These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP please lock

Author
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#41 - 2014-08-18 21:28:57 UTC
HerrBert wrote:
OKAY! EVERYBODY ... gimme a minute...


WHAT THE ACTUAL ****!


But before I start:

Mihzir: YES they have ... dont mind the people leaving wormholes space. Its all shiny. (Although Grass aint greener just different color of BMs)

Poopicus Butts welcome to the Wormhole subforum, where 5 years of surpressed rage are getting given around from generation to generation

Ayeson: Still the love of my life



AAAAAAAAAAANYWAY. Yaaddi yaadddi yaadddii you know what fudge it...

I just want to kill Moms with you guys for the lols. Sign me up.



OH HAI FUNNY TO SEE YOU HERE NEVER EXPECTED THAT YOU'D MAKE AN APPEARANCE IN THIS THREAD

I think the funnier bit of this will be seeing WHers grind out sites in order to make the mom site appear, **** will go sooooooooo slow depending on how many people show up.

I am accepting all bets on how long people think this will be kept up for. I have money on like a week.

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2014-08-18 21:30:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Tbh Fozzie was pretty clear that CCP don't want to design by committee and unless you get "burn Jita" numbers, that isn't going to change. What you should do is prove that your biggest fears have merit... Form a coalition and wipeout everyone else Twisted

Only time will tell if these changes are good or not and instead of any premature overreactions, I wish people would band together for a better cause, like wormholes finally getting a true expansion.
Hatshepsut IV
Un.Reasonable
#43 - 2014-08-18 21:34:15 UTC
I'll bring erections..... Err wait t3s. Erections come after the tears.

Public Channel | Un.Welcome

xpaulx
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#44 - 2014-08-18 21:41:47 UTC
I support this.
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#45 - 2014-08-18 21:50:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Phoenix Jones
This isn't a bad test actually. Think of it like this.

CCP just proposed a bad change. We hate it.

Now people know what they have to do... but will they?

So if the wormhole "collective" fail this fight, you basically give CCP carte blanche to do whatever the hell they want to do with T3's.

You do realize that this change sucks, but if you don't want to effect change, T3's will be trashed beyond compare because the wormhole community won't "fight hard enough".

With all of that theory crafting said.....

There is a point where a protest hits a boiling point. This is nowhere near there yet.

Will it happen? Eventually, when someone rises from the ashes and says "That's enough" and brings people together for the future of Wormhole Spaceship games.

Griefing a part of the game won't **** people off enough, as that's pretty much just emergent gameplay and what CCP wants.

"No need to deal with Incursions now, the wormhole people are griefing them. Isk balance achieved."

Have fun, but you need a better plan (or an organized strategy, either work)

Yaay!!!!

epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#46 - 2014-08-18 21:54:05 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Rek Seven wrote:
Tbh Fozzie was pretty clear that CCP don't want to design by committee and unless you get "burn Jita" numbers, that isn't going to change. What you should do is prove that your biggest fears have merit... Form a coalition and wipeout everyone else Twisted

Only time will tell if these changes are good or not and instead of any premature overreactions, I wish people would band together for a better cause, like wormholes finally getting a true expansion.


There is a big difference between design by committee, and being herded onto the train like cattle.

The core issue is that the game with this, takes one more step, to where it does not matter what we do. The decision has been reached, where introducing random luck, steps beyond, a simple programming trick that makes things easy to code, and doesn't need any rules behind it calculating the mechanics. And takes the giant leap to the point, where a players efforts are just as reliable, and important, and consistent as the loot fairy!

Why should one even bother to log in if you are just playing Russian roulette.

Today, this new design philosophy is coming to wormholes, tomorrow to you.

So there we are, will people fight to ensure they have a reason to play? Who knows.

If the mass change only included making the caps jump further, and the other ships following, be dragged to the same spot, we would have possibly still have disliked it, but we could see how things panned out, but that was not what we got at all.
Instead we got everything scattered across a sphere of space, and whether an individual lives or dies is 100% down to luck.

They are fighting for the concept that what we do in EVE has effects on EVE, it has persistence,and your efforts have direct and indirect consequences, your skill training and tactics and those of your opponent determine the result, THAT is what makes EVE unique, and without that it is a pale imposter, living off the spoils of those that created it. EVE was never based on success or failure through luck.

Hilmar loves his speech about when he lost his thorax, and he was so angry with himself when due to his mistake he lost it, and he says that it was then, he discovered that Eve was real, and Losses mattered. EvE was truly born that day.

If it happened after Hyperion, well meh it's just bad luck, "nothing I could have done", and press the Dev button for a new one, because It would no longer matter.

It seems that this has been forgotten, by the custodians of EVE, the Giants that preceded them are long gone, and the Game is now about pay packets and the occasional good party. It has lasted this long, why should in not last another ten or twenty years?

The question is, that when you surrender and squander, the single item that truly separates EVE from all the pretenders, it just becomes just another game, Pretending to be EVE, and missing the core reason for all it's successes.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Official Diplomat
Forgotten Godz
#47 - 2014-08-18 21:55:05 UTC
Confirming
Teleri Nova
Apex Force
#48 - 2014-08-18 21:58:07 UTC
A big shout out to CCP Fozzie for not only dunking WH bears, but trolling incursion bears by proxy.

Couldn't have been planned better, not even at the BBQ.

The actual WH changes are fantastic, they make WH's what they were always meant to be: dangerous.
Tzar Sinak
Mythic Heights
#49 - 2014-08-18 21:59:03 UTC
Interestingly a lot of people think they speak on behalf of the entire WH community. They don't. Such arrogance. I like all the changes because they are changes! WHs have been conquered. Time to shake thing up; time to develop new tactics; to create new methods; to see big and small fights; time to see shiny KMs. Once that has been done and everyone has settled in again, I hope CCP shakes the house again!

In the meantime I really like the sounds of the campaign. When do we start?

Hydrostatic Podcast First class listening of all things EVE

Check out the Eve-Prosper show for your market updates!

Iudicium Vastus
Doomheim
#50 - 2014-08-18 22:01:25 UTC
People sure love throwing around HTFU and 'Adapt or die', until it hits something they like.

[u]Nerf stabs/cloaks in FW?[/u] No, just.. -Fit more points -Fit faction points -Bring a friend or two with points (an alt is fine too)

Ab'del Abu
Atlantis Ascendant
#51 - 2014-08-18 22:02:03 UTC
Teleri Nova wrote:
A big shout out to CCP Fozzie for not only dunking WH bears, but trolling incursion bears by proxy.

Couldn't have been planned better, not even at the BBQ.

The actual WH changes are fantastic, they make WH's what they were always meant to be: dangerous.


0/10

If you haven't noticed, it's the big pvp groups (those dunking you null bears on a daily basis) that are most vocal about this change.
Amber Yamato
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#52 - 2014-08-18 22:03:53 UTC
Keith Planck wrote:

In response all of the major wormhole entities and many of the minor ones are banding together in protest.


Good to know that SSC isn't major anymore. :P
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#53 - 2014-08-18 22:05:52 UTC
I owned my own WH for 3 years (fending off squatters and 'evicters' here and there) and I always thought that rolling holes was too easy (even though I derped and lost an orca or two by being too complacent or yolo.)

I like the distance-from-hole change. Those who don't like it should propose an alternative (and the status quo doesn't cut it as an alternative imo.) I don't think the new 'impossible-to-collapse' hole is fair and I'd be pretty teed off about it if I still lived in WH space.

I don't see the point of popping Incursion MOMs, especially since they'll be popping left and right with the new shorter respawn timer, but whatever floats your boat, I guess.
Joran Jackson
The Red Circle Inc.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
#54 - 2014-08-18 22:09:02 UTC
Amber Yamato wrote:
Keith Planck wrote:

In response all of the major wormhole entities and many of the minor ones are banding together in protest.


Good to know that SSC isn't major anymore. :P


This is just amazing.

You read this thread and you start to understand slightly why there are people who still think the world is flat.
HerrBert
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#55 - 2014-08-18 22:10:51 UTC  |  Edited by: HerrBert
Phoenix Jones wrote:
This isn't a bad test actually. Think of it like this.

CCP just proposed a bad change. We hate it.

Now people know what they have to do... but will they?

So if the wormhole "collective" fail this fight, you basically give CCP carte blanche to do whatever the hell they want to do with T3's.

You do realize that this change sucks, but if you don't want to effect change, T3's will be trashed beyond compare because the wormhole community won't "fight hard enough".

With all of that theory crafting said.....

There is a point where a protest hits a boiling point. This is nowhere near there yet.

Will it happen? Eventually, when someone rises from the ashes and says "That's enough" and brings people together for the future of Wormhole Spaceship games.

Griefing a part of the game won't **** people off enough, as that's pretty much just emergent gameplay and what CCP wants.

"No need to deal with Incursions now, the wormhole people are griefing them. Isk balance achieved."

Have fun, but you need a better plan (or an organized strategy, either work)



HOW DARE YOU BRING REASON AND LOGIC INTO THIS REALM! BEGONE I SAY!

Edit: Hey Jester, hows the weather?

Community-Challenge: Make Jack Miton sing a Duett with me. http://www.youtube.com/user/HerrBertism Jibbychiggawooooow - CSM 9 Corbexx

Eveli
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#56 - 2014-08-18 22:17:32 UTC
Oh no, you poor people, your safe wormhole rolling will be gone!!

Follow me on the Twitters : @ThisIsEveli

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2014-08-18 22:18:18 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

There is a big difference between design by committee, and being herded onto the train like cattle.


CCP say they want to make it harder for people to roll and close themselves off and some of the community are demanding that they go back on that plan.

I just think it would be better if we give it a month to see how things work out. If it turns out people were right, you will get more people to take parts and CCP might take you seriously because you at least tried to live with the changes.
Official Diplomat
Forgotten Godz
#58 - 2014-08-18 22:22:16 UTC
Vote Official Diplomat for CSM 2015 and I will promise to make WH fun for all parties involved.
Jess Tanner
Bangworks Systems Inc.
#59 - 2014-08-18 22:27:15 UTC
Please god run next year...
Official Diplomat wrote:
Vote Official Diplomat for CSM 2015 and I will promise to make WH fun for all parties involved.

epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#60 - 2014-08-18 22:28:36 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

There is a big difference between design by committee, and being herded onto the train like cattle.


CCP say they want to make it harder for people to roll and close themselves off and some of the community are demanding that they go back on that plan.

I just think it would be better if we give it a month to see how things work out. If it turns out people were right, you will get more people to take parts and CCP might take you seriously because you at least tried to live with the changes.



Just get off the train and go into that room with the funny smell and the whirling knives and tell me how it is after a month, we can discuss it over a nice steak dinner.What?

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE