These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Gevlon's Second Doozie

First post
Author
Cidanel Afuran
Grant Village
#81 - 2014-10-14 13:48:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Cidanel Afuran
PotatoOverdose wrote:
So you each blue'd as many people as you could, and the servers couldn't take it. Hell, during B-R there were probably thousands of subcaps engaged in the surrounding systems, outside of the main engagement. And now you refuse to fight.

Sounds to me like my earlier point rings true:
The continued existence of both N3 and the CFC is not compatible with the long term health of eve.

Seeing as you can't/won't fight the other side for ~reasons~, these two points are likewise true:

Riddle me this: If 95% of null is in a coalition in the old system and 95% of null is in a coalition in the new system, who, exactly are you going to shoot? If you aren't going to shoot your neighbor and you aren't going to shoot the renters, who *exactly* are you going to shoot?


Sure, you aren't literally blue to 95% of null, you're just refusing to get into a serious engagement with 95% of null.


I was on the proviblock side of B-R and IS, and I would rather have lost systems in decent brawls and then had the fun of trying to take them back than have people (on both sides, honestly) batphone in caps when things turn south.

An easy first step to fixing null (IMO) is to take away all automatic notifications when sovs/POSes, etc are attacked.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#82 - 2014-10-14 14:31:41 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
I do agree that if the game is "fun" only, then there's no point to it.

Sorry, but there are people who want a niche game that's not just entertaining,
because every stupid lesser game already provides that.

I prefer my games hard, challenging, annoying and cumbersome.

Pretty much this: A game that offers a wide range of feelings is better than one
that offers just one. So, basically, you're superficial.

So what exactly makes a game good? One that's fun ...
... or one that offers a huge variety of feelings?
I think you misunderstand. For me a game should be both fun and challenging. It should not be a chore to play and it should not be a job. The thing is, EVE is neither. It's not challenging to get pretty much anything you want, and it's not fun to achieve what you do.

At the end of the day, EVE is entertainment, whether you get that entertainment from fun, challenges, social interaction, whatever. Gevlon will never accept this. In his mind EVE should be a life choice, and should be a burden to play that you must carry, and deriving enjoyment from that should not be allowed. Its pretty sad that someone can be consumed by a game to the point that it's more important than real life.

Solecist Project wrote:
Feel free to go. :)
If an when I choose to, I will. I don;t need the permission of a forum troll. Besides, I thought you were already quitting? When's that likely to finish?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#83 - 2014-10-14 14:41:49 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
So to be clear, you were impressed that Gevlon bought data available for free from zkillboard, analysed it badly and came to conclusions which the data can;t possibly represent, then you read on to his post about how video games shouldn't be fun and that CCP are removing fun from the game which he believes is a good thing, then you decided to post a wall of text about it here?

The answer to you're question is no, I will not be unsubbing because of the nerf since nothing will really change that much for null blobs, but CCP need to get to grips on what makes a game entertaining otherwise they will lose me to Elite Dangerous. Doing pretty much anything in eve is tedious and boring, not exactly what makes a game good.


I knew I had a reason to like Elite Dangerous, and here it is Twisted

For the life of me i can't understand a person who plays a game he fundamentally dislikes. I've never seen that in real life, not once did i see a guy at the park playing basketball while complaining "this game sucks, they should change the rules". I have, however, worked with people who don't like their job but keep coming to work. That at least makes sense because at least you get paid for that.

But you aren't getting paid to play EVE, so why?

The things you are complaining (and have complained) about are the things I (and I'd guess others) like about EVE. Every time I encounter someone like you I imagine a kid in kindergarten trying to stuff a square peg into a round hole and getting pissed off at the people who make round holes lol.

At some point it has to cross your mind that it's you and your entertainment needs/preferences that are incompatible with this game , not a problem with the game itself. Right?

I'm no fan of Gevlon despite the fact that I've been shooting Goons for the last 7 years (hell, soon after I joined TEST, they started shooting Goons too, I'm totally taking credit for that even though I had nothing to do with it lol). That's besides the point here, I really do hope Elite is something you will actually enjoy...for all of our sakes.
Solecist Project
#84 - 2014-10-14 14:42:50 UTC
lol the forum trolling nobody calls me a forum troll ... that's hilarious.


You haven't really adressed my post.

The point ...


Eve offers a wide variety of feelings ...
... and all you want is fun.

I understand thqt scrubs like you have no idea of the actual depth of the game ...
... so please understand that your "fun" and your "challenges" aren't really what it
has been about for pretty much a decade.

If this game never makes you feel miserable ...
... and thus makes you stand up again to become better ...
... then that's your issue.

Being annoyed and whatever else you wanna come up with ...
... is a part of the game. It bellngs into the game. It's why this game is great.

It's because it's the only one like it.

Anyone who calls EVE entertainment has no clue about EVE ONLINE,
because EVE ONLINE never was meant to be ENTERTAINMENT!

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#85 - 2014-10-14 14:43:47 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Arsine Mayhem wrote:

Mostly I do NPSI, because,,,,

I don't want to be you.


No, you do it for the same reason people drive hybrid cars, carry froo froo purse dogs, or go "gluten free" without having a digestive disease.

So you can hold your nose in the air and try to fool yourself into thinking that you're any better than anyone else.

But the mere fact that you try so hard is a giant beacon of your inferiority, that everyone around you can see.


You forgot about the Soy Lattes , can't go all froo froo purse without a Soy Latte.
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
Sedition.
#86 - 2014-10-14 16:23:34 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

But you aren't getting paid to play EVE, so why?

People like the idea of eve, a game world with freedom and consequences. People don't like the reality of eve, where sometimes consequences might sting just a tiny bit. So they join large groups to mitigate that risk.

A few people soar like a leaf on the wind, making baller solo and small gang pvp videos or making markets tremble in their wake. Most everyone else signs up for F1 duty and watches the politics unfold with *popcorn*. That's basically eve.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#87 - 2014-10-14 16:30:20 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

But you aren't getting paid to play EVE, so why?

People like the idea of eve, a game world with freedom and consequences. People don't like the reality of eve, where sometimes consequences might sting just a tiny bit. So they join large groups to mitigate that risk.

A few people soar like a leaf on the wind, making baller solo and small gang pvp videos or making markets tremble in their wake. Most everyone else signs up for F1 duty and watches the politics unfold with *popcorn*. That's basically eve.


Most of the people I encounter that play EVE 'in spite of EVE' and not because they like it are actually solo style player and PVE players too (though of course, they are not a majority of any group).

And we get it, you think "solo and small gang" stuff is good and the people who do that are 'superior'. I find it funny when people peg their own or others self worth to how they play a video game. The F1 guys are smashing the same buttons the 'baller solo guys' are.\

Every time in the past I've killed someone solo it was ok, but just as ok as that time I was in a big Atlas fleet and we took C-J6 from the Russians for the 1st time. ie No big deal, it's just a video game.
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
Sedition.
#88 - 2014-10-14 16:35:48 UTC  |  Edited by: PotatoOverdose
Jenn aSide wrote:

Most of the people I encounter that play EVE 'in spite of EVE' and not because they like it are actually solo style player and PVE players too (though of course, they are not a majority of any group).

And we get it, you think "solo and small gang" stuff is good and the people who do that are 'superior'. I find it funny when people peg their own or others self worth to how they play a video game. The F1 guys are smashing the same buttons the 'baller solo guys' are.\

Every time in the past I've killed someone solo it was ok, but just as ok as that time I was in a big Atlas fleet and we took C-J6 from the Russians for the 1st time. ie No big deal, it's just a video game.

Don't get me wrong, I think all styles of play are valid. The dude that figured out how to near-perfectly chain wormholes had an immense impact on eve. So too do the bloc level fc's that lead the fight in the sov war we all like to see.

But if all someone does is set keep at range on an anchor and press f1 in fleets...idk...I just don't find that very worthwhile.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#89 - 2014-10-14 16:43:21 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

But you aren't getting paid to play EVE, so why?

People like the idea of eve, a game world with freedom and consequences. People don't like the reality of eve, where sometimes consequences might sting just a tiny bit. So they join large groups to mitigate that risk.

A few people soar like a leaf on the wind, making baller solo and small gang pvp videos or making markets tremble in their wake. Most everyone else signs up for F1 duty and watches the politics unfold with *popcorn*. That's basically eve.


Most of the people I encounter that play EVE 'in spite of EVE' and not because they like it are actually solo style player and PVE players too (though of course, they are not a majority of any group).

And we get it, you think "solo and small gang" stuff is good and the people who do that are 'superior'. I find it funny when people peg their own or others self worth to how they play a video game. The F1 guys are smashing the same buttons the 'baller solo guys' are.\

Every time in the past I've killed someone solo it was ok, but just as ok as that time I was in a big Atlas fleet and we took C-J6 from the Russians for the 1st time. ie No big deal, it's just a video game.


You haven't lived in EVE until you have painted a giant kill me target on your ship in a large fleet battle, had your entire fleet fleet killed around you and then managed to evade an entire angry fleet with 3-4 other "survivors" in a ship hat has no business doing such hings.
Boom McCondor
Doomheim
#90 - 2014-10-14 16:53:58 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Anyone who calls EVE entertainment has no clue about EVE ONLINE,
because EVE ONLINE never was meant to be ENTERTAINMENT!

Technically still just a game. Games are made to be entertaining, although what's entertaining to one person may not be entertaining to another. Other than that, I pretty much agree with everything you said. There are a ton of very annoying things in EVE that I support simply because to change those things would be to change the essence of EVE. My killboard is more like a lossboard right now, but I wouldn't have it any other way because these losses aren't against the rules and they constitute the very nature of EVE Online: self-determination, multiple playstyles, taking risks, and finding your niche.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#91 - 2014-10-14 16:58:59 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
For the life of me i can't understand a person who plays a game he fundamentally dislikes. I've never seen that in real life, not once did i see a guy at the park playing basketball while complaining "this game sucks, they should change the rules". I have, however, worked with people who don't like their job but keep coming to work. That at least makes sense because at least you get paid for that.

But you aren't getting paid to play EVE, so why?
Because I do like EVE, and I have liked EVE for a long time, which is why seeing it go downhill is a shame. Trust me, at the point I stop being entertained by EVE, I will stop playing, I just hope it doesn't come to that.

Jenn aSide wrote:
The things you are complaining (and have complained) about are the things I (and I'd guess others) like about EVE. Every time I encounter someone like you I imagine a kid in kindergarten trying to stuff a square peg into a round hole and getting pissed off at the people who make round holes lol.
And what exactly is it you like? Tedious, time consuming gameplay with little to no challenge and no entertainment value? That's what we're heading towards. I mean their idea of an in game event is "gather items, donate to NPC". It's like a giant WoW quest. To be clear, I've played EVE for over 9 years, and throughout that time there's been plenty of changes I've liked, but lately it seems like they are more interested in tinkering with things while talking of a shakeup rather than actually shaking things up like needs to be done.

Jenn aSide wrote:
At some point it has to cross your mind that it's you and your entertainment needs/preferences that are incompatible with this game , not a problem with the game itself. Right?
That's funny, because it seems like it's not just my problem, it's a lot of people's problems. I know you'll say "but we can't possibly know!", but the EVE playerbase is in decline, fact. And it's because the game is stagnating and they aren't pushing hard enough to shake it up. ISK is too easy to get, everyone's min-maxed everything to hell, and the whole idea of being able to do anything you want only really holds true if you are willing to either ally with or pay an established group to be allowed to do so.

Personally I'd like to see them nuke force projection altogether, make self sufficient industry a reality in null, fix faction warfare so it's actually worth fighting for rather than just jumping sides and plexing, shake up resource generation so markets actually fluctuate naturally, hammer back on AFK play and multiboxing, etc. But that's unlikely to happen, since whenever someone complains about anything, they get called carebears and told to quit.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#92 - 2014-10-14 17:03:05 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
lol the forum trolling nobody calls me a forum troll ... that's hilarious.
Lol? And you're a somebody? That's a laugh.

Solecist Project wrote:
Eve offers a wide variety of feelings ...
... and all you want is fun.
Wrong. I want entertainment, which comes in many forms, one of which is fun. Being challenged, being scared, being awestruck, these are also ways to deliver entertainment.

Solecist Project wrote:
Anyone who calls EVE entertainment has no clue about EVE ONLINE,
because EVE ONLINE never was meant to be ENTERTAINMENT!
Bullshit. Go ahead and get a dev to explain how EVE ONLINE, the video game, is not meant for entertainment.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#93 - 2014-10-14 17:14:59 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:


But you aren't getting paid to play EVE, so why?
Because I do like EVE, and I have liked EVE for a long time, which is why seeing it go downhill is a shame. Trust me, at the point I stop being entertained by EVE, I will stop playing, I just hope it doesn't come to that.[/quote]

What exactly is going downhill?


Quote:
And what exactly is it you like? Tedious, time consuming gameplay with little to no challenge and no entertainment value? That's what we're heading towards. I mean their idea of an in game event is "gather items, donate to NPC". It's like a giant WoW quest. To be clear, I've played EVE for over 9 years, and throughout that time there's been plenty of changes I've liked, but lately it seems like they are more interested in tinkering with things while talking of a shakeup rather than actually shaking things up like needs to be done.


I've played for 7 years and I'm still loving it. This is what I mean, it's not something happening to the game, it's your perceptions. I haven't liked a lot of things that have come in to the game but actually like it more than when I started in 2007. By a long shot.

What you find 'tedious', I find relaxing after a long day of dealing with crackheads and other assorted life idiots. Entertainment value is different for each person. That's what you tend to not understand.

Quote:
That's funny, because it seems like it's not just my problem, it's a lot of people's problems. I know you'll say "but we can't possibly know!", but the EVE playerbase is in decline, fact. And it's because the game is stagnating and they aren't pushing hard enough to shake it up. ISK is too easy to get, everyone's min-maxed everything to hell, and the whole idea of being able to do anything you want only really holds true if you are willing to either ally with or pay an established group to be allowed to do so.


Example #2 of your perceptual problems. You don't know that the 'player base is in decline'. CCP introduced a mechanic that negated the need for multiple accounts for character/alt training, this alone could explain 'declining' PCU numbers (by helping to explain the inflated pcu numbers of the past). CCP has also made changes in the not to distant past that killed a whole lot of botting and got rid of a lot of botters.

So while you have jumped to the conclusion that EVE is in decline, it could very well be that the problem was that you actually drank the koolaid all these years when CCP was telling people that the 'playerbase' was growing when it wasn't. Either way, YOU have no way of knowing.

The truth here is that after 9 years of playing you're probably just bored, and rather than blame that boredom on your own aging and slowly evolving change of tastes, you blame it on CCP for not giving you (and others) more stuff to do. This is actually normal, in real life the older people get the more cynical even when the actual world situation isn't getting worse, they are just noticing the crappy parts more as they approach inevitable death lol.

Quote:

Personally I'd like to see them nuke force projection altogether, make self sufficient industry a reality in null, fix faction warfare so it's actually worth fighting for rather than just jumping sides and plexing, shake up resource generation so markets actually fluctuate naturally, hammer back on AFK play and multiboxing, etc. But that's unlikely to happen, since whenever someone complains about anything, they get called carebears and told to quit.


All that sounds great till this..

Say CCP does all this and yet you end up realizing you still feel the same way about EVE (proving it wasn't EVE at all but rather those evolving tastes I mentioned)? What then?

Elite, that's what lol.
Budan Kado
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#94 - 2014-10-14 17:29:00 UTC
baltec1 wrote:

He is an avid grr goon poster who will post anything to simply speg about us. Seriously, do you honestly think the average line member is happy with the current state of sov and wants to keep it intact? When at any point have we asked for CCP to make this game safer or to bring in instancing?


yes your average line member is happy with the way null sec is. they can rat all day long in peace and not have to worry about anything except their isk ticks per hour. your alliance along with the rest of the cfc have turned null sec into hello kitty online.

you dont want good fights, you dont want people living in NPC regions around you. this has been proven over and over again by having the CFC camp people in the stations. you dont even want some small alliance to start a fight with another alliance. when that happens you cram as many f1 button mashers in to the system and have them click PAP links.

you wouldnt need pap links if the 41 THOUSAND MEMBERS of your coalition actually wanted changes.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#95 - 2014-10-14 17:38:39 UTC
Budan Kado wrote:


yes your average line member is happy with the way null sec is. they can rat all day long in peace and not have to worry about anything except their isk ticks per hour. your alliance along with the rest of the cfc have turned null sec into hello kitty online.


We lose hundreds of ratting ships every month and make less than in high sec from anoms.

Budan Kado wrote:

you dont want good fights, you dont want people living in NPC regions around you. this has been proven over and over again by having the CFC camp people in the stations. you dont even want some small alliance to start a fight with another alliance. when that happens you cram as many f1 button mashers in to the system and have them click PAP links.


What we do to people in a war with us has nothing to do with how we want null to operate. We fight to win and use the mechanics to do so,
Budan Kado wrote:

you wouldnt need pap links if the 41 THOUSAND MEMBERS of your coalition actually wanted changes.


We have been pushing for big changes to null to end this stalemate for years, in the last 6 months we have been actively pushing for occupational sov and other changes to allow the current empire to contract from owning half the galaxy to just a single region.
Solecist Project
#96 - 2014-10-14 17:55:02 UTC
*pets Lucas' head*

Boom... I'm looking for that wow you wanted to post. ^_^

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Petre en Thielles
Doomheim
#97 - 2014-10-14 17:59:42 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
[quote=Budan Kado]
We have been pushing for big changes to null to end this stalemate for years, in the last 6 months we have been actively pushing for occupational sov and other changes to allow the current empire to contract from owning half the galaxy to just a single region.


BS...If Goon wanted to contract their empire, wouldn't they...contract their empire?

Occupational SOV would let the biggest powerblocks (aka, CFC, NCdot) to overwhelm smaller groups in null and take even more space.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#98 - 2014-10-14 18:01:44 UTC
Petre en Thielles wrote:
BS...If Goon wanted to contract their empire, wouldn't they...contract their empire?

Occupational SOV would let the biggest powerblocks (aka, CFC, NCdot) to overwhelm smaller groups in null and take even more space.


You have to actually use the space to keep it though. Deklein is our home & isn't at all heavily used considering our size. We'd probably have trouble holding on to that region alone.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#99 - 2014-10-14 18:02:34 UTC
To OP: lol

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Boom McCondor
Doomheim
#100 - 2014-10-14 18:04:25 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
*pets Lucas' head*

Boom... I'm looking for that wow you wanted to post. ^_^

Eh, it's ultimately inconsequential. I'll change it to "Wow! Noticed by a forum pro! I can retire."