be something like "Because Star Trek is being cancelled, geeks are being hurt" but even that's iffy.

And lastly, you tell me to HTFU when this entire change was brought about by whiners such as yourself complaining instead of adapting. Again, the irony here is strong. I've not complained in my posts. My fellow players and I presented arguments as to why this change should not occur, only to be met with strawman arguments, trolling, appeals to authority, attempts to bring emotion into this, using arguments to attack ISBoxing while excusing station trading, and an endless stream of "umad?", "stop crying", and no-true-scotsman fallacies. If anyone needs to HTFU, it's the whiners and the trollers.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#2994 - 2014-12-31 20:49:46 UTC  |  Edited by: DaReaper
Nolak Ataru wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to tell people to record everything they saw and heard. Next time, I'll be sure to have people bring hidden microphones and button cams.

pssh, lots of people were filming.
and second, ISBoxers are not a citizen of anything. And you can still use ISBoxer with no problem. You just can't use input broadcast. Thus, Multiboxing is not changing, just the way you were is. That's the difference. By definition, I am correct.
This is the equivlant of saying that because Dr, Who is cancled that all geeks are being punished.. no, only Dr. Who fans are punished, the rest will shrugs it off.
Welcome to eve, Adapt or die, HTFU and if you cancel accounts you can contract me your stuff, i'll keep it safe for you.


I highlighted a word you might find interesting.
The irony coming from your post is so strong I could use it to make a longsword. This was never about ISBoxer itself being banned, despite what the trolls and the ill-informed would like you to think. This was about input broadcasting. And as I said before (which you ever-so-quickly ignored) ISBoxers ARE BY DEFINITION MULTIBOXERS. Therefore, anything which affects ISBoxers and people who use input broadcasting software affects multiboxers via set-of-value rules.

Quote:
This is the equivalent of saying that because Dr Who is canceled, geeks are being punished.

Fixed your earlier statement and removed strawman argument. An even better statement would be something like "Because Star Trek is being cancelled, geeks are being hurt" but even that's iffy.

And lastly, you tell me to HTFU when this entire change was brought about by whiners such as yourself complaining instead of adapting. Again, the irony here is strong. I've not complained in my posts. My fellow players and I presented arguments as to why this change should not occur, only to be met with strawman arguments, trolling, appeals to authority, attempts to bring emotion into this, using arguments to attack ISBoxing while excusing station trading, and an endless stream of "umad?", "stop crying", and no-true-scotsman fallacies. If anyone needs to HTFU, it's the whiners and the trollers.


Please go through my post history and find a single instance where I 'whined' about isboxer. You won't, cause frankly I never cared. If you wanted to spend tons of cash on a program that ccp never officially said was good or bad then that was your choice. 99% of my post dealing with ISBoxer was telling whiners that as long as ccp says its ok, then they need to stop whining and HTFU. The rules they are changed, so now its your turn to adapt. Its that damn simple. And I still argue that and while isboxers are multiboxers the term "multiboxing is changing" is invalid. As its not. A single subsect is, the entire thing is not. So again, still wrong. In addition, you are making a claim that CCP is lied. I'm asking for you to prove said claim. You say it was said at fan fest and vegas. I'm again asking for proof. To which you side step. Thus you have none. Your claim they are lying is false. For if you had a way to prove it, then your claim could be true, but tis not. Its like the dust buniess stating 'ccp lied about being lasor focused on dust when they were at eve vegas.. whaaa!" no, ccp did not lie, because you miss the entire post. For the 9000000th time. Multiboxing is not changing, a small % of multiboxers who use a third party application to make it easier, there game play is changing. Thus the argument that multiboxing is changing is again false. You should have said "multiboxing using isboxer is changing, ccp stated that nothing to do with multiboxing would change, here is the proof (link) thus ccp is lying" You are basicly distorting facts with no evidence to support your claim. Thus, invalid claim. If you make the acusation, you are the one who has to provide proof. And as I must of missed where it was said, then I asked for you validate your claim. Which you can't. So.. shrugs.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Sol Project
Shitt Outta Luck - GANKING4GOOD
#2995 - 2014-12-31 20:56:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Sol Project
Selfishness over and over.

If isboxing stays you all will leave as soon as there are mostly isboxers left playing.
Not that they could keep the game alive anyway.

