These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Does CODE honor their permits?

First post
Author
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#141 - 2014-09-12 15:37:47 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
The point still stands. If people fly a proc they have basically nothing to worry about from code. If you are tanked up there will always be some excuse for not killing you. Permits are irrelevant since they are only valid if you wouldn't be a target anyway.

Well at least the mindset did change that you actually have to tank your ship and that Highsec isn't safe for your anti-tanked Hulk. We are clearly making progress, the miners who actually adopt start to use Procurers and Skiffs. They are a common sight now in Highsec ice fields.

And while it is true that we can't gank all the ships all the time everywhere yet, we get more and more people every day. It's only a matter of time until anti-Skiff fleets are a common thing and we will probably meet once again on the forums where the common carebear cries for CCP's help.
Sister Bertrille
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#142 - 2014-09-12 16:07:24 UTC
And then the common griefer /exploiter/sand castle kicker will cry when CCP makes the changes.
RollRollRoll
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#143 - 2014-09-12 18:38:02 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:



You have to wonder if code are really just a group set up by mass mining botters to cull the competition from actively playing miners, since they target people who actively mine and avoid targeting people who mine in large groups. Amusingly the peons at the bottom of the chain would never know that's what they supported.


Nah. If that were true there would be a no kill list with the names of their alts. Remember that THE code isn't the same thing as CODE. alliance.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#144 - 2014-09-12 18:44:34 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:



You have to wonder if code are really just a group set up by mass mining botters to cull the competition from actively playing miners, since they target people who actively mine and avoid targeting people who mine in large groups. Amusingly the peons at the bottom of the chain would never know that's what they supported.


Nah. If that were true there would be a no kill list with the names of their alts. Remember that THE code isn't the same thing as CODE. alliance.


Confirming. I've never been told not to shoot someone. I have my own list of blues, but I don't expect anyone else in Code to follow it, and I've never been provided a list of people to not shoot. If that were happening Kell, you'd hear about it really fast. I myself would call it out as it would be in violation of the Code, I don't care who it is doing it.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.

ISD Supogo
ISD BH
ISD Alliance
#145 - 2014-09-13 01:03:11 UTC
Removed a rather offensive post.

Quote:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not conductive to the community spirit that CCP promotes. As such, this kind of behavior will not be tolerated.

ISD BH Supogo

Bughunter

Equipment Certification and Anomaly Investigations Division (ECAID)

Interstellar Services Department

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#146 - 2014-09-14 00:49:24 UTC
Sister Bertrille wrote:
And then the common griefer /exploiter/sand castle kicker will cry when CCP makes the changes.
RollRollRoll

griefers and exploiters usually get banned, because it is against the EULA. So they can't cry on the forums.I don't see how that is related to the topic.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#147 - 2014-09-14 01:20:07 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Well at least the mindset did change that you actually have to tank your ship and that Highsec isn't safe for your anti-tanked Hulk. We are clearly making progress, the miners who actually adopt start to use Procurers and Skiffs. They are a common sight now in Highsec ice fields.

And while it is true that we can't gank all the ships all the time everywhere yet, we get more and more people every day. It's only a matter of time until anti-Skiff fleets are a common thing and we will probably meet once again on the forums where the common carebear cries for CCP's help.
I'd say the increase in the actual usability of the procs and skiffs and the increased reliance on isboxer were responsible for that. You really lose very little yield now with procs and skiffs.

And you have to ask yourself, what's the benefit? You are still ganking people who don't know to used tanked ships and people who are relying on flying solo and generally leaving alone mass miners and bots. You are performing a task which is directly opposed to what your stated goals are.

Leto Thule wrote:
Nah. If that were true there would be a no kill list with the names of their alts. Remember that THE code isn't the same thing as CODE. alliance.
Why would there be a list? If you were all running isboxer proc fleets you'd never worry about being ganked by code.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#148 - 2014-09-14 09:52:14 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
And you have to ask yourself, what's the benefit? You are still ganking people who don't know to used tanked ships and people who are relying on flying solo and generally leaving alone mass miners and bots. You are performing a task which is directly opposed to what your stated goals are.

I report bots to CCP, there are also a lot of solo pilots who use bot programs in Highsec. Some of them even auto-dock when someone of CODE. enters the system. If I have the DPS to gank them I go to great lengths to kill them anyway because it is quite interesting what happens if you do that. I encountered some bots who after I killed and podded them undocked the pod again, I doubt it was also upgrading the clone. If I can't gank them (sorry I don't summon a fleet to gank one bot who will be banned anyway) and if they auto-dock I usually just AFK camp them after I am done with playing.

