These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

total multibox domination

First post
Author
Josef Djugashvilis
#81 - 2014-11-17 17:17:53 UTC
Ayx Shewma wrote:
There's no point in complaining about multiboxing. It's rare for a game company to ban the practice, because doing so would cause them to lose money. period.


This ^^^

This is not a signature.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#82 - 2014-11-17 17:23:01 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Multiboxing is a catastrophe for the game and should be banned. Everyone should equally have the benefit of one account logged in at a time.



erm.. no.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Jvpiter
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#83 - 2014-11-17 17:26:13 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Multiboxing is a catastrophe for the game and should be banned. Everyone should equally have the benefit of one account logged in at a time.



Feel free to provide arguments or justify anything you say.

Call me Joe.

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#84 - 2014-11-17 17:32:42 UTC
It allows a single human being to enjoy the fruits of simultaneous labor by multiple pilots. It unduly rewards those who are willing to purchase better hardware, more subscriptions, and more plex to acquire in game assets. It fundamentally conflicts with the idea that the human being is the solitary pilot logged on, and should be solely entitled to the output of that pilot.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#85 - 2014-11-17 17:33:42 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Multiboxing is a catastrophe for the game and should be banned. Everyone should equally have the benefit of one account logged in at a time.


Translation: "Everyone's game play should be restricted to my preferences only no matter how unrealistic, unenforceable and just plain bad for CCP that desire may be, for I have spoketh, so sayeth me"

See, i told y'all I could speak fluent Veersish! Even with a Belvarian accent!.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#86 - 2014-11-17 17:36:48 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Multiboxing is a catastrophe for the game and should be banned. Everyone should equally have the benefit of one account logged in at a time.


Translation: "Everyone's game play should be restricted to my preferences only no matter how unrealistic, unenforceable and just plain bad for CCP that desire may be, for I have spoketh, so sayeth me"

See, i told y'all I could speak fluent Veersish! Even with a Belvarian accent!.


Another spot on comment Jenn. Keep up the great work. Roll
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#87 - 2014-11-17 17:39:29 UTC
Damn, this is a challenge for even my excellent Veerish, but I'll give it a try.

Veers Belvar wrote:
It allows a single human being to enjoy the fruits of simultaneous labor by multiple pilots.


"I don't care that no one you trust is online to light you a cyno, i have one account and so should you"

Quote:
It unduly rewards those who are willing to purchase better hardware, more subscriptions, and more plex to acquire in game assets.


"Damn it, the current status quo means that people who are willing to invest more into their game experience gets more out of it than I do, therefore it must be abolished!".


Quote:
It fundamentally conflicts with the idea that the human being is the solitary pilot logged on, and should be solely entitled to the output of that pilot.


"I don't like not knowing if the guy shooting at me is an alt or a main, so it must go away".

Veersish is the easiest language to decipher lol.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#88 - 2014-11-17 17:41:12 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Multiboxing is a catastrophe for the game and should be banned. Everyone should equally have the benefit of one account logged in at a time.


Translation: "Everyone's game play should be restricted to my preferences only no matter how unrealistic, unenforceable and just plain bad for CCP that desire may be, for I have spoketh, so sayeth me"

See, i told y'all I could speak fluent Veersish! Even with a Belvarian accent!.


Another spot on comment Jenn. Keep up the great work. Roll


Translation : "Damn it, he's hit the nail on the head and exposed my mental deficiencies,better deflect him with F'd up smilies and warp off"

I'ma start charging isk for my services.
Jason Xado
Doomheim
#89 - 2014-11-17 17:42:51 UTC
Hausser0815 wrote:
play eve more rts style


This guy gets it :-)
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#90 - 2014-11-17 17:44:05 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Multiboxing is a catastrophe for the game and should be banned. Everyone should equally have the benefit of one account logged in at a time.


Translation: "Everyone's game play should be restricted to my preferences only no matter how unrealistic, unenforceable and just plain bad for CCP that desire may be, for I have spoketh, so sayeth me"

See, i told y'all I could speak fluent Veersish! Even with a Belvarian accent!.