No one cares about you, because you only care about yourselves.

You do not care about the game at all.

When people stop joining this game because most people are multiboxing
this game is doomed. You do not care at all about this fact.

Even 1000 isboxing accounts gone is a drop in the bucket compared to the
long time damage you people do to the integrity of the reality of this game.

Does anyone consider how it looks to have "karl heinz001" to "karlheinz100" in local?
No.

Does anyone of you care about how it looks to have dozens of toons look equal?
No.

Does anyone of you care that you do not actually provide content in an equal manner
as the same amount of real people would?
No.

Do you care about the impression this creates for people who aren't playing yet?
No.

Your only arguments are based on selfishness.


You are no loss.


Go compensate your lack of self worth somewhere else.


Bye bye... you won't be missed!

Ladies of New Eden YC 117 by Indahmawar Fazmarai

Warning: NSFW! Barely legal girls in underwear!

Diana Kim > AND THIS IS WHY THE FEDERATION MUST BE DESTROYED!!

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#2996 - 2014-12-31 20:57:53 UTC
Sol Project wrote:
Selfishness over and over.

If isboying stays you all will leave as soon as there are mostly isboxers left playing.
Not that they could keep the game alive anyway.

No one cares about you, because you only care about yourselves.

You do not care about the game at all.

When people stop joining this game because most people are multiboxing
this game is doomed. You do not care at all about this fact.

Even 1000 isboxing accounts gone is a drop in the bucket compared to the
long time damage you people do to the integrity of the reality of this game.

Does anyone consider how it looks to have "karl heinz001" to "karlheinz100" in local?
No.

Does anyone of you care about how it looks to have dozens of toons look equal?
No.

Does anyone of you care that you do not actually provide content in an equal manner
as the same amount of real people would?
No.

Do you care about the impression this creates for people who aren't playing yet?
No.

Your only arguments are based on selfishness.


You are no loss.


Go compensate your lack of self worth somewhere else.


Bye bye... you won't be missed!



Exactly, I have not seen or heard a single argument for why input broadcast is good for the game and why it should say, besides "I paid xxx and it was fine last year..."

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Marsha Mallow
#2997 - 2014-12-31 21:04:23 UTC
KC Kamikaze wrote:
It's ok ... you whine and cry enough ccp will make the rest of us conform to what you want and we will still always be better than you so you will continue to petition and whine and cry at every opportunity. This game is like the burning crusade expansion of WoW .. hard as **** and unforgiving... by the time you are done whining and crying we will have pandas and faceroll content in every corner. You will get what you want and we will move on to another game. Fortunately we are not there yet and I sincerely hope that CCP moves away from this sandbox for toddlers mentatity and puts the game back in the real players control.

The funny thing is, no-one has really been whining and crying over this topic other than you and a handful of others. Most of the wider playerbase aren't all that interested either way (other than sniggering at the hysterical and ineffectual tantrum).

There wasn't even a concerted 'campaign' from the playerbase to ban ISboxing, despite this wierd victim mentality you have. Every whine thread about the topic that I can recall seeing in the last few months has been slapped down by forumites because CCP had stated their postition and weren't budging on it. For whatever reason they've decided to change that, and given it's a bold step in a series of bold steps, did you actually expect anything other than cheering?

For those of us unaffected there are no negative effects (irrelevant scrubs got backhanded, news at 11, ohhh maybe plex prices will drop etc). No offense, but... I quite like CCP, even though they are a bit daft (maybe because they are). You are not particularly likeable. I'd work on that when attempting to get sympathy. They generally act in the best interests of their game, and since I like their game, I'll support them. You act in your interests, rant on and on, then threaten to quit. And have a massive tantrum when everyone else laughs.

You're a bunch of semi legal botting farmer peasant scumbags who deserve nothing, have earned nothing but contempt, and deserve a smack in the chops. Don't think for a second the comments made here have helped your cause, you just publically immoliated yourselves. You brought this on yourselves btw by smugging too loudly about a practice which is at heart, cheating. Those smug youtube vids encrouraged fringe groups to jump on the fail train and abuse the crap out of it while they could. Interestingly, they aren't whining.