The multiboxing fleets are a different topic. I would say a multiboxer is a more active player than the normal Retriever or Mackinaw pilot. Also ganking is not the only weapon at our hands. I have great success shutting down multiple multiboxer fleets with one single 100MN Stabber.

I would say it's probably the solo Procurer and Skiff pilot who gets the least attention. Since they already made the choice of tank over cargohold (AFK) or yield (greed) they acknowledge that Highsec is a dangerous place and are therefore not really our primary concern.
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#149 - 2014-09-14 19:01:25 UTC
They do if you follow the code but the code.is so full of holes such as 1 rule.is your.not to mine everyday, if you do you invalidate your permit. I do honor my ganker permits as I shoot any and all gankers that dont have 1Evil

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith

Steppa Musana
Doomheim
#150 - 2014-09-14 23:42:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Steppa Musana
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Sister Bertrille wrote:
And then the common griefer /exploiter/sand castle kicker will cry when CCP makes the changes.
RollRollRoll

griefers and exploiters usually get banned, because it is against the EULA. So they can't cry on the forums.I don't see how that is related to the topic.

If griefers got banned, your leader would have been banned well over a year ago.

Let's not split hairs, The New Order is primarily about griefing people for the purpose of creating amusing stories for a certain blogger to blog about. I know many CODE. members who are not like this, but that is the purpose of The New Order as it stands in 2014.

I don't personally have a problem with a small grief or troll; a "gf" in local or a little chat asking about permits is perfectly fine. Using gameplay mechanics to annoy others is also perfectly fine in my books. Unfortunately when this get turned into egging the player on through questionable social conduct for the purpose of publicly humiliating the player on a popular blog page, it becomes unhealthy for the state of the game.

At least some of your members and past supporters are starting to see the light, leave and pull support. Seems the message is getting across. The question is: How long until you see it?

Hey guys.

Lady Areola Fappington
#151 - 2014-09-15 08:25:06 UTC
Steppa Musana wrote:

If griefers got banned, your leader would have been banned well over a year ago.

Let's not split hairs, The New Order is primarily about griefing people for the purpose of creating amusing stories for a certain blogger to blog about. I know many CODE. members who are not like this, but that is the purpose of The New Order as it stands in 2014.

I don't personally have a problem with a small grief or troll; a "gf" in local or a little chat asking about permits is perfectly fine. Using gameplay mechanics to annoy others is also perfectly fine in my books. Unfortunately when this get turned into egging the player on through questionable social conduct for the purpose of publicly humiliating the player on a popular blog page, it becomes unhealthy for the state of the game.

At least some of your members and past supporters are starting to see the light, leave and pull support. Seems the message is getting across. The question is: How long until you see it?



I agree only in that some people are taking things too far in CODE. You can get more than enough fun-time rage stories to blog about without unduly antagonizing people.

I'll continue to always back the core ideas of CODE, which is making highsec unsafe, punishing the unwary, and bringing content to the contentless ice and 'roid belts. I'm not going to back blatant harassment just to "milk" a mark of more tears and better stories. If the tears keep flowing, collect away for sure, but once they stop, move on to the next mark.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Black Pedro
Mine.
#152 - 2014-09-15 11:23:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Steppa Musana wrote:

Let's not split hairs, The New Order is primarily about griefing people for the purpose of creating amusing stories for a certain blogger to blog about. I know many CODE. members who are not like this, but that is the purpose of The New Order as it stands in 2014.

I don't personally have a problem with a small grief or troll; a "gf" in local or a little chat asking about permits is perfectly fine. Using gameplay mechanics to annoy others is also perfectly fine in my books. Unfortunately when this get turned into egging the player on through questionable social conduct for the purpose of publicly humiliating the player on a popular blog page, it becomes unhealthy for the state of the game.

At least some of your members and past supporters are starting to see the light, leave and pull support. Seems the message is getting across. The question is: How long until you see it?


I think you overestimate the amount "unhealthy egging on" that goes on by the New Order to get blog material. Of course some mild in-game trolling takes place - after all the New Order are the major villains (or heroes depending on your view of what kind of game Eve is) of highsec, but from my experience, players featured on the website often humiliate and embarrass themselves with their own reactions to being exploded in a game about exploding spaceships.

