These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE is not dying and you all are illinformed

First post
Author
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#61 - 2014-09-06 11:35:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Prince Kobol wrote:
In regards to accounts the last official figures given that I can find for Tranquillity was from the last QEN Report from Q4 2010.

The figure given was around 360,000 accounts with 725,000 different characters in-game

The next was when CCP announced they had surpassed 500,000 Subscribers World wide in Feb 2013 however that figure included Dust 514 and the Chinese server Serenity.

So how many of those 500,000 Subscribers belonged to Tranquillity.. who knows.

Are still at 500,000 Subscribers today, only CCP knows for sure but personally I believe they are not simply because I do not believe that Tranquillity has gained more players then Dust and Serenity have lost.

On a side note, please CCP fix the damn forums, losing half of what you have written when you hit post and then having to wait the timer countdown to put it back in is getting really annoying.


It's not subscribers, but subscriptions... that's one meaningful difference as one subscriber can have (and in EVE, MUST HAVE) more than one subscription.

In terms of how many people care about the game, EVE is a niche game. Even a promise of a future game can attract more people just for being outside of a fringe niche and more into the mainstream of interest in the genre.

As I said a few times, we old farts never played a game like EVE, as no game like EVE existed. But we played Elite, Wing Commander and the such.

The only thing that potentially could wipe the floor with SC, would be something like X-Wing Online...
Prince Kobol
#62 - 2014-09-06 11:44:34 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

The only thing that potentially could wipe the floor with SC, would be something like X-Wing Online...


X Wing Alliance.. damn I loved that game.

That brings back memories of having it cart my PC to above a computer shop in the middle of town where me and mates used to use so we could play multiplayer games over a BNC network.

Now you have made me feel old Cry
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#63 - 2014-09-06 11:49:49 UTC
Tbh, I think that the greatest threat EVE could ever face is if Euro Truck Simulator went MMO. Lol
Prince Kobol
#64 - 2014-09-06 11:54:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Tippia wrote:
Tbh, I think that the greatest threat EVE could ever face is if Euro Truck Simulator went MMO. Lol


Pretty sure Goat Simulator would give anything a run for its money if it went online :)

http://www.goat-simulator.com/

Of course you can not discount European Bus Simulator 2012, Street Cleaning Simulator and the magic that is Robot Vacuum Simulator 2013.

(yes these games do exist)
Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#65 - 2014-09-06 13:20:27 UTC
Solj RichPopolous wrote:
As far as EVE goes, its about as boring as they come and I am actually surprised alot are still around.



Oh man, I disagree. This game offers so many options, most of which can unlock relatively quickly, that if someone is bored it's because they havent yet "built their portfolio," so to speak. The game offers so many viable options that one can pick between being semi-afk, only half-assed paying attention, or having to pay complete attention to every detail, every second. I'll use myself as an example:

1 and 1.5 - PVP - Probably my favorite activity, and Im not even all that good at it (yet, right?) Along with this high-pressure activity comes what I consider to be very fun as well, and that's EFT-ing new ships, different creative ways of using ships (like doing the shield/nano thing with armor-tanking ships) etc. I sometimes spend almost all my time on EFT. It in and of itself is like a seperate strategy game game, to me anyway.

2. PVE - /shrug Some ppl like it. Incursions can pay out mad money if that's your thing.

3. Trading - Most of my money these days come's from trading. IMO its the perfect way to make cash, because I can go afk whenever I want, for how I want to,, and the wallet just keeps on blinking. One can get a "good enough" trader in about 8 days, provided it's just going to be a re-seller, for example buying goods in jita and bringing them to Dixie to sell. Very mellow, Im often doing other things online, trolling the forums here or Facebook, and listening to music, which isnt practical in a group PVP or PVE setting because you have to be on comms, etc.

Exploration - Not as good as it was before so many people got into it, but there's still really good (sometimes ridiculous) money to be made doing relic sites in null. Plus you get the added fun of trying to prevent yourself from hitting a bubble and/or getting popped by the locals. Being in danger is fun! It is for me, anyway.

DED Sites - Dont bother in hisec, but go out to lowsec and start scanning down combat sites. There's a lot more of them all over the place than u may think. They keep my attention for a while when I need to up security status and whatnot. Plus, I think it's a lot of fun getting faction and deadspace mods. It's like finding hidden treasure :D

Scamming - I hear there's money in that too. :D

Others can probably come up with additional things to do, the above are just the ones that I do, and yeah after a while each one gets boring, so I switch it up and do something else till I get bored with it, move on to the next one, etc. Eve boredom is going to happen with any activity,the key, imo, is to have a list of things you're interested in and provide yourself with alternatives when any 1 particular activity gets boring.


\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#66 - 2014-09-06 13:22:29 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Pretty sure Goat Simulator would give anything a run for its money if it went online :)

http://www.goat-simulator.com/
I still haven't learned how to walk on the fore legs. Oops
Prince Kobol
#67 - 2014-09-06 13:24:44 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Pretty sure Goat Simulator would give anything a run for its money if it went online :)

http://www.goat-simulator.com/
I still haven't learned how to walk on the fore legs. Oops



You have to be the goat
Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#68 - 2014-09-06 13:25:44 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Pretty sure Goat Simulator would give anything a run for its money if it went online :)

http://www.goat-simulator.com/
I still haven't learned how to walk on the fore legs. Oops


So fore play isn't your thing?


\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#69 - 2014-09-06 13:26:40 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
You have to be the goat
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
So fore play isn't your thing?

You guys suck. Cry
Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#70 - 2014-09-06 13:50:01 UTC
I love that Eve is a "niche game." At the very least, I know that I'm playing with people who are for the most part "on the same wavelength" as me. I forget how many millions of WoW players there are, but as someone who spent a lot of time on that game I can assure you that 90% of them are morons.

This is why I get so pissed off when people come in here and complain the rules should be more stringent and "player-friendly." As Ive often said, people who want that have a huge selection of games to choose form. People like as have ONE, and man does it irk me when some arse strait outta WoW gets on here and suggests a million vanilla things to change. HTFU or GTFO.

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#71 - 2014-09-06 15:39:55 UTC
The reports of EVE's death are as usual greatly exaggerated. But I am noticing that there is no more talk of a game that is steadily growing in subscription numbers. That is not a good sign. But there is less reason to run multiple accounts than there used to be, and that could account for some of the slowdown. For me, Eve is just too much of a time sink. I keep re-subbing this account just so I can troll the forums when I want to.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#72 - 2014-09-06 15:50:51 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Whilst eve offline proves nothing about subs, it does show that less players are logging in.

What it doesn't show is the average time a player is logged on for which is an important statistic, one I would love CCP to release.

The other important statistic is how many actual real players are playing Eve.

Lets for example say we have 30k people logged in, is that 30k individual players or is it 20k individual players and the rest alts.

The alt ratio is another important factor we need to consider along with amount of time logged in.

As for subs, I do not claim they are down but you can not claim they are up as nobody other then CCP knows and they are not telling us anymore which right or wrong to many is an indication that they are down.

What I am interested to see is what effect if any the recent Revenant event has had on the PCU.


the difference between the first 6 month this year and last year show that subs are down. How much? thats the big unknown. Unless dust made negative money ofc

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#73 - 2014-09-06 16:10:23 UTC
Ban Bindy wrote:
The reports of EVE's death are as usual greatly exaggerated. But I am noticing that there is no more talk of a game that is steadily growing in subscription numbers. That is not a good sign. But there is less reason to run multiple accounts than there used to be, and that could account for some of the slowdown. For me, Eve is just too much of a time sink. I keep re-subbing this account just so I can troll the forums when I want to.


as i said, i understand why they have not said the eve sub numbers, if dust was a failure, we can quickly calculate that. And then you would have a bigger jita riot.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#74 - 2014-09-06 19:03:04 UTC
Quote:
The point is, we do not have enough information to determine if subscriptions are down. And that's the problem. The internet makes everyone stupider because everyone thinks that with the info they an get, that thy are accounting genious', or awesome ceo's, whatever. But the point is, you do NOT have all the info. So you want to fill in the blanks. And that, is the problem.


1. log in every day and physically observe how many people play the game, notice numbers are down.
2. look at eve-offline and notice numbers are down.
3. look at eves financials and numbers are down.

Its kind of like the global warming debate; everybody has their opinion, and nobody has every single piece of info, but its certified fact that Antarctica is melting and water levels are rising.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#75 - 2014-09-06 19:20:38 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
The point is, we do not have enough information to determine if subscriptions are down. And that's the problem. The internet makes everyone stupider because everyone thinks that with the info they an get, that thy are accounting genious', or awesome ceo's, whatever. But the point is, you do NOT have all the info. So you want to fill in the blanks. And that, is the problem.


