These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2901 - 2014-12-29 05:13:15 UTC
Wait, what do you mean by "frankencomputer"? This really is a new phrase to me.

Sniping remarks aside, EVE never had a "breakout" moment because it was never designed or catered to the "casual" or "average" person like WoW was. EVE was always marketed as a game where you claw your way up from nothing in a universe where one of the main jokes is "EVE stands for Everyone vs Everyone", where you can be a station trader earning billions of isk on the market, pirate terrorizing the locals with a destroyer, or the leader of a massive coalition commanding hundreds of capitals. This game was not meant to usurp WoW, or Guild Wars, or Final Fantasy, and it's that difference that brought a lot of players into the game. Attempting to change the game and turn it into another WoW clone will only end in disaster.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2902 - 2014-12-29 13:09:25 UTC
Personally, if EVE makes the changes that would be necessary to appeal to a larger segment of the gaming population, at the cost of the "hardcore" players it has now, I would stay.

Frankencomputer is what I have linked in my sig as mk III.
Adrie Atticus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2903 - 2014-12-29 13:42:15 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Personally, if EVE makes the changes that would be necessary to appeal to a larger segment of the gaming population, at the cost of the "hardcore" players it has now, I would stay.

Frankencomputer is what I have linked in my sig as mk III.


But why would they do the transition over to a crowd which doesn't bring in money, doesn't stay for long and demands everything to be handed on a silver platter via instant gratification?

Those games exist for a reason; so that I don't have to mingle with every single "OH EM GEE" teen who are not even worthy of getting themselves beaten lifeless with their selfie sticks.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2904 - 2014-12-29 13:46:07 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
EVE was always marketed as a game where you claw your way up from nothing in a universe where one of the main jokes is "EVE stands for Everyone vs Everyone", where you can be a station trader earning billions of isk on the market, pirate terrorizing the locals with a destroyer, or the leader of a massive coalition commanding hundreds of capitals.

Of course we must never forget the doctrine of isk on field. Because you gotta make the isk, deploy it, and nothing makes it easier than having numbers.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2905 - 2014-12-29 13:48:13 UTC
Adrie Atticus wrote:
But why would they do the transition over to a crowd which doesn't bring in money, doesn't stay for long and demands everything to be handed on a silver platter via instant gratification?

Those games exist for a reason; so that I don't have to mingle with every single "OH EM GEE" teen who are not even worthy of getting themselves beaten lifeless with their selfie sticks.

But a selfie of themselves about to be owned on a gate...

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Sealin Windfire
Rum Runners and T2 Ducktape
#2906 - 2014-12-29 16:10:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Sealin Windfire
I would like to Clarify that in no way do I use any form of anything to control the 5 accounts I have, but I would like to point out the legality aspect of this. The only way CCP could be finding out what somebody is using on there on personal computer is to be gathering information out side of the scope of the game. This means running some sort of Trojan horse program or a Bot of there on. it would have to gather software and hardware information with out the owner of the computer first being able to decide if they will allow this. this is know has "planting the worm" or flat out hacking our system.

The truth is do you really have a right to dictate to paying customers what software we run on our personal computers, And is gathering information from our computers even legal? So I ask out of concern of Privacy How exactly do you intend to determine what if any software you are running. to find out who is using software or hardware that is in no way actually connected to the game, as these will run on personal computers. I will be keeping a close Eye on what information is being received and sent to any CCP related system. I don't care about the use of programs or hardware to control accounts. My only concern is for my Privacy and those of my family who also might use the computers I use to play Eve.

I eagerly await CCP response to my quarry.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#2907 - 2014-12-29 16:43:48 UTC
Sealin Windfire wrote:
I would like to Clarify that in no way do I use any form of anything to control the 5 accounts I have, but I would like to point out the legality aspect of this. The only way CCP could be finding out what somebody is using on there on personal computer is to be gathering information out side of the scope of the game. This means running some sort of Trojan horse program or a Bot of there on. it would have to gather software and hardware information with out the owner of the computer first being able to decide if they will allow this. this is know has "planting the worm" or flat out hacking our system.

