These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A complaint about two things in wormholes.

First post
Author
MooMooDachshundCow
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#81 - 2014-11-17 15:24:45 UTC
Remember kiddies: the best ship in Eve is Friendship.

That's what the watchlist is supposed to be for, more than anything. So I can be like "oh, my friend just logged in, now we can X"

or:

"oh, that jerk just logged in, now we can do X to him"

Either way the watchlist leads to activity, which is why it's a good thing. If you can't handle that, then I'm sorry for you. Maybe you need more neutral alts or something. vOv

Yeah, well, it's just like my opinion, man.

Ghenghis Kralj
Big Johnson's
#82 - 2014-11-17 15:44:46 UTC
I feel like this escalated rather quickly
350125GO
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#83 - 2014-11-17 15:48:24 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
:-)
This topic isn't actually about me but people are trying damn hard to make it about me because deconstruction of a debate through fostering a lower level of dialogue is a pretty easy tool to access for people who haven't got a legitimate basis for their argument.


I've seen you post this twice now in response, and have decided that your egocentrism is so strong that you seriously can't tell how you made this thread about you from the very first post. This isn't a thread about mechanics, if it was, it would have been posted as such or in the correct forum, this is a thread about you, and you only.

I'll save you the trouble of analyzing your words, as I'm feeling generous this morning, but count how many times in the first post you use personal pronouns (I, me, my, mine). In fact I'll do a quick total for you, in your colossal wall of tears here's the rough count:

I (20)
I'm (14)
me (11)
my (15)
mine (1)

How the hell is this not about you?

You're young, you'll adjust. I'm old, I'll get used to it.

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#84 - 2014-11-17 15:56:19 UTC
Don't forget that pulling the watchlist down will trigger even worse events than removing API has...
Hans Bonderstadt
#85 - 2014-11-17 16:16:49 UTC
Bronya Boga wrote:
Dude...if you have ships floating in your pos go and get an SMA. If you cant afford the 5mil mail me in game ill buy you two of them jesus. Also pick up your **** from space (mobile depot, MTU, ect.) How is this a problem?

dis
i cant stand pos trash

the trap is our venue pussy is on the menu

Alundil
Rolled Out
#86 - 2014-11-17 16:28:52 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:

It's not a problem, right. That's why I'm not the only one with a problem with it. Let's go over the basics.

Definition of 3rd party.:

hird party
noun
noun: third party; plural noun: third parties

1.
a person or group besides the two primarily involved in a situation, especially a dispute.
"the involvement of a third party as an independent valuer"

adjective
adjective: third-party; adjective: third party

1.
relating to a person or group besides the two primarily involved in a situation.
"third-party suppliers"

So yeah I'm right about that one. Let's carry on..

Um....your interpretation of the definition of "3rd Party" and how you apply it to Eve would make EVERY game mechanic in Eve where the game itself facilitates something other than direct player to player "3RD PARTY".

You can choose to think of it this way, but you're going to have a bad time with it (as you clearly are).

I'm right behind you

Caleb Seremshur
Commando Guri
Guristas Pirates
#87 - 2014-11-17 20:48:45 UTC
350125GO wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
:-)
This topic isn't actually about me but people are trying damn hard to make it about me because deconstruction of a debate through fostering a lower level of dialogue is a pretty easy tool to access for people who haven't got a legitimate basis for their argument.


I've seen you post this twice now in response, snip

How the hell is this not about you?


The topic is in the first two paragraphs and the op was written from my point of view. This is elementary.

So my op was a bit emotional it's true and blood in the water naturally attracted certain indiviuals. The pity party rocked up to share their advice some of which I've already taken and some I've discarded. But by and large the topic has been avoided. People aren't showing a reason why you should be allowed to use watchlisting offensively like an intel tool. There's even enduring confusion over terms for levels of involvement incredibly.

This is as much a cultural issue as it is a game mechanics one, obviously, since people who are complete strangers have decided to take it so personally. I took it personally, too, at the time but now it's time for action.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#88 - 2014-11-17 20:59:21 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
350125GO wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
:-)
This topic isn't actually about me but people are trying damn hard to make it about me because deconstruction of a debate through fostering a lower level of dialogue is a pretty easy tool to access for people who haven't got a legitimate basis for their argument.


I've seen you post this twice now in response, snip

How the hell is this not about you?


The topic is in the first two paragraphs and the op was written from my point of view. This is elementary.

So my op was a bit emotional it's true and blood in the water naturally attracted certain indiviuals. The pity party rocked up to share their advice some of which I've already taken and some I've discarded. But by and large the topic has been avoided. People aren't showing a reason why you should be allowed to use watchlisting offensively like an intel tool. There's even enduring confusion over terms for levels of involvement incredibly.

This is as much a cultural issue as it is a game mechanics one, obviously, since people who are complete strangers have decided to take it so personally. I took it personally, too, at the time but now it's time for action.



YEA! Go fight those WL camping whores in your WH.

Wait that was the action you mean right?
Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#89 - 2014-11-17 23:57:51 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
People aren't showing a reason why you should be allowed to use watchlisting offensively like an intel tool.


because you can also use it defensively.
Alex Pathfinder
Scordite Syndicate
Raravathian Mining and Logistics
#90 - 2014-11-18 00:02:36 UTC
oh my god oh my god i have found someone thicker than Jade goodie

also deal with
get over it,
it is the same for everyone else,
you know you can use that feature on people who are trying to kill you,

and.........