Those of you who have posted 200+ times in this thread, with reasonably articulate arguments, are basically deranged.
GF scrubs o7

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2998 - 2014-12-31 21:06:28 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
This is like you owning a house with a lot of land, some guy decides 'well you are not using this section of your land, so i'll build a house here' For whatever reason you did not notice till the done and you tell him 'no get off my land' the argument 'but I spent xxx amount making the house.." means jack.

Technically, no. Since you didn't stop him when he was building the house, he now owns that house. By not telling him or forcing him to stop, you basically gave consent. Very interesting part of the law.

DaReaper wrote:
2) again, how much the input broadcaster paid is irrelviant. A Bot pays a lot for that program or for someone to make said program, should they be allowed to bot? A RMT pays a lot of money to setup websites so he can sell his crap, should he be allowed to? A car theif pays for the equipment and the skill to steal your car, should you just let him? That's the point. It does not matter how much time or money someone put into something. This is CCP's game. Last I checked you don't own CCP. Thus your opinion means nothing. And I've ran 5 accounts in wormhole sites at the same time with no issues, by alt tabing, so your point is what?

Great strawman. Really had me going for a bit. A more accurate thing though would be if something like PYFA was a paid program, and then CCP, after years of saying it was OK with years of Devs backing it up, suddenly turned around and banned it. Sure, it's their game and they can do what they want, but to ban without any argument, evidence, or reasoning is fairly bad PR, not to mention the bad message it sends to anyone else. Just because I do not own CCP, does not mean my opinions are invalid. Stop attempting to silence us.

DaReaper wrote:
3) once again... Do you own CCP? They make the rules, and they decided that input broadcast was bad for the game. That all there is to it. End of discussion.

Do you? Who are you to tell us what to do? Who are you to tell us to stop talking, or to leave? If it was truly "end of discussion" this thread would have been locked after the first post.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#2999 - 2014-12-31 21:07:12 UTC
Sol Project wrote:
If isboxing stays you all will leave as soon as there are mostly isboxers left playing.
Not that they could keep the game alive anyway.
Because obviously the past few years with ISBoxer being allowed, clearly EVE died, right? And more income, that's definitely a terrible idea for CCP!

Sol Project wrote:
When people stop joining this game because most people are multiboxing
this game is doomed. You do not care at all about this fact.
Prove this actually happens on scale. I guarantee more players leave because of gankers and scammers than multiboxers.

Seriously, be a better troll at least.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#3000 - 2014-12-31 21:17:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Marsha Mallow wrote:
The funny thing is, no-one has really been whining and crying over this topic other than you and a handful of others. Most of the wider playerbase aren't all that interested either way (other than sniggering at the hysterical and ineffectual tantrum).
I'm sorry, you must be new. Welcome to the EVE Forums. If you look around, you'll see pretty much weekly posts with people whining about people multiboxing. Usually they were met by the same trolls who now troll this thread and the usual "HTFU". Apparently it's not HTFU anymore, it's "whine louder so we can cater to you more easily".

Marsha Mallow wrote:
For those of us unaffected there are no negative effects (irrelevant scrubs got backhanded, news at 11, ohhh maybe plex prices will drop etc). No offense, but... I quite like CCP, even though they are a bit daft (maybe because they are). You are not particularly likeable. I'd work on that when attempting to get sympathy. They generally act in the best interests of their game, and since I like their game, I'll support them. You act in your interests, rant on and on, then threaten to quit. And have a massive tantrum when everyone else laughs.
Except the obvious downsides, where there will definitely be non-broadcasters banned, there will be a mass influx of support tickets from idiots that can't tell the difference between broadcast an manual, and there will be more changes in the future which will put even more players and gameplay at risk. I know, I know, slippery slope, right? Well the fact remains that often small changes really do lead to larger ones.

Marsha Mallow wrote:
\You're a bunch of semi legal botting farmer peasant scumbags who deserve nothing, have earned nothing but contempt, and deserve a smack in the chops. Don't think for a second the comments made here have helped your cause, you just publically immoliated yourselves. You brought this on yourselves btw by smugging too loudly about a practice which is at heart, cheating. Those smug youtube vids encrouraged fringe groups to jump on the fail train and abuse the crap out of it while they could. Interestingly, they aren't whining.
So no the reality comes out. You have no idea how ISBoxing actually works (it's absolutely nothing like botting, not even remotely) and you have some stick up you're ass about multiboxers. "Waah waah waah, you're all scumbags waah". Grow up kid.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.