These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dodging Wardecs

First post
Author
Absolutely Not Analt
Carebears on Fire
#281 - 2014-09-10 16:35:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Absolutely Not Analt
baltec1 wrote:
Vol Arm'OOO wrote:

You're completely missing the point. You want to engage in pvp, the other guy does not. Even if they could get the tools to engage in pvp, they say "f-it, we dont want to." Neither you nor CCP have the power to compel someone to pvp if they dont want to.


Yes we do. Everyone who plays EVE agrees to PvP every time they log in.


Now back to the subject. If I find our enemys' alt logistics corp and I want to disrupt it to reduce supplies to a nullsec front line I can take out a war dec. They respond by leaving the corp for another.

Question: Was I successful in that war?


That depends entirely on your criteria for success. If it was simply to cause a limited disruption in their service, then yes. If it was something more concrete then...not really.

Though, to be frank, you'd have a far more devastating effect on their shipping if you just ganked their freighters once you knew who the pilots were - less warning, and no real reason to drop corp on their part since there's no war dec to dodge.

Edit to add: But I assume you already knew that.

Eve is a multi player game. And you are the content. - Ralph King-Griffin Being meh at two things is not better than being great at one. - Lugh Crow-Slave

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#282 - 2014-09-10 16:35:52 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
your PvP is constrained by CONCORD, which is what highsec is supposed to be about anyway.


No, but nice try. Did you enjoy being on the show?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#283 - 2014-09-10 16:36:00 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
EDIT: No idea what I was getting at there, sorry.


Yah.... I was in the process of asking but, I guess this is my answer.

You know what.... Imma go out on a limb here and throw this idea up in the air, see what kind of reaction it gets.

Let's talk compromise: I will accept perfect safety in highsec for EVERYBODY in exchange for nerfing Veers Belvar. Seriously, just limit him to 10mil SP max, give him a wallet limit, and I'll move to lowsec permanently. I already hang out there a lot so it's not a huge pain in the arse for me really...


Can you try to stop with the personal stuff? Thanks.


This actually produced tears? Seriously? There it was me thinking it was a tongue and cheek banter kind of pulling your leg thingy.

At least I know now, why you think how you do.


Trying to keep this important conversation focused on the wardecc mechanics, and preventing it from getting derailed talking about me, is not "tears."
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#284 - 2014-09-10 16:36:23 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
NPC corps do need some rethinking. This is a player driven game, all npc interaction should be secondary to relying on people.
Wardecs need rethinking too.

Jenn aSide wrote:
I'm sorry, i thought I was talking to some who has experienced puberty, guess not lol.

Those corps aren't evading. What I do is evade (by playing the game), sorry you can't understand that, but you don't seem to understand much so meh .
Only kids can think someone's an idiot. True story.

And yes, they are. They are just evading in a different way to you.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Which is saying they are the same..
What version of English are you using? That isn't remotely saying that at all. It's saying that yes, high sec safety mechanics are unbalanced, but throwing them a nerf with no other changes would throw the balance out other way. Smaller changes to the other side would create balance.

Jenn aSide wrote:
'Balance' needs to be applied to the thing that is broken. The only thing broken here is dec-dodging.
Wrong. And the suggestion war mechanics themselves are not broken in any way is quite laughable.

Jenn aSide wrote:
The way to avoid a gankers or war deccer is to learn how to think like them. Once you do,you'll learn that they do put a lot of thought into what they are doing. That's how I survive. in fact I found that learning to counter them was FUN.

Again you are too caught up in prejudice to see it. Doesn't really matter I guess, you don't have to agree with the truth that dec-dodging is broken. In every society there are those people who live in denial. Guess what, for EVE, you're it lol.
Apparently the way to avoid deccers is to use the available mechanics to recreate your corp if you can, then worry about the more effort intensive ways if that's not an option. I don't really care what you do, since it's irrelevant. I live in null and so are unaffected by wardecs, therefore the way you are evading wardecs is doing it wrong as my way is superior. See how that sounds stupid? That's exactly the same way it sound when you go on about your way being the correct way.

And lol, again, I at no point said that dec dodging isn't broken, it's just not the only thing that's broken and would cause more harm than good if nuked on it's own.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#285 - 2014-09-10 16:37:20 UTC
Absolutely Not Analt wrote:

Though, to be frank...


To be quite Anne Frank about it, I keep reading your name as

Absolutely Not Anal T

Sorry

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Absolutely Not Analt
Carebears on Fire
#286 - 2014-09-10 16:38:48 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Absolutely Not Analt wrote:

Though, to be frank...


