These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Maybe Eve isn't dying after all....

First post
Author
Velicitia
XS Tech
#21 - 2014-08-08 15:06:53 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:


(If anyone knows of any jobs that you can do while buck ass naked and drinking beer, I'd appreciate it forever Big smile )


porn star?Cool

well, you'll at least get the buck-ass-naked part of the job ...

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2014-08-08 15:38:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Gallowmere Rorschach
Qalix wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Qalix wrote:
Until EVE has 11 million subscriptions, this is a silly argument.


Popularity =/= quality. Take Justin Bieber for example.

It does, however, equal a gigantic pile of money. Put it this way: WoW can lose 50% of its subscribes, still have 5million or more left, and still have a giant pile of money coming in. If EVE lost 50%, it would lose the critical mass necessary to continue the sandbox. Hell, it's getting close to losing that critical mass now, and it HASNT lost 50%.

So, what exactly is the number of this critical mass of subs, that is required to proceed?

Oh? You don't know, and are just talking out of your ass?

Interesting. Never seen that behavior here before.
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog
B.L.U.E L.A.S.E.R.
#23 - 2014-08-08 15:52:08 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Qalix wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Qalix wrote:
Until EVE has 11 million subscriptions, this is a silly argument.


Popularity =/= quality. Take Justin Bieber for example.

It does, however, equal a gigantic pile of money. Put it this way: WoW can lose 50% of its subscribes, still have 5million or more left, and still have a giant pile of money coming in. If EVE lost 50%, it would lose the critical mass necessary to continue the sandbox. Hell, it's getting close to losing that critical mass now, and it HASNT lost 50%.

So, what exactly is the number of this critical mass of subs, that is required to proceed?

Oh? You don't know, and are just talking out of your ass?

Interesting. Never seen that behavior here before.


Can't deny that WoW is positioned to lose a lot more subs and still remain healthy than EVE is.

And EVE is still the game where the playerbase is easily less than half of the actual subscriber count. Every time someone leaves, the game gets hit twice as hard . . . or would, if some other whale wasn't stepping up to create another alt.

Milking the existing playerbase and minimally reinvesting in your game is a short-term way to keep the lights on, but the longer it goes on, the closer things come to a failcascade. EVE will continue to limp along as it always has for a great many years, but when it dies, it won't be with a whimper - it'll be with a sad bang.

I am not an alt of Chribba.

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#24 - 2014-08-08 16:02:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
Qalix wrote:
Until EVE has 11 million subscriptions, this is a silly argument.



All I want to see is, how many HUMAN beings are in possession of any (1 or more) accounts and not just the total number of accounts.

For years I have said that this "you need an alt for this, that and the other thing" looks like a scam to a lot of people. I can't even tell other adults I play Eve any more, and for one reason, it makes me look like a chump. A lot of people have come to the game and seen this deal where you need more than one account "just to survive" and they see that as a scam. Oh, you want to play? OK, but unless you want to be gank fodder, double what you pay us, at least. It does not matter if you think that's a scam yourself, or if you are for or against it, it's just what it looks like.

So there are two camps, one is silent and have said their very last and irrefutable word on the topic, that if you fall for this you are a chump. Where are those people? They left, and they don't come to these forums to get trolled by the other camp, the ones who put so much $$ into this racket that to let go of the "you need X number of accounts" mantra means the thought they might be chumps starts to creep into their heads, and that hurts their ego, so they push the mantra even harder. They'll call the ones who left all kinds of names, but they won't listen, they won't care because they left.


So this "number of subs" thing is BS in a game where a mantra of alts is pushed and held in high regard (by those with Stockholm syndrome or maybe just a case of autists gonna autist). I want to see the number of total human subscribers and compare that to the number of subs. I don't want exceptions paraded around either (ISBoxers and altaholics). Just show me the money.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2014-08-08 16:12:16 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Qalix wrote:
Until EVE has 11 million subscriptions, this is a silly argument.



All I want to see is, how many HUMAN beings are in possession of any (1 or more) accounts and not just the total number of accounts.