Another spot on comment Jenn. Keep up the great work. Roll


Translation : "Damn it, he's hit the nail on the head and exposed my mental deficiencies,better deflect him with F'd up smilies and warp off"

I'ma start charging isk for my services.


Ya, please do.

Because nothing says Eve like a single person controlling a 20 ship nado gank squad, a 40 ship procurer mining fleet, or a massive lowsec gatecamp. That makes the game super appealing to new and casual players. What's next, and entire nullsec alliance run by a single person using ISBotter? Roll
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#91 - 2014-11-17 17:44:26 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
pop quiz: how many accounts does the average player have



the average is 1.5. most players have at least 2 though. I have 3 active and about 6 not active, but that's what 10 years of eve gets ya. make a trial, decide you don't need that extra miner, let trial expire. get another zany idea , make a trial, etc

higher
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#92 - 2014-11-17 17:46:18 UTC
See.. here is the issue with this whole anti multibox thing...

Eve is not a theme park.

I'll tell you, very simply why multiboxing is not play to win in eve...

BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING TO WIN.

*wait wha?!?*

I'll prove it.

Take me for an example, I have been here for nearly 11 years. (will be 11 in april) I have ran a fun corp for 7 years now, ran two failed alliances, both times I heald sov, once on my own for ~2 (give or take a few months) years (between the kari pipe, Catch and owning Z-UZZN) And once as a renter in cloud ring and again in wicked creek. I have had 500 pilots under my command. I owned a nyx for a month, lost it in battle. Owned 5 stations in my eve life time, lost them all in battle, have 130m sp's (kids, use implants, or it hurts your sp numbers) Lost 50 badgers in a single month (yes look it up. This is why I don't use implants) successfully feed a pos network for 30 pos' alone (before fuel blocks) Have recruited and trained well over 10k players in my eve time. 99% of the time I have had less then 500m isk to my name, I am primarily an industrialist (I suck at pvp hence no implants) and I have 3 accounts (Da is a miner/alliance leader/industrialist, lombar is my pvp alt.. and death fox is my hauler alt) I find this type of play to be fun and enjoyable. I always had the right amount of isk to do what I want, was never space rich, and I enjoy myself. I set my own goals an objectives and attempt to reach them.

In other words, I don't give a flying **** if someone had 50 accounts and is making 1T isk a month. Does it bother me? no. Do I give a **** if they pop me? No. Why? Go check my k/d ratio and you will see that I don't judge 'success' that way.

That's the point. I don't care if you have 1 account or 10000000000000, eve has no set rate of success. Stop thinking of it as a liniear game, and then you won't worry about mutliboxers. Cause in the end, if they have 1t isk or 1isk, they still die the same ******* way. You are prolly one of thouse guys who pisses and moans irl because some rich dude was given a crap load of money from his parents and thus he did not start out 'fair'.

Grow up, play eve your way, and don't worry what billybob next door is doing. If you dislike billybob's play style, go fine friends who also dislike billybobs play style and blow him the **** up.

Play smart and a multi boxers won't bother you.

If you can't wrap your head around that eve is NOT a play to win game, no matter what you do, cause frankly there si no end game, no end, just like life. Then maybe you need to look into WoW.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#93 - 2014-11-17 17:48:22 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


Ya, please do.

Because nothing says Eve like a single person controlling a 20 ship nado gank squad, a 40 ship procurer mining fleet, or a massive lowsec gatecamp. That makes the game super appealing to new and casual players. What's next, and entire nullsec alliance run by a single person using ISBotter? Roll


translation: "THINK OF THE CHILDREN! And by "children" I mean "my own self interests""

1 million isk please.
Longtom McGregor
2ndAmendment
#94 - 2014-11-17 18:36:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Longtom McGregor
Jvpiter wrote:


How did you encounter a gate camp? Why would any of your assets jump a gate without knowing what's on the other side?


Even if we ignore the collosal mistake that you made, which is hard to do, do you think you would have survived fifteen individual people at that gate?


What is the fundamental difference between the two?



I made no mistake. You assumed, (hoping) to prove a point. I WAS scouting, and I lived.

Also, YOU are the one who moved the goalpost, sir. Not the other poster. You conveniently side-steped the fact that this guy can't be attacked or challenged. That's pay to win - pay to win - pay to win.