The truth is do you really have a right to dictate to paying customers what software we run on our personal computers, And is gathering information from our computers even legal? So I ask out of concern of Privacy How exactly do you intend to determine what if any software you are running. to find out who is using software or hardware that is in no way actually connected to the game, as these will run on personal computers. I will be keeping a close Eye on what information is being received and sent to any CCP related system. I don't care about the use of programs or hardware to control accounts. My only concern is for my Privacy and those of my family who also might use the computers I use to play Eve.

I eagerly await CCP response to my quarry.
By playing EVE, you have agreed to section 7D of the EULA which reads:
Quote:
You agree that CCP may remotely monitor your Game hardware solely for the purpose of establishing whether in playing the Game and accessing the System you are using software created or approved by CCP, or whether you are using unauthorized software created by you or a third party in contravention of Section 6.
So they can (and do) monitor your PC anyway.

With this change however, it's likely to be a server side change looking for simultaneous actions from the same IP address.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Rosewalker
Khumaak Flying Circus
#2908 - 2014-12-29 16:46:14 UTC
Sealin Windfire wrote:
I would like to Clarify that in no way do I use any form of anything to control the 5 accounts I have, but I would like to point out the legality aspect of this. The only way CCP could be finding out what somebody is using on there on personal computer is to be gathering information out side of the scope of the game. This means running some sort of Trojan horse program or a Bot of there on. it would have to gather software and hardware information with out the owner of the computer first being able to decide if they will allow this. this is know has "planting the worm" or flat out hacking our system.

The truth is do you really have a right to dictate to paying customers what software we run on our personal computers, And is gathering information from our computers even legal? So I ask out of concern of Privacy How exactly do you intend to determine what if any software you are running. to find out who is using software or hardware that is in no way actually connected to the game, as these will run on personal computers. I will be keeping a close Eye on what information is being received and sent to any CCP related system. I don't care about the use of programs or hardware to control accounts. My only concern is for my Privacy and those of my family who also might use the computers I use to play Eve.

I eagerly await CCP response to my quarry.


Since CCP isn't responding to this thread anymore, I'll just drop this section of the EVE Online EULA here.

Section 7D of the EVE EULA wrote:

D. MONITORING

You agree that CCP may remotely monitor your Game hardware solely for the purpose of establishing whether in playing the Game and accessing the System you are using software created or approved by CCP, or whether you are using unauthorized software created by you or a third party in contravention of Section 6.


Always read the EULA before buying a new game. It's been in the EULA for years.

The Nosy Gamer - CCP Random: "hehe, falls under the category: nice try, but no. ;)"

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2909 - 2014-12-29 18:39:32 UTC
Adrie Atticus wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
Personally, if EVE makes the changes that would be necessary to appeal to a larger segment of the gaming population, at the cost of the "hardcore" players it has now, I would stay.

Frankencomputer is what I have linked in my sig as mk III.


But why would they do the transition over to a crowd which doesn't bring in money, doesn't stay for long and demands everything to be handed on a silver platter via instant gratification?

Those games exist for a reason; so that I don't have to mingle with every single "OH EM GEE" teen who are not even worthy of getting themselves beaten lifeless with their selfie sticks.

if you don't stop I'm telling Carneros that you're posting bad.
Adrie Atticus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2910 - 2014-12-29 18:55:45 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Adrie Atticus wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
Personally, if EVE makes the changes that would be necessary to appeal to a larger segment of the gaming population, at the cost of the "hardcore" players it has now, I would stay.

Frankencomputer is what I have linked in my sig as mk III.


But why would they do the transition over to a crowd which doesn't bring in money, doesn't stay for long and demands everything to be handed on a silver platter via instant gratification?