To be quite Anne Frank about it, I keep reading your name as

Absolutely Not Anal T

Sorry


I know, I know. I actually petitioned CCP for a change. It was funny until I started posting on the forums a lot with this character, having sold my old main.

All well.

Eve is a multi player game. And you are the content. - Ralph King-Griffin Being meh at two things is not better than being great at one. - Lugh Crow-Slave

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#287 - 2014-09-10 16:40:14 UTC
Absolutely Not Analt wrote:


Though, to be frank, you'd have a far more devastating effect on their shipping if you just ganked their freighters once you knew who the pilots were - less warning, and no real reason to drop corp on their part since there's no war dec to dodge.

Edit to add: But I assume you already knew that.


I do. That's the point, wardecs are more or less useless at their job.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#288 - 2014-09-10 16:41:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Lucas Kell wrote:

And lol, again, I at no point said that dec dodging isn't broken, it's just not the only thing that's broken and would cause more harm than good if nuked on it's own.


What harm? That mythical loss of 'subs' you keep talking about but that has never happened in the entire recorded history of EVE?

How could war decs possibly be broken? you pay CONCORD a fee and you can shoot people in the DEc'd corp. Very simple.

Of course you probably have some overly protectionist idea that you should only be able to war dec 'certain' corps, which is wrong (why do you even play video games if you want such protection btw?)

. The only possible problem with the war dec system is that it's incomplete: NPC corps (except starter corps, which should hav e a TIME LIMIT) should be war deccable (at the price of the war deccing corp then going to war with the entire faction ie war dec the Scope, end up in a war with the Gallente Federation).
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#289 - 2014-09-10 16:41:42 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Absolutely Not Analt wrote:


Though, to be frank, you'd have a far more devastating effect on their shipping if you just ganked their freighters once you knew who the pilots were - less warning, and no real reason to drop corp on their part since there's no war dec to dodge.

Edit to add: But I assume you already knew that.


I do. That's the point, wardecs are more or less useless at their job.


Wardeccs are useful against medium-large corps, since its a pain for them to drop corp. This means that you can engage them without CONCORD showing up.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#290 - 2014-09-10 16:43:31 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Absolutely Not Analt wrote:


Though, to be frank, you'd have a far more devastating effect on their shipping if you just ganked their freighters once you knew who the pilots were - less warning, and no real reason to drop corp on their part since there's no war dec to dodge.

Edit to add: But I assume you already knew that.


I do. That's the point, wardecs are more or less useless at their job.


Wardeccs are useful against medium-large corps, since its a pain for them to drop corp
. This means that you can engage them without CONCORD showing up.


Cheers for posting the thing that is broken about Dec-Dodging.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#291 - 2014-09-10 16:43:37 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Absolutely Not Analt wrote:


Though, to be frank, you'd have a far more devastating effect on their shipping if you just ganked their freighters once you knew who the pilots were - less warning, and no real reason to drop corp on their part since there's no war dec to dodge.

Edit to add: But I assume you already knew that.


I do. That's the point, wardecs are more or less useless at their job.


Wardeccs are useful against medium-large corps, since its a pain for them to drop corp. This means that you can engage them without CONCORD showing up.


It's not a pain though, it's actually very easy. But let's say for argument's sake it is a pain - if all it is is pain, then it's still too easy.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#292 - 2014-09-10 16:43:50 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
NPC corps (except started corps) should be war deccable (at the price of the war deccing corp then going to war with the entire faction ie war dec the Scope, end up in a war with the Gallente Federation).


YES

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Paranoid Loyd
#293 - 2014-09-10 16:45:11 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Trying to keep this important conversation focused


Lol This is serious business y'all.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#294 - 2014-09-10 16:45:21 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


Wardeccs are useful against medium-large corps, since its a pain for them to drop corp. This means that you can engage them without CONCORD showing up.


Its not a pain, it takes all of 5 minutes.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#295 - 2014-09-10 16:46:09 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:

Wardeccs are useful against medium-large corps, since its a pain for them to drop corp. This means that you can engage them without CONCORD showing up.


This is true and I will say that its the only useful thing about wardecs;

It allows good CEOs to identify weak pilots in their corp and kick them due to them appearing on the kill roster.

Also anyone who hasnt been given permission to drop corp who does so is permanently banned from returning.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#296 - 2014-09-10 16:46:35 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

Again you are too caught up in prejudice to see it. Doesn't really matter I guess, you don't have to agree with the truth that dec-dodging is broken. In every society there are those people who live in denial. Guess what, for EVE, you're it lol.