Friends? So basically, this guy's fifteen accounts equals fifteen of my friends? (Pay to win, anybody?)

Any way you wanna f*$c that football, it's pay to win. Skills don't matter in that fight. Whoever has the most accounts, the most MONEY invested in the game, wins. (psst, pay to win)

Did I say "pay to win" enough?
Jvpiter
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#95 - 2014-11-17 18:52:10 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
It allows a single human being to enjoy the fruits of simultaneous labor by multiple pilots. It unduly rewards those who are willing to purchase better hardware, more subscriptions, and more plex to acquire in game assets. It fundamentally conflicts with the idea that the human being is the solitary pilot logged on, and should be solely entitled to the output of that pilot.



So you think a person who is paying for 2 accounts should not bear the fruits of 2 accounts?


I agree that certain activities in EVE lend themselves to ISBoxing because of how low maintenance they are. This is a problem that needs to be solved from the game design perspective.


Gate camping is not one of those activities, and the thread starter just happens to have some misconceptions about gameplay. See my next post for more on that.

Call me Joe.

Longtom McGregor
2ndAmendment
#96 - 2014-11-17 18:52:45 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
Sigh... did not read all the replies but...

1) how do you know he was multiboxing?

2) are you 100% sure he was?

3) so what?

4) get some friends and go blow his fleet up, if hes multiboxing all his ships will be fit the same, figure out his weakness and exploit it.

But again, how do you know he was multi boxing? or did you just assume?


Yea. 101% His characters were named something like "multibox1," and "multibox2," etc.


Jenn aSide wrote:
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Jvpiter wrote:

Apparently a verbal timer over voice comms and fleet warp is a thing for multiple pilots.


How would that be any less effective than an ISBoxer?


Dave Stark wrote:

so will people that listen.

if you don't know people that listen, that's your issue and nothing to do with isboxer.


Come on guys, personally I don't have a dog in this arguement, but if you are claiming that 15 people responding to a verbal instruction will operate in millisecond-precision co-ordination, you are being patently dishonest. Watch any fleet warp by verbal command (rather than by the fleet warp), you'll see a cascade of ships warp off seperately, and that's discounting the one guy who isn't aligned, the two who bumped each other, and the guy who miss-clicks and does something completely different. Multiply that by multiple commands to execute in sequence (decloak, bomb, warp), and the reaction time seperation will spread further.

Whether or not you agree or not with isboxer in general, bombing is a rare instance of isboxing being preferable to other players filling the position, and that is dubious.



Then the problem is how bombers work, not isboxer (or multiboxing in general).

People dislike isboxer for a lot of reasons (some good, some not), but Isboxer hate is based on jealousy or anger at a loss of internet spaceship pixels.

Personally, I don't use isboxer and I don't care that others do, even bombers, as it makes no difference to me in the long run how many real people pushed the button that launched the bombs that killed my Abaddon (Abaddon? wtf is this, 2012??). What is irritating is people blaming their incompetence (such as dying to a gate camp in low sec in a game with a million ways to not die to low sec gate camps) on some external scapegoat like isboxer.


Oh, dear. Let's talk about this little gem of a post.

Incompetencies? So having one account is an incompetency? Or is not being able to challenge and kill a guy with three accounts an incompetency? I'm sorry. I'll run out and buy 3 more accounts so I'm not "incompetent."

Scapegoat? I can't kill a guy with 15 accounts. Obviously, I'm just blaming isoboxer for my inadequacy. HAHAHA

PFFFFTTT!
Jvpiter
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#97 - 2014-11-17 18:54:22 UTC
Longtom McGregor wrote:

I made no mistake. You assumed, (hoping) to prove a point. I WAS scouting, and I lived.

Also, YOU are the one who moved the goalpost, sir. Not the other poster. You conveniently side-steped the fact that this guy can't be attacked or challenged. That's pay to win - pay to win - pay to win.

Friends? So basically, this guy's fifteen accounts equals fifteen of my friends? (Pay to win, anybody?)

Any way you wanna f*$c that football, it's pay to win. Skills don't matter in that fight. Whoever has the most accounts, the most MONEY invested in the game, wins. (psst, pay to win)

Did I say "pay to win" enough?



