These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 
Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#101 - 2014-08-18 09:27:14 UTC
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
Well, pay me $1 of RL money and I will contract you 1 PLEX for free. But if you would like I could buy that PLEX back from you at Jita price + 10%. No problem here I guess...


The difference is authorisation. Have you got CCP's authorisation to do that? If not, then no.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ace Boogi
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#102 - 2014-08-18 09:30:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Ace Boogi
This again? I'm sure CCP will get around to addressing the issues at hand,right after they finish preparing that community survey or whatever they promised us last year Twisted
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#103 - 2014-08-18 09:30:54 UTC
Difference is I don't have MD affiliate link for you to use but mechanism is the same. I have RL $1 you get more ISK than you would by selling PLEX on market.

I don't have to be CCP approved PLEX dealer to do it, I just need to apply to affiliate program of any of those approved dealers.

Invalid signature format

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#104 - 2014-08-18 09:32:04 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Posting in another SOMER hate thread that dismisses all the authorised PLEX dealers as RMT'ers and just picks on the one they lost too much of their isk playing.

You did a great job of reading absolutely none of the thread and then making a broad, incorrect generalization about it.


Except that I did read it, and made a correct assessment of the general tone of the thread.

you mean attacking the motivations of the people complaining instead of the complaint? misrepresenting the complaint? that's not an 'assessment', that's fallacious garbage.
Lair Osen
#105 - 2014-08-18 09:33:51 UTC
What if Somer had decided to make the buy price equal to 0.01ISK below the current lowest sell order, would you still classify that as RMT?
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#106 - 2014-08-18 09:36:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Benny Ohu wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Posting in another SOMER hate thread that dismisses all the authorised PLEX dealers as RMT'ers and just picks on the one they lost too much of their isk playing.

You did a great job of reading absolutely none of the thread and then making a broad, incorrect generalization about it.


Except that I did read it, and made a correct assessment of the general tone of the thread.

you mean attacking the motivations of the people complaining instead of the complaint? misrepresenting the complaint? that's not an 'assessment', that's fallacious garbage.


Again, I understand it just fine, and it's no different from any other witch hunt I've been privy to. Fallacious garbage? Can you say "irony"? Because you just described the entire thread. Which I did read and assess correctly, and that includes examining Somer's Blink Credit page.

This is "Grr Somer". That's all this is.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

handige harrie
Vereenigde Handels Compagnie
#107 - 2014-08-18 09:39:41 UTC
Lair Osen wrote:
What if Somer had decided to make the buy price equal to 0.01ISK below the current lowest sell order, would you still classify that as RMT?



Yes, the only way not to make RMT is to cut out the buying back of plex out of game:

Use a somer affiliate link, get plex ingame, sell plex on ingame market, get money, transfer money to your somer account.


How it is setup now is just a cheap way to RMT the isk blink makes.

Baddest poster ever

Guttripper
State War Academy
Caldari State
#108 - 2014-08-18 09:45:23 UTC
Who is the greater evil in this case - Somer or CCP?
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#109 - 2014-08-18 09:48:06 UTC
Guttripper wrote:
...evil...


See? Witch hunt. Nothing but overreacting, sensationalising, and fist pumping. If you're going to jump to conclusions before CCP says anything on the matter, and assume "guilty" via trial by personal emotions, you're barely even worth the contempt I have for this kind of behaviour.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Lair Osen
#110 - 2014-08-18 09:48:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Lair Osen
handige harrie wrote:
Lair Osen wrote:
What if Somer had decided to make the buy price equal to 0.01ISK below the current lowest sell order, would you still classify that as RMT?



Yes, the only way not to make RMT is to cut out the buying back of plex out of game:

Use a somer affiliate link, get plex ingame, sell plex on ingame market, get money, transfer money to your somer account.


How it is setup now is just a cheap way to RMT the isk blink makes.


Well then we can clearly see that the price of PLEX and the 'RMT'ing is not the issue at all here but the fact that the program is only available to Somer referal users.

So, what you are really unhappy with is that Somer is allowed to provide a service of any kind, even if it is not good, and discriminate the use of the service to it's customers. The RMT element is completely irrelevant.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#111 - 2014-08-18 09:54:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
handige harrie wrote:
Lair Osen wrote:
What if Somer had decided to make the buy price equal to 0.01ISK below the current lowest sell order, would you still classify that as RMT?

Yes, the only way not to make RMT is to cut out the buying back of plex out of game:

Use a somer affiliate link, get plex ingame, sell plex on ingame market, get money, transfer money to your somer account.

How it is setup now is just a cheap way to RMT the isk blink makes.

More generally, the problem is in the “if — and only if — you use this affiliate link (read: if you give us real money) we will give you something in-game” setup of the deal.

The actual value of the stuff given in-game is irrelevant. They could be giving away one trit and it would still be RMT since it's an exchange of out-of-game currency for in-game possessions. The only way for it not to be RMT is if the affiliate-link purchase only has out-of-game benefits. I don't know what that would be in Somer's case… high-priority server connections that responds to clicks faster or something?