There is a lot of prejudice from nearly everyone posting in this thread. Including you.

On the one hand you have the 'I just want to exploit the broken mechanic to ensure risk free kills' people and on the other you have the 'I just want to exploit the broken mechanic to avoid losing ships' people.

At it's basic level, you are all agreeing on one thing. It's a broken mechanic. It will not be fixed by forcing people to stay in corp and it will not be fixed by forcing neutrals to be a part of the war. All I'm seeing is people wanting to keep their preferred exploit and taking away the one the other side is using.

What needs to happen is both sides getting together and hashing out a reworked system and not fighting each other over keeping it broken. It's like arguing over whether to use slaves or citizens to manufacture goods instead of coming up with the steam engine. It's a pointless waste of time.

Instead start a thread in F&I where both sides can brainstorm together to come up with a new system that works. Then make it known to our CSM reps that there is a thread and it's important for them to do their job and act upon the needs of the players who care enough to want to see this mechanic revamped to be a workable solution that is good for the game and not just some small niche that like their little exploit and don't want to see it changed.

Or just keep arguing over whether it's better to pull or push a box instead of working together to invent the wheel. Your choice.

Mr Epeen Cool
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#297 - 2014-09-10 16:46:50 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Trying to keep this important conversation focused


Lol This is serious business y'all.


Ironically, nothing Veers posts is important.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#298 - 2014-09-10 16:48:00 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
invent the wheel.


Heretic

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#299 - 2014-09-10 16:48:32 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
What harm? That mythical loss of 'subs' you keep talking about but that has never happened in the entire recorded history of EVE?
You would move people who are currently in player corps permanently to NPC corps. Would you say that's a good thing?

Jenn aSide wrote:
How could war decs possibly be broken? you pay CONCORD a fee and you can shoot people in the DEc'd corp. Very simple.
You pay them a trivial fee and there's no limit to how many people you can dec. So you dec a bunch of industry corps, use their loots to dec more, so on and so forth until you can pretty much dec everyone. That's pretty broken IMHO.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Of course you probably have some overly protectionist idea that you should only be able to war dec 'certain' corps, which is wrong (why do you even play video games if you want such protection btw?)
Nope, you should be able to wardec any corp. I've even suggested the idea of individual decs before too for when you have a grudge against someone in particular. I just think there should be a limiting factor, so wardec corps have to choose between who to dec and can't just go with deccing everyone simultaneously. The vast majority of wardeccers would be unaffected by this, it's only the extreme ones which would be affected and those I believe are the main reason people are so risk averse when it comes to wardecs.

I'd also suggest that wardecs have no real purpose beyond being an off switch for concord. It would be nice if they got buffed into being a bit more of a choice of career path.

Jenn aSide wrote:
The only possible problem with the war dec system is that it's incomplete: NPC corps (except started corps) should be war deccable (at the price of the war deccing corp then going to war with the entire faction ie war dec the Scope, end up in a war with the Gallente Federation).
I'm sure red-frog and the entirety of highsec industry would be well happy with that...

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Absolutely Not Analt
Carebears on Fire
#300 - 2014-09-10 16:49:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Absolutely Not Analt
Jenn aSide wrote:
NPC corps (except started corps) should be war deccable (at the price of the war deccing corp then going to war with the entire faction ie war dec the Scope, end up in a war with the Gallente Federation).


So treat the faction like an alliance, and every corp under it is now your enemy - move the starter corps to the Sisters of Eve Faction and that removes them from the danger zone. I'd be ok with that if you also lose the ability to dock at any station controlled by any of those member corporations (since you basically just declared war on a sovereign Empire) regardless of that station's location in space.

Lucas Kell wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
The only possible problem with the war dec system is that it's incomplete: NPC corps (except started corps) should be war deccable (at the price of the war deccing corp then going to war with the entire faction ie war dec the Scope, end up in a war with the Gallente Federation).
I'm sure red-frog and the entirety of highsec industry would be well happy with that...


Red-frog is large enough that they would adapt. The station trading alts (like me) would be unaffected - I am literally in an NPC corp because I cannot be arsed to click the Create Corp button - a wardec would have just as much effect on me and my operations if I was in a player corp.

Eve is a multi player game. And you are the content. - Ralph King-Griffin Being meh at two things is not better than being great at one. - Lugh Crow-Slave