You were scouting and you lived? Well that's wonderful! Apparently there is a way around a multiboxed gatecamp, then.


This guy can't be attacked or challenged by who? Yourself? 15 of your friends? Why do you think you alone should be able to challenge 15 ships?


Do you have 15 friends? Why do you need to challenge a band of 15 ships? How would it be any different if 15 people challenged you instead?


You said "pay to win" plenty of times. I don't see where you've demonstrated where a multiboxed gatecamp fits that definition.


Call me Joe.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#98 - 2014-11-17 18:54:30 UTC
Longtom McGregor wrote:
Jvpiter wrote:


How did you encounter a gate camp? Why would any of your assets jump a gate without knowing what's on the other side?


Even if we ignore the collosal mistake that you made, which is hard to do, do you think you would have survived fifteen individual people at that gate?


What is the fundamental difference between the two?



I made no mistake. You assumed, (hoping) to prove a point. I WAS scouting, and I lived.

Also, YOU are the one who moved the goalpost, sir. Not the other poster. You conveniently side-steped the fact that this guy can't be attacked or challenged. That's pay to win - pay to win - pay to win.

Friends? So basically, this guy's fifteen accounts equals fifteen of my friends? (Pay to win, anybody?)

Any way you wanna f*$c that football, it's pay to win. Skills don't matter in that fight. Whoever has the most accounts, the most MONEY invested in the game, wins. (psst, pay to win)

Did I say "pay to win" enough?


So somehow, using isboxer erects this magical shield where in a fleet of similar size made of of people (or of another guy using isboxer) can't defeat the guys using isboxer? If so i better go download isboxer, because i too would like that magical shield (been wanting one ever since CCP lied an named a mod "Invulnerability Field" that doesn't make you invulnerable...).

"Pay to win" is when a game company gives you a game mechanics based advantage after you give them money. Having multiple accounts or using isboxer doesn't do anything for anyone per se, you still have to figure out how to play the game. Nothing about isboxer or PLEX or being able to use multiple accounts is pay to win (and like DaReaper said, their is nothing to win anyways lol).

I can tell from you rant of an OP that the base emotion here isn't sadness, but envy , because if it was anger or 'sadness', that would have spurred you to gather friends and slaughter the isboxing blasphemer. Anger and sadness spur action, Envy spurs General discussion forum rants aimed at getting CCP to 'fix' for you a 'problem' you should be tackling yourself.
Prince Kobol
#99 - 2014-11-17 18:57:07 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
pop quiz: how many accounts does the average player have



the average is 1.5. most players have at least 2 though. I have 3 active and about 6 not active, but that's what 10 years of eve gets ya. make a trial, decide you don't need that extra miner, let trial expire. get another zany idea , make a trial, etc

higher


Accord to the last QEN report the average was just over 2 which was back in 2010. I suspect it has probably gone up but that is just my own opinion.

CCP have not released any figures since the last QEN as far as I know.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#100 - 2014-11-17 18:58:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Longtom McGregor wrote:


Oh, dear. Let's talk about this little gem of a post.

Incompetencies? So having one account is an incompetency? Or is not being able to challenge and kill a guy with three accounts an incompetency? I'm sorry. I'll run out and buy 3 more accounts so I'm not "incompetent."


Good, that's a start, at least you are learning.

if you want to gimp yourself by playing on one account in a game where COMPETITIVE PEOPLE multibox, that is no one's fault but your own. Of course, it's easier to cry about it like a child on some forums.

I multibox because it makes game tasks a slightly less awful (lvl 5s and 10/10s are painful with 1 character) but also because my competition (other explorers) are doing it also. if you want to play with the big boys, get big boy toys, no one promised you solo gameplay heaven.

Quote:

Scapegoat? I can't kill a guy with 15 accounts. Obviously, I'm just blaming isoboxer for my inadequacy. HAHAHA

PFFFFTTT!


So you can't gather 14 friends and/or get isboxer yourself (since you want to compete with someone using isboxer)? Inadequacy and incompetence aren't the right words then, too bad the right words aren't allowed here. Twisted