These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

code permit holders...... safe from ganking?

First post
Author
Black Pedro
Mine.
#61 - 2014-10-04 21:39:15 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Quote:
just evaluating the cost/benefit of a permit? Because .... I can assure you that your 10M ISK/ year is a good investment in safeguarding your assets.
No.

Well then if you find such a group or start your own, please let us know about it. Besides, if your plan is to somehow oppose the New Order by blowing up those with permits, it would best for propaganda value if you publicize your successes as far and wide as possible in any case.

I think your plan is a good one as if you find you like ganking but get bored of the limited target selection offered by the lower number of compliant miners in highsec, you can always switch sides and join the New Order proper.

The Code truly always wins.
gantin Adoudel
Ars Goetia Corporation
#62 - 2014-10-05 00:19:46 UTC
How come no one in code ever ganked me :( I was ripe for the killing when I was younger although I never afk mined still someone could of shown me some love!

To those in code I have shot don't worry I'm not trying to stop you from ganking I just enjoy shooting stuff and on that day you happened to wiggle infront of me like a worm on a hook :)
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#63 - 2014-10-05 00:21:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Barbara Nichole
CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909 wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Quote:
just evaluating the cost/benefit of a permit? Because .... I can assure you that your 10M ISK/ year is a good investment in safeguarding your assets.
No.

Yes, it is.

I could not disagree with you more than I do.

gantin Adoudel wrote:
How come no one in code ever ganked me :( I was ripe for the killing when I was younger although I never afk mined still someone could of shown me some love!

To those in code I have shot don't worry I'm not trying to stop you from ganking I just enjoy shooting stuff and on that day you happened to wiggle infront of me like a worm on a hook :)

Some would have you believe that code or any other ganker for that matter has some sixth sense with which he can determine a botter from others and they would likewise try to convince you that ganking is some kind of a crusade against said botting; this is nothing but babble however. They really don't care about botting enough to make that kind of effort. They just want kills and to disturb other players. Why didn't they attack you? Simple they didn't find you... or if they did they were too busy doing something else at the time.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

malcovas Henderson
THoF
Double D and M
#64 - 2014-10-05 00:43:25 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909 wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Quote:
just evaluating the cost/benefit of a permit? Because .... I can assure you that your 10M ISK/ year is a good investment in safeguarding your assets.
No.

Yes, it is.

I could not disagree with you more than I do.


Tell that to the ones that have been ganked by CODE.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#65 - 2014-10-05 00:47:30 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Tell that to the ones that have been ganked by CODE.
happily

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Black Pedro
Mine.
#66 - 2014-10-05 13:10:12 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909 wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Quote:
just evaluating the cost/benefit of a permit? Because .... I can assure you that your 10M ISK/ year is a good investment in safeguarding your assets.
No.

Yes, it is.

I could not disagree with you more than I do.

Some would have you believe that code or any other ganker for that matter has some sixth sense with which he can determine a botter from others and they would likewise try to convince you that ganking is some kind of a crusade against said botting; this is nothing but babble however. They really don't care about botting enough to make that kind of effort. They just want kills and to disturb other players. Why didn't they attack you? Simple they didn't find you... or if they did they were too busy doing something else at the time.


As a highsec resident, you can deal with the reality of the New Order in New Eden in one of four ways:

1) Leave James 315's territory - just to remind you that is all of highsec - and problem solved.

2) Purchase a permit, and/or stay compliant with the Code and show that you understand that Eve is a game about risk vs. reward that you are indeed actively playing.

3) Become a rebel and actively (and ideally competently) oppose the New Order by ganking permit holders, spoiling ganks, and any other means your devious mind can come up with to fight something that you feel is wrong, and generate content along the way.

4) Come to the forums and beg for someone else to stop the New Order, or worse, whine to CCP to change game mechanics to elminate highsec PvP so you can go about maximizing ISK/hour risk-free.

Three of these are "playing Eve" and one is not. You are are now engaging the one in that is not.

Be the change that you wish to see in New Eden.


Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#67 - 2014-10-05 13:36:55 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Three of these are "playing Eve" and one is not. You are are now engaging the one in that is not.
Typical bot-aspirant.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

ashley Eoner
#68 - 2014-10-06 02:19:54 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
Black Pedro wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
is there a group who activiely and aggressively gank code permit holders?


No, there is no evidence that an organized effort to gank permit holders exists. There has been some impotent bluster from the usual places, but in the end there has been no discernible action by any group.

Are you thinking of starting one, or just evaluating the cost/benefit of a permit? Because if it is the later I can assure you that your 10M ISK/ year is a good investment in safeguarding your assets. The monetary amount is a fraction of what even one ship loss will cost you, plus the chances of a running into a New Order ganker while mining bareback (i.e. without a permit) are orders of magnitude higher than being found by some (mythical?) anti-New Order gank squad.

