These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Wormhole town hall 16th August 22.00 UTC

First post First post
Author
Jess Tanner
Bangworks Systems Inc.
#41 - 2014-08-12 00:42:27 UTC
MaxDEL
Quantum Explosion
#42 - 2014-08-12 04:55:59 UTC  |  Edited by: MaxDEL
+100500 😉
Our alliances also discuss the resumption of the statistics API
Hatshepsut IV
Un.Reasonable
#43 - 2014-08-12 05:20:01 UTC
I will miss this due to work but look forward to listening afterwards.


Also.........


Corbexx via Fozzie and crew

Is there any chance for curiosity sake to see numbers for amount of wormholes generated and killed less then an hour after spawning in an average day? Is that even something you guys track backend wise?

Public Channel | Un.Welcome

Nelly Uanos
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#44 - 2014-08-12 06:27:21 UTC
Will try to be there... If I remember about it... happen to have a Alliance tournament right before it so chance i'll forget is VERY HIGH! P
Seraph Essael
Anomalous Existence
Spatial Instability
#45 - 2014-08-12 07:03:14 UTC
2300 hours UK time so I will attempt to be there.

Will go round my alliance and ask if anyone wants anything brought to the attention of anyone / air their thoughts.

Quoted from Doc Fury: "Concerned citizens: Doc seldom plays EVE on the weekends during spring and summer, so you will always be on your own for a couple days a week. Doc spends that time collecting kittens for the on-going sacrifices, engaging in reckless outdoor activities, and speaking in the 3rd person."

Pashko Morgan
0ffline Corporation
#46 - 2014-08-12 15:47:26 UTC
Great idea Corbexx.
I'll try not to fall asleep and attend there.
o/
corbexx
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#47 - 2014-08-12 16:21:20 UTC
Hatshepsut IV wrote:

Corbexx via Fozzie and crew

Is there any chance for curiosity sake to see numbers for amount of wormholes generated and killed less then an hour after spawning in an average day? Is that even something you guys track backend wise?


good ******* question i will ask.
progodlegend
Syndicate Enterprise
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#48 - 2014-08-12 16:26:56 UTC
I should be able to attend to help with mediating and to lend a theorycrafting hand.

I know I'm not the CSM wormhole rep, but I'm a 2nd year CSMer who's been locking horns with CCP on changes like this for over a year now, so I'll pitch in where I can and help guide the conversation towards constructive feed back if need be.
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#49 - 2014-08-12 17:28:55 UTC
progodlegend wrote:
to help with mediating


My airhorn soundboard is ready

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Lamhoofd Hashur
Ehefkae
#50 - 2014-08-12 19:21:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Lamhoofd Hashur
Since I'm not sure whether our server host will be happy with me posting the TS details in public: In case anybody wants to come but does not have SSC's Joint Teamspeak details, do not hesitate to contact us to acquire them. Corbexx and most (bigger) w-space corps will also be able to help you out Blink.
Tiger Tesla
Patriot Security Services
New Signature
#51 - 2014-08-12 20:15:16 UTC
As the CEO of a C4 wolf-rayet corp, it is my duty to attend this. While all of wormhole space is affected by these changes, it is hard to think of a class/effect wormhole that is more affected. With the addition of a static, as well as the drastic increase in small weapon damage, as well as the roaming frigate wormholes, that will have the previously noted damage bonus, there is a lot to consider.

I will be representing my members, many of which I have lived with in a C4 for well over a year.
Winthorp
#52 - 2014-08-12 20:59:35 UTC
progodlegend wrote:
I should be able to attend to help with mediating and to lend a theorycrafting hand.

I know I'm not the CSM wormhole rep, but I'm a 2nd year CSMer who's been locking horns with CCP on changes like this for over a year now, so I'll pitch in where I can and help guide the conversation towards constructive feed back if need be.


Sure invite the most bipola null FC to come along....

I hope people ignore you like they do your jabber fleet pings. I do hope if you attend you are normal for once and do not end up like the last null CSM that had to be booted from comms the last WH townhall meeting...
JN Jarvis
On Scan
#53 - 2014-08-13 03:20:59 UTC
I'll be there to listen so +1.

BTW would someone teach me how to vote for the next CSM elections, I need to vote for corbexx...
Jack Miton
Perkone
Caldari State
#54 - 2014-08-13 05:15:29 UTC
corbexx wrote:
Hatshepsut IV wrote:

Corbexx via Fozzie and crew
Is there any chance for curiosity sake to see numbers for amount of wormholes generated and killed less then an hour after spawning in an average day? Is that even something you guys track backend wise?

good ******* question i will ask.

whatever the number is, I bet you a million dollars it will drop drastically if the range spawn sh!t goes through...

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

calaretu
Honestly We didnt know
#55 - 2014-08-13 07:23:32 UTC
Corbexx, if possible, could you get a answer from Fozzie if they have considered giving all wormholes a timer to automatically spawn the k162 ? And thus making it harder to isolate a system over an extended period of time?
Axloth Okiah
Ehefkae
#56 - 2014-08-13 08:46:28 UTC
corbexx wrote:
I've been green lit to use SSC's joint TS.
I will be collecting entry fees: 100 mil per WH corp, 150 mil for non-WH corp, a PLEX for NPC alts. Early-bird discounts are available. Book early to avoid disappointment.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#57 - 2014-08-13 09:16:59 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Corbexx, just a suggestion, when anyone quotes isk per hour earned in a WH, can the question be asked, is that rate achieved with using an alt for security scanning or wormhole control? Or is the testing done on the test server and therefore not requiring security.

The reason is that if one is using alts, the rate should take that into account, as alts like minerals for a miner are not free.
And dscanning every few seconds does slow down mission completion time.

And of course, one may be disturbed, which either ends income generation or turns into PVP.

There is also the reality that running sleeper sites, requires time to secure the system, either through wormhole control, or through pos scanning and evaluation, and setting up safe points.

These need to be understood so that when comparing to null income deep in the blue or hisec, they do not appear out of balance.

Only a small part of the time spent in clearing sleeper sites is actually killing sleepers, especially in lower class holes where a response fleet is less likely to be available.

If a balance is decided without these points being taken into account Wormhole space will end up in real terms the lowest paying area in EVE.

Please point this out in the town hall.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Temba Ronin
#58 - 2014-08-13 09:25:15 UTC
progodlegend wrote:
I should be able to attend to help with mediating and to lend a theorycrafting hand.

I know I'm not the CSM wormhole rep, but I'm a 2nd year CSMer who's been locking horns with CCP on changes like this for over a year now, so I'll pitch in where I can and help guide the conversation towards constructive feed back if need be.

Sounds like a great town hall meeting, first some want to have only CEOs and Alliance leaders speak and now we'll also have a CSM member moderating to keep us inline to give what he solely determines is "constructive feed back".

Silly me I imagined a town hall meeting was for all the towns people not just the brass and those who give the politically correct constructive feed back.

I'll try to be there to listen to what you wise and powerful wizards of oz have to say that impacts all us little insignificant subscribers.

No doubt any thing I'd have to say would be ignored because I am no CEO and certainly not politically correct. Just a paying subscriber, because I'd ask why are you parading out this massive nerf for small wh corps giving them potentially "lots more risk" without a corresponding "lots more reward"?

It's not constructive feedback to ask CCP to live up to it's risk vs reward mantra is it?

The Best Ship In EVE Online Is "Friendship", Power To The Players!

Winthorp
#59 - 2014-08-13 09:47:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Winthorp
Temba Ronin wrote:
NPC ALT RAMBLINGS

RAMBLE

RAMBLE



Just another Plex for Ax it seems.
Jez Amatin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2014-08-13 11:00:58 UTC
progodlegend wrote:
I should be able to attend to help with mediating and to lend a theorycrafting hand.

I know I'm not the CSM wormhole rep, but I'm a 2nd year CSMer who's been locking horns with CCP on changes like this for over a year now, so I'll pitch in where I can and help guide the conversation towards constructive feed back if need be.


Request name change to Proboblegend or gtfo. Lol

I know Corbexx has been on it, but I'm kinda more concerned with knowing ccp are actually taking feedback onboard - a lot has been given on forums with little in the way of comments from devs so far... And September is not that far away What?.