These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So who will be moving to THERA? (Jita without Concord)

First post
Author
Vapor Ventrillian
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#221 - 2014-11-21 01:20:24 UTC
See what Im thinken is we get as many npc's together and claim it for Npc...you aint npc ...You Dead bruh!Twisted

For Thera!!

Crazy idea no 123

o7
Vapor

The Evil Overlord of Scope, self elected as all good overlords should be

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#222 - 2014-11-21 02:17:19 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Today there were 8 wormholes in Thera on Sisi:

2 leading to highsec
3 to lowsec
3 to nullsec

That could all change, obviously.

I wonder how we will find Thera on TQ? Until people start to actively use (open) those static connections, the only way in will be random ones, correct? I wonder how many of those will there be...


Did you check the entire system? Is it a possibility you could have missed some?

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#223 - 2014-11-21 08:15:42 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Today there were 8 wormholes in Thera on Sisi:

2 leading to highsec
3 to lowsec
3 to nullsec

That could all change, obviously.

I wonder how we will find Thera on TQ? Until people start to actively use (open) those static connections, the only way in will be random ones, correct? I wonder how many of those will there be...


Did you check the entire system? Is it a possibility you could have missed some?
I checked the 8 signatures that appeared on the overlay/scanner.

I believe that with current mechanics, all signatures present in the system automatically show on your overlay/scanner.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Humera Hekard
Hekard Industries Inc.
#224 - 2014-11-21 08:23:57 UTC
T-Space is going to be an interesting place. :)
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die
Pandemic Horde
#225 - 2014-11-21 09:23:31 UTC
its a completely stupid idea... sorry....

All my views are my own - never be afraid to post with your main, unless you're going to post some dumb shit

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#226 - 2014-11-21 17:04:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Lloyd Roses
Aaron wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Today there were 8 wormholes in Thera on Sisi:

2 leading to highsec
3 to lowsec
3 to nullsec

That could all change, obviously.

I wonder how we will find Thera on TQ? Until people start to actively use (open) those static connections, the only way in will be random ones, correct? I wonder how many of those will there be...


Did you check the entire system? Is it a possibility you could have missed some?


I've been scanning thera over the last week:

3 low-statics, 3 null-statics are in there, no doubt.
2 more Q063s are cruisersized holes that connect to anywhere in K-space, not necessarily though to Highsec.

2 wandering holes in highsec (one large, one frigsized) exist.
5 wandering holes in wormholes (F135) connecting to Thera exist.

Then in addition, there seems to be atleast one frigsized hole in null and one in low connecting to Thera.

People that say Thera got two highsec-statics are wrong. Thera doesn't have a highsec static. Just that one static might connect to highsec.
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#227 - 2014-11-21 20:06:08 UTC
Lloyd Roses wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Today there were 8 wormholes in Thera on Sisi:

2 leading to highsec
3 to lowsec
3 to nullsec

That could all change, obviously.

I wonder how we will find Thera on TQ? Until people start to actively use (open) those static connections, the only way in will be random ones, correct? I wonder how many of those will there be...


Did you check the entire system? Is it a possibility you could have missed some?


I've been scanning thera over the last week:

3 low-statics, 3 null-statics are in there, no doubt.
2 more Q063s are cruisersized holes that connect to anywhere in K-space, not necessarily though to Highsec.

2 wandering holes in highsec (one large, one frigsized) exist.
5 wandering holes in wormholes (F135) connecting to Thera exist.

Then in addition, there seems to be atleast one frigsized hole in null and one in low connecting to Thera.

People that say Thera got two highsec-statics are wrong. Thera doesn't have a highsec static. Just that one static might connect to highsec.
Thanks, great info! If it stays this way on TQ, obviously...

I'm obviously clueless on wormholes lol...

Anyway, good to know about the 3 lowsec statics!

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

ZAKURELL0 LINDA
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#228 - 2014-11-22 03:22:55 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Ka'Narlist wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
if indeed a Jita without Concord can be controlled by one entity?

Jita means a major trade hub where everyone and their mother brings their stuff to sell it.
How do you think this will happen in a system where everyone is ganking everyone?

A couple of reasons:

1: Apparently due to sheer incredible size, and quite possibly new system mechanics, it will be difficult if not impossible to lock the system down. Too huge, too many ways in and out.

