These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dodging Wardecs

First post
Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#881 - 2014-09-17 16:03:23 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Hmmmm.... I did miss that, and I don't feel like searching for it. I'll take your word on it.


#DeleteTheLazy


Not lazy....just don't care. How about DeleteTheArrogant?

DeleteTheGuyWhoThinksHe'sEdgy?



You obviously must be new here.


Remi is the edgiest of the edge that's standing on the edge of the edgy edge.


Simple stuff really.


Oh and also,

#Lookinamirror2014



So edgy, I'm on a Rohk.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#882 - 2014-09-17 16:04:34 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:


No one said no PvP hi sec...ever.


You must have just gotten to the forums tonight. Actually, someone did not too long ago post a thread demanding the removal of PVP from high sec. This is what the gradual disintegration of PVP integrity in EVE is coming to, and the more CCP panders to the demands of the carebears, the more demands the carebear makes.

As a result, I'm forced to change my own position on the matter. To prevent the pansification of EVE and the nullification of the PVP'er, I stand firmly against rolling corps for the sake of dec dodging. If you can't learn to pew pew, even if just to defend yourself, then you bring it on yourself.

#DeleteTheWeak

That thread is an obvious troll. The OP reeks of hi sec ganker tears.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Valkin Mordirc
#883 - 2014-09-17 16:05:07 UTC
Just make sure you stay align.
#DeleteTheWeak
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#884 - 2014-09-17 16:05:18 UTC
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:


No one said no PvP hi sec...ever.


You must have just gotten to the forums tonight. Actually, someone did not too long ago post a thread demanding the removal of PVP from high sec. This is what the gradual disintegration of PVP integrity in EVE is coming to, and the more CCP panders to the demands of the carebears, the more demands the carebear makes.

As a result, I'm forced to change my own position on the matter. To prevent the pansification of EVE and the nullification of the PVP'er, I stand firmly against rolling corps for the sake of dec dodging. If you can't learn to pew pew, even if just to defend yourself, then you bring it on yourself.

#DeleteTheWeak

That thread is an obvious troll. The OP reeks of hi sec ganker tears.


You know he reposted it twice right?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Trixie Lawless
State War Academy
Caldari State
#885 - 2014-09-17 16:06:39 UTC
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:


No one said no PvP hi sec...ever.


You must have just gotten to the forums tonight. Actually, someone did not too long ago post a thread demanding the removal of PVP from high sec. This is what the gradual disintegration of PVP integrity in EVE is coming to, and the more CCP panders to the demands of the carebears, the more demands the carebear makes.

As a result, I'm forced to change my own position on the matter. To prevent the pansification of EVE and the nullification of the PVP'er, I stand firmly against rolling corps for the sake of dec dodging. If you can't learn to pew pew, even if just to defend yourself, then you bring it on yourself.

#DeleteTheWeak

That thread is an obvious troll. The OP reeks of hi sec ganker tears.


There's nothing wrong with hi sec ganking.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#886 - 2014-09-17 16:07:18 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Just make sure you stay align.


Whatever you do, don't be Makalu.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#887 - 2014-09-17 16:08:09 UTC
And I just gave away my Deep Purple albums to a friend of mine... too bad because now I want to listen to "Space Trucker" for some unknown reason.

Dark Side, Light Side... either works, hell even grey. At least you grasp how things work.
Less PVP is bad, mkay? Hurts the economy, hurts the fun, hurts EVE. Moar PVP makes the economy bloom as more demand for modules and ships and ammo happens. More fun ensues, makes EVE happy. She's less likely to take one of your kidneys when she's happy.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Trixie Lawless
State War Academy
Caldari State
#888 - 2014-09-17 16:09:32 UTC
Think if we stay off topic long enough we can get this thread locked and all move on and argue other things we don't have control over? Big smile
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#889 - 2014-09-17 16:11:36 UTC
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Think if we stay off topic long enough we can get this thread locked and all move on and argue other things we don't have control over? Big smile


I dunno... I was just starting to enjoy the tension between us, it was kinda hot.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#890 - 2014-09-17 16:12:55 UTC
Are we off topic? I thought we were discussing war decs and the dodging thereof? I personally think that the wardec mechanic should be refined to also include a character specific version where one character is able to declare a personal vendetta against another. Something that would transcend corporation or alliance. I hunt YOU, only I and only you... and I shall murder you in the alley that I find YOU in. But I doubt CCP would ever implement such a thing.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Trixie Lawless
State War Academy
Caldari State
#891 - 2014-09-17 16:15:04 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Think if we stay off topic long enough we can get this thread locked and all move on and argue other things we don't have control over? Big smile


I dunno... I was just starting to enjoy the tension between us, it was kinda hot.



I hope you like 6'4" hairy dudes... Shocked
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#892 - 2014-09-17 16:15:47 UTC
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Think if we stay off topic long enough we can get this thread locked and all move on and argue other things we don't have control over? Big smile


I dunno... I was just starting to enjoy the tension between us, it was kinda hot.



