These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

People shooting renting corps in null. ( )

First post
Author
Ka'Narlist
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#21 - 2014-10-15 13:27:06 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:

Of every big sov holding alliance there must be people who like to rat. These people could be set up
to farm anoms and deliver parts of the income to the alliances ... which would be bigger income than
from actual renters, no?

Yes they allready do through taxes, at least in most alliances. I don't now if GSF or PL have general taxes set up. But the thing is alliance members don't like high taxes because if they go through the hassle of ratting they want to keep the most part of the isk for themself otherwise no one would rat.

Renters on the other hand are only allowed in thier rented space because they pay isk for it and they don't seem to mind paying a lot of isk because their only purpose in the game seems to be earning isk anyways.
So you can milk out your renters but you usually can't milk out your alliance members.
Solecist Project
#22 - 2014-10-15 13:36:34 UTC
Okay ... renters don't mind it ... alliance members do.

Seems weird. One would assume that in alliances containing thousands of people
it would be trivial to find people who wouldn't mind ...

... it's seriously confusing me, but I guess I have to accept this weirdness.


Thanks!

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Ra' zutao
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2014-10-15 14:04:46 UTC
eh some enjoy fighting back, I'm not scared of losing a ship, but i'm also not going to fight 30 people that hot drop me.. imma freak out poop myself and run the F away.
Max Deveron
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#24 - 2014-10-15 14:08:16 UTC
back around 2012...i had a main that was part of a renter alliance....we rented at roughly 4 billion isk per system and we had two systems. so 8 bill per month. Though we in the great scheme of things paid our lip service to the Landlord....most of leadership snickered a bit at them.

The reason was on the average our 200 member group at the time collectively made 200 billion isk oer month....with just two systems. We were decently self sufficient when it came to industry. Our only short coming was the super small pvp division that we had at the time supplemented on occassion by our ratting corps. Alliance Coffers obtained taxing our own corps to be out there about 25% of that collective income per month.

So recalling this experience.....I would say 'no' renters are not required in nullsec. And I also call BS on those nullbears that say it isnt possible to fully utilize their space for the projects they are doing. Motivation and a will to actually own something and maintain it is the key....not easy laziness. Things get easy after the work and infrastructure are in place.
Arsine Mayhem
Doomheim
#25 - 2014-10-15 14:08:57 UTC
Wait till after the patch. Invasion imminent.

Solecist Project
#26 - 2014-10-15 14:10:49 UTC
Thank you for sharing your history and opinion, Max.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Winter Archipelago
Autumn Industrial Enterprises
#27 - 2014-10-15 14:54:39 UTC
I use a bomber alt to do my nulsec hunting, so my response comes from the viewpoint of an individual pilot whose primary targets are miners, BC's, and BS's that are tanked against local damage types.

On the individual level, as I see it, it's largely meaningless. A single pilot cannot have enough of an impact on any one group to severely affect them (with a few exceptions, of which Cloaking in their system for a length of time is, though a decent person will barely even be affected by that if they know what they're doing). At the same time, an individual in a renter corp doesn't have enough matter in the grand scheme of things for their losses to matter.

However, even a small group can create a meaningful impact in a localized area, while larger groups can affect a region (look at PASTA as an example). There aren't enough large hunters to make much of an impact beyond that, though.

In the grand scheme of things, the ISK in nulsec is just too good, and there are too many renters and potential renters with too few predators to make a meaningful impact on a larger scale.

Generic Renter Corp may have five people lose a combined 15b in carriers this week to a roaming gang, but the month before, those same five people made a combined 25b ISK from it while their space was barely even noticed, will still be up 10b ISK this month, and when the roamers move on to their next target, those five people will make another 25b the next month, while the corp as a whole pulled in 100b+ for the month after loses and expenses.

Even when a system is being camped, passive forms of income such as station trading in the regional hub (if one exists) and PI can still produce a bit of profit (nothing quite like what they would be making while ratting, but they've hardly been reduced to having zero income), and if the players were wise, they would have jumpclones set up in Empire space to have something to do during a concentrated camping effort, essentially negating the efforts of the campers, to begin with.

So individually, no, there's no impact being made. Small groups can have a fairly decent impact in a localized area, but on the whole, they aren't able to really have a decisive presence to cause a lot of issues for the locals. There just aren't enough hunters to make a meaningful impact on a wide scale (even PASTA, with ~400 members, are largely only able to affect a small area, in the grand scheme of nulsec space).
Solecist Project
#28 - 2014-10-15 15:03:13 UTC
Thank you for your very interesting post, Winter!

Can you, or someone else, tell me more about Pasta, what they do and their impact?

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#29 - 2014-10-15 15:05:21 UTC
PvP is killing nullsec :D


amidoingitrite?

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Ka'Narlist
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#30 - 2014-10-15 15:49:19 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:

Can you, or someone else, tell me more about Pasta, what they do and their impact?

Awoxing guarantees citizenship Blink


Please don't tell me you don't know wheniaminspace
Barton Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2014-10-15 16:00:46 UTC
Ka'Narlist wrote:
All the turbo jews are not interested in something like this.


Seems that parts of the lingo are very very old...
knobber Jobbler
State War Academy
Caldari State
#32 - 2014-10-15 16:03:20 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Okay ... renters don't mind it ... alliance members do.

Seems weird. One would assume that in alliances containing thousands of people
it would be trivial to find people who wouldn't mind ...

... it's seriously confusing me, but I guess I have to accept this weirdness.


Thanks!


Peoples motivations are different and in turn one needs the other to survive. For me to have SRP to replace my blown up ships we need ISK, to get ISK we need income and that income - at least a small part right now - is from renters (for PL and NCDOT it's probably there core income). In turn my ships get blown up defending renter empires.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with renting out space or running protection rackets in EVE - inventive methods of income should be championed in EVE. The problem lies in something like PL or NCDOT's rental empires which take up most of the east of EVE: A very small group of people using supercapitals and carriers can effectively defend half the map because they're flying unbalanced ships and force projection allows that. It's not PL or NCDOT's fault either, its because the mechanics allow them to do this, so they've done it.
Ka'Narlist
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#33 - 2014-10-15 16:19:07 UTC
Barton Breau wrote:
Ka'Narlist wrote:
All the turbo jews are not interested in something like this.


Seems that parts of the lingo are very very old...

Yes it is and quite hard to get rid of Blink
But there is no offense intended to actual jewish people
Solecist Project
#34 - 2014-10-15 16:41:54 UTC
Ka'Narlist wrote:
Solecist Project wrote:

Can you, or someone else, tell me more about Pasta, what they do and their impact?

Awoxing guarantees citizenship Blink


Please don't tell me you don't know wheniaminspace
No, I don't actually know him.
I think I catched the name once, but no idea who he is.

Can you tell me more?


And thank you, knobber, for your interesting post!

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2014-10-15 17:02:16 UTC
Killing renters is an absolute necessity.

It's what interceptors were meant for, and besides a good number of renters are multiboxing botters anyway. Your'e really helping CCP out by killing them.

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#36 - 2014-10-15 17:19:37 UTC
The way I look at it is if im red to an alliance, and that alliance rents to people, then those people are red and therefore targets.


But then of course, anyone who isn't red is a target. Half the time anyone who isn't a purple is a target...


Im pretty much all for more targets.


Plus, renter tears are some of the sweetest tears of all!

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Elsa Hayes
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#37 - 2014-10-15 18:38:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsa Hayes
Max Deveron wrote:
back around 2012...i had a main that was part of a renter alliance....we rented at roughly 4 billion isk per system and we had two systems. so 8 bill per month. Though we in the great scheme of things paid our lip service to the Landlord....most of leadership snickered a bit at them.

The reason was on the average our 200 member group at the time collectively made 200 billion isk oer month....with just two systems. We were decently self sufficient when it came to industry. Our only short coming was the super small pvp division that we had at the time supplemented on occassion by our ratting corps. Alliance Coffers obtained taxing our own corps to be out there about 25% of that collective income per month.

So recalling this experience.....I would say 'no' renters are not required in nullsec. And I also call BS on those nullbears that say it isnt possible to fully utilize their space for the projects they are doing. Motivation and a will to actually own something and maintain it is the key....not easy laziness. Things get easy after the work and infrastructure are in place.


I am not sure if the rents are still the same but if we take your 4 billion per system as a guideline and look at 688 systems with Northern Associates holding sov. we arrive at the not so shabby sum of 2752 billion PER MONTH for the landlords of NA.

Bottinghood of Tangra would earn their PL lords ~1450 billion per month and even the CFC renters would earn their masters ~500 billion a month.

Oh how poor must the land lords be and how terrible the life must be if you get that much isks each month for doing nothing at all. Since there is a no sov war agreement there isn´t much to waste isks on.

How many titans did PL lose again? 33? if we assume 100 bill each including fitting for the sake of easy calculating, those losses were basically replaced as far as isks are concerned within a little over 2 months.
So during this age of the blue doughnut with nothing to waste these insane amounts of isks on what do N3., PL and the CFC do with all those isks? Stockpile cap and supercap fleets at every other system so that the upcoming fatigue system won´t bother them at all?
Brorr Liason
Maraque Enterprises
Just let it happen
#38 - 2014-10-15 18:41:55 UTC
I see it as nothing more than content generation on a small scale by both the renters and the renter hunters.

We have been renting for awhile now and we see the 'normal' WH groups come through quite often. They have no lasting effects on the usage of our systems nor on the morale of my pilots. Of course bickering goes back and forth because easy kills were not given, we blobbed them or we got caught by them. We also understand they are out for 'good fights' AND easy kills at the same time or they wouldn't bother coming to the same regions every night.

We actually look forward to some of the groups that pass through because they fly well and provide good pvp for us. Some are just dicks and aren't worth trying to engage or converse with. Without them it would be both boring and an ISK farm. They are the only ones adding risk to the renter portion of nullsec.

While I don't plan to rent forever, we are enjoying our time in our region and my pilots are learning enough to be sufficient at supporting themselves and working to expel the fleets that come through. People gotta start somewhere and some of us choose to pay to be in null.

So I throw a wave at the common groups that fly through my area:

0/
Solar
Lazerhawks
Adastra and friends
Ixtab
Hard Knocks
No Holes Barred
Camel (Occasionally)
A4D (Occasionally)
Moon Tribe
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork



^
Without those guys (and others), we'd be bored and they help shape and train my pilots. Whether renting or not should happen isn't really a problem for us. I'm sure it doesn't make sense to some but we've been around EVE the past few years and I feel it's a good step for some corporations before they find their niche in the universe.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#39 - 2014-10-15 18:44:53 UTC
Jacob Holland wrote:
I believe renting goes back further than that...
Didn't BoB rent out some of their space? Not in the sense that they got ISS to put up stations for them but in the more modern manner.

The arguement that renting "gets the little guys out to null" brings me to recall people like Mom and Pop Ammo Shoppe - They were a small corp, I guess 20 members (it was a long time ago) and they lived out of a single POS in a single system... When IAC took over the pocket (and later the constellation) they remained in place and remained neutral, I don't believe they paid us anything (except refining taxes when we built The Distillery)...
Getting "the little guys" out to null seems rather an altruistic sentiment - though the method may have a great deal more to do with enlightened self-interest...



It was also a little more complicated then it is now, but yes, there were various factions that paid rent, or protection/hush money. BoB had the GBC which it would let die often if it was not in there interest to save there pets.

My alliance, Brotherhood of steel, used to live in the kari pipe and were alies with UK. When CVA came in and tossed UK on there rear end we were given the option to switch sides or die. We switched, but still had a war with cry havocs founders. For some odd reason, I had a working relationship with Tyraxx, and for reasons I still dunno, he let us move to iac space. We did not pay rent but we had a few systems and were semi pets.

So in some cases, its was more complicate then.

When dominion came out, my alliance was one of the first renters, only because a director took sov in cloud ring before we were ready so we sued for peace with Evoke. When goods, or It might of been test, I forget, put pressure on evoke in CR we moved and became altas. renters. They had lame rules, in that we had to blue all other renters. it was annoying as there were a few I would of loved to have a skirmish with.

Anyway, picking on renters is easy to do, cause form experience, most of the time the renting alliance is too weak to stop you. Otherwise they would throw off the yoke of rent.

And I saw first hand, how if one alliance won't pay rent and gets evicked, then there are 5 more that will. We used to have biddign wars for systems in atlas space a few times.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Solecist Project
#40 - 2014-10-15 18:45:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Solecist Project
Thank you, Brorr, for this really nice post ... even with greetings! :D


And thanks, DaReaper, as well ... for this short trip into the past. :)

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia