These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

War Decs as a griefing tool

First post
Author
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#661 - 2014-09-03 01:24:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Veers Belvar wrote:
No, my posts in each thread were on topic
They may or may not have been on topic, that doesn't alter the fact that the appropriate place to discuss your ideas is the Features and Ideas forum.

You should also be aware that the ideas you're proposing would very much affect wardecs if they were implemented poorly, bumping is a commonly used mechanic to hold people on field until tackle can be brought up.

I've done it myself to hold a war target in place until the appropriately fitted ships could get there.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#662 - 2014-09-03 01:27:58 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
No, my posts in each thread were on topic
They may or may not have been on topic, that doesn't alter the fact that the appropriate place to discuss your ideas is the Features and Ideas forum.

You should also be aware that the ideas you're proposing would very much affect wardecs if they were implemented poorly, bumping is a commonly used mechanic to hold people on field until tackle can be brought up.

I've done it myself to hold a war target in place until the appropriately fitted ships could get there.


I think the question in this thread was if there is an appopriate way to shield highsec non-pvp corps from the detrimental effects of being wardeced from someone terrifying like Marmite, etc... Personally I don't see any viable way to do that, nor do I think that it is necessary to do so.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#663 - 2014-09-03 01:29:55 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
No, my posts in each thread were on topic
They may or may not have been on topic, that doesn't alter the fact that the appropriate place to discuss your ideas is the Features and Ideas forum.

You should also be aware that the ideas you're proposing would very much affect wardecs if they were implemented poorly, bumping is a commonly used mechanic to hold people on field until tackle can be brought up.

I've done it myself to hold a war target in place until the appropriately fitted ships could get there.


I think the question in this thread was if there is an appopriate way to shield highsec non-pvp corps from the detrimental effects of being wardeced from someone terrifying like Marmite, etc... Personally I don't see any viable way to do that, nor do I think that it is necessary to do so.
Wow 2 posts I can agree with in 1 day. The end is nigh.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#664 - 2014-09-03 01:31:53 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
I'd always like to fly in highsec knowing that my allies in CONCORD are available to assist.


This attitude is exactly why Concord needs to be removed. The perpetuation of this attitude is exactly why people like you should be banned from posting. If you are passing on this 'wisdom' to newer players, you should also be banned from the game.


I would shudder to think of a highsec without CONCORD, and would probably quit the game.


That's because this game is not for you, and this would suits those it is for just fine, it could only make the game better for its intended audience.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#665 - 2014-09-03 01:32:56 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
someone terrifying like Marmite, etc...


lolwut?

Terrifying?

Boy, you are new aren't you.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Grog Aftermath
Doomheim
#666 - 2014-09-03 01:36:09 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
I'd always like to fly in highsec knowing that my allies in CONCORD are available to assist.


This attitude is exactly why Concord needs to be removed. The perpetuation of this attitude is exactly why people like you should be banned from posting. If you are passing on this 'wisdom' to newer players, you should also be banned from the game.


I would shudder to think of a highsec without CONCORD, and would probably quit the game.


That's because this game is not for you, and this would suits those it is for just fine, it could only make the game better for its intended audience.


Problem I see there is, backing a niche game into an even more niche market.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#667 - 2014-09-03 01:41:29 UTC
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
I'd always like to fly in highsec knowing that my allies in CONCORD are available to assist.


This attitude is exactly why Concord needs to be removed. The perpetuation of this attitude is exactly why people like you should be banned from posting. If you are passing on this 'wisdom' to newer players, you should also be banned from the game.


I would shudder to think of a highsec without CONCORD, and would probably quit the game.


That's because this game is not for you, and this would suits those it is for just fine, it could only make the game better for its intended audience.


Problem I see there is, backing a niche game into an even more niche market.


How is that a problem if it's intended audience is a niche market to begin with? CCP have demonstrated huge success with niche markets, so I'm not seeing how this could be detrimental. Additionally, the game would still be available to audiences that it's not intended for. Some people outside the intended audience will adapt, most, like Veers, won't.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#668 - 2014-09-03 01:41:52 UTC
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
I'd always like to fly in highsec knowing that my allies in CONCORD are available to assist.


This attitude is exactly why Concord needs to be removed. The perpetuation of this attitude is exactly why people like you should be banned from posting. If you are passing on this 'wisdom' to newer players, you should also be banned from the game.