I hope you like 6'4" hairy dudes... Shocked


Depends... what'd you have in mind? Blink

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Trixie Lawless
State War Academy
Caldari State
#893 - 2014-09-17 16:18:17 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Think if we stay off topic long enough we can get this thread locked and all move on and argue other things we don't have control over? Big smile


I dunno... I was just starting to enjoy the tension between us, it was kinda hot.



I hope you like 6'4" hairy dudes... Shocked


Depends... what'd you have in mind? Blink


http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=enJJeOqHbqE
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#894 - 2014-09-17 16:19:17 UTC
Trixie Lawless wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:


No one said no PvP hi sec...ever.


You must have just gotten to the forums tonight. Actually, someone did not too long ago post a thread demanding the removal of PVP from high sec. This is what the gradual disintegration of PVP integrity in EVE is coming to, and the more CCP panders to the demands of the carebears, the more demands the carebear makes.

As a result, I'm forced to change my own position on the matter. To prevent the pansification of EVE and the nullification of the PVP'er, I stand firmly against rolling corps for the sake of dec dodging. If you can't learn to pew pew, even if just to defend yourself, then you bring it on yourself.

#DeleteTheWeak

That thread is an obvious troll. The OP reeks of hi sec ganker tears.


There's nothing wrong with hi sec ganking.

Oh, I agree. I'm merely pointing out that the thread Remiel is referring to is a blatant troll. I'd be very surprised if that clown was actually serious.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#895 - 2014-09-17 16:22:29 UTC
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:


No one said no PvP hi sec...ever.


You must have just gotten to the forums tonight. Actually, someone did not too long ago post a thread demanding the removal of PVP from high sec. This is what the gradual disintegration of PVP integrity in EVE is coming to, and the more CCP panders to the demands of the carebears, the more demands the carebear makes.

As a result, I'm forced to change my own position on the matter. To prevent the pansification of EVE and the nullification of the PVP'er, I stand firmly against rolling corps for the sake of dec dodging. If you can't learn to pew pew, even if just to defend yourself, then you bring it on yourself.

#DeleteTheWeak

That thread is an obvious troll. The OP reeks of hi sec ganker tears.


There's nothing wrong with hi sec ganking.

Oh, I agree. I'm merely pointing out that the thread Remiel is referring to is a blatant troll. I'd be very surprised if that clown was actually serious.


At first, I thought so too. Then it got locked, and he copied and pasted the exact same OP and title straight back into GD. Then he put another one in F&I. It's not so blatant when they go out of their way to defy the rules like that. A troll would post once, let the flames commence, then leave it be when it got locked, as is demonstrated by the daily troll threads we witness.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#896 - 2014-09-17 16:25:22 UTC
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Trixie Lawless wrote:
Think if we stay off topic long enough we can get this thread locked and all move on and argue other things we don't have control over? Big smile


I dunno... I was just starting to enjoy the tension between us, it was kinda hot.



I hope you like 6'4" hairy dudes... Shocked


Depends... what'd you have in mind? Blink


http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=enJJeOqHbqE


NAH

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Solecist Project
#897 - 2014-09-17 16:32:01 UTC
Hey Trixie ...

Just so we're clear here ....

You can have the couch ...
... but the shower ....


... is mine!


;)

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#898 - 2014-09-17 16:33:21 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
At first, I thought so too. Then it got locked, and he copied and pasted the exact same OP and title straight back into GD. Then he put another one in F&I. It's not so blatant when they go out of their way to defy the rules like that. A troll would post once, let the flames commence, then leave it be when it got locked, as is demonstrated by the daily troll threads we witness.

He's upset; probably over the recent E1-related bans, given his rant over "harassment".

"I will see the end of ganking in high sec." Roll You honestly believe this fool is serious?

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Solecist Project
#899 - 2014-09-17 16:35:57 UTC
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
At first, I thought so too. Then it got locked, and he copied and pasted the exact same OP and title straight back into GD. Then he put another one in F&I. It's not so blatant when they go out of their way to defy the rules like that. A troll would post once, let the flames commence, then leave it be when it got locked, as is demonstrated by the daily troll threads we witness.

He's upset; probably over the recent E1-related bans, given his rant over "harassment".

"I will see the end of ganking in high sec." Roll You honestly believe this fool is serious?

Yes, he was dead serious.
And he seems to have mental issues.

We'll notice the next time he comes up.


I also think I spotted who he really is,
because I saw his distinct behaviour on someone else already.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#900 - 2014-09-17 16:37:14 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
At first, I thought so too. Then it got locked, and he copied and pasted the exact same OP and title straight back into GD. Then he put another one in F&I. It's not so blatant when they go out of their way to defy the rules like that. A troll would post once, let the flames commence, then leave it be when it got locked, as is demonstrated by the daily troll threads we witness.

He's upset; probably over the recent E1-related bans, given his rant over "harassment".

"I will see the end of ganking in high sec." Roll You honestly believe this fool is serious?

Yes, he was dead serious.
And he seems to have mental issues.

We'll notice the next time he comes up.


I also think I spotted who he really is,
because I saw his distinct behaviour on someone else already.
DE or SR?

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack