EVE General Discussion

Good to see you again Kane :) I appreciate that there are more complicated mega alliance issues but if you can't fix the obvious what chance does that have ?

seriously dude, i still can't understand your statement, mind explaining it?

Gankers like to follow PvE fitted ships into any areas they can gain access to, to attack you since you aren't PvP fitted. There's tons of PvP-ers they can go up to and smack, but gankers aren't there to fight. They're there for easy kills so they can giggle and tell their brain dead friends how good they are at EVE, a game that is supposed to require a tad bit of SKILL (as far as the gaming world has been led to believe.)

What would be neat fun is to totally boycott all the events the devs work so hard to design, (like missions you have to earn access to by activity, but a ganker can just follow you into - "single shard" right?) Put together PvP fitted ships and totally focus on pre-emptive ganking of WoW refugees who have come over here to play WoW in spaceships!

Let CCP pay hundreds of thousands of Icelandic dollars (worth a tenth of a Mexican peso) on developers who develop things nobody uses since it's STUPID to use them with all these gankers around one-shotting you in what are supposed to be fail build canoes. I can't think of a better way to pay CCP back for such a fabulous gaming concept as letting gankers run their game then by bleeding them for high-end wages on computer game designers whose stuff never gets used.

Makes sense, right?

so what is your point?

neutrals who doesn't want to be invloved in a war shouldn't be living in the warzones...

Any ship not in fleet with you is a threat. That said I'd love to see neutrals locked out of plexes so that,
A. We could plex systems and effect the war without being constantly ran off by pirate blobs.
B. More people would join militia to get their pvp kicks making FW more populated with enemies we wont get sec status hits for shooting.
B2. No more using gate/station guns to protect link ships.

I've been playing eve nearly a year now, almost all of which has been as faction war, and I think I can safely say that neutrals in the war zone help make the place interesting. They also add an element of diplomacy and political intrigue to the area too. FW space is entirely lowsec, if the nasty pirates upset you, maybe you'd be better off in highsec?

The only changes FW needs are rollback timers and removal of those bloody missions!

Shah, at least he found GD...

I'm very happy he is staying out of NCQA.

Now, we don't have to play nice anymore....

My god...are you just stupid, or very good at pretending?



Yes, let's add a function so you can see any standigns by any other person/corp/alliance to a certain someone...this would totally not flood the servers with all the standing-spider-webs that exist in EVE.


p.s. CCP, give me a "Retards, needs "special" attention" standing...for a certain person that really doesn't know how to read or how to apply logic.



p.p.s

If you are in NPC FW, you still have a joint access channel to PC in FW called militia chat. Through which you can share intel, and you can set personal stnadings to anybody yourself if you want (basically corp standings are nothing more then group-wide personal standings).

If you want to benefits of a corp...join a corp.

If you want the benefit of info that FW players get...join FW.

Or both of the above.

are you kidding me? in FW, we get our fights most of the time at (com)plexes. in fact we prefer to slug it out in there. my corp doctrine is designed to fight in plexes and really suck at gate/station games

get your facts straight dude.

and if you are in FW, you don't care about sec status.

Uhm, doesn't the usual...heh, he is neutral give it away in local.

Or maybe that PvP ship on D-scan

Or his killboard.

Or the fact he is likely -5 or lower already and thus flashing in local.


OOh, wait, you mean NPC corp members work together..whahahahahahaha, what drugs are you on, I want some.