These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

No Safe Haven/Harbor for criminals in high sec

First post
Author
peoplewatcher
1silly2things3dogs4shots
#1 - 2014-10-07 19:31:11 UTC
There should be no safe haven/harbor for known criminals. Put simply, if any eve player can shoot at another player without concord intervention (-5 sec status or lower), that player with a low sec status should not be allowed to dock in any .5 or higher station or enter a POS bubble within a .5 or higher system.

This could fall under harboring a known fugitive, a fairly common law in the real world. Since a player who has a criminal status is known to the systems and star-gates, that information should also be propagated to stations and POSs.

What this would do, is force criminals into low sec to purchase/fit ships. Force criminals to respawn in low sec systems. Basically restore some balance to High Sec. Basically, as a criminal, you can move around in high sec, you can still gank in high sec. You just have no place to dock, and no place to go AFK in high sec.

I do not believe that High Sec should be 100% safe. I do think it should be safer than it is. If ganking is your thing, more power to you, but I believe you should have to work a little harder for it. Yes, there is a lot of work that goes into ganking a freighter, however there is little to no skill involved in ganking a mining frigate/barge.

To match this, there should be larger penalties for ganking, partially based on value ganked. Larger sec status hits.

I am sure there will be those who will decry, "But game mechanics... bla bla bla." It is a tired argument, allowing criminals safe harbor in high sec is a broken game mechanic. What is the point of security status, or criminal status if it is not utilized by NPC stations in game, or POSs utilized in high sec in game?

Then there will be the ones who say, "How will we buy and sell stuff?" Just like the gankers excuse for being able to blow up freighters. "This is a social game, they should have some support with them, or at least an in corp alt that can provide support." The same applies here, you can use an alt, or a corp mate to buy/sell/deliver needed items to/for you. If your corp/alliacne is all about ganking they can seed markets in low sec locations for the stuff that you need.

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#2 - 2014-10-07 19:37:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Alvatore DiMarco
peoplewatcher wrote:
I do not believe that High Sec should be 100% safe. I do think it should be safer than it is.


As a highsec resident who rather likes his 5.0 security status and is terrible at PvP, let me tell you one thing:

If highsec gets any safer, even a tiny little bit, IT WILL BE 100% COMPLETELY SAFE.

Highsec is already so ridiculously safe that words fail to properly express it. I just don't even understand how you don't get this.

Additionally, show us on the doll where the big mean ganker touched you. Preferably before the imminent ripping-to-shreds that's about to descend upon this thread.
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#3 - 2014-10-07 19:42:49 UTC
Access to stations is solely at the discretion of the alliance/faction/empire that holds sovereignty over that station. If NPC corporations and/or factions don't disallow access to their stations to pilots with -5 and below faction standing with them, they certainly won't disallow access to their stations to pilots with -5.0 and below standings with another faction, even if it is CONCORD.

Access to POS bubbles is solely at the discretion of the corp that owns the control tower. I highly doubt that any game mechanic, aside from having an active criminal flag in hisec (in which case they will be relieved of their ship in short order anyways), would ever prevent a pilot from accessing their own POS assuming their corp allows it.

tl;dr: No.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#4 - 2014-10-07 19:52:05 UTC
Go back to STO.
peoplewatcher
1silly2things3dogs4shots
#5 - 2014-10-07 20:11:53 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:

If highsec gets any safer, even a tiny little bit, IT WILL BE 100% COMPLETELY SAFE.

Highsec is already so ridiculously safe that words fail to properly express it. I just don't even understand how you don't get this.


Riiite, it is not as safe as it once was. I get it, people are bored. Have your fun, but there should be a cost associated with it. Other than losing an ~8M isk ship.

Alvatore DiMarco wrote:

Additionally, show us on the doll where the big mean ganker touched you. Preferably before the imminent ripping-to-shreds that's about to descend upon this thread.


Bah, I have only been ganked once (life happens, if you cannot afford to fly a ship, don't fly it). It isn't the ganking that bothers me. It is the prevalence thereof that bothers me. I feel there should be real consequences to criminal ganking.

Branson Hughes wrote:

Access to stations is solely at the discretion of the alliance/faction/empire that holds sovereignty over that station. If NPC corporations and/or factions don't disallow access to their stations to pilots with -5 and below faction standing with them, they certainly won't disallow access to their stations to pilots with -5.0 and below standings with another faction, even if it is CONCORD.

Access to POS bubbles is solely at the discretion of the corp that owns the control tower. I highly doubt that any game mechanic, aside from having an active criminal flag in hisec (in which case they will be relieved of their ship in short order anyways), would ever prevent a pilot from accessing their own POS assuming their corp allows it.