For years I have said that this "you need an alt for this, that and the other thing" looks like a scam to a lot of people. I can't even tell other adults I play Eve any more, and for one reason, it makes me look like a chump. A lot of people have come to the game and seen this deal where you need more than one account "just to survive" and they see that as a scam. Oh, you want to play? OK, but unless you want to be gank fodder, double what you pay us, at least.

So there are two camps, one is silent and have said their very last and irrefutable word on the topic, that if you fall for this you are a chump. Where are those people? They left, and they don't come to these forums to get trolled by the other camp, the ones who put so much $$ into this racket that to let go of the "you need X number of accounts" mantra means the thought they might be chumps starts to creep into their heads, and that hurts their ego, so they push the mantra even harder. They'll call the ones who left all kinds of names, but they won't listen, they won't care because they left.


So this "number of subs" thing is BS in a game where a mantra of alts is pushed and held in high regard (by those with Stockholm syndrome or maybe just a case of autists gonna autist). I want to see the number of total human subscribers and compare that to the number of subs. I don't want exceptions paraded around either (ISBoxers and altaholics). Just show me the money.


Your point is wrongheaded, and would be irrelevant, even if it were correct.
First, I have literally one alt account, and it houses a Dread pilot in training who does a bit of missioning in highsec when I am bored. Guess where my main lives. Hint: it's nowhere near my alt. You are nuts if believe that alt accounts are a necessity. Make some damned friends and stop pretending that you have to do everything by yourself.
Second, what does it matter if 20 characters are controlled by 20 people, or one guy? Oh...right...it doesn't. All of those accounts have to be paid for.
Harrison Tato
Yamato Holdings
#26 - 2014-08-08 16:14:53 UTC
Ban Bindy wrote:
Eve players constantly trash WoW. WoW players for the most part don't know Eve exists. I left Eve to play ESO, which I am enjoying because I can play it for an hour or two at a time and have some fun. It doesn't have to be my life. (And I played Eve for five years and my main had 1500 player kills, so I'm not exactly a carebear.) The only time Eve comes up on the ESO forums is as a negative comparison.

Eve players are welcome to their sandbox. But this assumption that Eve is somehow the top of the heap and the ultimate gaming experience is pretty arrogant and rather ludicrous. Lots and lots of people like to play in theme parks and they don't harm anybody by doing so. Where does all this attitude come from? A game should be fun and rewarding as far as I'm concerned; I'm looking for amusement, not a way of life.

That's the reason I left Eve. I had to think about Eve almost the same way I thought about my job. That just got to be too much.

(And I'm back this month because I had to log on to help my old corp out by moving my stock to another player, to answer the obvious question of why I'm still here to post.)



Yeah but if EvE players constantly talk about how hard the game is and how steep the learning curve is that means that they are the best video game players in teh world right? EvE is a lot of fun but I take more of a risk eating a fast food lunch than playing a video game.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#27 - 2014-08-08 16:18:07 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Qalix wrote:
Until EVE has 11 million subscriptions, this is a silly argument.



All I want to see is, how many HUMAN beings are in possession of any (1 or more) accounts and not just the total number of accounts.

For years I have said that this "you need an alt for this, that and the other thing" looks like a scam to a lot of people. I can't even tell other adults I play Eve any more, and for one reason, it makes me look like a chump. A lot of people have come to the game and seen this deal where you need more than one account "just to survive" and they see that as a scam. Oh, you want to play? OK, but unless you want to be gank fodder, double what you pay us, at least.

So there are two camps, one is silent and have said their very last and irrefutable word on the topic, that if you fall for this you are a chump. Where are those people? They left, and they don't come to these forums to get trolled by the other camp, the ones who put so much $$ into this racket that to let go of the "you need X number of accounts" mantra means the thought they might be chumps starts to creep into their heads, and that hurts their ego, so they push the mantra even harder. They'll call the ones who left all kinds of names, but they won't listen, they won't care because they left.


So this "number of subs" thing is BS in a game where a mantra of alts is pushed and held in high regard (by those with Stockholm syndrome or maybe just a case of autists gonna autist). I want to see the number of total human subscribers and compare that to the number of subs. I don't want exceptions paraded around either (ISBoxers and altaholics). Just show me the money.


Your point is wrongheaded, and would be irrelevant, even if it were correct.
First, I have literally one alt account, and it houses a Dread pilot in training who does a bit of missioning in highsec when I am bored. Guess where my main lives. Hint: it's nowhere near my alt. You are nuts if believe that alt accounts are a necessity. Make some damned friends and stop pretending that you have to do everything by yourself.
Second, what does it matter if 20 characters are controlled by 20 people, or one guy? Oh...right...it doesn't. All of those accounts have to be paid for.




I never said they were a necessity. Learn reading comprehension please. I said that the mantra of alts is constantly pushed, mainly by those who fell for it themselves. You are correct in that the perceived need for alts is well based on people trying to treat the MMO like a single player game.

Just because you have one alt account, you seem to be miffed. As if I was trying to down you personally. This is a problem I see from people born after 1980. They see something said about some topic, have some relation to the topic that's on the downside of the opinion, and then get all butthurt and start with mudflinging and arguing. It's like dealing with and office full of oversensitive women. So you have an account for one purpose, a dread. Big deal. Get a titan on your account and then you'll know what they mean by calling them "player coffins".

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2014-08-08 16:28:59 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
I never said they were a necessity. Learn reading comprehension please. I said that the mantra of alts is constantly pushed, mainly by those who fell for it themselves. You are correct in that the perceived need for alts is well based on people trying to treat the MMO like a single player game.

Just because you have one alt account, you seem to be miffed. As if I was trying to down you personally. This is a problem I see from people born after 1980. They see something said about some topic, have some relation to the topic that's on the downside of the opinion, and then get all butthurt and start with mudflinging and arguing. It's like dealing with and office full of oversensitive women. So you have an account for one purpose, a dread. Big deal. Get a titan on your account and then you'll know what they mean by calling them "player coffins".

Fair enough on point one. I mistook your relaying of the perceptions of others, as you relaying your own.

As for the rest of it: Jesus Christ that's some of the most off the wall **** I've read in a while. Something I've noticed about people born before 1980: they seem to believe that all of those born after are hypersensitive pussies who take everything personally, while attempting to put forth their own superior sense of objectivity. See? I can do it too, and it doesn't make any more sense when it's reversed, even though you already provided evidence for my goofy claim.

As for the titan: ehm, no. Until they're made dockable, I have no interest in ever owning one.
Qalix
Long Jump.
#29 - 2014-08-08 17:02:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Qalix
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Qalix wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Qalix wrote:
Until EVE has 11 million subscriptions, this is a silly argument.


Popularity =/= quality. Take Justin Bieber for example.

It does, however, equal a gigantic pile of money. Put it this way: WoW can lose 50% of its subscribes, still have 5million or more left, and still have a giant pile of money coming in. If EVE lost 50%, it would lose the critical mass necessary to continue the sandbox. Hell, it's getting close to losing that critical mass now, and it HASNT lost 50%.

So, what exactly is the number of this critical mass of subs, that is required to proceed?

Oh? You don't know, and are just talking out of your ass?

Interesting. Never seen that behavior here before.

My ass is quite eloquent.

In any sandbox, critical mass is necessary to proceed. If you have no one to fight, there's nothing to do. Not enough miners, not enough supply, not enough traders, no market. If YOU knew anything, you'd know that eve's market was seeded at the beginning and only over time have they systematically switched things over to player production. Perhaps if you spent more time thinking than posting, your ass would be as smart as mine.

edit: there's also the matter of critical mass of subscribers necessary to pay the bills. Or do you think that's ridiculous as well?
Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2014-08-08 17:48:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Gallowmere Rorschach
Qalix wrote:

My ass is quite eloquent.

In any sandbox, critical mass is necessary to proceed. If you have no one to fight, there's nothing to do. Not enough miners, not enough supply, not enough traders, no market. If YOU knew anything, you'd know that eve's market was seeded at the beginning and only over time have they systematically switched things over to player production. Perhaps if you spent more time thinking than posting, your ass would be as smart as mine.

edit: there's also the matter of critical mass of subscribers necessary to pay the bills. Or do you think that's ridiculous as well?

Yes, already know what you meant.
If you'll go back an reread what I wrote, you'll see that I asked for a number.
I am not saying that you are wrong about a required critical mass. I am saying that your assertion that Eve is getting close to it, while having no numbers to back it up, is ridiculous. You don't just get to pronounce 'it's almost there' with no evidence to back it up. That's what doomsayers do, which is one of the reasons that they are so universally reviled.
Bel Tika
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2014-08-08 17:58:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Bel Tika
CCP Seagull hints in this she is worried at the Eve Numbers, its a good listen if you have not heard it already

Quote:
So, this is the first year CCP hasn't released subscription figures. Until then it was ten years of slow growth. How satisfied are you with the health of Eve online?: I think I'm not satisfied. We have a lot of work to do to convince people that Eve is a great game to play, and we've seen that in various players with the effects on the game and I think people can feel that. I'm working on making stuff that will convince past players that Eve is worth investing your time in and enjoying yourself when you come back.
What will fix this in the next 12 months?: Yes and no. My view is that there's no single idea that will 'fix eve' It's about us making lots of good decisions in many places. There's changes we can make that are fast but will make big improvements to the game, and we need to do them. Even with important things like sovereignty, there's no single big thing that will fix it, so we're making upgrades to things such as corp and alliance code so we're in the position to make big changes. Like, farms and fields that will keep thousands of people active doing things instead. Sometimes we have to leap ahead to stop the pain - we know that the star base code needs to be replaced but we still made quality of life improvements to spare players the pain now. Same with sovereignty - we will change it, but that doesn't mean we'll leave it alone until it's replaced.
Big fixes take a lot of man-hours and aren't sexy for new players. How does that affect new player retention?: It's my belief that Eve should grow from the inside out, rather than from the outside in. If people are having fun in Eve, they will bring more people in. Enablers etc. 'making war in space' I'm not going to sell that to a new player - the guy who's putting together the war effort is who I want. Not to dumb down the concepts so a newbie can understand it but to let everyone else explain why they should care about war in space. It's still our job to make systems that make sense, but we're not interested in, e.g. explaining the intricacies of the severity system to new players so they suddenly want to join the metagame. I'd prefer to get them into corporation that could explain it better.
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#32 - 2014-08-08 18:01:26 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
I do find it funny that they used the 2010 highpoint as a benchmark. You know what that year coincides with? The return of difficult instance content (until they nerfed it for the QQbears) with Cataclysm's launch, and later with the introduction of LFR for the shitlers.

Seriously, you think the "Eve is too hard and mean" sperg here is bad? Go look at the December to February 2010 WoW forums. It was ******* hilarious.

What can we take away from this? Bads will always suck, no matter what game they play, and we should not kowtow to their whiny bullshit, because they are just going to leave anyway.


Pressing like AS HARD AS I CAN while throwing ducats at the screen.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#33 - 2014-08-08 20:03:21 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
I do find it funny that they used the 2010 highpoint as a benchmark. You know what that year coincides with? The return of difficult instance content (until they nerfed it for the QQbears) with Cataclysm's launch, and later with the introduction of LFR for the shitlers.

Seriously, you think the "Eve is too hard and mean" sperg here is bad? Go look at the December to February 2010 WoW forums. It was ******* hilarious.

What can we take away from this? Bads will always suck, no matter what game they play, and we should not kowtow to their whiny bullshit, because they are just going to leave anyway.


I've been saying it for years here. Some people THINK they want easier and safer, but when you make things easier and safer, the same people get bored and leave lol.

I heard a joke about it once, and be warned, this is horribly politically incorrect lol:


So this guy is married to this wonderful woman. But he himself is a world class jerk. Lying, cheating, arrogant scum bag. Year after year she tells him he needs to be a better man or she'll leave. Years after year she doesn't. He's been that way since the 1st day she met him.

One day he gets into a horrendous car accident. Spends a month in the hospital and during this time he realizes what an Ass he's been, how he doesn't deserve his wife, and how he's going to do better once he gets home. And he does. He gets released from the hospital and showers his wife with love, attention and affection.

A week later he comes home from work to find that she's moved out. On the counter is a letter. He opens it and reads. It says "Dear Husband, the last week has been wonderful but I have to leave you now. Mainly because you are no longer the man I fell in love with.

She eventually finds love with a new guy, an unemployed alcoholic ex convict..........



This is what I think will happen when that hyped vapor ware game that I shall not name, gets released if it does, people will leave eve for it, get bored quickly and return home. Mining is not as fun if there is no risk that someone is gonna bump ya or try and shoot you

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Rosewalker
Khumaak Flying Circus
#34 - 2014-08-08 21:49:20 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:

To bite a WoW related quote from Greg Street when people were QQing about difficulty, and certain things being underpowered:
"Have you ever played an electronic game on god mode?
(UUDDLRLRBABASTART.) It's cute for about fifteen minutes. Then you realize there is no challenge. You don't have to keep on your toes. You can't strive to get better at the game. I can load up my personal copy of WoW right now and go through and death touch all of the bosses in Icecrown. Guess how much time I actually spend doing that. It's just not very compelling."

It's a shame the man caved to corporate pressure and lost his HTFU attitude.


You know that Greg Street quit Blizzard and now works for Riot, right?

The Nosy Gamer - CCP Random: "hehe, falls under the category: nice try, but no. ;)"

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#35 - 2014-08-08 21:52:59 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
I never said they were a necessity. Learn reading comprehension please. I said that the mantra of alts is constantly pushed, mainly by those who fell for it themselves. You are correct in that the perceived need for alts is well based on people trying to treat the MMO like a single player game.

Just because you have one alt account, you seem to be miffed. As if I was trying to down you personally. This is a problem I see from people born after 1980. They see something said about some topic, have some relation to the topic that's on the downside of the opinion, and then get all butthurt and start with mudflinging and arguing. It's like dealing with and office full of oversensitive women. So you have an account for one purpose, a dread. Big deal. Get a titan on your account and then you'll know what they mean by calling them "player coffins".

Fair enough on point one. I mistook your relaying of the perceptions of others, as you relaying your own.

As for the rest of it: Jesus Christ that's some of the most off the wall **** I've read in a while. Something I've noticed about people born before 1980: they seem to believe that all of those born after are hypersensitive pussies who take everything personally, while attempting to put forth their own superior sense of objectivity. See? I can do it too, and it doesn't make any more sense when it's reversed, even though you already provided evidence for my goofy claim.

As for the titan: ehm, no. Until they're made dockable, I have no interest in ever owning one.

But we need titans, or else Vince Draken will end us, along with our 0.0 dream.

Or maybe it should be end our 0.0 dream, along with us.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#36 - 2014-08-08 21:56:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaarous Aldurald
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote:

Can't deny that WoW is positioned to lose a lot more subs and still remain healthy than EVE is.


Yeah, I can deny the hell out of that, actually.

Their overhead is far, far, far higher than EVE Online, and they have a much larger staff to boot. They've been shedding huge numbers, but it's the overall percentage of their income that really matters, since they are sunk so deep into microtransactions.

Quote:

Milking the existing playerbase and minimally reinvesting in your game is a short-term way to keep the lights on, but the longer it goes on, the closer things come to a failcascade. EVE will continue to limp along as it always has for a great many years, but when it dies, it won't be with a whimper - it'll be with a sad bang.


And I suppose "moar PvE content, ban teh gankerz!" is the solution to this? Roll

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#37 - 2014-08-08 22:41:12 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:

Milking the existing playerbase and minimally reinvesting in your game is a short-term way to keep the lights on, but the longer it goes on, the closer things come to a failcascade. EVE will continue to limp along as it always has for a great many years, but when it dies, it won't be with a whimper - it'll be with a sad bang.


And I suppose "moar PvE content, ban teh gankerz!" is the solution to this? Roll

Ganking isn't PvP, therefore it is PvE

We need more ganking

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2014-08-08 22:46:10 UTC
Rosewalker wrote:

You know that Greg Street quit Blizzard and now works for Riot, right?

Yeap. I never played LoL though, so I have no idea what kind of impact (if any) he's had.

Alavaria Fera wrote:

But we need titans, or else Vince Draken will end us, along with our 0.0 dream.

Or maybe it should be end our 0.0 dream, along with us.

But, I's a spacepoor. :(
Zero Sum Gain
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2014-08-08 23:08:41 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Ban Bindy wrote:
Eve players constantly trash WoW. WoW players for the most part don't know Eve exists. I left Eve to play ESO, which I am enjoying because I can play it for an hour or two at a time and have some fun. It doesn't have to be my life. (And I played Eve for five years and my main had 1500 player kills, so I'm not exactly a carebear.) The only time Eve comes up on the ESO forums is as a negative comparison.

Eve players are welcome to their sandbox. But this assumption that Eve is somehow the top of the heap and the ultimate gaming experience is pretty arrogant and rather ludicrous. Lots and lots of people like to play in theme parks and they don't harm anybody by doing so. Where does all this attitude come from? A game should be fun and rewarding as far as I'm concerned; I'm looking for amusement, not a way of life.

That's the reason I left Eve. I had to think about Eve almost the same way I thought about my job. That just got to be too much.

(And I'm back this month because I had to log on to help my old corp out by moving my stock to another player, to answer the obvious question of why I'm still here to post.)


Then why, exactly, are you posting here ?

You're obviously a part of the instant gratification crowd many of us come here to get away from. And why do you care about how EVE players feel about the game they play on a forum dedicated to EVE. It seems like you have way too much time on your hands.

EVE is more hobby than game. I enjoy everything I do in EVE, it's not a job , mainly because I can't do my job while buck ass naked and drinking beer.

(If anyone knows of any jobs that you can do while buck ass naked and drinking beer, I'd appreciate it forever Big smile )



I really enjoyed reading the first line of your post ask what he explained in the last line of his, and then the subsequent **** talk based entirely from an assumption made by not reading what you quoted.
Glathull
Warlock Assassins
#40 - 2014-08-08 23:11:13 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote:

Can't deny that WoW is positioned to lose a lot more subs and still remain healthy than EVE is.


Yeah, I can deny the hell out of that, actually.

Their overhead is far, far, far higher than EVE Online, and they have a much larger staff to boot. They've been shedding huge numbers, but it's the overall percentage of their income that really matters, since they are sunk so deep into microtransactions.

Quote:

Milking the existing playerbase and minimally reinvesting in your game is a short-term way to keep the lights on, but the longer it goes on, the closer things come to a failcascade. EVE will continue to limp along as it always has for a great many years, but when it dies, it won't be with a whimper - it'll be with a sad bang.


And I suppose "moar PvE content, ban teh gankerz!" is the solution to this? Roll



I came here to say this, basically. Kaarous is pretty much spot-on here.

To expand on that a little bit: CCP has somewhere in the general neighborhood of 6% of the workforce Blizzard has. CCP has a very different revenue model than Blizzard does. Blizzard has a larger variety of streams of income than CCP games does. From a business strategy perspective, the two companies are very different. I don't know enough about either company to know what the cost of acquiring a new player is, the cost or retaining that player, the cost of support per subscription, or what percentage of a sub all of those costs add up to. And you would need to know those things to be able to tell what the lower threshold of user base is in terms of the business.

In terms of what's the smallest number of people playing eve that would still support an in-game economy worth playing in, I don't know. But I suspect that number is lower than the lower threshold on the business end, so it essentially doesn't matter.

Bottom line is that drawing any comparison between the two beyond "they both make games" is really not appropriate.


P.S.
I just logged in to update skill queues. EvE is not dead. Just FYI.

I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon

Previous page123Next page