Those games exist for a reason; so that I don't have to mingle with every single "OH EM GEE" teen who are not even worthy of getting themselves beaten lifeless with their selfie sticks.

if you don't stop I'm telling Carneros that you're posting bad.


Santa didn't bring a new iphone for you?

How about you come and shoot me in the head (ingame) and we can stay on topic. Do you ahve anything to add to the point or are you just testposting?
ESN Seeker
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2911 - 2014-12-29 20:22:47 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Frankencomputer is what I have linked in my sig as mk III.


Nice! But ... don't you need a few more monitors? Big smile
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2912 - 2014-12-29 23:11:50 UTC
is this the twilight zone?

Adrie Atticus wrote:
Santa didn't bring a new iphone for you?

How about you come and shoot me in the head (ingame) and we can stay on topic. Do you ahve anything to add to the point or are you just testposting?

what about my new iPhone m8?

ESN Seeker wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
Frankencomputer is what I have linked in my sig as mk III.


Nice! But ... don't you need a few more monitors? Big smile

yeah, I'm about to add 4 conventional 23" 1080p
Marsha Mallow
#2913 - 2014-12-30 00:34:41 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
is this the twilight zone?

Yes. I mean no. Take the blue pill.

I didn't mean you with the earlier remarks btw *ahem*. There was an older topic used to justify multiboxing where someone posted snaps of their screens with a handmade keyboard input. Your 8 inch screens are quite cute compared to that. Although the plyboard wall mount, batman logo, plastic cup and strumpet figurine.... anyway, moving along.

What's that ball thing in the final snap though? I want one.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2914 - 2014-12-30 00:48:11 UTC
Marsha Mallow wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
is this the twilight zone?

Yes. I mean no. Take the blue pill.

I didn't mean you with the earlier remarks btw *ahem*. There was an older topic used to justify multiboxing where someone posted snaps of their screens with a handmade keyboard input.

And soon enough they'll be banned if they use it

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2915 - 2014-12-30 01:31:59 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
And soon enough they'll be banned if they use it


Implying multiboxing only started in the last year.
Implying it'll stop people from multiboxing.
Implying RR broadcasting is banned.
Implying it'll magically cause PLEX to drop to 250m.
Implying it'll magically solve "the blue donut".
Implying it'll fix bombing.
Implying it'll fix incursions.
Implying it'll fix mining.
Implying that everyone is the same and can make friends as easily as you.
Implying that you aren't badly shitposting.
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2916 - 2014-12-30 03:31:04 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
I'm still trying to spot all the fallacies in this post. Every time I look, I find something new.

Engaging in a fallacy of fallacies while deflecting. How cute.

Only fallacy I can find is possibly grouping every "casual" MMO player into a small subset. But then again, that's what most of EVE's players are. In every other MMO / MMORPG I can think of, no other world is like EVE. Every other MMO, you run into town, grab a quest, run out, complete it, come home, and you basically roleplay as a hero. In WoW for example, you kill monsters and bosses such as The Lich King and Galleon day in and day out. You're a hero, sure, but you don't forge your own destiny (excuse the movie cliche) like you do in EVE. You can't take over entire regions and hold them, harvesting resources and fighting for survival. If you die in WoW, you respawn and start again with little to no loss of actual *things* other than potions and food you consumed in the fight. If you die in EVE, not even counting being podded, that ship is gone, and you can't just click a button and pop it back into existence, ready to continue the fight. That ship cost time and effort to mine and construct, and ISK to produce and purchase it off the market or in a contract.

EVE right now is the only MMO that allows players to play the bandits, the pirates, the scammers. In WoW (sorry I'm using it so much. I have a friend who played and we've talked about the differences a lot), scams are not allowed, and severe punishment is handed out. You cannot play the bandit or pirate, raider of towns/cities/stations/systems, except in carefully pre-generated battlefields with linear story-lines. Sure, there are PVP maps and a gladiator arena, but the PVP map is nothing more than a scripted siege of a city. I will grant that the new dojos are coming, and I posted a similar idea on the F&I forum a while ago, which is where I found some of the ideas about balancing the more-common forms of ISBoxing in EVE. That was well before I was a multiboxer, FYI, but I'm sure you'll still accuse me of having a vested interest in defending ISBoxing.