If you are planning on starting some sort of a permit-gank organization, please let us know so we can follow your progress. Personally, I love emergent gameplay like this - it is way more entertaining than the usual pouting and whining you get from most of the A-G folks.

I've ganked a few just because they had permits.

I haven't set about systematically ganking them but I know I'm not the only one that has ganked permit holders just for having a permit. I've also killed several code wannabes during gank attempts.

My gank alts have empty KBs too because I don't give a rats ass about the epenor..
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#69 - 2014-10-06 02:32:23 UTC
ashley Eoner wrote:
My gank alts have empty KBs too because I don't give a rats ass about the epenor..


Ah, the old "I gank, honest, I just don't killboard" excuse. I see your main has exactly no hits on zkillboard, too.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Tyyler DURden
Mordechai and Sons Distribution Co.
#70 - 2014-10-06 05:26:23 UTC
admiral root wrote:
ashley Eoner wrote:
My gank alts have empty KBs too because I don't give a rats ass about the epenor..


Ah, the old "I gank, honest, I just don't killboard" excuse. I see your main has exactly no hits on zkillboard, too.

I'm trying to understand the point of your statement here.
Correct me if I'm reading into this the wrong way, but are you saying that kills don't count unless they show up on some killboard?

Tyyler DURden says "use soap"

somedudeinaship
Star Whorz
#71 - 2014-10-06 05:42:04 UTC
Nobody is ever safe, unless you are parked in a station at least or cloaked out in some safe spot in a random system. The second you become visible in the game space you are free game.

Trust no one.
Dave Kitaro
Doomheim
#72 - 2014-10-06 06:58:07 UTC
It's a protection racket which doesn't even offer protection. Now, if CODE were to offer retribution on behalf of permit holders who'd been ganked by non-CODE members, then perhaps the permit fee might be worth something.

Until then, resist the racketeers.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#73 - 2014-10-06 07:03:39 UTC
Tyyler DURden wrote:
admiral root wrote:

Ah, the old "I gank, honest, I just don't killboard" excuse. I see your main has exactly no hits on zkillboard, too.

I'm trying to understand the point of your statement here.
Correct me if I'm reading into this the wrong way, but are you saying that kills don't count unless they show up on some killboard?


I think it is clear that he is calling ashley Eoner a liar. Many people in this game claim things that are not true, and the good admiral is pointing to the fact he has heard such exaggerations of PvP prowess from others before.

And yes, kills count if they are not on a killboard somewhere. However, if you do not post them to a killboard, only you and the victim know for sure they happened, so do not be surprised when others doubt the veracity of your claims.

In the context of ganking permit holders, not using killboard makes no sense. The whole point of it is to discourage others from buying a permit by adding risk to displaying a permit in your bio. If you just silently kill permit holders, at best you will discourage that specific miner from renewing their permit, but you will have no effect on the new permit sales to others as they have no way to know of your actions.

Of course, if you are just ganking permit holders for your own pleasure, then killboard verification is of little consequence. But in this case you are really not engaged in a active public campaign against the New Order. Thus, I would suggest you stay off the forums with your claims of ganking, or at least not act surprised when some people doubt what you are saying.

However, we both know why you and ashley are hiding behind the no-killboard excuse - even together you have ganked just a handful of permit holders, a number that if verified would be a fraction of a percent of the CODE. aliiance verified kills. Not providing a number allows you use the uncertainty to present the your modest actions as more significant than they really are.

Don't get me wrong, even your isolated acts of rebelling do you credit as they are infinitely more than most carebears do - I just don't want any potential permit buyers to think there is an actual risk to holding a New Order permit from permit-gankers. Perhaps you guys will organize and that will change in the future, but for now that risk is essentially zero.

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#74 - 2014-10-06 07:35:46 UTC
Code's list of permit holders make's wardeccing easier.

Nuff said

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#75 - 2014-10-06 08:55:09 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Black Pedro wrote:

1) Nope
2) Nope
3) Nope
4) Nope

not needed, try:

5) Fly a procurer / better skiff, fit it properly, ignore codie-contacts, do not talk to them. -> hard to kill / boring target since no talking they can not make propaganda with you.

Top choice.


Find a corps that you like. more people can do more fun stuff.
Top recommendation.

EDIT
a permit might make you an extra target, for code-enemies. So don't bother, you might get shot anyway.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Black Pedro
Mine.
#76 - 2014-10-06 10:53:39 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
not needed, try:
5) Fly a procurer / better skiff, fit it properly, ignore codie-contacts, do not talk to them. -> hard to kill / boring target since no talking they can not make propaganda with you.

Top choice.

EDIT
a permit might make you an extra target, for code-enemies. So don't bother, you might get shot anyway.


Your 5) falls under my 2) - respect the Code. By fitting for tank over yield you are complying with the Code and acknowledging that there is indeed risk in highsec. Sure, you not fully Code-compliant without a permit and still subject to a New Order gank, but you are tacitly showing you recognize the threat we pose to your mining operation (AKA we win!).

Ignoring us will do you no good - we kill bots all the time that never respond to us. If someone doesn't respond I just conclude they are not just a bot-aspirant, but an actual bot or AFKer, and will kill you with more satisfaction. Still, I suppose it is better to stay silent than to spout off the hatred and bigotry we too often see come out of the mouths of the ganked that ends up on www.minerbumping.com. I would suggest though if an agent reaches out to you while you are mining, that you wish them well to let them know that you are indeed at your keyboard, and then you can begin a polite discussion on how to get your permit to be fully compliant with the Code. That gallant behaviour very well might save your mining vessel while ignoring the agent could have you in your pod, or worse, back in an alpha clone in a station.

And no, as I outlined above in this thread, there is no significant risk of being targeted by anti-CODE. gankers. Or at least if a risk exists, it is extremely elusive and several orders of magnitude less than the chance of being ganked by an Agent of the New Order if you don't have a permit.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#77 - 2014-10-06 12:06:43 UTC
Uhmm...ya.....I also investigated ganking permit holders.

Found a few problems:

1 - There are very, very few actual permit holders

2 - 95% of those are just Code alts who buy the permits as a troll. During my brief stay in the minerbumping channel, some folks from 315 miners, who were permit compliant miners, they assured me, kept challenging me to 1v1 duels. Yet when I asked to join their mining ops I was met with stunned silence.

3 - The people you see in belts with permits are trolls who just concoct a fake permit to stick it to CODE.

So basically, ganking permit holders won't work because there is no one to actually gank. The whole permit scheme is a massive fraud that is undertaken only to give CODE cover under the EULA. The fee is too low to ever make any meaningful amount of isk, and the natural resistance to giving in to extortion ensures that few will actually purchase such permits.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#78 - 2014-10-06 12:19:24 UTC
Let me ask y'all a serious question. Does ganking occur THIS MUCH that people have to post about it and James all the time?

I'm serious,because if you look at the forums it would seem like there is a Gank around every other corner. My 1st character was created on May 3, 2007 and in all that time I've had ONE gank attempted against me. I had an officer mod (albeit a very cheap on, like 60 mil) in a tech 1 hauler and a dude tried to gank me between Jita and Amarr. I got out in with like 80% hull left because I had a tank (triple tank lol). Me and the ganker had a laugh in local together after he realized that ym cargo wasn't that lucrative. I docked, repaired and haven't have a single problem in the 5 years since that happened. I've flown freighters and jump freighters since then, as well as missioned in pirate faction battleships in 0.5 systems.

Is it THIS difficult to take some minor precautions? Is a slight sense of personal responsibility for one's on safety and game enjoyment THAT hard to do. How hard is it to put a damage control and some defensive rigs on a mission ship to discourage gankers (for example as I am more mission runner than anything else)? I know that nothing is 100% but 7.5 years without a gank while flying ships other people would like to gank should tell y'all something.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#79 - 2014-10-06 12:26:44 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.


27. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued to the off-topic poster.



Thread re-opened.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#80 - 2014-10-06 12:49:10 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Let me ask y'all a serious question. Does ganking occur THIS MUCH that people have to post about it and James all the time?

I'm serious,because if you look at the forums it would seem like there is a Gank around every other corner. My 1st character was created on May 3, 2007 and in all that time I've had ONE gank attempted against me. I had an officer mod (albeit a very cheap on, like 60 mil) in a tech 1 hauler and a dude tried to gank me between Jita and Amarr. I got out in with like 80% hull left because I had a tank (triple tank lol). Me and the ganker had a laugh in local together after he realized that ym cargo wasn't that lucrative. I docked, repaired and haven't have a single problem in the 5 years since that happened. I've flown freighters and jump freighters since then, as well as missioned in pirate faction battleships in 0.5 systems.

Is it THIS difficult to take some minor precautions? Is a slight sense of personal responsibility for one's on safety and game enjoyment THAT hard to do. How hard is it to put a damage control and some defensive rigs on a mission ship to discourage gankers (for example as I am more mission runner than anything else)? I know that nothing is 100% but 7.5 years without a gank while flying ships other people would like to gank should tell y'all something.


Mission runners have a bad perspective on this. Mission runners are usually behind acceleration gates and it is a pain to scan them down and gank them. Plus its usually -EV. During my months of running highsec missions I faced 0 gank attempts, and only a couple of visits from "space trash collectors," who were hoping to bait me into shooting at them.

Ganks of haulers, miners, autopiloters, etc.... are far, far more common, since they require no scanning, have a higher probability of success, and are often +EV.