1. log in every day and physically observe how many people play the game, notice numbers are down. No, all this shows is less people on at certin times, this doesn't prove that subs are down
2. look at eve-offline and notice numbers are down. No, all this proves is the average player son line in any given day is lower.
3. look at eves financials and numbers are down. Yes, this does, however by how many is the question based on we still don;t have all the info we need to make an educated desicion

Its kind of like the global warming debate; everybody has their opinion, and nobody has every single piece of info, but its certified fact that Antarctica is melting and water levels are rising.



No, what you are trying to say is:

Hey i see less cars on the road today, that means there are less people driving in the world, awesome!

Except there is no evidence to support your claim.

Using eve offline to support the claim that there are less people subscribed to eve is a false arugment, becuase thats NOT what eve-offline shows. Can it be used as a tool with other things to show that there are less people? why yes it can. Can it be used by its self with no other evidence? no.

Your three points together, show decently that yes eve is down subs, thats proven in the finances. But no it actually is not at the same time. All three make a big case, but you still don;t have enough info to fully claim eve is down subs

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Josef Djugashvilis
#76 - 2014-09-06 21:57:51 UTC
At £89.99 for an annual subscription, Eve would have to be pretty dire for me to leave.

Even though real life gives me little spare time to play for the next few months, it is still good value if only to keep my never ending skill queue going.

I do believe it would help if CCP were to share their vision of 'our' future with us (rather than, you know - stuff - some time in the future in never never land) once the bulk of the re-balancing etc gets nearer to completion.

Just giving us some new ideas - content to look forward to, would I think, stop many folk from quitting the game.

This is not a signature.

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#77 - 2014-09-06 23:20:32 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
DaReaper wrote:
I don't drink but as my thread will be locked anyway... WOOOOO HOOO!
You better start drinking then, as I will not lock your thread at this time.

Yarda Black wrote:
I said it once and I'll say it again:

I'll keep undocking until CCP shuts down the server. I don't care how many jumps I have to make to find the only remaining dude who doesn't care about subs, ISK/hour etc and I'll shoot him. I cant promise I'll blow him up tho. Cos he's apparently a very determined individual...
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
You should be fine, I'll give neutral reps Blink
Iain Cariaba wrote:

That will be me.
And I will blow you up with my yet to be created faction titan. Twisted
Rest assured that at that time I will still be around to moderate the shiptoasting ranting thread from hell that ensues after that fight about the unfairness of A. Neutral repping, and B. Faction Titans.

Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
The Great Karnak predicts that this thread will be locked for discussing moderation and not for any topic around why the thread exists.
Sadly I have to refute my previous statement on the matter, as in this instance the prediction of The Great Karnak is slightly in error as I will not lock this thread on grounds of discussing forum moderation. Or at all at this moment in time for that matter.


Having said that, I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.
Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!

The Rules:
20. All posts must be related to EVE Online.

Posts regarding other companies and products or services are prohibited and any content of this nature will be removed. Posts regarding other games are however permitted on the Out of Pod Experience forum for the purposes of discussion only.


27. Off-topic posting is prohibited.

Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.



Thread re-opened.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Amarr Citizen 1312151005
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#78 - 2014-09-07 00:46:55 UTC
DaReaper wrote:
Stuff and things

The fact that you have to self assure your self with this post is funny.
EVE just like every MMO in history will have a decline, that decline has been slow but it happens.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#79 - 2014-09-07 00:51:23 UTC
Amarr Citizen 1312151005 wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
Stuff and things

The fact that you have to self assure your self with this post is funny.
EVE just like every MMO in history will have a decline, that decline has been slow but it happens.


oh it was not an assurance, it was a bored post while i was at work, that wound up in a locked thread, so i wanted to post it, as i spent some type typing lol

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#80 - 2014-09-07 00:53:36 UTC
Amarr Citizen 1312151005 wrote:
DaReaper wrote:
Stuff and things

The fact that you have to self assure your self with this post is funny.
EVE just like every MMO in history will have a decline, that decline has been slow but it happens.


EVE has declined before, and then gone back up. Net growth over the decade of it's existence, which includes those occasional declines, has been steadily rising. Stop shilling for EA and projecting your own fear of EVE's success onto people who enjoy the game or I'll throw tomatoes at you. Evil

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104