I don't want to see this game turned into another WoW/LOTRO/DDO/GW2 clone. I play EVE because it's different than the others, because I can influence the map if I wanted, because players make a difference in the world of EVE. If you can't see why others are glad that this isn't WoW with no lasting consequences for mistakes (Asakai) or luck (hacking minigames, officer spawns) or perseverance (BRAVE), then I'm sorry.
Adrie Atticus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2917 - 2014-12-30 08:12:07 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
I'd like to help both of you, but I don't know where to start.


Screw it, I'll bite for the fallacies part, please do read on.

Monetization: recent study released by Swrve (link broken, see here) shows how most of players do not give any money at all in a gaming situation if presented with the option of not paying. This leads into half of the revenue of the game being paid by the top 0.15% of players and the only way to keep a company afloat is to keep those few people happy by steering the development minutely towards their habits instead of pleasing more people.

Average player retention and how monetization ties into that: Kongregate released its numbers for multiple F2P games which show their revenue and user retention rates to be close to the Swrve study. They showed that 62% of revenue comes from 1.1% of players, who are also the only ones playing the game at a "committed" level of returning more than 500 times. If you're actually going through the slides, see slide 11 for this. Asian market is large but this isn't an asian MMO played majorly by asians. Less than $5 per head is payed in F2P at best. That's less than half of the cheapest subscription. For Eve to reach an ARPU of $5 with 1-month subscriptions, we need one out of 35 players who try the game to stay for one month per year. I cannot recall the retention rates from the keynote, but I'm fairly sure it was higher. Remember, largest F2P studios come by with way less money than CCP who can afford to run projects on the side and fail with them without going bankrupt.

User age: Here's a curse report with F2P as one of the bars for age. Feel free to find more, but keep in mind the average age of an Eve Online player is past 30.

Instant gratification vs delayed gratification is a well-researched topic and you need to provide both for humans to stay attached. Provide too much of IG and no DG, you're in a situation where you need to ramp up the impulse to get the same reward from your brain; see drug addiction.

How this ties into ISBoxer? No idea, but multiboxing is fun and I'm staying roughly on topic.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2918 - 2014-12-30 08:27:18 UTC
Adrie Atticus wrote:
Instant gratification vs delayed gratification is a well-researched topic and you need to provide both for humans to stay attached. Provide too much of IG and no DG, you're in a situation where you need to ramp up the impulse to get the same reward from your brain; see drug addiction.

How this ties into ISBoxer? No idea, but multiboxing is fun and I'm staying roughly on topic.

It's Multiple (Broadcasted) gratification

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2919 - 2014-12-30 08:30:48 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
It's Multiple (Broadcasted) gratification


Quick fix: Make all boxers use missiles and non-sentry drones!
/sarcasm
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2920 - 2014-12-30 08:33:11 UTC
RE: Adrie

Ok, I'll disagree with that point, since EVE is already what it is with a mix of F2P and P2P, and I think adding more players would mean more revenue. In other words, if it's likely true, it's also true right now, and even by percentages, more players means more revenue.

So. Why they would do such a thing is revenue, which they would gain.

My second main issue with your statement is the presumption that making EVE not-clunky means appeasing childish, selfish behavior, and also that you said it.

I'm not concerned with things like people's personalities, and I think it's a waste of time and words to be judge players when the goal is whether they have enough fun to pay money.

And Nolak, I don't know where you got the prompts for all those words. If it's in response to my comment to Adrie, I'll need each paragraph summarized with their main statements and conclusions (per paragraph). Reading that post feels like wading through knee-high water.