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/52159747/Gifs/Crying.gif

Dry those tears princess it is a game....kill or be killed or go back to farmville.

Love you :D
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#91 - 2014-11-18 00:13:16 UTC
Once this thread dies, can someone evict him so that we can get another shittier post like this one?

Also, watchlisted OP and WTB > entrance to his hole.

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Rei Moon
Perkone
Caldari State
#92 - 2014-11-18 00:54:57 UTC
I get your point about WL.
You still pissed in inverted position, resulting in more bitter tears than they should have
therefore this turning into a funny conference.
Cheers op.
You got Dusettes here, it's a clear win-win.

Down the pole podcast "Annhhh"

Caleb Seremshur
Commando Guri
Guristas Pirates
#93 - 2014-11-18 11:02:26 UTC
Bronya Boga wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
People aren't showing a reason why you should be allowed to use watchlisting offensively like an intel tool.


because you can also use it defensively.


You realise that is a false equivalency don't you..

Like the gun control fallacy. I do use WL for specific hostile individuals but that's exactly the problem. Now we're getting philosophical.
Bronya Boga
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#94 - 2014-11-18 14:27:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Bronya Boga
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
Bronya Boga wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
People aren't showing a reason why you should be allowed to use watchlisting offensively like an intel tool.


because you can also use it defensively.


You realise that is a false equivalency don't you..

Like the gun control fallacy. I do use WL for specific hostile individuals but that's exactly the problem. Now we're getting philosophical.


No. Thats practical and its not a false equivalence. They use it offensively to know when you are on to hunt you. You use it defensivly to know when they on hunting you. For more intel you must scout just like they do.

Edit: honestly this thread hasnt convinced me and the argument "the bad boys in my class are bullying me every time i come into class" isnt a good one because everyone knows that if you want to get rid of bullies you beat the **** out of them.
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#95 - 2014-11-19 10:23:29 UTC
They want to see you explode, and they likely want your tears. You seem to be doing well on the tears side of things. Did you do something particularly offensive to warrant a long term camping campaign against you? If your corp is too small to be able to put up resistance to them, or too poor to pay someone else to do it for you, then you should fall back on boring them out. Simply go somewhere else for a while, mission in highsec, pvp in low, whatever. A few days time they'll be gone again. Sure, they'll see you are online, but not in your hole. If they have a vendetta against you then you can expect them to come and find you again, at which point just move again to a different part of the galaxy. No-one can be bothered with that for too long, assuming you haven't insulted their mother or something.

Sure, the watchlist thing is kinda overpowered, but the hunted have a far bigger advantage over the hunters. Actual targeted bounty hunting isn't actually a thing for a reason, it's pretty hard to locate and kill a specific target, even with location agents.

But one thing is for sure, sitting in your POS crying about watchlists and not playing the game is basicly a victory for those harassing you. This thread alone might be enough to encourage them to keep on doing it.

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Komodo Askold
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#96 - 2014-11-19 12:35:38 UTC
I have just posted this topic at Features & Ideas. I recommend everyone here to have a look.

Maybe this topic is close to a rant, but the OP has a point.
Galmas
United System's Commonwealth
#97 - 2014-11-19 16:42:01 UTC
Well, that's several massive walls of whining...

Anyway, independently of the reasons of the OP i would like to see the watch list not working in w-space as well but also i would love to see it being removed in k-space too.

Of course i am using the watch list atm, cause it works and is very powerful and others will use it against me. Very similar to the local channel in k-space, isn't it?

Cara Forelli
State War Academy
Caldari State
#98 - 2014-11-19 17:02:58 UTC
Think about it this way...you are a very patient person that is watching some dude floating in his POS. Suddenly he warps out to a random location so you get very excited! Where did he go? Time to use that dscan! Better check all the sigs, maybe there's a new hole. Did he just go to a safe? He's not on dscan anymore. Did he jump through a hole? Maybe he cloaked up?

No. He just vanished from the universe. Talk about OP.

Want to talk? Join my channel in game: House Forelli

Titan's Lament

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#99 - 2014-11-19 22:10:24 UTC
Galmas wrote:
Well, that's several massive walls of whining...

Anyway, independently of the reasons of the OP i would like to see the watch list not working in w-space as well but also i would love to see it being removed in k-space too.

Of course i am using the watch list atm, cause it works and is very powerful and others will use it against me. Very similar to the local channel in k-space, isn't it?


I don't think it should be removed. It should be limited to someone who accepts your watchlist request, probably linked to the 'Send notification' checkbox already in place when you add a contact.

In recompense, locator agents should be changed so they can will tell you if a person (who does not accept your request) is online even if in a wormhole. But there is a cost associated with that so it is not instant, free, recordable intel.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#100 - 2014-11-19 23:20:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Miton
FFS you guys.... how'd we get so off topic?!?!

To get the thread back on track, I saw a Dusette LOGGED IN and in corp chat last night!!!
Have screenshot evidence too!

PS: just noticed this: "Join channel Aussies in space to chat with AU/NZ players". If you play in AU tz you have NOTHING to complain about since no one else does so you're perfectly safe to go carebear your tiny little mind out. Unless of course I connect to you. In which case I may or may not watchlist you before I blow you up.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout