These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The "Say a benign yet offensive word to make someone upset" thread

First post
Author
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2014-08-22 08:18:53 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Nowhere in any of my posts did I "advocate the use of slurs," that's another straw man from you, and a personal attack. You have slandered me.

I'm seeing a lot more defense of their behavior from you than condemnation.

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
They need a reality adjustment if they think they have a right to silence those who offend then, even if tthose people ARE douchebags.

Nobody is trying to silence anyone.

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
You don't know anything about me or what I have or haven't endured in my life.

Why is this your defense? This is exactly the point I'm trying to make to you, is that you don't know what kind of effect such words may have on a person and you shouldn't presume that they're not harmful to someone just because they're not harmful to you.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#42 - 2014-08-22 08:19:15 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat stop trying to turn this into a discussion on freedom of speech. It was never about that. Nobody is saying you're not free to walk about spouting ****** this and ****** that. We're just pointing out that your speech, like it or not, can have an emotionally deleterious effect on people.


Oh. Thought I saw a post containing profanity somewhere and the poster saying they would only change it if the threads OP edited his post.


\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#43 - 2014-08-22 08:19:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Eugene Kerner
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:

You know who else didn't think one should be able to speak his or her mind? ****** What?

And it's interesting how hatespeech is treated in that country now, don't you think?


Indeed it is "interesting." There's no freedom of speech there. I have to say, "meet the new boss, same as the old boss."


Yep. Germany in 2014 is the same as 1940s Germany. Do you see where your analogies run into a wall, or did you want more examples?


Of course it's a bit of an exaggeration, but regarding the topic of free speech, the only difference is now you get a prison sentence rather than a bullet in the head.

Laws against free speech? Check.
Prison terms for political dissidents? Check. (see Ernst Zundel)

I could probably come up with more, but I think the point is made. In my heartfelt opinion, imprisoning people because of the words they say is tyrannical.

There used to be a saying here in America: "I abhor what you have to say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it." THAT is liberty, THAT is how decent, freedom-loving people think.

NOT "lets create some protected classes of people, and punish anyone who says anything that offends the special people."

That doesnt make YOU free if you're one of the protected classes, that just means the bully in the schoolyard happens to like you.




We for a badass over here!
Neo Nazis and Nazis should be locked away and not given a plattform to spread their opinions in a democratic country.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2014-08-22 08:21:17 UTC
Remember the discussions we had when Fon Revedhort was running for CSM?
Yeah, fun times.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#45 - 2014-08-22 08:23:04 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Nowhere in any of my posts did I "advocate the use of slurs," that's another straw man from you, and a personal attack. You have slandered me.

I'm seeing a lot more defense of their behavior from you than condemnation.


I haven't defended his behavior, I have defended his right to be a douchebag, and decried anyone's perceived "right" to not be offended.
Quote:

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
They need a reality adjustment if they think they have a right to silence those who offend then, even if tthose people ARE douchebags.

Nobody is trying to silence anyone.


But it's ok to use out and out profanity and state that you wont remove it unless the person who offended you changes their post. I'm not seeing the difference.

Quote:
Why is this your defense?


It's not a defense, it's a statement of fact, correcting your stated assumption that "some people have endured more reality than I have. Stop with the logical fallacies.

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2014-08-22 08:23:12 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat stop trying to turn this into a discussion on freedom of speech. It was never about that. Nobody is saying you're not free to walk about spouting ****** this and ****** that. We're just pointing out that your speech, like it or not, can have an emotionally deleterious effect on people.


Oh. Thought I saw a post containing profanity somewhere and the poster saying they would only change it if the threads OP edited his post.

Profanity generally isn't used as a directed attack on someone's personhood.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2014-08-22 08:23:26 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat stop trying to turn this into a discussion on freedom of speech. It was never about that. Nobody is saying you're not free to walk about spouting ****** this and ****** that. We're just pointing out that your speech, like it or not, can have an emotionally deleterious effect on people.


Oh. Thought I saw a post containing profanity somewhere and the poster saying they would only change it if the threads OP edited his post.



I see what you're doing. I see it.


I'm eating some baby carrots right now and I'll be happy to share them with you.

But getting pulled into this discussion in happythread isn't going to happen. You know where my email is if you're really jonesing for a wall of text. There are many who can attest to my ability to deliver close to the 10,000 character limit on seemingly trivial and meaningless email debates.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#48 - 2014-08-22 08:25:42 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Remember the discussions we had when Fon Revedhort was running for CSM?
Yeah, fun times.


So now youre trying to sneak in an implication that I'm a neo-Nazi as a personal attack because you have nothing but logical fallacies to spout. Incidentally, that one is called an ad hominem attack. Should I link the Handbook of Logical Fallacies for you?

You win, right!


\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2014-08-22 08:25:44 UTC
On the subject of free speech...

You can say whatever you want to say. That's your right. It is also the right of those that hear what you say to criticise your speech, because they have free speech as well. So if you say something dickish, then you can bet your bottom dollar that someone is going to criticise you for it, because they have a right to. (The one that I'll respond to personally is when people call other people "autistic" because they do something bad - all it does is perpetuate negative connotations about autism and it makes you a complete **** if you do it).

If you want to cry "BUT FREE SPEECH!!" after someone has criticised what you've said, just remember, you've already said it. You've had your ******* free speech, and now it's someone else's turn to have theirs as well. If you support free speech, then you won't be a **** and try to deny the free speech of those that would criticise what you choose to do with it.

Freedom, in a society where we all depend on one another whether we realise it or not, comes with responsibility, especially social responsibility.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#50 - 2014-08-22 08:26:32 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat stop trying to turn this into a discussion on freedom of speech. It was never about that. Nobody is saying you're not free to walk about spouting ****** this and ****** that. We're just pointing out that your speech, like it or not, can have an emotionally deleterious effect on people.


Oh. Thought I saw a post containing profanity somewhere and the poster saying they would only change it if the threads OP edited his post.

Profanity generally isn't used as a directed attack on someone's personhood.


What if profanity offends me?

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#51 - 2014-08-22 08:28:11 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
I haven't defended his behavior, I have defended his right to be a douchebag, and decried anyone's perceived "right" to not be offended.

I apologize then for mischaracterizing you. Still, nobody has said that he doesn't have the right to be a douchebag, merely that he shouldn't be a douchebag.

There are lots of things you have the right to do and yet sometimes people need to be reminded not to do them because they're still ****** things to do.

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
But it's ok to use out and out profanity and state that you wont remove it unless the person who offended you changes their post. I'm not seeing the difference.

I don't see how that's alike censorship at all. If you're arguing that I have a right to use slur words, then for the sake of consistency you should be arguing that I have a right to use profanity in opposition.

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
It's not a defense, it's a statement of fact, correcting your stated assumption that "some people have endured more reality than I have. Stop with the logical fallacies.

Maybe they have though. You don't know that.

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
What if profanity offends me?

You can complain about that too, but you'll have a harder time demonstrating emotional harm from profanity than from slurs.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#52 - 2014-08-22 08:28:33 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:

What if profanity offends me?


Devil's advocate spotted.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Foodpimp
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2014-08-22 08:29:12 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Remember the discussions we had when Fon Revedhort was running for CSM?
Yeah, fun times.


So now youre trying to sneak in an implication that I'm a neo-**** as a personal attack because you have nothing but logical fallacies to spout. Incidentally, that one is called an ad hominem attack. Should I link the Handbook of Logical Fallacies for you?

You win, right!




You do realize that saying "logical fallacy" on the internet is just about the douchiest, e-hippster thing you can do...right? All you're missing are a few sprinklings of "false flag" and "oligarcy", and you'll have achieved full on derp status.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2014-08-22 08:29:45 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat stop trying to turn this into a discussion on freedom of speech. It was never about that. Nobody is saying you're not free to walk about spouting ****** this and ****** that. We're just pointing out that your speech, like it or not, can have an emotionally deleterious effect on people.


Oh. Thought I saw a post containing profanity somewhere and the poster saying they would only change it if the threads OP edited his post.

Profanity generally isn't used as a directed attack on someone's personhood.


What if profanity offends me?



In a society of free speech, you do not have the right to not be offended, by virtue of such a right restricting free speech.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#55 - 2014-08-22 08:30:53 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
On the subject of free speech...

You can say whatever you want to say. That's your right. It is also the right of those that hear what you say to criticise your speech, because they have free speech as well. So if you say something dickish, then you can bet your bottom dollar that someone is going to criticise you for it, because they have a right to. (The one that I'll respond to personally is when people call other people "autistic" because they do something bad - all it does is perpetuate negative connotations about autism and it makes you a complete **** if you do it).


I agree 100% +1

Quote:
If you want to cry "BUT FREE SPEECH!!" after someone has criticised what you've said, just remember, you've already said it. You've had your ******* free speech, and now it's someone else's turn to have theirs as well. If you support free speech, then you won't be a **** and try to deny the free speech of those that would criticise what you choose to do with it.


I dont try to deny the free speech of those who wanna call a douchebag a douchebag, for that matter, I think you have the right to call anyone a douchebag, even a "nice person." But where I see a line drawn is where one of the posters implied approval of "hate criime" laws like they have in Germany, where exercising one's birthright of the freedom to speak ones mind can result in imprisonment. In this day and age! Now THAT is where even I get offended.

Quote:
Freedom, in a society where we all depend on one another whether we realise it or not, comes with responsibility, especially social responsibility.


You were born free. You were not born with the "original sin" of signing some illusory "social contract."

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#56 - 2014-08-22 08:31:18 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Remember the discussions we had when Fon Revedhort was running for CSM?
Yeah, fun times.


So now youre trying to sneak in an implication that I'm a neo-**** as a personal attack because you have nothing but logical fallacies to spout. Incidentally, that one is called an ad hominem attack. Should I link the Handbook of Logical Fallacies for you?

You win, right!



I'm not alleging that you're a Fon Revedhort. I'm saying that this discussion reminds me of the discussions surrounding his views and speech. A lot of the arguments you're making were used in defense of his candidacy.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#57 - 2014-08-22 08:31:44 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Ssabat stop trying to turn this into a discussion on freedom of speech. It was never about that. Nobody is saying you're not free to walk about spouting ****** this and ****** that. We're just pointing out that your speech, like it or not, can have an emotionally deleterious effect on people.


Oh. Thought I saw a post containing profanity somewhere and the poster saying they would only change it if the threads OP edited his post.

Profanity generally isn't used as a directed attack on someone's personhood.


What if profanity offends me?



In a society of free speech, you do not have the right to not be offended, by virtue of such a right restricting free speech.


EXACTLY

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2014-08-22 08:33:13 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:


In a society of free speech, you do not have the right to not be offended, by virtue of such a right restricting free speech.


EXACTLY

Exactly what I said. Did you miss it?

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2014-08-22 08:33:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:


EXACTLY


That being said, remember the spiel I posted earlier?

If someone finds something you've said offensive, they've got as much right to be offensive right on back at ya. And if you're just posting for the sake of being offensive, well... these forums are privately owned, and you use them under specific terms and conditions. One of them is that you forfeit your right to free speech in order to follow the rules of the forums. In which case, if this thread gets locked, which it probably will, you still can't cry "BUT MAI FREE SPEECH!!!" because it doesn't apply here.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#60 - 2014-08-22 08:33:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaarous Aldurald
If "take it to PMs" was ever appropriate, it's here.

You're both being idiots.

On the one hand, don't swear and rant like that guy did on forums, it's liable to get your thread locked, and it's pointless besides.

On the other hand, no single individual's "personhood" should be so wrapped up in one single characteristic that their life falls apart hearing anything against it.

Everyone can swear. Unless there's children around, no one should care. If any adult is genuinely so fragile that they can't shrug off an unkind word, then they sincerely belong in a mental institution.

Now both of you shut the hell up.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.