In high sec the rules are a little different, such as, there is a tax charged for installing jobs on a corp/alliance owned POS in high sec. As such, harboring a criminal in an NPC owned station in high sec could become a decree of CONCORD, and the same could be followed for High Sec POS bubbles. As there are other rules around high sec pos, their deployment, and their usage in high sec.

As I stated, standings should have no effect on this proposed mechanic. No Safe Harbor for known criminals. Once your sec status is above -5 you are free to dock anywhere you are allowed.

baltec1 wrote:

Go back to STO.


Never played STO, I have been an eve player since 2007.
Paranoid Loyd
#6 - 2014-10-07 20:14:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Go fly around with -10 sec status and then tell me how easy it is to gank with said sec status, until then you have no idea what you are talking about.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

peoplewatcher
1silly2things3dogs4shots
#7 - 2014-10-07 20:26:12 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Go fly around with -10 sec status and then tell me how easy it is to gank with said sec status, until then you have no idea what you are talking about.


When you fly around in a pod, about the only thing you have to worry about is a insta-locking ship on the gate, other than that no NPC will mess with you in a pod.

I have watched how a lot of gankers move about in game, I am not saying all of them do this, but a large majority do (again from what I have seen). They pod to a target system, have an alt in system with a high sec status to fly their stuff in, transfer it in station to ganker, undock and hunt. Ship gets popped, wait out agresion timer, dock, get another ship, lather rinse repeat.

No it isn't that hard when you travel by pod.
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#8 - 2014-10-07 20:31:38 UTC
peoplewatcher wrote:
There should be no safe haven/harbor for known criminals.
....
To match this, there should be larger penalties for ganking, partially based on value ganked. Larger sec status hits.

HTFU you pansy.

F
Paranoid Loyd
#9 - 2014-10-07 20:33:24 UTC
peoplewatcher wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Go fly around with -10 sec status and then tell me how easy it is to gank with said sec status, until then you have no idea what you are talking about.


When you fly around in a pod, about the only thing you have to worry about is a insta-locking ship on the gate, other than that no NPC will mess with you in a pod.

I have watched how a lot of gankers move about in game, I am not saying all of them do this, but a large majority do (again from what I have seen). They pod to a target system, have an alt in system with a high sec status to fly their stuff in, transfer it in station to ganker, undock and hunt. Ship gets popped, wait out agresion timer, dock, get another ship, lather rinse repeat.

No it isn't that hard when you travel by pod.


Like I said until you have done it, you are not in any position to judge whether something is hard or not. Go do it then come back and tell me how easy it is. We can talk all day long but it doesn't mean a thing.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#10 - 2014-10-07 20:36:55 UTC
peoplewatcher wrote:
In high sec the rules are a little different, such as, there is a tax charged for installing jobs on a corp/alliance owned POS in high sec. As such, harboring a criminal in an NPC owned station in high sec could become a decree of CONCORD, and the same could be followed for High Sec POS bubbles. As there are other rules around high sec pos, their deployment, and their usage in high sec.

As I stated, standings should have no effect on this proposed mechanic. No Safe Harbor for known criminals. Once your sec status is above -5 you are free to dock anywhere you are allowed.

Job install costs are universal; they exist in hisec, lossec. nullsec, even in WH space. That's a poor example of the rules being a little different in hisec.

Access control to stations/starbases is also universal. Yes, CONCORD could make such a decree, but why would they? Their role is reactionary, not preventative.

I listed standings as an example for a specific reason: if empires aren't even willing to exclude their own enemies from docking at their stations, what makes you think that they'll exclude criminals from docking?


Sorry, but this idea isn't going to go anywhere. Hisec isn't safe and CCP has indicated that they have no intention of making it any safer.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#11 - 2014-10-07 20:37:15 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
People with low security status don't need to enter a station or POS to get ships in high-sec. They can instead sit in a safe spot indefinitely in their pod (Faction Police won't care unless they are in an actual ship), have a neutral Orca (either a friend or alt character) deliver the gank ships to said safe spot, and as soon as a target appears everyone will jump into the ships and warp to it.

And like Paranoid Loyd said... ganking with low security status isn't as easy as you think. A lot of planning, preparation, and scouting has to go into it for the odds of success to be reasonable... assuming, of course, that the target isn't dumb and has put in an equal amount of time, energy, and effort into protecting themselves (which most don't).
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#12 - 2014-10-07 20:39:07 UTC
peoplewatcher wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Go fly around with -10 sec status and then tell me how easy it is to gank with said sec status, until then you have no idea what you are talking about.


