These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Biohazard Joins the CODE. Alliance in Uedama Ganking Ships

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Luwc
State War Academy
Caldari State
#101 - 2014-08-27 07:48:50 UTC
k.

http://hugelolcdn.com/i/267520.gif
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#102 - 2014-08-28 23:56:14 UTC
Voyager Arran wrote:
I can't tell you how disappointed I am that a gatecamp was running for that long without a goon managing to die to it. At least you got a Bastion member, that's almost kinda the same thing.


Glad that had not happened, after all, the "anti-ganking" community would apply their flawless logic to it and realize that since the entire New Order consists of Goon alts, they were seeing evidence of some sort of epic internal power struggle or something like that. :)
Anal Canal
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#103 - 2014-08-29 07:57:55 UTC
DJentropy Ovaert wrote:
Voyager Arran wrote:
I can't tell you how disappointed I am that a gatecamp was running for that long without a goon managing to die to it. At least you got a Bastion member, that's almost kinda the same thing.


Glad that had not happened, after all, the "anti-ganking" community would apply their flawless logic to it and realize that since the entire New Order consists of Goon alts, they were seeing evidence of some sort of epic internal power struggle or something like that. :)



We'd be scissored.

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate
Luwc
State War Academy
Caldari State
#104 - 2014-08-29 08:01:43 UTC
came for butthurt.

not dissapointed.

thanks zen. how do they warp core stabbed thrashers go nowadays ? :)

http://hugelolcdn.com/i/267520.gif
Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#105 - 2014-08-30 21:45:54 UTC
Anal Canal wrote:
DJentropy Ovaert wrote:
Voyager Arran wrote:
I can't tell you how disappointed I am that a gatecamp was running for that long without a goon managing to die to it. At least you got a Bastion member, that's almost kinda the same thing.


Glad that had not happened, after all, the "anti-ganking" community would apply their flawless logic to it and realize that since the entire New Order consists of Goon alts, they were seeing evidence of some sort of epic internal power struggle or something like that. :)



We'd be scissored.


Lowsec Easysec

Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com

Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,  live it, breathe it!
Gritz1
Ice Fire Warriors
#106 - 2014-08-31 05:13:24 UTC
http://goo.gl/78Eh12


is bio still a corp. it seems like they have had a terrible, terrible decline in members.
Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#107 - 2014-08-31 22:15:53 UTC
Gritz1 wrote:
http://goo.gl/78Eh12


is bio still a corp. it seems like they have had a terrible, terrible decline in members.



30 is more than enough to gank freighters.

Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com

Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,  live it, breathe it!
Varrinox
Shadows of the Empire
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#108 - 2014-09-01 21:32:31 UTC
Look at the ganking scrubs, bein all scrubby in scrubsec.

Right now that my post is at the level of posting of the rest of you I shall be real.

Firstly, nobody really cares and this does not warrant a thread.

Secondly, you talk like code ar the first group who did organised ganking. Son, you are far from the first and for sure wont be the last because you will no doubt get bored of such uneventful pvp and some other slack jawed fool will take your place.

Lastly, biohazard were in amarr militia for a while. Gallente before that and started of in minmatar. Don't take their movement as any kind of reflection on amarr militias real attitude to caldari. Caldari gallente minmatar, your all scum to us, jut that 2 of you show up orange and the other shows up purple. Also from my understanding biohazard is where it is because the then CEO aslon wanted to move to Nullsec, most of his pilots didnt want to go, alliance disbanded, CEO left, majority of leadership has left. All you have is the leftovers of a failed minmatar talwar blob corp.

And on the topic on amarr vs caldari, if you got the likes of 24eme or DnG to attack caldari, then you can call it real war between us.

Until that point you can continue to faceroll in highsec

In conclusion. **** you.
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#109 - 2014-09-04 00:41:57 UTC
Varrinox wrote:
Look at the ganking scrubs, bein all scrubby in scrubsec.

Right now that my post is at the level of posting of the rest of you I shall be real.

Firstly, nobody really cares and this does not warrant a thread.

