Wormholes

Public we ballsed it up apology transversal tanking awesomeness.

The more i think about this the more the absurdity level grows.

Make reverse engineering changes that will cause the subsystem market to crash with no re balance of T3 subsystems.

Openly say in a separate feedback thread about said reverse engineering changes that one of your options to fix the inevitable crash of the subsystem market was to mess with the RNG drop rate % of Melted Nano Ribbons. (So fix a HS industrialists income with no thought to the income of the WH resident farming said MNR's? WTF)

Promise for at least a year now that a T3 hull and subsystem nerf/rebalance was coming that people had become actually excited about despite the inevitable HP nerf the excitement about previously mentioned Fozzie ideas like removal of SP loss, fluid rig changes and subsystems that are actually useful.

So instead of the above rebalance of T3's and T3 subsystems we get "new tech" WHY? When you can't fix the T3's we have now would you release new T3's??????????????

Why would you create an ISK sink that like Trinket said will inevitably be won by some logistic guy from the top Corp/Alliance. I hope they enjoy their name on some in game paperweight lel.

When will you be hiring another economist? You really need to CCP.

Without knowing what the new tech is i am already dismayed at the whole idea of it, sure i will most likely build this new tech and make more stupid ISK from it but when we already have a T3 meta that could be so much better for more parts of the game then they are used now it just makes go /sigh....

Well, i hope we will have some people trying to get into wormholes with the event.
So we can burn them all in the name of BOB!

Jimminy Cricket, did I predict this or wat? SSC guy now offering to buy all blue poo for...lulz...roleplay.

If this is T3 frigate, I will seriously table flip. The only use for T3 frigates will be cloaky nullified Astero clones. Like, wat. Just make frigate holes as rare as V holes hi-ssec to nullsec, so people don't notice or ever encounter them more than once or twice a year as a novelty, and move on.

Also, what Winthorp said, 100%. We can all deal with out protatos having <300K EHP if we stop losing SP's when we blow up (and, not that I've lost many, but could we get those SP's back?).

I mean....not like anyone is playing wormholes these days. I felt like i achieved a great thing last night when i bubble trapped a hauler. ENTHRALLING GAMEPLAY ABOUNDS.

Though, yeah, totally going to be selling my blue poo for 100% markup this week. Some idiots just need to be idiots, and I need ISK.

T3 shuttle anyone?

Wow I didn't know you bittervets could get any more bitter or cynical but you're astounded me yet again.

1. It's a lore thing
2. They just introduced frig holes
3. Because it's a lore thing they want to say: Thanks to Mik95 blah blah blah we've been able to use all this blueloot to reverse engineer all these new T3 Frig designs.

Blah blah blah stop being idiots it's a game. Either donate some or not, stop complaining etc.

PS. I will not be coming back here to re-read this thread because obvious reasons.

T3 battleships. One of the subs will be a jumpbridge with bonus to fatigue and hugely expanded fuelbay.

T3 Frigates would be totally awful.

Just let it be a featherbrained attempt to increase wh activity. But wait. They have promised something new ... oh no, please no IMBA T3 frigates. The worst but best case I would expect from CCP now is a new Subsystem for strategic cruisers or something stupid for the nullsec people to counter the jumprange nerf. Anything, but no T3 frigates please.

What about a new T2 Dessie built from sleeper designs?
I would really like to see more destroyer hulls...

Best guess, to combat their utterly mind-blowingly stupid attempt to nerf power projection, is it's a new lowslot module that reduces fatigue or increases range. Because that totally helped with the jump fuel right?