2: It's connected to... literally... everywhere. Depending on how this is handled it could be the most convenient market hub in all of New Eden.

imagine JITA 5-5 being hell bubbled...... no one can ever undock unless u have massive support fleet clearing the way out for da haulers................

RIP Iron Lady

Opertone
State War Academy
Caldari State
#229 - 2014-11-22 20:16:15 UTC
bombs, bring more bombs !

This post sums up why the 'best' work with DCM inc.

WARP DRIVE makes eve boring

really - add warping align time 300% on gun aggression and eve becomes great again

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#230 - 2014-11-27 03:55:13 UTC
I had a look at Thera on Singularity. It is hard to see how this will turn into another Jita. Sure, the stations will be stocked but the prices will be atrocious. The connections are:

Q063
This wormhole seems to lead into high security space.
Up to medium sized ships can pass through this wormhole.

V898
This wormhole seems to lead into low security space.
Larger ships can pass through this wormhole.

E587
This wormhole seems to lead into null security space.
Very large ships can pass through this wormhole.

Only the null E587 allows freighters through. This means that if you want to properly stock Thera with hulls you have three options:


  1. Fly or jump your freighter to the null entry and come in through there.
  2. Import hulls in a smaller industrial one at a time (for cruisers) or just fly them in manually.
  3. Build them in Thera (which just removes the problem one level for material importation unless you are crazy enough to try and mine in this system).


This is disappointing. I was looking forward to the challenge of stocking this system but I think the risk is too high. I don’t understand why freighters would be excluded from low and highsec connections.

Does CCP think that the risk for freighters would be too low? It will be enormous regardless of where you jump in from. At least open up the lowsec connection please.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#231 - 2014-11-27 05:07:08 UTC
ZAKURELL0 LINDA wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Ka'Narlist wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
if indeed a Jita without Concord can be controlled by one entity?

Jita means a major trade hub where everyone and their mother brings their stuff to sell it.
How do you think this will happen in a system where everyone is ganking everyone?

A couple of reasons:

1: Apparently due to sheer incredible size, and quite possibly new system mechanics, it will be difficult if not impossible to lock the system down. Too huge, too many ways in and out.

2: It's connected to... literally... everywhere. Depending on how this is handled it could be the most convenient market hub in all of New Eden.

imagine JITA 5-5 being hell bubbled...... no one can ever undock unless u have massive support fleet clearing the way out for da haulers................

Your frame of reference is off. That quote was made before we knew how many stations would be in Thera.

It now looks like Thera may be more of a transport/combat hub than a trade hub, much as Fozzie stated it would be... as Jita would be without Concord.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Leannor
State War Academy
Caldari State
#232 - 2014-11-27 09:32:48 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
ZAKURELL0 LINDA wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Ka'Narlist wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
if indeed a Jita without Concord can be controlled by one entity?

Jita means a major trade hub where everyone and their mother brings their stuff to sell it.
How do you think this will happen in a system where everyone is ganking everyone?

A couple of reasons:

1: Apparently due to sheer incredible size, and quite possibly new system mechanics, it will be difficult if not impossible to lock the system down. Too huge, too many ways in and out.

2: It's connected to... literally... everywhere. Depending on how this is handled it could be the most convenient market hub in all of New Eden.

imagine JITA 5-5 being hell bubbled...... no one can ever undock unless u have massive support fleet clearing the way out for da haulers................

Your frame of reference is off. That quote was made before we knew how many stations would be in Thera.

It now looks like Thera may be more of a transport/combat hub than a trade hub, much as Fozzie stated it would be... as Jita would be without Concord.



seriosuly? ... you think a couple more stations will make a difference to Alliances that field 1,000+ players? That live in systems with high populations ... entirely their own?

You think there is a difference between 1 and 4 stations?

20, maybe ... but not a handful. lol

"Lykouleon wrote:

STOP TOUCHING ICONIC SHIP PARTS"

Tarpedo
Incursionista
#233 - 2014-11-27 10:01:19 UTC
I won't move to There. Boring scan mini-game is killing everything.
Signal11th
#234 - 2014-11-27 12:10:32 UTC
tiberiusric wrote:
its a completely stupid idea... sorry....



Have to agree.

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#235 - 2014-11-27 14:51:05 UTC
Leannor wrote:
seriosuly? ... you think a couple more stations will make a difference to Alliances that field 1,000+ players? That live in systems with high populations ... entirely their own?

You think there is a difference between 1 and 4 stations?

20, maybe ... but not a handful. lol

But the way the system is laid out, you'd need that alliance to dedicate most of its manpower to permacamping the four stations and all the wormholes and not to something like, say, holding conventional nullsec territory. What exact benefit are you then getting from camping Thera 24/7?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Leannor
State War Academy
Caldari State
#236 - 2014-11-27 15:21:04 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Leannor wrote:
seriosuly? ... you think a couple more stations will make a difference to Alliances that field 1,000+ players? That live in systems with high populations ... entirely their own?

You think there is a difference between 1 and 4 stations?

20, maybe ... but not a handful. lol

But the way the system is laid out, you'd need that alliance to dedicate most of its manpower to permacamping the four stations and all the wormholes and not to something like, say, holding conventional nullsec territory. What exact benefit are you then getting from camping Thera 24/7?


er ... if it's your base ... you'd not camp the enterances, granted ... but the stations, you would (and you only need to cover one of the two anyway to make it an unviable nuetral trade hub)... and ... why else does anyone blob a system in eve? ... to own it.. there's rarel;y any rationale reason besides that.

besides ... you don't need to perma'camp' it ... threat is enough. How many people don't undock if there's a single red in system? ... like I say ... not a viable nuetral trade hub. That's easy to happen for an allaince basing out of there. 100+ in system is all the camp you need, don't matter where they are, or cloaked, or docked, ... hub relies on traffic flow, and that just wouldn't happen to any industrialist. (import export wise) ...

"Lykouleon wrote:

STOP TOUCHING ICONIC SHIP PARTS"

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#237 - 2014-11-27 15:22:05 UTC
The real truth is that no one knows what will happen with Thera, and speculating about it this much is rather stupid.
Leannor
State War Academy
Caldari State
#238 - 2014-11-27 15:53:11 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
The real truth is that no one knows what will happen with Thera, and speculating about it this much is rather stupid.


assessing what we know, isn't . That's all I'm doing :) Based on what they have said and their spoken intent.

"Lykouleon wrote:

STOP TOUCHING ICONIC SHIP PARTS"

Kaye Kaye
Doomheim
#239 - 2014-11-27 17:42:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaye Kaye
I am brand new, but can't see how this will be any type of trade hub.
Seems like it will be NPC Null Sec without Local, with perma camped stations.

Pass... seems more like a place to have big PVP battles though.... or maybe just another variant of the Blue doughnut I've been reading about.

All and all, it seems cool to add to the games playable options.
Leannor
State War Academy
Caldari State
#240 - 2014-11-28 09:09:13 UTC
Kaye Kaye wrote:
I am brand new, but can't see how this will be any type of trade hub.
Seems like it will be NPC Null Sec without Local, with perma camped stations.

Pass... seems more like a place to have big PVP battles though.


This much is true. And why it is not a bad idea. I'm not against this idea in anyway, all for new space and new toys. All I challenge at the moment is that it's said it will be a trade hub. If it is destined to be a trade hub, maybe the comments of logic will help it actually become a trade hub. Firstly, a tonne more stations (think Ammamake? that lo-sec system in minnie space with like 30,000 stations), 'and' some kind of station fighting nerf (be it guns, or range, or timer guns, or something) and some bonus to the WH's - maybe ... that cloakble ships don't need to de-cloak after jumping into system? That together with station guns, no bubbles, and access from across eve directly, would create a trade hub.

Of course ... I'll admit one thing actually. Trade hub. Funny. That doesn't actually specifiy 'what' is being traded .... one just assumes it's 'everything'. Could just be the control choke point of trdaing a certain sleeper or Jove technololgy. In which case, that is a very BIG reason why alliances will want to dominate it. Anyway ... what's the point of living if you can't specualte and gossip and imagine. Life would be very dull ... and no one would have said "Crazy idea guys, what about getting loads of people to pay for a game where they fly around in ships and blow each other up ..."

(yeah, that's been said better too ... the whole "EVE, the experiment where people pay to have a job" ) Lol

"Lykouleon wrote:

STOP TOUCHING ICONIC SHIP PARTS"