Secondly, you talk like code ar the first group who did organised ganking. Son, you are far from the first and for sure wont be the last because you will no doubt get bored of such uneventful pvp and some other slack jawed fool will take your place.

Lastly, biohazard were in amarr militia for a while. Gallente before that and started of in minmatar. Don't take their movement as any kind of reflection on amarr militias real attitude to caldari. Caldari gallente minmatar, your all scum to us, jut that 2 of you show up orange and the other shows up purple. Also from my understanding biohazard is where it is because the then CEO aslon wanted to move to Nullsec, most of his pilots didnt want to go, alliance disbanded, CEO left, majority of leadership has left. All you have is the leftovers of a failed minmatar talwar blob corp.

And on the topic on amarr vs caldari, if you got the likes of 24eme or DnG to attack caldari, then you can call it real war between us.

Until that point you can continue to faceroll in highsec

In conclusion. **** you.


rofl someone is angry and I fear he have may have immersed himself a little too much

but I give you a +10 internets for one of the most random angry rage posts I have read all day. Bonus points for

"Firstly, nobody really cares and this does not warrant a thread."

You seem to care, sir, you care a lot. Also you assume we care about your silly little FW thing. We just shoot you all :)
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#110 - 2014-09-04 01:50:48 UTC
Interesting dev blog about systems with high gank rates having their security status upped to make it harder to gank!

Might be interesting.
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#111 - 2014-09-04 10:11:58 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Interesting dev blog about systems with high gank rates having their security status upped to make it harder to gank!

Might be interesting.


?

Link? I can't see that really working very well without the opposite happening, as in - if high-gank rate systems go up in sec status, then at some point everything will become 1.0 - which I am sure there are some carebears out there who would enjoy this, I don't see it working well for EVE.

Considering the flip side, we'd have to have systems that don't see much gank action drop in sec status. This means that 1.0 systems (think Jita) are going to drop fast and become slaughterhouses. Not that I would have a problem with this, but just imagine the tears :P
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#112 - 2014-09-04 10:17:13 UTC
Nah sec only drops in systems that once had lower sec. Current sec is baseline.
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#113 - 2014-09-04 10:55:32 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Nah sec only drops in systems that once had lower sec. Current sec is baseline.


Interesting.

I'm not against the idea right off the top of my head, but like all "large" changes - I worry there may be a lot of unintended side effects. I'd like to see it go a little deeper, however.

I think the logic here is that a bunch of ganking activity in one high-sec system should cause CONCORD to have a faster response time (by raising the sec status of that system), right? So, let's use that logic and assume that CONCORD has to come from somewhere, so systems with little or no ganking activity should be able to drop below baseline. This could be fun :)
Varrinox
Shadows of the Empire
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#114 - 2014-09-04 10:59:53 UTC
You dont care about our little FW?

I dont care about your pressing F1 against AFK autopiloting ships.

As for the apparent rage, nah bro this is just good internet smack talk. I have a degree in it from Infantry Online.

Scrub lords of scrubsec remain scrubby
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#115 - 2014-09-04 11:06:20 UTC
Varrinox wrote:
You dont care about our little FW?

I dont care about your pressing F1 against AFK autopiloting ships.

As for the apparent rage, nah bro this is just good internet smack talk. I have a degree in it from Infantry Online.

Scrub lords of scrubsec remain scrubby


\o/ yay we can unite in lack of caring :)
Miriya Zakalwe
World Wide Welp
#116 - 2014-09-07 10:09:29 UTC
Gritz1 wrote:
http://goo.gl/78Eh12


is bio still a corp. it seems like they have had a terrible, terrible decline in members.


Actually that looks like a typical WMTR fail cascade to me, like the ones before it. Unfortunately they will probably pop back.
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#117 - 2014-09-08 10:57:24 UTC
Confirming that this forum needs more Drysonbenningon, ASAP.
Rahelis
Doomheim
#118 - 2014-09-08 14:44:38 UTC
As I understood most former bio capsuleers moved ot other corps, many to other fw corps.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#119 - 2014-09-12 22:24:03 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
ummm, OK but why did this need a new thread?
Good question. To be honest, I have no idea....

Thread locked.

The Rules:
17. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.

As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)