If they were to under-price the payout rather than overprice it, it would still be a trade between out-of-game for in-game stuff on top of being a bad deal for the trader. The latter is just a scam, the former is pretty much the definition of RMT.
Guttripper
State War Academy
Caldari State
#112 - 2014-08-18 10:00:05 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Guttripper wrote:
...evil...

... you're barely even worth the contempt I have for this kind of behaviour.


Remiel Pollard wrote:
Patronising and quote mining.... are you a creationist by any chance?

Practice what you preach or you above yourself?
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#113 - 2014-08-18 10:01:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Gully Alex Foyle
EDIT: changed my analysis following clarification on Somer's mechanics. It's not RMT, it's a scam. Lol



'Pure' RMT would be: give me 1$ IRL and I'll give you 50 Million ISK in-game.

This scheme is: give CCP 20$ IRL and I'll give you 50 Million ISK in-game, because CCP will give 1$ IRL to me.


The difference is that CCP is the middleman in the RL cash transfer.

It's not a negligible difference, and if CCP says it's ok then it's ok.


But if CCP says it's ok, then logic would suggest:

1) anybody can do it, not just Somer

2) the PLEX buyback is completely unnecessary, anybody should be free to just give ISK, in-game assets, or both to players that buy PLEX from them


If 1) and 2) don't apply, then yes this is indeed shady.


On a side note, I think all lotteries are stupid and if everybody thought the same, Somer wouldn't even exist. Big smile

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#114 - 2014-08-18 10:03:08 UTC
Guttripper wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Guttripper wrote:
...evil...

... you're barely even worth the contempt I have for this kind of behaviour.


Remiel Pollard wrote:
Patronising and quote mining.... are you a creationist by any chance?

Practice what you preach or you above yourself?


No, I wasn't quote mining. I was pointing out the use of the word. Just using it is overreacting. Genocide is evil. **** is evil. RMT? #Firstworldproblems

Quote mining is quoting a selection out of context. The word you used, evil, WAS the context.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#115 - 2014-08-18 10:07:46 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Again, I understand it just fine,

that's lovely. and i didn't say otherwise.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
and it's no different from any other witch hunt I've been privy to. Fallacious garbage? Can you say "irony"? Because you just described the entire thread. Which I did read and assess correctly, and that includes examining Somer's Blink Credit page.

This is "Grr Somer". That's all this is.

you attacked the motivations of the thread's participants twice and misrepresented the complaint twice before even acknowledging what you believe is a flawed premise, that blink credits can be equated to a real ingame isk value.
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#116 - 2014-08-18 10:13:29 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
a flawed premise, that blink credits can be equated to a real ingame isk value.
I'm honestly unfamiliar with Somer Blink mechanics:

. Don't you need ISK to buy these credits?

. Can't you convert the credits back to ISK? If not, how do you 'win' ISK?

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Steijn
Quay Industries
#117 - 2014-08-18 10:13:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Steijn
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
'Pure' RMT would be: give me 1$ IRL and I'll give you 50 Million ISK in-game.

This scheme is: give CCP 20$ IRL and I'll give you 50 Million ISK in-game, because CCP will give 1$ IRL to me.


The difference is that CCP is the middleman in the RL cash transfer.

It's not a negligible difference, and if CCP says it's ok then it's ok.


But if CCP says it's ok, then logic would suggest:

1) anybody can do it, not just Somer

2) the PLEX buyback is completely unnecessary, anybody should be free to just give ISK, in-game assets, or both to players that buy PLEX from them


If 1) and 2) don't apply, then yes this is indeed shady.


On a side note, I think all lotteries are stupid and if everybody thought the same, Somer wouldn't even exist. Big smile


its not the lottery thats shady/stupid, its the connection between the lottery and CCP that is shady.
Victor Andall
#118 - 2014-08-18 10:15:36 UTC
The funniest part about this thread is the part where none of this **** matters.

I just undocked for the first time and someone challenged me to a duel. Wat do?

19.08.2014 - Dinsdale gets slammed by CCP Falcon. Never forget.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#119 - 2014-08-18 10:16:40 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Again, I understand it just fine,

that's lovely. and i didn't say otherwise.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
and it's no different from any other witch hunt I've been privy to. Fallacious garbage? Can you say "irony"? Because you just described the entire thread. Which I did read and assess correctly, and that includes examining Somer's Blink Credit page.

This is "Grr Somer". That's all this is.

you attacked the motivations of the thread's participants twice and misrepresented the complaint twice before even acknowledging what you believe is a flawed premise, that blink credits can be equated to a real ingame isk value.


I gave the thread and its sensationalist posters the acknowledgement they deserved. I don't need to explain myself to you though. Who are you that I do?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Arec Bardwin
#120 - 2014-08-18 10:25:06 UTC
On another note, why is Markee the only entity that is allowed to offer 30 day trial accounts?