Let's summarize what's on the main page of minerbumping.com right now:

1) Kills of the Week - factual and pretty tame with the only tears being in the public bio of a freighter gank victim (no private communications at all)
2) Over Four Hundred Eleven Billion in Shares Sold - just business
3) See You in 315 Station, Part 1 - probably the only one with a significant humiliation factor. The crude and racist material in the embarrassing bio pre-existed the events though (not the New Order's fault), but it is a great example of how mild trolling gets a profane and homophobic reply right away from some people.
4) The Stream of Justice, Part 1&2 - An uplifting story where the gank victim responds positively to the New Order and together he and the agents have fun while exploring other aspects of the game than mining together.
5) Taxing Difficulty - A story about AWOXing a carebear corp. The only humiliating thing about this is the victim's unrepentant attitude towards his exploitation of new players.
6) Once You Go Code - A bizarre story where a player goes off on a self-humiliating rant against the New Order in response to a gank perpetrated by someone unrelated to the New Order. The communication was not initiated by the agent involved at all.

Certainly minerbumping.com shines a light on the bad behaviour of certain players, often bad behaviour in response to losing a pixel space ship to the New Order, but most of the time this comes spontaneously with very little "egging on". James 315 is also good about showing as much of the conversation that he can (that is still compatible with an entertaining post) so you can see for yourself how little it takes for some people to start embarassing themselves with their own bad behaviour. You also don't see the vast majority of gank victims that do not respond at all, or respond in good humour with a 'gf'-equivalent or a good-natured promise of revenge as these don't make the most entertaining minerbumping posts.
Sister Bertrille
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#153 - 2014-09-15 12:06:30 UTC
Oh please....you're trying to put lipstick on a pig (the pig meaning minerbumping.com)
Why dont you spin it some more.
Almost everything thats written in that blog is there to humiliate your victims and to humiliate new players and players that dont have the same play style as you.
Black Pedro
Mine.
#154 - 2014-09-15 13:16:55 UTC
Sister Bertrille wrote:
Oh please....you're trying to put lipstick on a pig (the pig meaning minerbumping.com)
Why dont you spin it some more.
Almost everything thats written in that blog is there to humiliate your victims and to humiliate new players and players that dont have the same play style as you.


I was not trying to spin it. I agree, the minerbumping.com website derives much entertainment value by highlighting how some players humiliate themselves by acting badly in a video game. It is more than that of course - the New Order is a banner for like-minded players to unite behind, players that understand the Eve is a competitive PvP game that can't have any "safe" areas (including highsec). In order for the game to function as designed, there has to be risk - risk for fitting a ship badly, playing badly (or not at all in the case of the botters/AFKers), or just being too greedy (choosing yield over protection) - otherwise everyone would just fit for maximum cargo/yield and AFK the economy into the ground while being bored or watching Netflix the whole time. So naturally we find ourselves in conflict with those that don't have the same "play style" as us, and they are the ones that end up providing us with the most minerbumping.com content.

I am not saying that some people can't take the roleplaying shtick too far and purposely look for an emotional response from their victims, but I am saying the vast majority of the self-humiliating content on minerbumping.com results from not much more than someone having their pixels blown up in a video game and then acting badly to a fellow player.

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#155 - 2014-10-26 09:31:14 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Every time clowns play smart, another clown comes and thwarts the effort...

Please have a friendly look at gankerbumping.blogspot.com: http://gankerbumping.blogspot.de/

permit tank is best tank?

The "karma-balancer" honors his name.

He revokes the permit for being AFK (well codies like to do that)...
But he revokes it from being AFK at Station!

Ain't that funny?
Those guys trying hard to give spin to propaganda (=lies) and *boom* another codie proofs thats all hilarious BS!

Any question why CODE. is the official clowns troupe of EvE?
More proof?
After that?
Or the AT 2014 CODE-disaster where they ran away?
The ridiculous amount of lies after, contradicting themself?
Where all that was, that they could not muster 12(!!) fighters?
An Alliance with almost 300 chars?
How many ppl could one assume behind them?
To quote banhammerd DJ: "i have a lot of ALTS"?

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Nathan Shavit
Shavit Risk Management
#156 - 2014-10-28 08:40:46 UTC
Instead of debating about CODE. just shoot them. They would not wait a second so why should we? The time for fair play is over. Ally up with Forerunner Protectorate [FOREP] and start ganking gankers today.

There is no problem an air strike cannot solve.

Black Pedro
Mine.
#157 - 2014-10-28 11:51:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Nathan Shavit wrote:
Instead of debating about CODE. just shoot them. They would not wait a second so why should we? The time for fair play is over. Ally up with Forerunner Protectorate [FOREP] and start ganking gankers today.


I always take a keen interest in new rebel organizations. Statistically at least, I figure that one of these days a competent one will arise and actually disrupt New Order activities to a noticeable extent. I am sure that is what the AFK miners and haulers are hoping for as well.

I will give you a free tip: set your goals to either kill gankers before a gank, or to save victims after the gank commences and use these as metrics for measuring your success. Don't fall into the trap most of the current crop of AGs have and think that just whoring on CONCORD killmails is actually affecting anything when the target dies anyway like they invariably do.

Also, when you inevitably get tired of protecting ungrateful and AFK players for free, consider joining up with the New Order to continue generating high quality content in highsec, rather than going back to spending your time on PvE.

But regardless, your rebellion already is making highsec a more interesting place so I wish you and your [FOREP]layers the best of luck. Fighting content with more content is the best way to play this game.
Thomas Mayaki
Perkone
Caldari State
#158 - 2014-10-28 12:50:30 UTC
Tengu Grib wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:



You have to wonder if code are really just a group set up by mass mining botters to cull the competition from actively playing miners, since they target people who actively mine and avoid targeting people who mine in large groups. Amusingly the peons at the bottom of the chain would never know that's what they supported.


Nah. If that were true there would be a no kill list with the names of their alts. Remember that THE code isn't the same thing as CODE. alliance.


Confirming. I've never been told not to shoot someone. I have my own list of blues, but I don't expect anyone else in Code to follow it, and I've never been provided a list of people to not shoot. If that were happening Kell, you'd hear about it really fast. I myself would call it out as it would be in violation of the Code, I don't care who it is doing it.


Its not against the Code to bot in nullsec which is where the main supporters of James 315 are from.
And I guess you are unaware of all the AFK ratters out there too.
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#159 - 2014-10-28 17:48:55 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Black Pedro wrote:
I will give you a free tip


Sounds as arrogant and as full of himself like Jimmy314,5!

Keep your ideas for yourself. You are not in position to explain to other people how to play EvE. EvE is a Sandbox with strong PvP background, but EvE is not meant as griefer paradise. codies have been warned more than one time.


Black Pedro wrote:

Also, when you inevitably get tired of protecting ungrateful and AFK players for free, consider joining up with the New Order

You are desperatly looking for new recruts, but:
Join any other ganking group, but do not join codies.
Codies are at the End of line, known as wimps, liars and hipocrits.
AT 2014 will not be forgotten since codies got at livetime ban.

Black Pedro wrote:

to continue generating high quality content in highsec, rather than going back to spending your time on PvE.

Griefing is not "highquality content" and shooting non-combatants is not "elite PvP" (on a sidenote: Alliance Tournament is elite PvP). It does not matter how often you repeat this, it will not get true. If i want to spent my time on PvE, i do so.

If you think you have to tell other people how to play a game, you better create you own game.

Black Pedro wrote:

your rebellion


There is no rebellion, there is resistance. code does not rule highsec, they "die" with every gank. thats like suicide-bomb-terrorists. Your opponents are "home-guard" or "civil-defense". With less than 300 alts with far less users behind, codies are not able to "enforce" anything. Ha, not even having 12 fighters for the AT...

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#160 - 2014-10-28 20:00:35 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Nathan Shavit wrote:
Instead of debating about CODE. just shoot them. They would not wait a second so why should we? The time for fair play is over. Ally up with Forerunner Protectorate [FOREP] and start ganking gankers today.


I always take a keen interest in new rebel organizations. Statistically at least, I figure that one of these days a competent one will arise and actually disrupt New Order activities to a noticeable extent. I am sure that is what the AFK miners and haulers are hoping for as well.

I will give you a free tip: set your goals to either kill gankers before a gank, or to save victims after the gank commences and use these as metrics for measuring your success. Don't fall into the trap most of the current crop of AGs have and think that just whoring on CONCORD killmails is actually affecting anything when the target dies anyway like they invariably do.

Also, when you inevitably get tired of protecting ungrateful and AFK players for free, consider joining up with the New Order to continue generating high quality content in highsec, rather than going back to spending your time on PvE.

But regardless, your rebellion already is making highsec a more interesting place so I wish you and your [FOREP]layers the best of luck. Fighting content with more content is the best way to play this game.


I tend to think that given the nature of the people getting ganked and the relevant game mechanics there is no hope of a successful resistance movement ever arising.