Wormholes

It could work quite easily if you set it up right... Yes things will be a lot easier once corp roles and access rights are improved but there are several things you can do to secure your stuff through a system of combining roles, separate pos, pos paswords and personal hangars.

There would probably be a limit on the number of people you could have in a system before things get unmanageable/too costly so you simple move half of your corp to a second wormhole when this happens, rinse and repeat.

Day to day, these groups would do the same thing all wormholes do (shoot sleepers and pvp) but they have the added activity created around being under constant war and having a nemesis. The bigger the two sided get, the more they will bump into each other.

Personally, i would start this by having both groups move into their own C2 wormholes that have static HS and a static wormhole connection.

Come to WH's ... WE HAVE PIE.

Isnt that how many wh groups already behave (FAP)?

Christ on a buttered toast. What the hell is wrong with you people? Like i said, if any newbro wants to see how w-space dysfunctions, just look at this thread. Or joun Gunner GzR's channel which is Low Class fail recruitment channel.

Seriously half the time they were "lets be blue!'.

No. I won't be blue. i won't be red. I'll be on team green or yellow.

I will follow the Unknown Code. If I've got some caps to gank (as low-quality as you may consider that PVP to be, whatever, if someone's screwed up I'm killing his caps) and I lack PVP pilots, then I'll ring your doorbell. If you backstab, you don't get invited again. If I encounter you the next day, and I believe I've got a chance, I'll have a swing at you.

I won't be "red" either. That's assumed. But I'm not going to evict people unless they are terrible farmers who screw up their POS defences and have buckets of tears waiting to be spilled. Even if I hate you, your kittens, your doe-eyed children, your white picket fences and everything you stand for, evicting you like SSC did to AHARM is pointless self-harm. Blowing up all but one of your POSs isn't, though.

I may eventually pick a fight by grinding upon your structures. A bit of POCO frottage or stront testing a foolishly undefended POS puts a timer in front of everyone, and lets us has teh fisticuffs. Bring a fight, and win or lose, you'll be part of the Prolapse. "catch and release" sport fishing programme.

We don't need Red vs Blue. That's just infantile circlejerk. it works for low-quality push button get candy gameplay in highsec. If RVB needed to reinforce each other's stations and could be evicted from highsec, it wouldn't be RVB, and the corollary is true. There is no point arranging fights. Move out to highsec if that's what you want.

True, we do need more content creators. As a content creator, I find that it is frustrating seeing the big grow bigger, and the small guys staying small. But success, PR, propaganda, boastful bombastic silhouette recruiters proclaiming their corp or alliance is elite when it is not (on all factual bases), all of this is frustrating.

it's frustrating because not only are the puffed-up cockerells of w-space misrepresenting their true ability to provide content, their new members are just fooling themselves in the process of contributing to the rarification of content - as has been pointed out. Again, it's up to the recruits to take a chance on some of the smaller entities, help them grow bigger and more active, and eventually there will be more smaller entities rolling about, having small gang fights without having to frot POCOs for attention.

Thats how we have been operating for forever...

Not everyone, but most of us do... or at least I'd like to think so.

Hence I kind of fail to see how this wspace RvB thing is new, or (if they are meant to fight mostly each other) how is it viable given the randomness.

There's nothing new under the sun... However, if you're claiming it's already being done, i would be interested to know what corps/alliances are involved.

The arranged fights, uniting to kill a cap and the dogpile eviction mentality we currently have in wormhole space is not the same as bringing the RvB model to wormhole space.

To be clear i'm not saying this is something wormhole absolutely needs but if we're talking about increasing population in wormhole space, this has more potential than saying "hey, come and join our corp".

If CCP really was into improving wormholes, they'd turn up the anoms in c1/2 space and to an extent in c3/4 space. Something like c1/c2 anoms respawning like nullsec anoms with upgrade and c3/4 considerably quicker.
Even then the ISK/hr would be laughable still compared to L4s for c1/c2 and acceptable compared to c3/4 given the included risk, necessity of teaming up and logistics around it.

Or they could remove MNRs from c5/c6 and slightly increase blue loot instead to help c1/2 people by increasing the value of their salvage.

They did one step into that direction already by adding datas/relics, points where you can grab a scanner and summon an engagement. c1/2 anom spawn rate is an activity killer for small corps to start with, so please - respawn in the same system instead of constellation or w/e, bound to delayed K-hole appearance.

I am already quite clear on WHAT you would like to achieve (which I think is commendable), I just dont see HOW you would like to achieve it. Hisec and Wspace are as different environments as they get, so Im not sure how do you imagine this concept be translated from one to the other. Im not saying you are wrong or that it is impossible, Im just asking you to elaborate on it a give us specific ideas how this would work in practice beyond repeating "RvB in wspace".

If thats what you call "specific ideas how this would work in practice", then I think we dont need to hear any more...