I would shudder to think of a highsec without CONCORD, and would probably quit the game.


That's because this game is not for you, and this would suits those it is for just fine, it could only make the game better for its intended audience.


Problem I see there is, backing a niche game into an even more niche market.


Yep, big part of the playerbase is casual high sec carebears. Forcing them into hopeless wars to get slaughtered would not be great for retention. On the other hand compromising wardecs to protect them would also not be great. They have a choice - learn to fight off the wardecs, or drop corp and seek safety in npc corp. It's always good to let people make important decisions.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#669 - 2014-09-03 01:46:42 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Problem I see there is, backing a niche game into an even more niche market.

Yep, big part of the playerbase is casual high sec carebears. Forcing them into hopeless wars to get slaughtered would not be great for retention.
The good news is that they're not being forced into hopeless wars to get slaughtered. And retention has never really suffered from the existence of wardecs — as many a CCP executive have said, there are some players that aren't worth retaining.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#670 - 2014-09-03 01:48:02 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


Yep, big part of the playerbase is casual high sec carebears. Forcing them into hopeless wars to get slaughtered would not be great for retention. On the other hand compromising wardecs to protect them would also not be great. They have a choice - learn to fight off the wardecs, or drop corp and seek safety in npc corp. It's always good to let people make important decisions.


You're right, of course, and I'm assisting one of these 'casual high sec carebears' right now that have been forced into 'hopeless war'. Only, you fail to consider how many of that majority player base is actually capable of adapting. Just because there's a lot of loud screaming and foot stomping on the forums from carebears in opposition to PVP in highsec, it doesn't mean that's the majority carebear opinion. In fact, the newbro carebear I'm assisting is reading this forum right now and agreeing with me - he thinks you're soft and need to go back to WOW. And he came to this decision on his own, with no coaxing from me at all.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#671 - 2014-09-03 01:50:23 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Yep, big part of the playerbase is casual high sec carebears. Forcing them into hopeless wars to get slaughtered would not be great for retention. On the other hand compromising wardecs to protect them would also not be great. They have a choice - learn to fight off the wardecs, or drop corp and seek safety in npc corp. It's always good to let people make important decisions.


You're right, of course, and I'm assisting one of these 'casual high sec carebears' right now that have been forced into 'hopeless war'. Only, you fail to consider how many of that majority player base is actually capable of adapting. Just because there's a lot of loud screaming and foot stomping on the forums from carebears in opposition to PVP in highsec, it doesn't mean that's the majority carebear opinion. In fact, the newbro carebear I'm assisting is reading this forum right now and agreeing with me - he thinks you're soft and need to go back to WOW. And he came to this decision on his own, with no coaxing from me at all.


Well, some people want to fight wars. From the large number of people sitting in NPC corps its clear that a lot of others (including myself) would prefer to carry on in highsec without needing to deal with wardecs. I'm perfectly happy playing Eve and have no intention of play WoW.
Grog Aftermath
Doomheim
#672 - 2014-09-03 01:52:16 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Problem I see there is, backing a niche game into an even more niche market.


How is that a problem if it's intended audience is a niche market to begin with? CCP have demonstrated huge success with niche markets, so I'm not seeing how this could be detrimental. Additionally, the game would still be available to audiences that it's not intended for. Some people outside the intended audience will adapt, most, like Veers, won't.


For a business to target a smaller section of the market than it already has, is by no means a good thing.
Kaely Tanniss
Black Lotus Society.
#673 - 2014-09-03 01:52:59 UTC
Wars, however glorious or annoying, whatever your view on them may be..are a part of Eve. Eve is a social game. Eve is unique in the fact that it is similar to rl. There are wars..there are criminals, there are scammers....all of which are allowed to make Eve a more grand experience. In rl, wars happen whether people like them or not. Crimes are commited whether you approve of them or not. Liars and cheaters walk amongst us in every turn of life. These are the things which determine who the strong and the weak are. You can either hack it, or you can't. If these kinds of things bother you, perhaps you are playing the wrong game. Eve is many things..what it is not is a progressive "hold your hand, lets all sing kumbaya" game. If you cannot handle the spirit and reality of Eve..might I suggest you try Farmville.....

If I had a nickel for every time someone said women don't play eve, I'd have a bag of nickels to whack the next person who said it..

Grog Aftermath
Doomheim
#674 - 2014-09-03 01:57:28 UTC
Kaely Tanniss wrote:
Wars, however glorious or annoying, whatever your view on them may be..are a part of Eve. Eve is a social game. Eve is unique in the fact that it is similar to rl. There are wars..there are criminals, there are scammers....all of which are allowed to make Eve a more grand experience. In rl, wars happen whether people like them or not. Crimes are commited whether you approve of them or not. Liars and cheaters walk amongst us in every turn of life. These are the things which determine who the strong and the weak are. You can either hack it, or you can't. If these kinds of things bother you, perhaps you are playing the wrong game. Eve is many things..what it is not is a progressive "hold your hand, lets all sing kumbaya" game. If you cannot handle the spirit and reality of Eve..might I suggest you try Farmville.....


Strangely enough those aspects of EVE are what attract a lot of the PvEers into high-sec. Of course if high-sec was to change to be similar to 0.0, you would lose most of those players.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#675 - 2014-09-03 01:58:08 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Well, some people want to fight wars. From the large number of people sitting in NPC corps its clear that a lot of others (including myself) would prefer to carry on in highsec without needing to deal with wardecs.
You'll find a lot, as in a large percentage, of the players sat in NPC corps are alts, 2/3 of my characters are currently in NPC corps.


In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#676 - 2014-09-03 02:01:52 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Yep, big part of the playerbase is casual high sec carebears. Forcing them into hopeless wars to get slaughtered would not be great for retention. On the other hand compromising wardecs to protect them would also not be great. They have a choice - learn to fight off the wardecs, or drop corp and seek safety in npc corp. It's always good to let people make important decisions.


You're right, of course, and I'm assisting one of these 'casual high sec carebears' right now that have been forced into 'hopeless war'. Only, you fail to consider how many of that majority player base is actually capable of adapting. Just because there's a lot of loud screaming and foot stomping on the forums from carebears in opposition to PVP in highsec, it doesn't mean that's the majority carebear opinion. In fact, the newbro carebear I'm assisting is reading this forum right now and agreeing with me - he thinks you're soft and need to go back to WOW. And he came to this decision on his own, with no coaxing from me at all.


Well, some people want to fight wars. From the large number of people sitting in NPC corps its clear that a lot of others (including myself) would prefer to carry on in highsec without needing to deal with wardecs. I'm perfectly happy playing Eve and have no intention of play WoW.


You're not happy with playing EVE, though. You've made that quite clear. You don't want to play EVE at all, not as it is. You're still suggesting making it something it's not and was never intended to be, because when you log into the EVE I'm playing, you accept the threat of wardecs, especially if you're in a player corp.

By restricting yourself to an NPC corp, you're only limiting the game available to you, and you do that to yourself. That's why I don't care about NPC corps, because when you're in one, you simply can't put a tower up on my moons for example, and you can't wardec me. I, however, can still suicide gank your mining ships if I don't like the look of you. You are irrelevant. When you're in an NPC corp, you might as well be an NPC yourself, that's how irrelevant you are to EVE.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#677 - 2014-09-03 02:07:31 UTC
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Problem I see there is, backing a niche game into an even more niche market.


How is that a problem if it's intended audience is a niche market to begin with? CCP have demonstrated huge success with niche markets, so I'm not seeing how this could be detrimental. Additionally, the game would still be available to audiences that it's not intended for. Some people outside the intended audience will adapt, most, like Veers, won't.


For a business to target a smaller section of the market than it already has, is by no means a good thing.


And yet, CCP have done well doing exactly that with EVE.

Ferrari have done well doing exactly that with their cars.

There are a lot of niche markets that, when catered to specifically, even at the exclusion of other possible audiences, can be very profitable and successful. It can be a very good thing, especially for the intended audience, who get a quality product that caters to and may even be tailored to them specifically.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Grog Aftermath
Doomheim
#678 - 2014-09-03 02:13:20 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Problem I see there is, backing a niche game into an even more niche market.


How is that a problem if it's intended audience is a niche market to begin with? CCP have demonstrated huge success with niche markets, so I'm not seeing how this could be detrimental. Additionally, the game would still be available to audiences that it's not intended for. Some people outside the intended audience will adapt, most, like Veers, won't.


