These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CODE. disqualified from AT XII

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
TharOkha
0asis Group
#41 - 2014-08-22 07:51:37 UTC  |  Edited by: TharOkha
LOL

First, they have made a rookie killing contest from which everybody laughs at

now they chicken-run from AT..... Big smileBig smileBig smile

Way to go CODE. ... Lol

Such laughtable reputation is bad even in harsh EVE

CODE. Venture hunt contest in a nutshell
Anal Canal
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#42 - 2014-08-22 08:08:52 UTC
The alliance gets the initial entry fee/deposit back I would assume since we are no longer allowed to participate within said tournament. Most lottos/drawings/bingo/what-have-yous that end with the results being null & void return the initial ante to the players involved.

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate
Anal Canal
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#43 - 2014-08-22 08:10:10 UTC
TharOkha wrote:
LOL

First, they have made a rookie killing contest from which everybody laughs at

now they chicken-run from AT..... Big smileBig smileBig smile

Way to go CODE. ... Lol

Such laughtable reputation is bad even in harsh EVE



You are still upset since your Venture didn't popped. Don't worry, I have 2 people as of last count over 200. (I could have only wished right now to use 9000s.... because.)

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate
Black Pedro
Mine.
#44 - 2014-08-22 08:11:42 UTC
So CODE. is getting not only banned, but permabanned from the tournament for forfeiting a single match, something that literally dozens of teams have done before with no penalty?

http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/08/codedot-tournament-team-makes-history.html

Seems disproportionate, no?

The 8 Golden Rules of Eve

Why Do They Gank?
Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#45 - 2014-08-22 08:11:48 UTC
Cheating: DQ, show up next year

No-show: Permaban

Proof that even CCP fears our power.

Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com

Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,  live it, breathe it!
Adrie Atticus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#46 - 2014-08-22 08:24:41 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
So CODE. is getting not only banned, but permabanned from the tournament for forfeiting a single match, something that literally dozens of teams have done before with no penalty?

http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/08/codedot-tournament-team-makes-history.html

Seems disproportionate, no?


The butthurt, it's glorious.

Best part of this is the inability of CODE. to understand what the difference is between "tell CCP 30 mins before start that we forfeit" and "log off at match start without a word".
8 EyedSpy
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2014-08-22 08:31:17 UTC
Adrie Atticus wrote:


The butthurt, it's glorious.

Best part of this is the inability of CODE. to understand what the difference is between "tell CCP 30 mins before start that we forfeit" and "log off at match start without a word".


Maybe you should read the rest of the article.

"As a matter of fact, many teams have forfeited by failing to show up for the Alliance Tournament. Like, a lot. It has been happening literally since day one. After the first day of the very first Alliance Tournament, all the way back in 2005, CCP announced:"
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#48 - 2014-08-22 08:48:01 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Styledatol wrote:
Somehow I have a feeling this won't bother CODE. too much.


It does!

You can see a heavy shitstorm blowing on them on their page.

The comparison to other forfeiters is, that the didn't even talked to CCP about what happend and just stayed hidden. The AT is a serious E-Sport Event. It is not a Kindergarden play for some Wannabees and their delusions. Even without being paid something this is reason enough to throw them out of this AT. Considering what they tried to pull in the forums and on their blog, expanding it to a permabann is logical. Since there is Sponsorship. there is serious Buisiness.

Rabe Raptor wrote:
Cheating: DQ, show up next year

No-show: Permaban

Proof that even CCP fears our power.


Nobody fears the code anymore.
With this the whole alliance is the official Joke of EvE.
Killing 3 day old newbies and brag about it!
sigh before a code whines "proof"

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
Echo Belly
#49 - 2014-08-22 08:48:20 UTC
Jerry Rin wrote:
CCP Gargant wrote:
Greetings everyone!

Keeping everything crystal clear, I wanted to open a topic on this subject.

CODE. did not show up for their scheduled match against Red vs. Blue nor did they make any attempt to inform the tournament organizers of their status. We have decided to interpret their actions as a sign of resignation from the tournament. As such they have been disqualified from Alliance Tournament XII and CODE. will not be able to enter future Alliance Tournaments.

Circle-Of-Two will thus get a bye in their scheduled match against CODE. on Sunday the 24th and all subsequent matches that day will happen 20 minutes earlier than initially scheduled.

Please keep discussions about this topic in this thread.

Thanks!


So does this mean you're changing your name to "CCP Upset"?

"CCP Butthurt" would be more appropriate.

It's so embarrassing to see people in charge at CCP overreacting like this...
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#50 - 2014-08-22 08:54:49 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
loyalanon wrote:


CCP Tears - Best Tears


I do not see any tears.
Another codie-delusion.

loyalanon wrote:

Do you want to buy a mining permit to ensure your safety in high sec?


Why should i?
I can shoot back.
LOL
Big smile
(you remember, if someone can shoot back like in the AT you run and hide proof )
Cool

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
Black Pedro
Mine.
#51 - 2014-08-22 09:17:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Black Pedro
Adrie Atticus wrote:
Black Pedro wrote:
So CODE. is getting not only banned, but permabanned from the tournament for forfeiting a single match, something that literally dozens of teams have done before with no penalty?

http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/08/codedot-tournament-team-makes-history.html

Seems disproportionate, no?


The butthurt, it's glorious.


I don't know. From a distance, this "glorious butthurt" seems present only in the posters in this forum frothing to have every punishment imaginable levied against the whole CODE. alliance, and CCP Gargant in the heavy-handed punishment for the most minor of infractions. For the most part, CODE. itself doesn't seem to care. So little in fact, they didn't bother to show up.

I guess this lack of caring is what really rankles the AT = elite E-Sport crowd (see: La Rynx below) and perhaps CCP. But it seems that most of the tears here are of the regular run-of-the-mill anti-New Order variety, flowing as the result of a rather unremarkable forfeit among many in the history of the Alliance Tournament.

La Rynx wrote:

The AT is a serious E-Sport Event. It is not a Kindergarden play for some Wannabees and their delusions. Even without being paid something this is reason enough to throw them out of this AT. Considering what they tried to pull in the forums and on their blog, expanding it to a permabann is logical. Since there is Sponsorship. there is serious Buisiness.

The 8 Golden Rules of Eve

Why Do They Gank?
Coffee Rocks
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#52 - 2014-08-22 09:26:49 UTC
La Rynx wrote:


The AT is a serious E-Sport Event. It is not a Kindergarden play for some Wannabees and their delusions. Even without being paid something this is reason enough to throw them out of this AT. Considering what they tried to pull in the forums and on their blog, expanding it to a permabann is logical. Since there is Sponsorship. there is serious Buisiness.



CODE members have a history (albeit a short history in the long history of EVE) of falling somewhere in the camp of "actually trying to disrupt the gameplay of others" and confusing it as a form of RP. A few are very aware of what they are doing and just enjoy the attempts at circumventing EULA and TOS.

When punishment looms, or is handed down, they then get their jollies trying to either a) act like punishment was the intended goal all along, or b) they are victims of CCP "violating their rights unfairly".

There are a few among the group that I'm amazed actually spout off "b" and really do think this. Roll

It's amazing that anyone gets their kicks trying to destroy the gameplay of others - even here in EVE. Driving players away from this game is not smart on any level. Hell, to that, it's even more amazing to me that CCP doesn't just bring the hammer down on the whole BS with more regularity.

You never fly alone - Broadcast 4 Reps | Twitter: @thecoffeerocks | Steam: CoffeeRocks
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#53 - 2014-08-22 09:28:33 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Black Pedro wrote:
But it seems that most of the tears here are of the regular run-of-the-mill anti-New Order variety, flowing as the result of a rather unremarkable forfeit among many in the history of the Alliance Tournament.


The difference is, that the other forfeiters entered a discussion with CCP. CODE. did not. Thats the reason why i call it kindergarden style. The whole code actions turned out to be childrens play when they first told ppl that they would fight and show their strength to every one and then not even appear to the fight. Giving every one interested or not a lot of excuses what they did and why they won, even claiming to be manipulating the AT or suggest they did gave up because of some freighter gank.

Permaban harsh?
It could have been very very easily avoided just by talking to CCP.
CODE. didnt.
CCP gives permaban, because suddenly noone from CODE. feels responsible.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#54 - 2014-08-22 09:29:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolai Serkanner
Gadon Longstar wrote:
TLDR:

ran off the same way a lowly AFK miner would.



How can you run off if you are not there?
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#55 - 2014-08-22 09:32:22 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Black Pedro wrote:
But it seems that most of the tears here are of the regular run-of-the-mill anti-New Order variety


Those are just codie-delusions.
There are no tears for codies anymore, only sardonic laughter about a group of PvP waanabees.

The laughter is always on the loser.
And i don't need to clarify, but just so:
Code lost.
Big Time

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."
Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#56 - 2014-08-22 09:33:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Rabe Raptor
La Rynx wrote:

(you remember, if someone can shoot back like in the AT you run and hide proof )
Cool


You're dumb.. lol. Proof You can always check the KB for all the stuff with guns we kill. Lowsec or highsec it makes no difference.

Failtroll is fail. Sort of funny but fail. 3/10

Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com

Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,  live it, breathe it!
Coffee Rocks
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#57 - 2014-08-22 09:33:40 UTC
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
Gadon Longstar wrote:
TLDR:

ran off the same way a lowly AFK miner would.



How can you ran off if you are not there?


Ooh, hi Nicolai o/ o/ o/ o/

We could totally take this to the subreddit and light a drama cyno!!

You know how much fun I have with this type of topic Big smile

You never fly alone - Broadcast 4 Reps | Twitter: @thecoffeerocks | Steam: CoffeeRocks
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#58 - 2014-08-22 09:38:26 UTC
Coffee Rocks wrote:
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
Gadon Longstar wrote:
TLDR:

ran off the same way a lowly AFK miner would.



How can you ran off if you are not there?


Ooh, hi Nicolai o/ o/ o/ o/

We could totally take this to the subreddit and light a drama cyno!!

You know how much fun I have with this type of topic Big smile


7o, We surely could.

I am not much into the whole CODE. drama really. I find it entertaining to follow both sides of the "argument" and the mudslinging going back and forth. It is all really not worth losing sleep over.
8 EyedSpy
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2014-08-22 09:58:27 UTC
Coffee Rocks wrote:
b) they are victims of CCP "violating their rights unfairly".


CCP has the right to do whatever they want but when one group is harshly punished for something and others are not it strikes me as pretty unfair.
Dheeradj Nurgle
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#60 - 2014-08-22 10:09:38 UTC
Should have buffed the tank on ORE Ships as a bigger F You.