When you fly around in a pod, about the only thing you have to worry about is a insta-locking ship on the gate, other than that no NPC will mess with you in a pod.

I have watched how a lot of gankers move about in game, I am not saying all of them do this, but a large majority do (again from what I have seen). They pod to a target system, have an alt in system with a high sec status to fly their stuff in, transfer it in station to ganker, undock and hunt. Ship gets popped, wait out agresion timer, dock, get another ship, lather rinse repeat.

No it isn't that hard when you travel by pod.

He didn't say go fly around in a pod, did he? Try flying around hisec with -10 in a ship and I'll wager that you'll change your tune.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#13 - 2014-10-07 20:52:34 UTC
+1 to the OP. The slap on the wrist punishments for career suicide gankers in highsec is absurd. Either don't let them dock, give them a longer aggression timer (6 hours or so seems right), or have CONCORD chasing them instead of the Faction Police. The carnage in Uedama over the last few days is decisive evidence of why the system is broken. -10 sec status sitting in dockup and getting warp ins from their neutral bumping/scouting alts. Rinse and repeat every 15 minutes with no adequate response from CONCORD. Talk about a completely broken revolving door justice system.

This change would not make highsec 100% safe, it would just force gankers to actually pick valuable targets, and to do some PvE between ganks, instead of just running a 24/7 gank service. Imagine actually doing activities sanctioned by CONCORD instead of just poking them in the eye.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#14 - 2014-10-07 20:57:58 UTC
Shiptoasting in a troll thread.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#15 - 2014-10-07 21:27:49 UTC
No more ganking criminals lurking off the Jita 4-4 undock? Sweet! Lol

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Karynn Denton
Astrometrica
#16 - 2014-10-07 22:03:08 UTC
peoplewatcher wrote:

When you fly around in a pod, about the only thing you have to worry about is a insta-locking ship on the gate, other than that no NPC will mess with you in a pod.


Then why aren't you that insta-locking ship on the gate?

Karynn Denton

Caravan Master

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#17 - 2014-10-07 23:19:47 UTC
Do everyone a favor and uninstall the game, after deleting your character. EVE does not need your kind of "player".

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#18 - 2014-10-07 23:40:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
peoplewatcher wrote:
I do not believe that High Sec should be 100% safe. I do think it should be safer than it is.


As a highsec resident who rather likes his 5.0 security status and is terrible at PvP, let me tell you one thing:

If highsec gets any safer, even a tiny little bit, IT WILL BE 100% COMPLETELY SAFE.

Highsec is already so ridiculously safe that words fail to properly express it. I just don't even understand how you don't get this.

Additionally, show us on the doll where the big mean ganker touched you. Preferably before the imminent ripping-to-shreds that's about to descend upon this thread.
I quite like my 5.0 sec status too, highsec is safe enough that people AFK with minimal risk of getting ganked as long as they avoid busy systems.

Restricting docking in highsec stations based on sec status won't lead to a decrease on ganking, an Orca is a mobile station. If anything it'll lead to a massive increase in short to mid-term ganking.

Best case scenario for the carebears would be that ganking increases massively for a while and then reduces to around current levels as the gankers expend their wrath and adapt their tactics.

And adapt they will, they do it every time they get nerfed.

You'll see nullsec become involved too, null groups like MiniLuv won't appreciate you nerfing them.

peoplewatcher wrote:
Riiite, it is not as safe as it once was.
Really? Highsec is safer now than it has been at any time in the last 5 years. I'm sure there are people out there that would be willing to educate highsec in what it used to be like before the years of nerfs to ganking started.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Mharius Skjem
Guardians of the Underworld
#19 - 2014-10-07 23:40:26 UTC
I think high security space is way too safe, so no.

yes you have concord punishment but that's it for capsuleers.

Belt rats should be a genuine threat to mining barges just like gankers, so tougher rats at belts as pirates are supposed to be criminals too.

A recovering btter vet,  with a fresh toon and a determination to like everything that CCP does to Eve...

Don't take me too seriously though, I like to tease a bit on the forums, but that's only because I love you...

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#20 - 2014-10-07 23:45:04 UTC
I don't like gankers and even I think this is a terrible idea.
Sec status should not shut you out of high sec, otherwise it makes it vastly harder to repair sec status.

Now.... if we instead say people with a criminal flag should be blocked at Stations & only at stations, that becomes different.
This allows people who have just been ganked (or a gank attempted on them) to attempt to find retribution. Rather than the gank happening and 10 seconds later the pod being docked for the next 15 minutes.
They should still be able to use a POS as the POS can be targetted via a war dec, and even if they tear it down in response that means the ganker can't hide there.
123Next pageLast page