For a business to target a smaller section of the market than it already has, is by no means a good thing.


And yet, CCP have done well doing exactly that with EVE.

Ferrari have done well doing exactly that with their cars.

There are a lot of niche markets that, when catered to specifically, even at the exclusion of other possible audiences, can be very profitable and successful. It can be a very good thing, especially for the intended audience, who get a quality product that caters to and may even be tailored to them specifically.


Sure, by targeting people with plenty of cash. Make more exclusive products aimed at a rich market.

Only way to make more money out of a shrinking market is to squeeze more out of your customers.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#679 - 2014-09-03 02:13:22 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:


Yep, big part of the playerbase is casual high sec carebears. Forcing them into hopeless wars to get slaughtered would not be great for retention. On the other hand compromising wardecs to protect them would also not be great. They have a choice - learn to fight off the wardecs, or drop corp and seek safety in npc corp. It's always good to let people make important decisions.


You're right, of course, and I'm assisting one of these 'casual high sec carebears' right now that have been forced into 'hopeless war'. Only, you fail to consider how many of that majority player base is actually capable of adapting. Just because there's a lot of loud screaming and foot stomping on the forums from carebears in opposition to PVP in highsec, it doesn't mean that's the majority carebear opinion. In fact, the newbro carebear I'm assisting is reading this forum right now and agreeing with me - he thinks you're soft and need to go back to WOW. And he came to this decision on his own, with no coaxing from me at all.


Well, some people want to fight wars. From the large number of people sitting in NPC corps its clear that a lot of others (including myself) would prefer to carry on in highsec without needing to deal with wardecs. I'm perfectly happy playing Eve and have no intention of play WoW.


You're not happy with playing EVE, though. You've made that quite clear. You don't want to play EVE at all, not as it is. You're still suggesting making it something it's not and was never intended to be, because when you log into the EVE I'm playing, you accept the threat of wardecs, especially if you're in a player corp.

By restricting yourself to an NPC corp, you're only limiting the game available to you, and you do that to yourself. That's why I don't care about NPC corps, because when you're in one, you simply can't put a tower up on my moons for example, and you can't wardec me. I, however, can still suicide gank your mining ships if I don't like the look of you. You are irrelevant. When you're in an NPC corp, you might as well be an NPC yourself, that's how irrelevant you are to EVE.




Uhm....I'm not in NPC corp, I'm in a 1 man corp that I fold if I get wardecced. I definitely do enjoy Eve as it currently is, though I always think it could be better. I'm quite happy running L4 missions and incursions with friends. And I don't log into your Eve, I log into the actual Eve. The threat of suicide ganking keeps things interesting....I don't mine nor do i have any intention of putting towers up, and am quite happy to continue playing the game as it currently is.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#680 - 2014-09-03 02:24:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Veers Belvar wrote:



Uhm....I'm not in NPC corp, I'm in a 1 man corp that I fold if I get wardecced. I definitely do enjoy Eve as it currently is, though I always think it could be better. I'm quite happy running L4 missions and incursions with friends. And I don't log into your Eve, I log into the actual Eve. The threat of suicide ganking keeps things interesting....I don't mine nor do i have any intention of putting towers up, and am quite happy to continue playing the game as it currently is.


Why do you go out of your way to be a pretentious shitstain? Don't put words in my ******* mouth, read the words I wrote - I never said MY EVE, I said, the EVE I PLAY. It's the same EVE you play. What you want is something else. And no, based on what you've said here, you do not enjoy EVE as it is. I don't care, at the end of the day, how you choose to restrict yourself in a PVP environment, but don't go pretending that it's not a PVP environment and don't expect it to change to suit the people who want it to not be a PVP environment, because they don't want to play EVE, they want something else.

EVE is a PVP environment, that is the bottom line, and anyone who wants something else is playing the wrong game. Is this point clear yet? Are you going to dodge it with some more rhetoric about how restricting your game experience can save you from PVP?

Because that's all you're doing, restricting your own experience. Even if that's all you want, personally, this is not the sort of thing you tell newbs that want more. "Hey, you don't like PVP, that's cool, as long as you restrict yourself from 90% of what EVE has to offer, you'll never have to do any."

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104